Why was quidditch so fricking retarded

Why was quidditch so fricking moronic

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    written by a woman
    /thread

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You can't "/thread" your own post, you gay, even if you're right.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        yes he can
        /thread

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Nope

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AYO NO SNITCHIN

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i loved reading the quidditch scenes as a kid
    Book 3 vs Hufflepuff was the best

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >don't catch the snitch till we're 150 points ahead
      Kino

      written by a woman
      /thread

      This but also somebody who didn't understand sports and preferred allegory. Much like all the characters in the series, the players in Quidditch help shape the general atmosphere of the match but at the end of the day the match will only end one one of the Seekers (Harry and Voldemort) catches the snitch

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because JK Rowling was from the peak of "LMAO Sportsball" crowd, but always admired public school culture so she had to amalgamate all the sports she didn't understand into something intentionally obtuse.
    Successful people who think hating sports makes them seem smart are always more into just being public trolls than being prolific. Between Rowling and Chomsky I can't think of anything they've done in the past 20 years that wasn't profiteering off millennials and saying things to piss people off.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Sounds like you've spent your whole life seething about people recognizing your love of sport as a dimwit's trait.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      its purely private school culture. wtf are you yapping about

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        brits call private schools "public"

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because it's a whimsical, intentionally illogical fantasy thing. Like so much in the first book, it doesn't fit in quite as well with the elaborate, rational worldbuilding of the latter few books.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >the elaborate, rational worldbuilding of the latter few books.
      Because those were ghostwritten by real writers and not just a Lottery Win for a wannabe scene girl.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I doubt it. A Rowling got more of a sense that she was writing something big and important, she felt the need to make the books weightier and more "mature," hence the half-baked themes about racism, the swearing, the escalating death and misery, etc. With that came a more rational method of worldbuilding and the lightness and whimsy of the first few books was left behind.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I don't think Rowling herself changed that much, she just wrote each book for a target audience of the age of the characters

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I guess this is unfalsifiable, but imo the last few books really have a sense of "I'm doing something Grand and Important" that is not at all present in the first few.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              It's because the POV got older and wiser

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the books get progressively worse though
        so i don’t think it’s ghostwriters
        since the first books are good because they are simple kids story with a boring ass world building which works because rowlings is a shitty unimaginative moron
        later she tries to be more complex but everything is literally just how about real life event or thing but i add the word magic too it

        the books get longer and worse because she needs to fill it that’s why by book 4 the first like 100 pages are about some trash quidditch world cup
        probably because there was the football world cup at this time and she thought that would be great world building

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because the entirety of Harry Potter is fricking moronic, obviously

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm gonna say it:
    You mainly hate the books because she is female.
    As far as kids books nothing comes close.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Dumbledore said calmly

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      First book was boring as hell. No clue about the others, obviously.

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >woman
    >sports

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >game has points
    >can earn points by throwing a ball through a hoop
    >can also earn points by catching a special ball
    >entire game hinges on catching that special ball and it doesn't end until that happens
    >also it's not a guaranteed win, just a big jump in points so you can still lose
    >no other position in the sport really matters besides the guy who catches the special ball

    Pretty dumb

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Why was quidditch so fricking moronic
    It was based on American Football.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nearly as moronic as American Football.

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Doesn’t Harry win because someone just gifts him a broom that flies faster than everyone else’s? What kind of sport is that?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Motor "sports"?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        yes but motor sports are more about the best engines and the brand behind it
        plus the whole motorsports is always only about direct handling of a vehicle
        nobody is playing waterpolo in speedboats
        quidditch is more like if one football player had magical shoes that make him faster then anyone else

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >should the snitch just be some kind of bonus points thing to help your team win? maybe you could help score more balls after
    >NO it must be bonus points to end the game also because wizards are super eccentric sometimes games don’t end for days because it’s SO WACKY
    This is why women shouldn’t be given power

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Worst part is that it would make sense if it just ended the game (and maybe give 1 point if you're tied or something). That way you have to keep and protect it until you're ahead.

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >brainlet answer
    hurrr durrr womyn

    >actual answer
    all sports are moronic

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >all sports are moronic
      moronic femoid answer

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >story teller creates make believe sport

    Never ends well. Prove me wrong.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      damn Blitzball was kino huh

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This was was pretty based but the net shouldn't have been a triangle.

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's a sport where literally everyone on the field is irrelevant unless the only player that matters from each team completely sucks at what they're supposed to do.

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    For all intents and purposes the snitch awards the same as 15 goals so therefore the sport only makes sense if play is so fast that the average team could be expected to easily get a 15 point lead in the time it takes for the seeker to get the snitch. There are defensive strategies, the bludgers can delay the seeker allowing the losing team more time to catch up but at the expense of having less defence themselves and potentially allowing the other team to score.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *