why was this filmed in one shot?

why was this filmed in one shot?

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It was produced during the era of "OMG _______ was filmed in one shot" Reddit meme posts.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It's called a gimmick.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The silent trenches scene in King's Man was 100 better than this whole Oscar-bait movie.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      agreed, I loved that part! Genuinely shocking "twist" too.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    One shot was impressive technically, but as a movie it just didn't do anything for me.

    I didn't feel any connection to characters or tention, it was just setpiece after setpiece, it wasn't a story, more like a collection of scenes.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      arguably it makes it more immersive...adds to the sense of impending danger and that we're closer to these characters. arguably.

      Because single-shot scenes are fricking impressive

      Few movies these days try to impress you. Spending a bajillion dollars on CG isn't impressive.

      It was literally just to save money. It’s cheaper to do it in one take. You’re only filming for two hours instead of potentially months on end, and you hardly have to cut/edit at all.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Watch it again

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    arguably it makes it more immersive...adds to the sense of impending danger and that we're closer to these characters. arguably.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Because single-shot scenes are fricking impressive

    Few movies these days try to impress you. Spending a bajillion dollars on CG isn't impressive.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Because single-shot scenes are fricking impressive
      they shouldn't be. it's called acting. did you know actors act, on a stage, in a theatre, for hours at a time? and they do it daily?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Are you moronic?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          no. why do you ask?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Because single-shot scenes are fricking impressive
      Not unless they serve a purpose. And these ones were badly edited.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Nice to see once but I wouldn't watch it again

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Watched it a second time recently. It hold up well. Awesome flick

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    it wasn't

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It was gimmicky but in a good way.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    To bait Oscar voter
    Thankfully Chad Parasite stopped it

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    i felt a great deal of relief at the end in the grassy fields.. a great calm somehow. Maybe it was because it was filmed in one go.

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Because they watched this with its famous longtake scene and thought "we can do that too!", but they forgot that you need to make a decent movie as well.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >decent
      >this are the people criticizing WW1 kino
      Cinemaphile is really full of pseuds

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Give me good editing over meme tracking shots any day of the week.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Give examples, frickhead

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    did they have to start from over everytime one of the extras looked at the camera or the characters forgot the lines? how many times did they have to shoot the 2 hour scene

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      they made a sublte cut in the middle of the movie

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Should've been a trench movie about trench warfare in a war based around trench warfare, not a tour through pillaged France.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Though you’re meant to think it was, it wasn’t. There were many cuts. But the illusion of ‘no cut’ is meant to enhance your immersion. It’s Kino

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      dishonest filmmaking

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Are there really people who weren't able to spot every single cut and honestly thought the film was done in one go

      Also remember the dude loses consciousness at one point in the middle and we get a straight up black-out and time-skip

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I said it before, and a say it again.
    War horse>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>1917

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I wonder what that post said. must be from 2003 or something

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        is it in the archives

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Archives didn't exist when Cinemaphile was young

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            yeah I forgot
            lost to the winds of time

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It's a good 'theme park' movie but I wouldn't watch it again on a smaller screen. Definitely one you should've seen in a cinema, like Gravity.

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    why didnt they just send a message pigeon ?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Those are just a myth dude
      'Yeah we just tell the birds where to go and they go there, because they speak english' God some people believe anything.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        They don't speak it, moron. They read it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Those are just a myth dude
      'Yeah we just tell the birds where to go and they go there, because they speak english' God some people believe anything.

      The only thing you can train a pigeon to do is to go home, then when you leave a place you can take a pigeon with you, attach the message to it and release it and it will go home with your message. It can't go wherever you want it to.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >EDWARDS
      >RELEASE THE PIGEON

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    For a lark.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Because it's meant to portray the never ending cycle of combat in wwi

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It wasn't.
    It's hundreds of shots edited together.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      34 actually, which is still very impressive for a 2 hour movie

  23. 2 years ago
    scp foundation- mr. bruh (state: euclid)

    cus was a masterpiece

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The gimmick actually works in favor of this movie and it would have been worse without it. HOWEVER, the marketing went overboard on it.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *