>close your eyes, goy
Why do you come into these threads on a television/film forum and tell people to stop talking about that stuff? Do you think you are smarter than anyone? Because you're not.
well it can help them in some ways, like you go to thereview site and see it highly rankend and in the most viewed, it can pickup your interest.
Or the high score might earn you one or 2 articles written byse "journalist" and might reach more people. Or when you search it in google you see an high score, just increasing its visibility but ultimately this
/thread
Moral of the story is, nobody fricking cares. I’m pretty sure angry Cinemaphile posters know more about this movie than anyone else.
Some bots that praise it and some shills that say how the movie is good and if you don't want to watch it you are a racist, it will not bring in viewership, a genuine good show won't need it and people will organically talk aboutit and "shill" to friends and socials themselves, even if the company might have bots and shills in there to talk well about the movie/series
>Just stop thinking about it bro
We aren't fricking Russians or Chinamen you absolutely cretinous ape why do you think our society is more advanced than those exploding drunken mongs could ever dream of: because we can see when we are being manipulated by ((them)) and we fight to stop it
>ideology is the inversion of reality
It starts to all make sense when you realize they’re being indoctrinated into a soft-satanic “do as thou wilt” but for cattle being led to slaughter.
its for people who bought tickets and were asked to review it elsewhere which is why they dont have accounts
still obviously fake reviews but thats the reason
>2-3 paragraths where people complain about how bad this film portrays the slavers making them into heroes. >FRICK YOU! HATERS BOMBING REVIEWS! FAKE!! >WOWZA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 10 STARNTS!!! >Actual honest and intelectual review.
>this movie sucks >that 1/10 review was poorly made and couldn't be considered a real review so we deleted it >wowza!!!!!! >perfectly crafted 10/10 review it stays
>Dahomey became a major center in the Atlantic Slave Trade until 1852 when the British imposed a naval blockade to stop the trade. War with the French began in 1892 and the French took over the Kingdom of Dahomey in 1894. The throne was vacated by the French in 1900, but the royal families and key administrative positions of the administration continued to have a large impact in the politics of the French administration and the post-independence Republic of Dahomey, renamed Benin in 1975.
It's been like this for a while now. Every recent film I've seen because of online recommendations has turned out to be shockingly bad. This incredibly bad piece of shit was touted as film of the year by a few forums.
I sat there for 20 minutes with my mouth open not able to believe that there was anyone dumb enough to like such a shit film until I realized it was me who was dumb for thinking the comments were genuine. It is now not possible to watch a good film because of recommendations from the internet.
I unironically think Cinemaphile is the only platform that I can trust for an honest review. Its probably the last place where people actually give their opinion without a filter.
You still need to keep your wits about you, though. We get a lot of shilling for the latest tv shows. If the discussion is about movies from 5+ years ago then yeah I agree with you.
>watching political show on israelitetube >go to comments afterwards for keks >nearly all comments are were saying the same thing but worded slightly different
Not sure if npcs or bots but it doesn't seem natural.
Youtube comments are bottom of the barrell. I thought that it was common knowledge.
YouTube has an AI that deletes nearly all comments, leaving only the most NPC trash. I've had YouTube delete my comments that didn't use any slurs, nothing negative at all, just objective observations, BOOM deleted.
You Cinemaphile users are so fricking racist it makes me sick. Tough black women shouldnt be rwjoiced? You cry when black people are in your movies. Even a fricking mulatto makes you weep.
Why cant you juat stfu and be happy foe once that black people are starting to succeed in life.
You looked down at us and called us subhuman and now when we are trying tclimb up up out of filth and try to give back to society our accomplishments are a thorn in your eyes.
Frick you
Frick you. How will humanity ever reach the stars like this.
>Frick you. How will humanity ever reach the stars like this.
We won't. The children of the devil temporarily have full control, we've entered into a new period of dark ages that will last until the next massive solar flare disables certain systems.
>The children of the devil temporarily have full control
And who fault is that? Who voted for reagan and tachter, who voted for Bush, who allowed israelites to control the media and education, who allow open borders and cuck shit, who allow ariel to Black? At some point whites need to accept their just as bad if not worse than the israelites they hate.
keep your hate for the welsh descendents of the phoenicians out of my history lesson please and thank you, that's what you mean yeah? That words that originally was used to describe the Llewish Welsh before it was repurposed?
We ain't reaching the stars with black people hanging from our necks like an albatross. I would have been interested in a more historical accurate film rather than some fanfic written by black and brown zoomers. Is your history not good enough to talk about? Have you even been to Africa? You think we hate you but you have no idea how much they hate you.
The movie deals with one african slaver nation (Dahomey) getting fricked over by another african slaver nation (Oyo). The whites don't seem to be part of it at all.
>damn they lost that badly? it must be because the french firearms and cannons are superior >"The Fon staged several fierce charges over two to three hours that all failed against the 20-inch (50 cm) bayonets of the French.[5] "
Literally mogged by bigger pointy sticks.
This article works SO hard to paint the Dahome Amazonians as some kind of X factor despite getting mogged every step of the way >However, Dahomey remained a potent force in the area and quickly re-armed with modern weapons in anticipation of a second, decisive conflict. >The Dahomey army left the field in defeat losing some 200 soldiers.[9] The French carried the day with only 42 casualties.[9] The Dahomey Amazons were also conspicuous in the battle. > The battle was also significant in that much of Dahomey's Amazon corps was lost. > From the French arrival until 14 October, Dahomey's Amazons were absent. On 15 October, some women were noted to have been present on the front lines of the Dahomean forces which were defeated after a bayonet charge by a Legion battalion. >The Amazons are reported by the French to have fought the hardest, charging out of their trenches but to no avail. >Amazons seemed to have made up much of the force. After four hours of desperate combat, the Fon army withdrew. >The last engagement at Cana, which took place at the village of Diokoué, site of a royal palace, was the last time Amazons were used.[12] Special units of the Amazons were assigned specifically to target French officers.[12] After a full day of fighting, the French overran the Dahomey army with another bayonet charge.
Every other paragraph in this 3 page long article keeps shoehorning in "There were women there, and they fought fiercely!" before footnoting the paragraph with "And then the French butchered them with knives"
This sounds like fairly run of the mill, European power in Africa, sequence of events, except 'with added women who actually fought'.
I'm sure for the Dahome this was a major historical event, for the French this was Tuesday.
I beleive you can look at the version changes of articles and follow up the conversations between editors as to why they've made changes.
I recall some spastic who went through every article they could about WW2 and erased any hint at the Germans having anyone that wasn't a israelite killing death machine. I specifically remember them going crazy on the article about Guderian.
So that means from now on every audience review in rotten will be from shills? There goes the last ounce of rotten tomatoes integrity. This idea wont backfire at all lmao
Theatrically released movies (AKA films airing in theaters) are locked exclusively behind "Verified" ratings as of February 2019. Doesn't count for anything on streaming services.
Even leftists on twitter shit on it as Dahomey were one of the main slave suppliers and still kept slaves and human sacrifice even after the western civilization banned it.
In fact the nation was destroyed early last century since it refused to ban slavery so it made enemies out of everybody.
But yeah, israelites will rewrite all history if they can.
>See excelent reviews >Read many comments saying it's good >"Hey it's kino, go watch it!" >Go watch it >It's crap, propaganda shit as usual >"Hey you said it was goo-" >¯_(ツ)_/¯
I went to the sub Reddit for box office and people were celebrating this piece of shit doing a $19 million weekend on a $50 million budget (double that with marketing). I mean that's a guaranteed bomb. That shit is not making back it's budget let alone making a profit, yet these black-loving leftists are lying to themselves that it's a big success and calling racists anyone who calls them out. It's an insane cult.
This is what real schizophrenia looks like. Remember the same happened when black panther made over a billion dollars. Chuds were convinced Disney was buying their own tickets to inflate their numbers. Everything they don't like is fake, everything they like is real
The film CELEBRATES SLAVE OWNERS/TRADERS/CONQUERERS
There is even a statue honoring them
https://thisisafrica.me/politics-and-society/benins-30m-amazon-statue-honours-the-women-warriors-of-dahomey/
This teaches us we should honor our on slave owners as well. And replace all the Confederate statues that were torn down .
Time to celebrate those courageous ancestors of our past who conquered other people
That German airport has a wild amount of gates packed into a tight space. Its square design also allows to straight-forward and easy access to the runways.
The German one has nearly as many gates and isn't an enormous unwalkable eyesore. Also you know you're comparing a generic utilitarian short range airport for mostly freight use with something that was built as a propaganda piece, right?
I had a nightmare a couple weeks ago I was lost in an airport trying to find my gate and that chinese airport looks exactly like the airport i was lost in only there were way more levels
I had the misfortune to have a 3-hour layover in a chinese airport once on a particularly polluted day. The pollution was so bad even indoors that it was difficult to breathe, even though I am rather fit.
The closest runway and parts of the terminal I was in were the only things visible outside the windows. Everything else was a uniform brownish grey in every direction you could possibly look. All I could see and taste was dust.
0/10 would not recommend
And in true Chinese fashion only 10% of the gates are functional, the rest have non-opening outer doors, dummy tv's, empty elevator shafts and "bathrooms" without fixtures.
This is what real schizophrenia looks like. Remember the same happened when black panther made over a billion dollars. Chuds were convinced Disney was buying their own tickets to inflate their numbers. Everything they don't like is fake, everything they like is real
>celebrating China as a communist success story
homie China abandoned communism in the 90s. it's much closer to fascism now.
>bottom picture is literally a painting.
You're lucky liveleak is down so we can't see all the lack of respect for basic human life that goes down there.
>Remember the same happened when black panther made over a billion dollars. Chuds were convinced Disney was buying their own tickets to inflate their numbers.
That's exactly what they did and every afrocentric movie that doesn't make a billion dollars at the box office supports this.
BP was an exercise in fraud brought too far. Its main purpose was to support globohomosexual initiatives by showing an afrocentric movie making a lot of money at the box office instead of quietly flopping and eventually breaking even on video, as most black movies do. This allows other entertainment companies to legally lie to investors and claim anti-whiteness is profitable.
But whatever mechanisms Yidsne tried out with BP were too heavy and they inflated the numbers way too high for what was an interstitial MCU story.
Since it is derived from real history, the Woman King story is more complex than a simple hero’s tale — and the accuracy of the film has been a subject of speculation even before its first public screening. In mid-August, The 1619 Project author Nikole Hannah-Jones tweeted, “It will be interesting to see how a movie that seems to glorify the all-female military unit of the Dahomey deals with the fact that this kingdom derived its wealth from capturing Africans for the trans-Atlantic slave trade.” The film does tackle that subject — Davis’ Nanisca objects to her king’s practice of selling war prisoners into slavery, and advocates for a different policy. “When I came aboard, those were some of the first conversations,” Prince-Bythewood says, of the depiction of the slave trade. “But it was, ‘We’re going to tell the truth. We’re not going to shy away from anything.’ But also we’re telling a part of the story which is about overcoming and fighting for what’s right. And I think we got it right.”
In assembling a crew for the five-month, South Africa-based shoot, Prince-Bythewood prioritized department heads who were women and people of color, including cinematographer Polly Morgan, production designer Akin McKenzie, costume designer Gersha Phillips, visual effects supervisor Sara Bennett and editor Terilyn Shropshire. For makeup, she hired a local, South African artist, Babalwa Mtshiselwa. “The thing is for women and people of color, often the résumés are not long because it’s about lack of opportunity, not lack of talent,” Prince-Bythewood says. “So when you’re in my position, it’s important to look past that résumé. There were a couple of people who’ve never done a film of this size before, but what they brought into that meeting,
Davis had the unusual (for her) experience of getting mixed to negative reviews for her last TV project, Showtime’s First Ladies, in which she played Michelle Obama. When a BBC News interviewer asked her about the negative reviews, Davis said, “Critics absolutely serve no purpose.”
avis had the unusual (for her) experience of getting mixed to negative reviews for her last TV project, Showtime’s First Ladies, in which she played Michelle Obama. When a BBC News interviewer asked her about the negative reviews, Davis said, “Critics absolutely serve no purpose.”
Schulman left STX in 2016 to return to producing, and she, Bello, Davis, and Davis’ husband and producing partner at JuVee Productions, Julius Tennon, pitched the film around town. Studios didn’t see the film as likely to earn enough to warrant the budget it required, or they wanted to cast light-skinned, well-known actresses, which felt historically inaccurate to the producers and likely to take the audience out of the movie, Davis says. “We talked to a lot of people and got rejected. We were trying to reason with them. What is it that is standing in the way of you saying yes and accepting this movie and giving us a proper budget?”
In the summer of 2017, at Sony’s TriStar label, Davis and her fellow producers met with the studio’s then-chief, Hannah Minghella, and Minghella’s then-senior vp, Nicole Brown. Within two years, Minghella would depart for a job at Bad Robot and Brown would ascend into the studio’s top role, making her the first Black woman to run a live-action label at a major film studio. When Brown became the head of the company, she made The Woman King one of TriStar’s top priorities, and the film secured a co-financier, eOne. At the time of that first meeting, the film didn’t have a script or a director, but, Brown says, “I could see the movie. I was so mesmerized by the thought that these women existed in the world and I hadn’t heard of it. It had all the makings of a huge theatrical story, epic emotions, and incredible thrills and hero moments. And it had landscapes that I just wanted to see. And it had never been told.”
We don’t always want different or new, unless you have a big star attached, a big male star. We didn’t have that going on for The Woman King. [Hollywood studios] like it when women are pretty and blond or close to pretty and blond. All of these women are dark. And they’re beating the shit out of men. So there you go.”
The process of making The Woman King coincided with and contributed to an era of personal reinvention for the actress. “I’m in a period of redefining myself for myself,” Davis says. “My Blackness, my womanhood, my nose, my lips. I reject everything anyone ever said about me. And I didn’t know that I had the power to do that.”
In 2015, Bello traveled to the West African nation of Benin, formerly the Dahomey kingdom, and learned the story of the Agojie there. Bello came home to L.A. convinced there was a film in that history, and enlisted producer Cathy Schulman, then head of the organization Women in Film, to help her realize it. “We wondered if it was possible to make an all-Black female action movie, which is really what we wanted to do,” Schulman says. This was before Marvel’s Black Panther, which fictionalizes the Agojie as the female warriors of the Dora Milaje, broke box office barriers in 2018, and before the Black Lives Matter movement sparked a new urgency in Hollywood’s sometimes halting efforts at inclusion. In 2015, Bello used a moment when she was presenting Davis with an award at the Skirball Center in Los Angeles to tell the audience the story of the Agojie general and suggest that she’d like to see Davis play the role. “Instead of just presenting the award the way you normally would, she pitched the script, just this whole story,” Davis says. “And then when she finished it, everybody started cheering.” Davis was in.
Marvel released Black Panther, which would go on to gross $1.3 billion worldwide and be nominated for best picture, disproving one of the more pernicious pieces of Hollywood conventional wisdom, that movies with Black casts don’t travel. “When I heard that movie was happening, I got a little nervous,” Brown says of Black Panther. “Like, ‘Oh no, did we not move fast enough?’ And then when I saw it, it only emboldened me more to make sure we made this movie. There’s absolutely room for both stories. That’s a comic book, fantasy experience, and this is inspired by real life. This is real people and a real part of our history.”
Davis had the unusual (for her) experience of getting mixed to negative reviews for her last TV project, Showtime’s First Ladies, in which she played Michelle Obama. When a BBC News interviewer asked her about the negative reviews, Davis said, “Critics absolutely serve no purpose.”
avis had the unusual (for her) experience of getting mixed to negative reviews for her last TV project, Showtime’s First Ladies, in which she played Michelle Obama. When a BBC News interviewer asked her about the negative reviews, Davis said, “Critics absolutely serve no purpose.”
Schulman left STX in 2016 to return to producing, and she, Bello, Davis, and Davis’ husband and producing partner at JuVee Productions, Julius Tennon, pitched the film around town. Studios didn’t see the film as likely to earn enough to warrant the budget it required, or they wanted to cast light-skinned, well-known actresses, which felt historically inaccurate to the producers and likely to take the audience out of the movie, Davis says. “We talked to a lot of people and got rejected. We were trying to reason with them. What is it that is standing in the way of you saying yes and accepting this movie and giving us a proper budget?”
In the summer of 2017, at Sony’s TriStar label, Davis and her fellow producers met with the studio’s then-chief, Hannah Minghella, and Minghella’s then-senior vp, Nicole Brown. Within two years, Minghella would depart for a job at Bad Robot and Brown would ascend into the studio’s top role, making her the first Black woman to run a live-action label at a major film studio. When Brown became the head of the company, she made The Woman King one of TriStar’s top priorities, and the film secured a co-financier, eOne. At the time of that first meeting, the film didn’t have a script or a director, but, Brown says, “I could see the movie. I was so mesmerized by the thought that these women existed in the world and I hadn’t heard of it. It had all the makings of a huge theatrical story, epic emotions, and incredible thrills and hero moments. And it had landscapes that I just wanted to see. And it had never been told.”
We don’t always want different or new, unless you have a big star attached, a big male star. We didn’t have that going on for The Woman King. [Hollywood studios] like it when women are pretty and blond or close to pretty and blond. All of these women are dark. And they’re beating the shit out of men. So there you go.”
The process of making The Woman King coincided with and contributed to an era of personal reinvention for the actress. “I’m in a period of redefining myself for myself,” Davis says. “My Blackness, my womanhood, my nose, my lips. I reject everything anyone ever said about me. And I didn’t know that I had the power to do that.”
In 2015, Bello traveled to the West African nation of Benin, formerly the Dahomey kingdom, and learned the story of the Agojie there. Bello came home to L.A. convinced there was a film in that history, and enlisted producer Cathy Schulman, then head of the organization Women in Film, to help her realize it. “We wondered if it was possible to make an all-Black female action movie, which is really what we wanted to do,” Schulman says. This was before Marvel’s Black Panther, which fictionalizes the Agojie as the female warriors of the Dora Milaje, broke box office barriers in 2018, and before the Black Lives Matter movement sparked a new urgency in Hollywood’s sometimes halting efforts at inclusion. In 2015, Bello used a moment when she was presenting Davis with an award at the Skirball Center in Los Angeles to tell the audience the story of the Agojie general and suggest that she’d like to see Davis play the role. “Instead of just presenting the award the way you normally would, she pitched the script, just this whole story,” Davis says. “And then when she finished it, everybody started cheering.” Davis was in.
Marvel released Black Panther, which would go on to gross $1.3 billion worldwide and be nominated for best picture, disproving one of the more pernicious pieces of Hollywood conventional wisdom, that movies with Black casts don’t travel. “When I heard that movie was happening, I got a little nervous,” Brown says of Black Panther. “Like, ‘Oh no, did we not move fast enough?’ And then when I saw it, it only emboldened me more to make sure we made this movie. There’s absolutely room for both stories. That’s a comic book, fantasy experience, and this is inspired by real life. This is real people and a real part of our history.”
>But also we’re telling a part of the story which is about overcoming and fighting for what’s right. And I think we got it right.”
Ok, so slavery is right, and fighting against it is wrong? Got it
The movie isn't having them fight the British or the French. They're fighting another Black person empire that is also built on slavery and human sacrifice.
You can say that Africa was a real shithole even before whites went there.
>Wow you hate it when companies manipulate people by deleting critical reviews and making up stories about how it's all the fault of the reptoid illuminati targetting them, but also dislike when companies manipulate you with thousands of positive bot reviews?! >It's almost like you don't like being lied to and treated like cattle by multibillionaires!
> post some random ethnic chimp group from probably East Africa to represent all Blacks despite their extemine diverse genetics,skin tones, phenotypes etc
"Estradiol concentration was lower in non-Hispanic blacks (P=0.11) and Mexican-Americans (P=0.033) compared with non-Hispanic whites. After multivariable adjustment, in the 16–19 year-old males, testosterone, estradiol, and SHBG concentrations did not differ between non-Hispanic blacks and whites. Mexican-Americans had the highest testosterone concentration (versus non-Hispanic white: P=0.08), but did not differ from the other groups on estradiol and SHBG concentrations. In both age groups, these patterns were generally present, but less pronounced after adjusting for age and Tanner stage only." >I
Same, I thought they be at least below us but they literally about to pass us despite being vast minority.
asians is a big approximation of SEA, east asians and pajeets, if you look at the place with most trannies, is SEA and they are brown asians, so you have the same melanin factor in there
I’m curious how well it’ll do though, it’s a 50 million budget movie when it opened on Thursday/Friday with a total so far of 19 million, not bad but with those numbers in comparison I can honestly say that those reviews are indeed botted. It’s one of those movies that really isn’t on a lot of people radars (besides the shitposting) and a score like that just doesn’t look convincing at all. I’m sure it’ll do well in African nations for certain like black panther did because it’s not often you’ll see movies exploring this period and it’s based on a (loose) telling of a historical event in Africa. I honestly don’t think it’s a bad movie but I think giving it that high of a score is a bit overdone, especially for a movie not a lot of people are talking about
I don't like it cause it alt history about group of traitors that sold each other out, you might as well make a film about Vikings selling English to Arabs/Moors.
I'm really getting sick of the flood of third worlders and third world bots all over the internet.
It's not even subtle at this point, do people genuinely believe these reviews anymore? It feels like every positive review is written by "Bob S" in broken English. Even here the amount of obvious ESLs has risen dramatically in the past few years. I can't even play video games anymore without half the server spewing broken English at me mixed with Portuguese.
well the web is open, you don't have a firewalled USA internet, but some countries really need their own internet, like indians for example, they are too many and when you search something now you have indian english articles or answers, even worse is that they have to say their nationality in the comments or looking for other indians.
The problem is that a lot of people know english now and the communities of their original language is not so interesting or they go on both sides. You can't really do nothing about it and it will become worse as the time goes on, imagine when africa will really get a good connection and you will have 1b Black folk that know english, shitting every comment section. Some countries are able to keep themselves isolated, like japan or china, mostly due to their language and a lot of media production, but english countries doesn't have this luxury (and is mostly their fault either way).
I'm ESL too (italian)
>a lot of people know english now
Saying Brazilians or Indians "know english" is a stretch. A toddler can string together a more coherent sentence and has better reading comprehension than them. It's like they learn how to say colors in English then think they have the English vocabulary of Shakespeare. It must be a cultural thing regarding how confident they are speaking English at a sub-preschool level.
>stop changing characters to black >make your own movies!!! >Hollywood makes a movie about africans >NOOOOOOOO REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!
wtf do you want /misc/tv/ stop whining. This movie isn't even making that much money yet every day there are 20 threads about it.
>Bro, cotton pickers built this country. >Not the tobacco, furs, skins, salt meat, flaxseed, rice, tar, turpentine, and pitch we also exported.
Sanctimonious frick.
Stop using that website. Stop advertising them for free here by posting screenshots. Stop clicking on their fricking links etc.
The reason this shit is happening is because the outrage it generates on Cinemaphile alone is priceless, they are saving fricking millions on advertising.
Nowadays, movie studios buy tickets to their own films to try to astroturf interest in a movie. You're a literally moronic subhuman low IQ dumbass worthless piece of shit.
The french show up with 50 men carrying 1000 shitty old muskets and arm the opposing tribes and wait while they literally wipe out the whole country, as will repeat hundreds of time.
Movie doesn't have them fight the French or British. Their enemy is the Oyo Empire, also a slaver nation.
The narrative that white people went over to Africa to enslave them is shredded as people learn the obvious truth that Africans enslaved each other and sold them to westerners.
Funny, I've seen blacks asking to boycott this movie because the tribe in the movie are slave traders, which is weird because according to them Africa never gave out/traded slaves. I've even had an African from Sierra Leone say Africans didn't give out slaves.
Metacritic has user reviews that sound like a real person wrote it. Even if it is a reviewbomb at least the people behind doing so on metacritic aren't bots like on RT.
They all do. Every single one. The marketing approach for film and TV shows today includes hiring bots, human or otherwise, to shill their products on socialist media and the review sites. They also bribe review sites to filter bad reviews for them.
The only viable source of criticism today comes from amateur sources that you have identified as consistently posting their honest opinions on the various sources still availabe to everyday people, like YouTube, Twitch or whatever. The rest of the net has been bought off by corporate interests.
The internet died long ago, and what's left is nothing more than 45% corporate manipulation, 45% political manipulation, and 5% normal people trying to counter both. The internet is basically poison.
Why are there like 10 reviwers whose name is just "Google" on the first few pages? Is this the default name when you log in via Google or whats going on?
I think the point is to deify blacks to such an extent that you can put them in literally any context and portray them all as little black christ figures. The idea that you can straight up lie about history is also an important feature of what's happening, but is probably secondary to deifying blacks.
i'm going to plaster my baby batter inside your barren vampire womb, you unholy harlot! Take my wooden stake through your c**t and into your heart, you undead temptress!
Please just stop caring. Just don't talk or think about the film and it'll go away by itself
Why do all these audience reviews have "verified" next to them, yet every other audience review section doesn't have that?
Furthermore, why can't you click the profiles of the reviews?
If you don't look at it, it doesn't exist
>just ignore it bro
>nonono let me enjoy my anger
We will burn it into ashes until even the memory of it leads to scorn!
>close your eyes, goy
Why do you come into these threads on a television/film forum and tell people to stop talking about that stuff? Do you think you are smarter than anyone? Because you're not.
No
I don't want to ignore it. I want people to be aware that they are gaming the system.
Assuming this is true, that they’re bots; how does this help them? People who don’t want to watch it still won’t watch it regardless of praise
/thread
Moral of the story is, nobody fricking cares. I’m pretty sure angry Cinemaphile posters know more about this movie than anyone else.
well it can help them in some ways, like you go to thereview site and see it highly rankend and in the most viewed, it can pickup your interest.
Or the high score might earn you one or 2 articles written byse "journalist" and might reach more people. Or when you search it in google you see an high score, just increasing its visibility but ultimately this
Some bots that praise it and some shills that say how the movie is good and if you don't want to watch it you are a racist, it will not bring in viewership, a genuine good show won't need it and people will organically talk aboutit and "shill" to friends and socials themselves, even if the company might have bots and shills in there to talk well about the movie/series
The morons here love being outraged. Most will die of heart failure in their early fifties due to constantly being angry at something or someone.
>Just stop thinking about it bro
We aren't fricking Russians or Chinamen you absolutely cretinous ape why do you think our society is more advanced than those exploding drunken mongs could ever dream of: because we can see when we are being manipulated by ((them)) and we fight to stop it
Imagine the amount of copium which is needed to use bots and fake the audience reviews so lazy.
>Wowza!!!!!!!
>10 starts
what did pajeet bot mean by this?
He misspelled shart
What's wrong with "Wowza"
Explain yourselves, leftoids.
>ideology is the inversion of reality
It starts to all make sense when you realize they’re being indoctrinated into a soft-satanic “do as thou wilt” but for cattle being led to slaughter.
AhahahahahAHAHAAAAA
THEY DON"T EVEN FRICKING TRYING ANYMORE
FOR FRICK'S SAKE
WHEN THE KILLING WILL START ???????????????????????????????
its for people who bought tickets and were asked to review it elsewhere which is why they dont have accounts
still obviously fake reviews but thats the reason
so something they claim is verified cant even be verified?! Anyone who uses Rottentomatoes is a fricking idiot. I never did. It was always stupid
Creating a bot for black reviewers must be so easy.
imagine writing the scripts and telling yourself you're not raycis
Here's a black name generator
https://www.fantasynamegenerators.com/african-american-names.php
>2-3 paragraths where people complain about how bad this film portrays the slavers making them into heroes.
>FRICK YOU! HATERS BOMBING REVIEWS! FAKE!!
>WOWZA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 10 STARNTS!!!
>Actual honest and intelectual review.
>this movie sucks
>that 1/10 review was poorly made and couldn't be considered a real review so we deleted it
>wowza!!!!!!
>perfectly crafted 10/10 review it stays
On the plus side this movie will be the shit test to end all shit tests in terms of fake reviewing
>"Wowza!"
We need to make this a term for when studios manipulate stats.
>the woman king is full of wowza reviews
>deleting the youtube dislike button helps them fake wowzas
Wowzaviews?
reviewowza?
You're oversimplifying it. Just "wowza"
Kind of like 'government cheese'
Those are just black people, anon.
>cheritha d
>giselle g
Loooooooool
THOSE ARE GENUINE!!!
>The Woman Kino
I guess Black Panther finna be surpassed.
You al'ight white boy.
Okay but there's nothing wrong with saying "Wowza" in reviewing a good kino
Nobody says wowza except maybe cartoon characters from the 1950s
Yeah, so what?
Anyway, is anyone else watching Woman King Elisabeth's funeral right now?
>Dahomey became a major center in the Atlantic Slave Trade until 1852 when the British imposed a naval blockade to stop the trade. War with the French began in 1892 and the French took over the Kingdom of Dahomey in 1894. The throne was vacated by the French in 1900, but the royal families and key administrative positions of the administration continued to have a large impact in the politics of the French administration and the post-independence Republic of Dahomey, renamed Benin in 1975.
Yeh, I'm thinking...KINO
Yeah, this movie is literally about nogs getting uppity because white Europeans wanted to shut down the slave trade that made them rich.
Audience review used to be my actual metric. Now I don't even have that...
>Audience review used to be my actual metric.
>Posts the most blatant case of bot voting
Kek.
>still pretending the last jedi wasn't the worst star wars piece of media ever made
When is the last time you watched one of the most successful movies of our era? How many times do you revist everyone's favorite Star Wars a year?
The world will lose nothing of value when you die.
Last Jedi is shit
When will moviegays will stop rely on shitty reviews and use their fricking taste and brain to figure out what movie they should see next
Because thinking for yourself is the hardest thing for some people to do.
Wow imagine that this whole thread is about NOT following reviews.
42% is massively inflated.
It's like... 5%. I'm not exaggerating.
It's been like this for a while now. Every recent film I've seen because of online recommendations has turned out to be shockingly bad. This incredibly bad piece of shit was touted as film of the year by a few forums.
I sat there for 20 minutes with my mouth open not able to believe that there was anyone dumb enough to like such a shit film until I realized it was me who was dumb for thinking the comments were genuine. It is now not possible to watch a good film because of recommendations from the internet.
I unironically think Cinemaphile is the only platform that I can trust for an honest review. Its probably the last place where people actually give their opinion without a filter.
You still need to keep your wits about you, though. We get a lot of shilling for the latest tv shows. If the discussion is about movies from 5+ years ago then yeah I agree with you.
Most of the kinos I've seen have had absolutely dogshit reviews because somehow brainlet normies got their hands on them.
>watching political show on israelitetube
>go to comments afterwards for keks
>nearly all comments are were saying the same thing but worded slightly different
Not sure if npcs or bots but it doesn't seem natural.
Youtube comments are bottom of the barrell. I thought that it was common knowledge.
YouTube has an AI that deletes nearly all comments, leaving only the most NPC trash. I've had YouTube delete my comments that didn't use any slurs, nothing negative at all, just objective observations, BOOM deleted.
He's so mad lmao I love it that chudcels are on full damage control. This is just the beginning. Wakanda Forever next chudcel
>oy vey, chudcels
Finally!!! True rating. Been sick of seeing this fake bullshit 99%. Movie was A-mae-ZING!
I didn't see it yet but it was great! 21 stars out if 7!
>Woman King
>action/history
Why the hell is The Northman's audience score so low?
Marketing misleading people into thinking it was a vikangs action film when it was actually Hamlet Kino.
>avoid it thinking its annoying vikings action film
>It's actually hamlet kino
Guess it's time to watch the northman.
>misleading people into thinking it was a vikangs action film
I fell for it and loved what I got.
I only regret not watching it on a better screen.
The Northman was shit tho
The votes are in, people want slavery again.
Actually that actress is pretty based. She is the black Mary Louise "Meryl " Streep.
no she is a homosexual
Woman King audience reviews are fake, they are verified profiles with no reviews other than this movie.
How do you become a verified reviewer?
buy a ticket through fandango.
>The Woman King
you can just say queen
That’s sexist. Women suck inherently so using female-gendered titles is like an insult
I can understand it being liked, but that is a bit strange.
self-hating whites watching a film about the black tribe that literally enslaved and sold all the slaves in the slave trade.
zero self awareness but so much virtue signalling you get second-hand woke cancer
You Cinemaphile users are so fricking racist it makes me sick. Tough black women shouldnt be rwjoiced? You cry when black people are in your movies. Even a fricking mulatto makes you weep.
Why cant you juat stfu and be happy foe once that black people are starting to succeed in life.
You looked down at us and called us subhuman and now when we are trying tclimb up up out of filth and try to give back to society our accomplishments are a thorn in your eyes.
Frick you
Frick you. How will humanity ever reach the stars like this.
>How will humanity ever reach the stars like this.
It was good bait until this.
>You look down at us and call us subhuman
Ftfy Black person
>How will humanity ever reach the stars like this.
Unironically by getting rid of black vermin
We could have terraformed mars four times over with the amount of aid used to keep Black folk alive the last 60 years.
>Frick you. How will humanity ever reach the stars like this.
We won't. The children of the devil temporarily have full control, we've entered into a new period of dark ages that will last until the next massive solar flare disables certain systems.
>The children of the devil temporarily have full control
And who fault is that? Who voted for reagan and tachter, who voted for Bush, who allowed israelites to control the media and education, who allow open borders and cuck shit, who allow ariel to Black? At some point whites need to accept their just as bad if not worse than the israelites they hate.
keep your hate for the welsh descendents of the phoenicians out of my history lesson please and thank you, that's what you mean yeah? That words that originally was used to describe the Llewish Welsh before it was repurposed?
Cope Liz Triss is an ugly mutt anglo b***h who's tory and will gladly ignore the rapes and crime of those nafari apes and monkey africans for profit.
Like many cuckservatives who are neo-libs will
nice selfie
Fun fact: Blacks were against the Space Race because it took away gibs from them
N I G G E R
We ain't reaching the stars with black people hanging from our necks like an albatross. I would have been interested in a more historical accurate film rather than some fanfic written by black and brown zoomers. Is your history not good enough to talk about? Have you even been to Africa? You think we hate you but you have no idea how much they hate you.
The movie deals with one african slaver nation (Dahomey) getting fricked over by another african slaver nation (Oyo). The whites don't seem to be part of it at all.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Franco-Dahomean_War
>damn they lost that badly? it must be because the french firearms and cannons are superior
>"The Fon staged several fierce charges over two to three hours that all failed against the 20-inch (50 cm) bayonets of the French.[5] "
Literally mogged by bigger pointy sticks.
This article works SO hard to paint the Dahome Amazonians as some kind of X factor despite getting mogged every step of the way
>However, Dahomey remained a potent force in the area and quickly re-armed with modern weapons in anticipation of a second, decisive conflict.
>The Dahomey army left the field in defeat losing some 200 soldiers.[9] The French carried the day with only 42 casualties.[9] The Dahomey Amazons were also conspicuous in the battle.
> The battle was also significant in that much of Dahomey's Amazon corps was lost.
> From the French arrival until 14 October, Dahomey's Amazons were absent. On 15 October, some women were noted to have been present on the front lines of the Dahomean forces which were defeated after a bayonet charge by a Legion battalion.
>The Amazons are reported by the French to have fought the hardest, charging out of their trenches but to no avail.
>Amazons seemed to have made up much of the force. After four hours of desperate combat, the Fon army withdrew.
>The last engagement at Cana, which took place at the village of Diokoué, site of a royal palace, was the last time Amazons were used.[12] Special units of the Amazons were assigned specifically to target French officers.[12] After a full day of fighting, the French overran the Dahomey army with another bayonet charge.
Every other paragraph in this 3 page long article keeps shoehorning in "There were women there, and they fought fiercely!" before footnoting the paragraph with "And then the French butchered them with knives"
It seems to be trying to spin "charged into a bayonet line" positively.
There's a fine line between bravery and stupidity.
This sounds like fairly run of the mill, European power in Africa, sequence of events, except 'with added women who actually fought'.
I'm sure for the Dahome this was a major historical event, for the French this was Tuesday.
I beleive you can look at the version changes of articles and follow up the conversations between editors as to why they've made changes.
I recall some spastic who went through every article they could about WW2 and erased any hint at the Germans having anyone that wasn't a israelite killing death machine. I specifically remember them going crazy on the article about Guderian.
>make propaganda based on own racist world view
>you are so racist
Wasnt the trailer like 97% likes and 3% dislikes on Youtube? Doubt they are fake, you just mad incel.
So Jeff Bezos and Amazon doesn't have the money to pay for fake reviews but somehow Sony does?
"verified" means "bought a ticket through fandango." there's no such barrier for shows, either way.
So that means from now on every audience review in rotten will be from shills? There goes the last ounce of rotten tomatoes integrity. This idea wont backfire at all lmao
that happened after tlj homie, the site never had any credibility.
if the another anon is correct then I'm guessing they're leaving reviews for the process of buying a ticket
Theatrically released movies (AKA films airing in theaters) are locked exclusively behind "Verified" ratings as of February 2019. Doesn't count for anything on streaming services.
>99%
sure ...
Even leftists on twitter shit on it as Dahomey were one of the main slave suppliers and still kept slaves and human sacrifice even after the western civilization banned it.
In fact the nation was destroyed early last century since it refused to ban slavery so it made enemies out of everybody.
But yeah, israelites will rewrite all history if they can.
What Recia mean by this?
They're literally shitting on our heads and telling us it's raining.
they've been doing that since 2012.
They must of changed their diets or something, it didnt use to smell this terrible.
you're just becoming aware of the fact you're boiling.
Nah racsim always gets me boiling.
Meant that the process of making the mentally ill incel endlessly seethe was super easy and fast. Seethe.
>Meant that the process of making the mentally ill incel endlessly seethe was super easy and fast. Seethe.
Sirs do not redeem the process
>See excelent reviews
>Read many comments saying it's good
>"Hey it's kino, go watch it!"
>Go watch it
>It's crap, propaganda shit as usual
>"Hey you said it was goo-"
>¯_(ツ)_/¯
I went to the sub Reddit for box office and people were celebrating this piece of shit doing a $19 million weekend on a $50 million budget (double that with marketing). I mean that's a guaranteed bomb. That shit is not making back it's budget let alone making a profit, yet these black-loving leftists are lying to themselves that it's a big success and calling racists anyone who calls them out. It's an insane cult.
This is what real schizophrenia looks like. Remember the same happened when black panther made over a billion dollars. Chuds were convinced Disney was buying their own tickets to inflate their numbers. Everything they don't like is fake, everything they like is real
>Everything they don't like is fake, everything they like is real
Pot --> Kettle
THE IMPORTANT TAKE AWAY
The film CELEBRATES SLAVE OWNERS/TRADERS/CONQUERERS
There is even a statue honoring them
https://thisisafrica.me/politics-and-society/benins-30m-amazon-statue-honours-the-women-warriors-of-dahomey/
This teaches us we should honor our on slave owners as well. And replace all the Confederate statues that were torn down .
Time to celebrate those courageous ancestors of our past who conquered other people
sorry, whites aren't allowed to be honored for anything, ever.
DAMN! That's a huge b***h!
No bullshit. I thought that was Daisy Ridley from nuWars for a second.
I love these third world countries where foreign investment gets embezzled into making these abomination plazas with literally nothing else around.
Reminds me of the massive Columbus monument in Portugal.
The Black Panther cope was so funny, Cinemaphile homies were so confident it would flop lolol
little did we know disney would buy millions of their own tickets.
oh wait, we did, and they did, and they were brazen about it.
Hahahahaha keep going
>continue talking about how disney has been openly buying their own tickets since black panther, when it was literally part of the marketing campaign
ok
this has nothing to do with disney though, or black panther, not sure why you're bringing it up.
Then surely they could have bought enough tickets to prevent Eternals and Black Widow from flopping
those weren't as good for their ESG score.
I know this is bait but i dont see them building a snow ramp in the bottom pic
... i mean bottom is clearly an over-saturated propaganda shot
Muh saturation
yes, saturation makes things look brighter and more colorful.
That German airport has a wild amount of gates packed into a tight space. Its square design also allows to straight-forward and easy access to the runways.
Shouldnt there be a liveleak logo on the chinese one?
>Chinese airport.
Imagine all the walking, and all the long lines.
>real pic vs cgi render
>Chinese airport
>All roads and no runway access
Genius design!
>designing in a place where you can't even disturb/displace 10 million people to build an airport
VS
>designing in a place where you could fricking murder 10 million people if you wanted to build a government airport
look at all that fricking wasted tarmac. and your brown starfish looks like shit
German efficiency vs Chinese vanity
that airport was a waste of billions, completion has been delayed for a decade and it still is an architectural nightmare you dumbfrick
t. German
The German one has nearly as many gates and isn't an enormous unwalkable eyesore. Also you know you're comparing a generic utilitarian short range airport for mostly freight use with something that was built as a propaganda piece, right?
I had a nightmare a couple weeks ago I was lost in an airport trying to find my gate and that chinese airport looks exactly like the airport i was lost in only there were way more levels
I had the misfortune to have a 3-hour layover in a chinese airport once on a particularly polluted day. The pollution was so bad even indoors that it was difficult to breathe, even though I am rather fit.
The closest runway and parts of the terminal I was in were the only things visible outside the windows. Everything else was a uniform brownish grey in every direction you could possibly look. All I could see and taste was dust.
0/10 would not recommend
>efficiency vs aesthetics
Chinese airport looks like the Evangelion angel that asteroid'd itself to try and destroy Nerv's HQ.
wtf I love chinese architecture now
German chudcels btfo
And in true Chinese fashion only 10% of the gates are functional, the rest have non-opening outer doors, dummy tv's, empty elevator shafts and "bathrooms" without fixtures.
>Wasting land Is a good thing
So much for saving the environment, huh leftoid?
You probably have a hard time understanding "made in China" is more than just a meme.
But the German one won't randomly collapse and kill hundreds of "people".
"Randomly". Chinks do this shit intentionally to keep their numbers down.
>celebrating China as a communist success story
homie China abandoned communism in the 90s. it's much closer to fascism now.
that's a good thing btw
>be China
>build coronavirus shaped airport as a frick you to every foreigner that flies into your country.
They're rubbing it in our faces.
>oh, so you thought all that industrial metal and smog was ugly, guailo?
>well look at it in the golden hour! feel stupid yet?
>bottom picture is literally a painting.
You're lucky liveleak is down so we can't see all the lack of respect for basic human life that goes down there.
They were confusing thier opinion with having an authority on the subject, mouth breathing morons :^)
You will never be a woman and your wiener is never coming back.
>Remember the same happened when black panther made over a billion dollars. Chuds were convinced Disney was buying their own tickets to inflate their numbers.
That's exactly what they did and every afrocentric movie that doesn't make a billion dollars at the box office supports this.
BP was an exercise in fraud brought too far. Its main purpose was to support globohomosexual initiatives by showing an afrocentric movie making a lot of money at the box office instead of quietly flopping and eventually breaking even on video, as most black movies do. This allows other entertainment companies to legally lie to investors and claim anti-whiteness is profitable.
But whatever mechanisms Yidsne tried out with BP were too heavy and they inflated the numbers way too high for what was an interstitial MCU story.
Everything in westoid society is fake, fake currency, fake government, fake history, fake relationships, fake internet, fake happiness, fake wars, fake genders, fake ideology
As opposed to fake food, fake jobs, fake medicine, fake housing and fake countries.
The left can't meme. The fricking second china picture still looks like dogshit you fricking homosexual. Goddamn it just have a nice day already.
still looks like dogshit
like if pol even cares about collectivism
the future is noggers vs non noggers
Wow, they weren't being sarcastic.
>t. doesn't realize the second picture is just as bad but with a light filter
Kek.
Since it is derived from real history, the Woman King story is more complex than a simple hero’s tale — and the accuracy of the film has been a subject of speculation even before its first public screening. In mid-August, The 1619 Project author Nikole Hannah-Jones tweeted, “It will be interesting to see how a movie that seems to glorify the all-female military unit of the Dahomey deals with the fact that this kingdom derived its wealth from capturing Africans for the trans-Atlantic slave trade.” The film does tackle that subject — Davis’ Nanisca objects to her king’s practice of selling war prisoners into slavery, and advocates for a different policy. “When I came aboard, those were some of the first conversations,” Prince-Bythewood says, of the depiction of the slave trade. “But it was, ‘We’re going to tell the truth. We’re not going to shy away from anything.’ But also we’re telling a part of the story which is about overcoming and fighting for what’s right. And I think we got it right.”
In assembling a crew for the five-month, South Africa-based shoot, Prince-Bythewood prioritized department heads who were women and people of color, including cinematographer Polly Morgan, production designer Akin McKenzie, costume designer Gersha Phillips, visual effects supervisor Sara Bennett and editor Terilyn Shropshire. For makeup, she hired a local, South African artist, Babalwa Mtshiselwa. “The thing is for women and people of color, often the résumés are not long because it’s about lack of opportunity, not lack of talent,” Prince-Bythewood says. “So when you’re in my position, it’s important to look past that résumé. There were a couple of people who’ve never done a film of this size before, but what they brought into that meeting,
Davis had the unusual (for her) experience of getting mixed to negative reviews for her last TV project, Showtime’s First Ladies, in which she played Michelle Obama. When a BBC News interviewer asked her about the negative reviews, Davis said, “Critics absolutely serve no purpose.”
avis had the unusual (for her) experience of getting mixed to negative reviews for her last TV project, Showtime’s First Ladies, in which she played Michelle Obama. When a BBC News interviewer asked her about the negative reviews, Davis said, “Critics absolutely serve no purpose.”
Schulman left STX in 2016 to return to producing, and she, Bello, Davis, and Davis’ husband and producing partner at JuVee Productions, Julius Tennon, pitched the film around town. Studios didn’t see the film as likely to earn enough to warrant the budget it required, or they wanted to cast light-skinned, well-known actresses, which felt historically inaccurate to the producers and likely to take the audience out of the movie, Davis says. “We talked to a lot of people and got rejected. We were trying to reason with them. What is it that is standing in the way of you saying yes and accepting this movie and giving us a proper budget?”
In the summer of 2017, at Sony’s TriStar label, Davis and her fellow producers met with the studio’s then-chief, Hannah Minghella, and Minghella’s then-senior vp, Nicole Brown. Within two years, Minghella would depart for a job at Bad Robot and Brown would ascend into the studio’s top role, making her the first Black woman to run a live-action label at a major film studio. When Brown became the head of the company, she made The Woman King one of TriStar’s top priorities, and the film secured a co-financier, eOne. At the time of that first meeting, the film didn’t have a script or a director, but, Brown says, “I could see the movie. I was so mesmerized by the thought that these women existed in the world and I hadn’t heard of it. It had all the makings of a huge theatrical story, epic emotions, and incredible thrills and hero moments. And it had landscapes that I just wanted to see. And it had never been told.”
We don’t always want different or new, unless you have a big star attached, a big male star. We didn’t have that going on for The Woman King. [Hollywood studios] like it when women are pretty and blond or close to pretty and blond. All of these women are dark. And they’re beating the shit out of men. So there you go.”
The process of making The Woman King coincided with and contributed to an era of personal reinvention for the actress. “I’m in a period of redefining myself for myself,” Davis says. “My Blackness, my womanhood, my nose, my lips. I reject everything anyone ever said about me. And I didn’t know that I had the power to do that.”
In 2015, Bello traveled to the West African nation of Benin, formerly the Dahomey kingdom, and learned the story of the Agojie there. Bello came home to L.A. convinced there was a film in that history, and enlisted producer Cathy Schulman, then head of the organization Women in Film, to help her realize it. “We wondered if it was possible to make an all-Black female action movie, which is really what we wanted to do,” Schulman says. This was before Marvel’s Black Panther, which fictionalizes the Agojie as the female warriors of the Dora Milaje, broke box office barriers in 2018, and before the Black Lives Matter movement sparked a new urgency in Hollywood’s sometimes halting efforts at inclusion. In 2015, Bello used a moment when she was presenting Davis with an award at the Skirball Center in Los Angeles to tell the audience the story of the Agojie general and suggest that she’d like to see Davis play the role. “Instead of just presenting the award the way you normally would, she pitched the script, just this whole story,” Davis says. “And then when she finished it, everybody started cheering.” Davis was in.
Marvel released Black Panther, which would go on to gross $1.3 billion worldwide and be nominated for best picture, disproving one of the more pernicious pieces of Hollywood conventional wisdom, that movies with Black casts don’t travel. “When I heard that movie was happening, I got a little nervous,” Brown says of Black Panther. “Like, ‘Oh no, did we not move fast enough?’ And then when I saw it, it only emboldened me more to make sure we made this movie. There’s absolutely room for both stories. That’s a comic book, fantasy experience, and this is inspired by real life. This is real people and a real part of our history.”
no one is reading that shit
>But also we’re telling a part of the story which is about overcoming and fighting for what’s right. And I think we got it right.”
Ok, so slavery is right, and fighting against it is wrong? Got it
The movie isn't having them fight the British or the French. They're fighting another Black person empire that is also built on slavery and human sacrifice.
You can say that Africa was a real shithole even before whites went there.
?
...what if it's good?
Glorifying slavery is never good.
why
Because they pretend it never happened
>Cinemaphile complains about companies complaining about review bombing
>also complains about positive review bombing
What is this idiocy?
>YOU CAN'T JUST COMPLAIN ABOUT CORPORATIONS ASTROTURFING PUBLIC OPINIONS...!
shut the frick up, moron
>Wow you hate it when companies manipulate people by deleting critical reviews and making up stories about how it's all the fault of the reptoid illuminati targetting them, but also dislike when companies manipulate you with thousands of positive bot reviews?!
>It's almost like you don't like being lied to and treated like cattle by multibillionaires!
But you are cattle?
That's you, you limp wristed projecting cuckboi
>its objectification when men look at sexy women
>its empowering when women make themselves sexy
>its morally reprehensible when white people enslave black people
>its empowering when...
i think i'm noticing a pattern.
BAD GOY, BAD!
>a destined 95%+ critic / 60-70% audience is somehow 95% critic / 99% audience
they aren't even trying
Is that Michelle Obama?
>Woman King comes out
>Queen dies
They can't get away with this.
>black 'men' are so low t that black women have to defend their nation
sad
They have the highest serum estrogen levels of any race, by a standard deviation.
believe me it shows
> post some random ethnic chimp group from probably East Africa to represent all Blacks despite their extemine diverse genetics,skin tones, phenotypes etc
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3850289/
"Estradiol concentration was lower in non-Hispanic blacks (P=0.11) and Mexican-Americans (P=0.033) compared with non-Hispanic whites. After multivariable adjustment, in the 16–19 year-old males, testosterone, estradiol, and SHBG concentrations did not differ between non-Hispanic blacks and whites. Mexican-Americans had the highest testosterone concentration (versus non-Hispanic white: P=0.08), but did not differ from the other groups on estradiol and SHBG concentrations. In both age groups, these patterns were generally present, but less pronounced after adjusting for age and Tanner stage only."
>I
And I found it odd consider Hispanics are the highest number lgbt in country with Asians
I'm shocked Asians are that high. They're usually the most secure group on the planet.
Same, I thought they be at least below us but they literally about to pass us despite being vast minority.
asians is a big approximation of SEA, east asians and pajeets, if you look at the place with most trannies, is SEA and they are brown asians, so you have the same melanin factor in there
>Asian
Mostly Brownoid in SEA. For example, most lady boys in Thailand are brownoid.
t. gay Black person storage
>being a bro is le bad
a few of these could pass for black women if they got boobjobs
Not gonna lie, I'd frick the guy with the cute smile in the center. Nohomo.
I am awoken.
NKGPNR
Under the knee, under the knee,
Down in the gutter, oh how I flutter,
I cannot breath,
Counterfeit twenty, drugs I took plenty
Now I can't breathe
I’m curious how well it’ll do though, it’s a 50 million budget movie when it opened on Thursday/Friday with a total so far of 19 million, not bad but with those numbers in comparison I can honestly say that those reviews are indeed botted. It’s one of those movies that really isn’t on a lot of people radars (besides the shitposting) and a score like that just doesn’t look convincing at all. I’m sure it’ll do well in African nations for certain like black panther did because it’s not often you’ll see movies exploring this period and it’s based on a (loose) telling of a historical event in Africa. I honestly don’t think it’s a bad movie but I think giving it that high of a score is a bit overdone, especially for a movie not a lot of people are talking about
Best movie of all time imo and I'm racist
Nae one has even seen this shit show
Haven't heard hype from anyone
Guarantee 100% the national black caucus got ahold of the site owners.
be honest, its Cinemaphile who reviewbombs it with positive ratings because they are racists
SHUT IT DOWN
You seem pretty homosexual to me
>Posting more Africans
Yawn.
now kith
Also I don't obsess over whites meat like this board does with Black americans daily.
>a-ah only saved 15 terrabyte of gayporn to troll people
That's way less than the average Cinemaphilepol user then.
Also you started the gay posting and you're projecting that shit to me?
>NOOOO PEOPLE CAN'T JUST LIKE A MOVIE ABOUT BLACK PEOPLE, THE REVIEWS MUST BE FAKE
I don't like it cause it alt history about group of traitors that sold each other out, you might as well make a film about Vikings selling English to Arabs/Moors.
yes
dont whitewash xer!, you racist
>We live in times whne this shit is normal and they argue that its normal in front of kids.
It's been normal since the people voted for Reagan, so thank republicans.
>That's just your average democrat run city
>Ignores Black belt in the South.
Diversity kills Black Americans moreso than whites again blame the immigrate bill of 64 pass by both republican/democrat senate.
blacks Americans kill black Americans
white americans kill white americans.
>graph for ants
>nigerian gay posting
>He still thinks I care about africans.
Oh you care
I really don't.
source on the numbers on that made up graph?
That's just your average democrat run city, you can see a diverse range of peoples there
When are some anons gonna post some Cinemaphile reviews?
It has A+ Cinema score (most accurate score when it comes to audience reception). Same as Top Gun and Spider-Man.
>movie set in a kingdom that enslaved its own people to sell them to euros
how do they address this in the movie?
Viola Davis says she doesn't like it
>she doesn't like it
Well that makes it all okay!
reviews I agree with: legitimate
reviews I disagree with: fake
>look just because nobody rating it a five has ever reviewed any other movie doesn't mean it's a bot!
who cam up whit the fricking title. The woman king soo a queen?
I'm really getting sick of the flood of third worlders and third world bots all over the internet.
It's not even subtle at this point, do people genuinely believe these reviews anymore? It feels like every positive review is written by "Bob S" in broken English. Even here the amount of obvious ESLs has risen dramatically in the past few years. I can't even play video games anymore without half the server spewing broken English at me mixed with Portuguese.
well the web is open, you don't have a firewalled USA internet, but some countries really need their own internet, like indians for example, they are too many and when you search something now you have indian english articles or answers, even worse is that they have to say their nationality in the comments or looking for other indians.
The problem is that a lot of people know english now and the communities of their original language is not so interesting or they go on both sides. You can't really do nothing about it and it will become worse as the time goes on, imagine when africa will really get a good connection and you will have 1b Black folk that know english, shitting every comment section. Some countries are able to keep themselves isolated, like japan or china, mostly due to their language and a lot of media production, but english countries doesn't have this luxury (and is mostly their fault either way).
I'm ESL too (italian)
>a lot of people know english now
Saying Brazilians or Indians "know english" is a stretch. A toddler can string together a more coherent sentence and has better reading comprehension than them. It's like they learn how to say colors in English then think they have the English vocabulary of Shakespeare. It must be a cultural thing regarding how confident they are speaking English at a sub-preschool level.
>BUILD THE FIREWALL
>Verified Ratings
Basically they can pick what reviews they want now from the audience, not only the critics.
verified just means they bought the ticket online
>stop changing characters to black
>make your own movies!!!
>Hollywood makes a movie about africans
>NOOOOOOOO REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!
wtf do you want /misc/tv/ stop whining. This movie isn't even making that much money yet every day there are 20 threads about it.
Dude the are glorifying a literally empire that made billions of the slave trade lmao.
Technically every movie glorifying early America is doing the samething.
No, not technically, semantically, you fallacious jerk.
Nice disingenuous leftist whataboutism post.
Your wiener is never coming back
>Bro, cotton pickers built this country.
>Not the tobacco, furs, skins, salt meat, flaxseed, rice, tar, turpentine, and pitch we also exported.
Sanctimonious frick.
Stop using that website. Stop advertising them for free here by posting screenshots. Stop clicking on their fricking links etc.
The reason this shit is happening is because the outrage it generates on Cinemaphile alone is priceless, they are saving fricking millions on advertising.
four channel pirates movies
maybe but they work for free on promoting any modern movie by talking about it 24/7
Lol cope do you think their box office 18m is fake too anon?
Do you think they paid people to watch the movie to fake box office number alright?
Nowadays, movie studios buy tickets to their own films to try to astroturf interest in a movie. You're a literally moronic subhuman low IQ dumbass worthless piece of shit.
Did YT ever actually enslave a single homie?
It seems they would go to coast and buy them for cheap liquor.
So what happens at the end?
The french show up with 50 men, do a bayonette charge and literally wipe out the whole country?
The french show up with 50 men carrying 1000 shitty old muskets and arm the opposing tribes and wait while they literally wipe out the whole country, as will repeat hundreds of time.
Movie doesn't have them fight the French or British. Their enemy is the Oyo Empire, also a slaver nation.
The narrative that white people went over to Africa to enslave them is shredded as people learn the obvious truth that Africans enslaved each other and sold them to westerners.
Well that's one way to become a permanent resident in the US.
so is the movie good or not? has anyone here actually seen it or are we just waiting for a rip to hit the net
>implying it already hasn't
Still ain't watching it.
Funny, I've seen blacks asking to boycott this movie because the tribe in the movie are slave traders, which is weird because according to them Africa never gave out/traded slaves. I've even had an African from Sierra Leone say Africans didn't give out slaves.
So if The Woman King wasn't review bombed by Russians or racists then why is RoP still so low? Could it be that those are genuine reviews?
So what would be the correct way for white powers to have handled Africa as a whole?
actual genocide
Name of the documentary?
"Nuke the entire site from orbit--it's the only way to be sure"
SO was the movie good
I am literally the only person in the theater rn
>lights still on
>monday at 7pm
>ads playing
is it because you are really early for the starting time of the movie?
Metacritic has user reviews that sound like a real person wrote it. Even if it is a reviewbomb at least the people behind doing so on metacritic aren't bots like on RT.
Them fight scenes tho that was on some John woo shit
>Woman King has fake audience reviews lmfao
They all do. Every single one. The marketing approach for film and TV shows today includes hiring bots, human or otherwise, to shill their products on socialist media and the review sites. They also bribe review sites to filter bad reviews for them.
The only viable source of criticism today comes from amateur sources that you have identified as consistently posting their honest opinions on the various sources still availabe to everyday people, like YouTube, Twitch or whatever. The rest of the net has been bought off by corporate interests.
The internet died long ago, and what's left is nothing more than 45% corporate manipulation, 45% political manipulation, and 5% normal people trying to counter both. The internet is basically poison.
does no one remember the Captain Wagegap fiasco?
why are RT even considered here to begin with?
are you all moronic?
>resorting to dumping folder of gays and gay sex to ‘btfo’ the person they’re arguing with
/pol/cels are mentally ill and need to be euthanized
/misc/ acts moronic but they are literally correct on everything except for the vaxxaids. Thats a shill campaign by leftist to make gop look stupid.
What did she mean by this?
I dunno, I don't watch movies with them because there was way too many African Americans in London when I was growing up.
Nah. I'm pretty sure people who would hate this movie don't care enough to see it.
Why are Hollywood Liberals so fricking cringe?
all jokes aside, is there any leaked of funny or bad cgi scenes yet?
How does a woman become a king? Don’t they mean queen?
Why are there like 10 reviwers whose name is just "Google" on the first few pages? Is this the default name when you log in via Google or whats going on?
>whats going on?
Lies, that's "whats going on". The psychotic subhuman billionaires are lying and trying to destroy America.
Nonstop b***hing about slavery and then now they celebrate it?
I think the point is to deify blacks to such an extent that you can put them in literally any context and portray them all as little black christ figures. The idea that you can straight up lie about history is also an important feature of what's happening, but is probably secondary to deifying blacks.
never even heard of this flick before today
i'm going to plaster my baby batter inside your barren vampire womb, you unholy harlot! Take my wooden stake through your c**t and into your heart, you undead temptress!
FOR
I
AM
VAN
HELSING!!!!
RAAAAAAAAAAAA
Vampires don't poop.
i'm going to watch this movie just to jack it to this Nubian rage goddess. Take my white seed, she-devil.