Would this have been better received if they removed the needless racemixing angle by casting a Ben Whishaw or Nicholas Hoult?

Would this have been better received if they removed the needless racemixing angle by casting a Ben Whishaw or Nicholas Hoult? I haven't seen the movie but I assume its a completely fine script ruined by a rapey-looking pajeet lead being fawned over by England's last good-looking woman.

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      dumpster fire comment section why did I even look

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Would your life actually be worth living if you stopped obsessing over things like racemixing?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      My life is worth living *because* I obsess over things like racemixing. Consuming popular media is not a personality, hicklib

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Whine for me, boy. Whine your heart out.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >~~*media*~~ keeps pushing racemixing at an ever accelerated pace despite knowing it loses them money
      Why are you noticing, don't you have a life ?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >if you stopped obsessing over things like racemixing
      We're the ones obsessed with race mixing?
      Really?
      Really???

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why would the Beatles be a big deal in the 2020s if people’s first encounter with them was one jeet with an acoustic guitar singing Hey Jude?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you can tell a lot about a person by which Beatles song they like the most. Hey Jude is the favorite of pedophiles.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    For years this guy was known for his only acting role as an awkward geek in a British soap opera. When he left nobody thought he'd be starring in Hollywood movies and TV shows.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      fair play for being a young actor who can make a career post eastenders, he was also in Tenet

      The closest other examples i can think of were the guy who played peter beale being one of Bryan singers twinks and being in Xmen & Bohemian rhaposdy

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >talentless paki only manages to become successful by plagiarizing music written by Whites and shamelessly passing it off as his own

    What do you think was the filmmakers' meaning behind this?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Exactly. If it was just a boyish passively attractive english actor in the role, none of these themes would be present. It would just be a comfy silly romcom alt history movie

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Post-credits scene in a pub where Nicholas Lyndhurst shows up and goes, "Oi, you that bloke who tried ripping off The Beatles in an alternative reality?" Then Del Boy falls through the bar.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It would have been better if there was an actual fricking plot with conflict.
    >I'm the only one who remembers The Beatles!
    >now I'm famous!
    >now my hot friend is upset with me for no reason?
    >plagiarism is bad so I'll give away my music for free
    >now hot girl likes me for no reason again
    >the end

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the beatles are straight crap. i gave them an honest go, but it's boring 60s music. clearly i've been filtered

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Even the white album?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How exactly can you listen to Revolver, Sgt. Peppers and White Album yet still be filtered?

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Sar do you like the Beatles

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It would have been pretty dogshit regardless, the film just feels like a mess. It's so bizarre that in a romcom that's also showing reverence for The Beatles the romantic climax of the film has an Ed Sheeran song play over it. I honestly didn't even think the Indian guy was bad in it.

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >no mark david chapman suit-up post credit scene

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The French did it better

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Not seen it and will never watch it because they casted a paki pajeet.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This probably sums up what happened to the movie.

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If the Beatles never came out in the 60s other bands would had never come out as well, the whole music scene would have been completely different, with different highly influential bands taking their place.
    I would argue not only music but the entire world would be in a difference place, as their cultural influence was huge.
    Is this addressed on the movie or is it just
    >lol beatles never existed but other than that the world is 100% the same
    If this is the case, I don't think Beatles songs would be that popular with a 2000+ audience.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Work on your suspension of disbelief anon. Sometimes there's an outright error like "what if the Nazis won World War II?" and then a current world map shows "Czechoslovakia".
      Other times it's the Nazis won, and a background character is eating corn flakes and if you think about the history of corn flakes does that mean there was a US trade agreement and would it still be the Kellogg Company and would the packaging be in English where do they get the corn wouldn't culture around breakfast be different to the real world to begin with and and and.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Most of the time people throw around the whole "suspension of disbelief" thing to excuse poor or lazy writing.
        I can believe something like bttf because even though time travel is not exactly a realistic premise, it has a lot of in-universe details thought out that make the whole thing believable, it's also executed properly so you don't have to force your "suspension of disbelief" as it's something that just happens naturally.

        I'm just asking if they took the extra mile here or went the "jsut turn of you're brane bro :)" route, which I suspect the latter might be the case as per your comment.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          autism

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the beatles were inspired by american acts like the crickets, the 60s scene would still exist without them you'd still have the rolling stones the yardbirds etc

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Beatles wrote The Rolling Stones first hit

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >the 60s scene would still exist without them
        I'm pretty sure of it too, would have been just way different, and I was just asking if it was addressed properly in the movie or not.

        autism

        Well, yeah.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Just like every hit boomer band, they were a product of their time. If they hadn't made it big, someone else would've filled the same spot. israeli producers were pushing anything and everything that could chip away at society so we'd still be in the same place in terms of music if the Beatles hadn't existed

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >we all shit in a designated street
    >a designated street
    >a designated street

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Its a good idea for a story that they couldn't make very interesting.

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    People can't relate to brown skinned pajeets because they're not human

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yes, race mixing is disgusting and unnatural. There's a reason you only ever see porn addicts and cucks approve of it

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    putting aside poltarded race obsession, the really interesting thing about this is that the original story was that the main character would sing the Beatles songs but wouldn't get famous because the idea was that the Beatles were succesfull because of time and place.

    Richard Curtis is the epitome of British belief in meritocracy and so changed the entire way it unfolds

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How is it /misc/ that obsesses over racemixing? It's in every show and in every ad. /misc/ isn't making these shows. Since the media industry is controlled by israelites, it's clear the obsession lies with them. We're just ~~*noticing*~~.

      Why are israelites obsessed with racemixing, Cinemaphile?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >we
        we
        >we
        we
        >we
        we
        >we
        we

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          So why are are israelites obsessed with racemixing? What's that about?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Because the caucasian homonid nearly wiped out their neanderthal ass.
        >Twice
        Once in pre-history and once in the last 100 years.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Brownoids need to project

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >I’m not obsessed. I just get upset that there isn’t racist forced separation of different skin pigments and ethnicities in media

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You mean like there was for thousands of years? You don't have a right to live near white people, pajeet no matter how obsessed with us you are

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Race mixing is unnatural and forced though, only ugly beta males like you are obsessed with pushing it

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Was a leftist that didn’t give a shit about it a decade ago and still don’t give a shit about the actual couples, but the push is undeniable, fake and manipulative, and it’s especially funny and embarrassing to see every race of nonwhite male shamelessly hope and beg and plead for the inorganic propaganda push to favor them, like ugly indians that were psyched on RRR and praying for a bollywood push, asiancels thanking god for k-shit and even homies openly hoping that young girls grow up on porn. Nonwhite males have gotta stop larping like they have beliefs, you’re now just an inferiority complex that sprouted an identity.

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Stones >>> Beatles

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I doubt if I slipped into a universe without the Beatles I'd ever notice.

  22. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If the Beatles songs came out now they would sink without a trace. Beatles were revolutionary for the time and their worship is based on that but tastes change. Love me do, I wanna hold your hand etc would never get to no.1 as original songs now.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Were they even that original back then? Most of their early stuff isn’t that different from the doo-wop, 50s rock and even other contemporary bands that were out there like the Animals, the Kinks, and even The Beach Boys. I think they just hit whatever tipping point you see from other ‘mediocre’ acts like BTS and Taylor Swift, where they just get the right push at the right place and time and explode in popularity.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Love me do, I wanna hold your hand etc would never get to no.1 as original songs now.
      No shit, you picked songs that epitomize the 60s style of songwriting. If you go into their later catalogue, I could absolutely see a song like Hey Jude get popular if it was sung by Ed Sheeran or Here Comes the Sun played by one of those homosexual nu-folk artists.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Well those were number one singles anon. A big problem with the movie is that it supposes that if the Beatles were magic’d out of existence but music was otherwise exactly the same, you could become a sensation by reintroducing Beatles songs into the world. Not a couple songs here and there depending on the band, you could just play I Saw Her Standing There on acoustic guitar and everyone would flock to you

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I get what you're saying, I just wouldn't call the Beatles "revolutionary" in their first few years. Other than being a very talented and successful band, they didn't really "change music" until Rubber Soul when they started experimenting with new recording techniques and introducing styles unheard in pop music. Like, if Rubber Soul had been their first album, I don't think popular music would have progressed any differently without their earlier hits.

  23. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Beatles fatigue. Boomers have been in control of culture since they were teens and have never let go. No one forces Perry Como or Duran Duran down culture's throat like the Boomers have done with the Beatles. They were a talented group and have some good tunes. Same is true for many other groups, why are the Beatles deified? Probably because they represent the Boomer's youth which they've never been able to let go.
    Once the Boomers die off, the Beatles likely will become as obscure as Artie Shaw.

  24. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >In the town where I was born
    >lived a man who had to pee
    >Any time he had to go
    >He's drop a load right in the stree
    >We all shit in a designated street
    >A designated street
    >A designated street.

  25. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    this movie wasn't meant for you lmao. it was meant for women and brown men living in the west so get over yourself. it was a mediocre romcom, but it had some good moments.

  26. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Here’s how to fix this movie (besides replacing the Indian as OP already mentioned)
    1. The world should revert to a pre-Beatles state, musically, as a result of their nonexistence. Otherwise, what’s the point of them not existing? The Beatles don’t exist, and so now the entire world listens to skiffle and crooners and doo-wop. It’s true, as other anons pointed out, that the British rock scene already existed and if the Beatles didn’t exist someone else would have taken their place, but for the sake of the story we need to act like music just hasn’t evolved past 1962.
    2. Give the main character a band. This can create conflict within the movie, because he wants the band to recreate the entire Beatles discography in order, and he is trying to force the band to conform to his decade-long vision. Maybe make him a bit insecure in the beginning of the movie, because even though he started the band he’s the less creative/talented one of the bunch. The dynamic changes once he can remember the Beatles and they can’t. But then he starts to act unreasonable. “You can’t play your twelve-string yet. You can’t play that until our third album.” “We’ll need to create two versions of this song, with different drummers.” And of course, he refuses to let any other members songs appear on albums, because they’re not Beatles songs.
    3. Yesterday establishes he’s not the only person to remember the Beatles, but handwaves the others off by making them not musicians. This is another potential source of conflict that could have made an interesting story. There’s a girl out there playing Beatles songs who doesn’t get big, until she publicly accuses the main character of stealing her original songs. She has proof she released them first, it’s a big scandal, the band breaks up, his label abandons him. Eventually they’ll meet, there’s some obvious tension due to the circumstances, but they bond over their love of the Beatles and the fact they’re the only two people who remember they exist.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      4. In this universe, the reason the Beatles never formed is because John Lennon never met Paul McCartney. They go on a quest to bring John and Paul together. Or maybe all four members, it doesn’t matter. Once this is accomplished, they’re magically transported back to their own universe where the Beatles exist, and both of them are back to being unsuccessful musicians. But now they have each other. The movie ends with them in a relationship and making music together.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Good stuff, anon. A scene where the main character recreates Revolution #9 and insists it be on the album would be quite funny

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >random anon has a better creative vision than 100+ people involved in a 30$ million picture

      Every single time

  27. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He is why I didn't bother seeing it and is still why I haven't bothered seeing it, so you do have a point OP.

  28. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >In Poopy Lane, there is a sar showing photographs
    >Of every vagene he's had the pleasure to know
    >And all the people that cum and go
    Stop and pull their pants down low

  29. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I think it was too fundamentally flawed. The main character was annoying on a fundamental level beyond being a poo, the jokes weren't funny, the celeb-worship was tiresome, and the plot wasn't very engaging. It felt like a first draft which hadn't been properly hammered into shape yet, and I really don't understand who the main audience was. It was just a bad movie which only got greenlit because it was an interesting premise.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What’s funny is the first draft sounds better, then once the studio bought it they changed it. In the first draft the guy never gets famous, he just plays Beatles music and is baffled at his lack of results when they made it big.

  30. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The White erasure/genocide theme is the only reason the movie even got made.

  31. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >SHIT TOGETHER
    >RIGHT NOW
    >IN THE STREET

  32. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Brown man shitting in the dead of night
    >Wrote some Java code that won’t compile
    >All his life,
    >He was only waiting for a clean street to defile

  33. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    shitting lane is in my ears and in my eyes
    there beneath the blue indian sky

  34. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >I'd like to be under the Ganges
    In an pajeet's shitter in the street

  35. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This movie could have been amazing if Mark David Chapman was a character. The pajeet is getting famous off the Beatles' songs, everything is going great, and then one day he receives a fan letter from MDC. The rest of the movie becomes a thriller where he's paranoid that he's gonna get Lennon'd while his record label keeps pushing him to do public appearances. (End of the movie is him finding out Catcher in the Rye has also never been written, so it turns out he's in the clear (until in the post-credits scene it's revealed that a black woman is writing it, thus setting up a heart-pounding sequel))

  36. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Girls love BIC big Indian wieners.

  37. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Would this have been better received if they removed the needless racemixing angle by casting a Ben Whishaw or Nicholas Hoult?
    yes, obviously

  38. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why are the Beach Boys less popular than the Beatles despite being a way better act?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Hamstrung by being forced into surfer music too long and the talent behind it the songs has severe mental issues.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Sgt. Pepper? That’s kids stuff, here’s how I would have done it
      >never finishes it

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *