Why wouldn't she stop at this point?

>REEEE WOMEN ARE c**tS
>REEEE MEN HAVE SMALL PENIS

And then just repeat this 20 times and you're the same autistic frick you b***h about lmao.

I feel like "roastie" is more popular to say online than "daddy issues".

Gemerald if true. Shinemerald if false.

>Silly
>Dumb
>Stupid
>Unreasonable
>Stupid again

You know using synonyms of the same word is the same shit, right?

>Men have to write a fricking essay to insult women
>All women have to do is say "small penis" and it triggers an entire thread
>Somehow, you think this is not an effective insult when it constantly gets a reaction

Work smarter, not harder.

>Women have no morals, no rules. No boundaries. Women don't flinch at torture, human trafficking or genocide. They're not loyal to a flag or a country or any set of ideals. They trades blood for money and are willing to punch bellow the belt quite literally by going straight for the dick in an argument.
>Millions of men point out that isn't fair
>LOL I TROLLE U
Every time a woman does this another man realizes womens rights must be revoked.

Imagine being pissed because an insult made you mad and you acting as if that's not the fricking point. Holy shit, and you wonder why "small penis" gets you every fricking time.

>Women have no morals, no rules. No boundaries. Women don't flinch at torture, human trafficking or genocide. They're not loyal to a flag or a country or any set of ideals. They trades blood for money and are willing to punch bellow the belt quite literally by going straight for the dick in an argument.
>Millions of men point out that isn't fair
>LOL I TROLLE U
Every time a woman does this another man realizes womens rights must be revoked.

nta but
Its less
>revoking rights BECAUSE words on screen
and moreso
>worlds on screen being evidence for one of the reasons WHY rights are being revoked

Anon that is a quote from MW3 describing Makarov I just threw in for shitposting reasons.
Mostly true for a lot of women though.

>revoking rights because words on a screen hurt your feelings
I'm not a woman but, the frick? These threads are so weird to read as a free speech absolutist

See above.

Then you ought to know I was also shitposting at the revoking part.
I would never want women to stop the Freudian slip of spending more than 10 seconds without mentioning mens penises in the discussion. Call it Dick Law. Like Godwins Law.

I think it's not much of a freudian slip unless they're dykes. Women like peenus and they know it. Again, women don't literally believe you have a small dick, it just does the job as a triggering insult very effectively because men don't like the thought of having a small penis. I'm not condoning it, personally I don't and wouldn't say it, but just explaining it.

I've literally never heard of this insult, nor do I think it would work on a woman the way "You must have a small penis" does on men.

Really? Never? It's pretty common stuff, in a similar vein to hitting the wall. And why wouldn't it hurt a woman as much as saying small peepee hurts a man? Are you going to take this one literally too and say someting like "well they can just adopt" when the point is it's playing on biological insecurity and perceieved inferiority?

I'm not a woman

Is there a paper I can read looking into the history of the small peepee insult?

That's fair. Good point, though I will add
>who gives a shit about having a baby
The insult is based on all women wanting to marry and have children as a biological imperative, even the feminazi girlboss ones who act like they don't need no man. From a trad point of view, all women give a shit about having a baby because that's their evolved purpose, even if modern day brainwashing makes them hide or deny it. So a woman who runs out of eggs and never has babies is a worthless burden. A man with a "small penis" can still accomplish things and generally be superior because men have a purpose in life beyond making babies. But I'm hesitant to continue the /LULZ/ derailment so I'll stop.

Sistersisters why can't we stop thinking about tiny wieners and how badly we want them?

The most moronic thing a man can do
Is debate a woman as if she's capable of being equal to him

Give it up brothers, this is why we invented "yes dear that's very nice dear you're right dear"

anon idk how to explain to you that "small penis" only """works""" because men are sick of hearing it
notice how no one itt is offended, they're just saying "enough of that already"
its more akin to constantly poking someone, it's not a hardhitting offense it's just obnoxious
Imagine if nearly every other man you met said to you "BLIPPITY BLIPPITY" as soon as they realized you're a woman and you disagreed with them. it doesn't mean anything so there's nothing to get offended over, but you're gonna get sick of it and start wondering "why is that the only thing they can say?"
and when you do, they'll hit ya with that "OOOH TRIGGERED LE EPIC STYLE ARE YA?"

this is stuff an elementary schooler can figure out

If men could make women lose their shit just by saying "blippity" it would be awesome. "woman moment" is the closest tiny vague phrase that causes chaos once it's uttered.

If women started calling all the deadly work related accidents that make up for a decent chunk of men's mortality rates "men moments" men would lose their shit real fast.
It's like men need to have an emotional punching bag to feel big and in control but the second the punching bag says something back men lose their shit.
I get it, society sucks and many men suffer silently but wouldn't it be more productive to work on yourself or overthrow the financial systems making your life shit rather than go back to Le old punching bag and not change shit?

>men suffering from more workplace accidents is because they are doing the vast majority of physical labor, not because of some inherently male quality that would be absent if women were to become 90% of blue collar workers tomorrow
I mean, the inherent male quality present is giving less of a shit about one's well being/wanting to be macho. A vast majority of those accidents are preventable through safety measures that workers dont care to follow and bosses dont care to implement.
I am not saying women would do a better job overall but I am willing to bet that accident related deaths would decrease dramatically given that women are much better at self preservation than men.

>When I worked with men they usually do what you tell them, even if they don't want to
This anecdotal. I completely believe you but the reality, given the high numbers of preventable work related injuries, is that either measures are not implemented or workers simply dont follow them. I think an easy way to see this issue is the high number of construction workers who simply refuse to wear the adequate protection gear.
>women don't really follow occupational disease related measures either which is what they are often more exposed to in white collar work.
These do not tend to result in serious injury or death like blue collar work.
>men don't lack self-preservation, they have a higher tolerance for risk instead which is needed for a lot of physically demanding jobs.
As I said, most work related injuries are preventable. That higher tolerance for risk is a myth in itself since most of the risk can be averted by following the proper procedures. Sure, there are jobs that are simply more dangerous than others but, in developed countries, even the most dangerous jobs are extremely safe so long as you follow procedure. And even if not, we are talking about insults here. The whole 'woman moment' itself is not really grounded in any tangible reality other than wanting to insult women as a whole for certain stereotypes. Work related deaths are a stereotype for men.
> you should look at how autistic people get in the gym about form, you know, these "machos" you are talking about.
I dont think autistic people are indicative of anything here.

BLIPPITY BLIPPITY

>STUPID WOMAN, YOU MADE US LOOK BAD
>BLIPPITY BLIPPITY BLIPPITY BLIPPITY