Will Top Gun Maverick kick start a mini-revolution in Hollywood that showed them what kind of movies people audiences actually want to see instead of the moronic overly-politicized "platform" productions that get hijacked by self-inserting talentless writers?
They can't do what Tom Cruise does
The message they got from this film was to make more sequels
This. Tom Cruise is a madman and there's really no one else who will carry on his legacy.
>What kind of movies do people actually want to see
a reboot of 80's movies? They are already doing that. Also, it was just military propaganda. Which we also already do.
Then why aren't they all making a billion dollars over four month long theatrical releases?
Because Tom Cruise is not in them.
Reducing it to a "reboot of an 80s movie" and "military propaganda" is silly.
Look at the data.
It clearly resonated with people in a way that no other film has in years
It resonated because it's got real stunts, which only Cruise delivers. And he's getting too old to keep doing it, so another success like Top Gun 2 is unlikely.
Simply, it was exciting and fun. CGI is no longer exciting, and being lectured isn't fun. Set out to excite, not patronize, your audience - thats it.
it's been like half a year since this came out so your tell me, moron
Full of Black folk strong woman memes ?
Barbero a qt though
based Bob
this but unironically
I was serious. I would put her in one of those meme pregnancy flight suits if you catch my drift.
Neither of them played a stereotype though. The women were strong because, well, they're in the fricking air force as the elite of the elite. But there were no moments were either were better than the others. Overall I was surprised to see white actors not being overshadowed for being white.
Why did Pete's card decline?
Only boomers cared about it
No. The israelites are in the propaganda stage of their filmmaking now. They spent the last two decades building captive audiences through fanbases and universes or outright acquiring them.
It's not about the money anymore.
yes indeed there will be more attempt of military recruitment film afterall with iran and russia these couple of years
Black Panther made roughly the same amount of money and that didn't start any "revolution". Most movies still star generic white guys.
>Black Panther
It kind of did.
Nah, the nepotism will continue until we start beating these people with bricks and bats
>hur dur one movie will change everything
Yeah, because up until now they had no idea what their audience actually wanted or how economics works. homie please. They've been running their shit into the ground on purpose. One of the last of the megastar A-listers who can walk without assistance dusts off a character that can exploit this vacuum and all the sudden you think things have changed? No. He's allowed to do this as much because THEY KNOW this is a fluke as because of his pull in Hollywood. Either way, it's not someone finally speaking truth to power and now they're going to "wake up". You frickers are so naive that you think *something* is going to come along and change everything like the last 7-10 years of history has just been out-of-touch elites and not a concerted effort to run down our way of life and demoralize us. This shit was planned intentionally by CIA creature Obama during his last term in office. That's why everything started going to shit around 2013-2015.
You know I'm right.
I doubt it. More like Hollywood will completely misunderstand (deliberately or not) what made TG so good and continue to make their shit movies. Movies like TG only come along once every couple of years.
Not a chance in hell. THIS is their thinking. Since they're not personally responsible for financial losses, they'll sink any ship they get on board with.
>behaviour
Bongs can't even spell. Do you think anyone really cares what they think?
it's not about the money.
Unfortunately no. If anything, they're going to politicize things even more now in an effort to "get back" at us since they believe they're in a war.
no too many liberal homosexuals in hollywood now, the agenda is fully to destroy white man so these films will never be accessible now, think im kidding?
Watch "Hollywoodland" and realise that social engineering is Hollywoods primary goal, profit and entertaining audiences are distant secondary and tertiary goals.
Correction: "Hollywoodism"
I guess it's a good thing for them that the secondary objective is giving them billions and billions of dollars, isn't it.
Yes, it benefits them, what is your point?
That it benefits them too much not to be the primary motivation, numbskull. But sure, go around thinking that they're out to get their source of income.
The last decade alone are proof enough that profit is not, and can not, be the primary motive of Hollywood entertainment.
But you know this already and are just trying to muddy the waters with your downdoot snark.
>profitable are higher than ever
Brainlet
>dozens upon dozens of companies being bought and consolidated into less than a handful of mega-corporations is a sign of a healthy and profitable industry
Next you can tell me about how the western financial system is sustainable.
It's still a Hollywood movie created by the studio system. That you think this is a win AGAINST them is hilarious.
propaganda > profits
No, because for Hollywood pushing this bullshit was never for the money. Do you think they are genuinely morons and don't understand that making openly anti-white content wasn't a good idea for business?
Yes, and like virtually every other anti-white organizations, their largest shareholders are ALWAYS Vanguard/Blackrock, supplying them with endless cash to achieve their purposes.
Media owned by same promote their failing propaganda as successes, they buy movie tickets in bulk to fake box office sales, and only the dumbest smoothbrains can't see that the tiger is made of paper.