Why on earth would they give such an unbelievably boring pulpshit character their own book in current times?
 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
|
Why on earth would they give such an unbelievably boring pulpshit character their own book in current times?
This was one of the few good comics they’ve published in the last few years anon
It's just Pulpshit Anon autistic screeching again, ignore him.
Zoomers getting filtered by good characters will never stop amusing me.
Your mom took a pulpy shit the morning after I was done with her
Venditti does this every few years. He takes some golden age character and writes a modern story with them. Compared to Geoff Johns or James Robinson, they're always a bit dull, but you have to appreciate he's at least keeping obscure characters in rotation.
>He takes some golden age character and writes a modern story with them
There is literally nothing “modern” about this you massive homosexual and it’s not like venditti pitched this book, it was part of their JSA relaunch so he would have been the one approached to do it.
Why are people like you so divorced from reality and how the industry works?
In all honesty I can’t even think of a single example to fit what you just said.
Because it was a fantastic miniseries with a good story and brilliant stylized art that fits it. You missed out if you didn't read this.
might've been boring in this mini anon but Sandman Mystery Theatre is one of the best Vertigo books ever.
Redpill me on this anti-pulp anti-Sandman schizo.
Not the first time I see him.
No pulp heroes have maintained any real level of popularity except for Batman and that's because people just aren't interested in pulp adventures.
The problem is that pulp heroes had their style of storytelling evolve via superhero comics which quickly displaced them due to being more fantastical and engaging. Pulp stories, as the precursors to modern cape/action-adventure fiction, just feel too stereotypical and dated in their style to have mass appeal
Then why are you obsessed with them schizo?
the blue-haired bolsheviks on this board will obsess over all the wrongthink characters and demand you hate them too while demanding that nobody gives a shit about them at the same time
Ironic given that the 1930's were literally the Red Decade and you had actual pulp characters like The Spider praising communism. You'd think Cinemaphile would love this era.
>I just made something up to b***h about it
>What is Conan the barbarian
Constantly trying to find a modern audience?
you are a homosexual
pulpshit is based though
No pulp heroes have maintained any real level of popularity except for Batman and that's because people just aren't interested in pulp adventures.
The problem is that pulp heroes had their style of storytelling evolve via superhero comics which quickly displaced them due to being more fantastical and engaging. Pulp stories, as the precursors to modern cape/action-adventure fiction, just feel too stereotypical and dated in their style to have mass appeal.
What does Batman shoving his finger up my ass have to do with this copypasta?
Why should I care about popularity? Is something only good if it has mass appeal? Have you never enjoyed something for it’s own sake?
Cinemaphile always hated pulpshit but guys like Razorfist pushing it so hard in recent years has lead to a vocal backlash here
I didn't ask you, OP
c-list character are good, that is the reason.
Pulp heroes all died off because comics did what they did better. Simple as that. Then again there is always the possibility that nobody cares about them because they were never that good to begin with. Who knows most likely both.
Anyone want to casually bring up the objective fact that Sandman is not even a pulp character? He originated in comics.
I hate that a good portion of the few people that talk comics here are so obviously mentally ill.
Most of the sane people left.
Yeah yeah, you’re totally the holier than thou, better than the rest, exception to the rule. Now frick off.
Ironically it's the only good book of today