Wow. Just wow. Homophobic much tv? I mean its a literally the current year I expected much better from TV

Wow. Just wow. Homophobic much tv?
I mean it’s a literally the current year… I expected much better from TV

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm literally shaking reddit

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Wasn't it just recently that a whole shitload of leftist reviewers and bloggers kept repeating the mantra about how "Shows don't have to be for everyone" and if you don't like something you should just say "This isn't made for me".

    Funny how that only goes one way.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >then don't watch it, no one is forcing you to
      >NOOO NOT LIKE THAT!!!!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      There's a differenve between a film not being your cup of tea and actively avoiding it due to prejudice, chud.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Shut the frick up

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >taking the bait

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >le only pretending

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              he was obviously only pretending, moron

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Well here's a thing then. A romantic comedy genuinely doesn't interest me. Regardless of the leads or material. Could be great. Don't fricking care. It's a romantic comedy, they're all fricking trash.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >differenve
        This troons so made he can't even type lmao

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >There's a differenve
        lol lmao
        have a nice day troony

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >actively avoiding
        you can't actively avoid anything unless someones forcing you to go.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        no

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You're the biggest moron on this entire board.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >actively avoiding it
        What? No. I just don't give a frick. I never go to the cinema anyway

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        gr8 b8 m8

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      no, i think they temporarily abandoned that mantra when people used it as a reason to not watch 'turning red'

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They didn't, they were using it a shitload to justify the "racism" towards House of the Dragon.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Turning Red was kino

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They were saying that when they thought the people who complained about the woke shit were a tiny minority. Now that it turns out even normies won't watch woke shit unless it had some other draw (big name actor or part of a successful franchise already).

      It is fun to watch them pivot from, "don't watch it because it isn't made for you" to "you HAVE TO watch this because it is important to the culture war".

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Homophobic
    I'm not homophobic. Phobia implies fear. I'm not afraid of homosexuals. I hate them.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You know what they say, know your enemy. Go see the movie then

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Hello Billy.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >You know what they say, know your enemy.
        I already know my enemy, I've seen the pictures from the Folsom Street Fair. I cannot unsee them.

        >Go see the movie then
        No.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      More importantly, it is implicitly irrational or unfounded.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      gaycist

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Work next to a radio for 8 hours a day. Was hearing ads for this all last week, but not a peep today.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why the frick do they expect “support?” Just make a good film and people will watch it, fail to do that and people will still watch it if it’s serviceably entertaining, fail to do both and you only have yourself to blame. Especially if you’re making mid market trash. An art film getting btfo at the box office is a tragedy if it’s good and the director deserves genuine credit for their achievement, but why would anyone need to support a multi million dollar project? You’re not a goddamn charity. I’m sick of this shit.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      1 art film getting btfo at the box office is a tragedy, 1million art films getting btfo at the box office is a statistic.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Because it’s not film, it’s propaganda. They’re upset because it isn’t working.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Damn straight people *shakes fist*

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        DONT

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This trend of multinational corporations and actors screaming at the general public for not consuming their products is really fricking bizarre. It's so just so unhinged that these people feel entitled to earn massive profits and be successful.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >LISTEN I'VE GOT 2 MONTHS TO MAKE SOME CASH BEFORE ALL THE GOOD UKRAINIAN CHILDREN ARE BOUGHT UP SO YOU WILL WATCH MY SHITTY MOVIE

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    make good movies for a broad audience then instead of pandering homosexual shit. not saying homosexual shit doesnt have its niche but plan your budget accordingly
    >budget 22 million
    you needed to half that, and then take half of that. how the frick does this cost 22 MILLION

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >how the frick does this cost 22 MILLION

      round the clock cast monkeypox tests

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If you don't watch this corperate goyslop you are racist to pedophiles or something

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    can gay people be funny?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      fez whatley is the only funny gay ever, mostly to laugh at

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So he's either slurring generic audiences erroneously as homophobic, or validating any actual homophobes who will simply enjoy its failure. Has he thought this through?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You don't understand what these words mean anymore. For example if you refuse to date a trans person, any trans person who asks, you are transphobic.

      Please read your New Dictionary so you are up to date on the Correct Speak.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Straight people will never let LGBT films into their little safe spaces it's sad but true. Claim to be 95% supportive of gay rights and then spit on us when we barely ask for any support.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      We were just offering lube

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Actually straight men have the same reaction to seeing male on male love as seeing swarming maggots

      It’s instinctual.

      I have gay friends, but I would never want to see their love life

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        That's called projecting, straight men should have no reaction when they see 2 men kiss but closeted right wing religious nuts will lose their minds and are secretly fricking all their friends husbands.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >that's called projecting
          Is it now? https://www.psypost.org/2017/06/straight-mens-physiological-stress-response-seeing-two-men-kissing-seeing-maggots-49217

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Cope. No one likes your homosexualry and you can't do anything about it.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          keep coping pickle kisser

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Think of it in terms of evolution

          The men that didn’t want to frick other men due to disgust had babies with women, and the ones that did want to all died out

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          gay people in 2008:
          >it's not like we're forcing you to watch us make love to each other. don't be bigoted
          gay people in 2022:
          >if you don't like watching us make love to each other that just means you're homophobic

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          There are multiple peer reviewed studies that demonstrate men’s instinctual disgust towards homos, moron. And the visceral instinctual disgust is the same regardless of political affiliation. Liberals just hide it better, kek.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Do you want me to pull out the studies about homophobic men popping erections when exposed to gay porn?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I'm not that anon, but 'homophobes' =/= normal straight men. The latter put up with gays just fine, but still find the sight of them kissing instinctively repulsive. It's pure 'transphobes just want to frick me' style cope to suggest otherwise.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I bet you think it’s unfair straight people can reproduce toojvo2y

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Neutrality implies acceptance but your way of life is just wrong on every basic level so a thinly veiled disgust is about as courteous as I can be

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >t. feces blood and semen purveyor

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I'm in the same boat. The sight of gay men kissing is viscerally repugnant, regardless of political feelings on marriage equality etc. I dare suggest normies also feel this way, albeit internally, and really opted to dodge this film.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Normies do feel this way, psychologists have even done studies proving it kek.
          Here’s one from 2017:
          https://www.psypost.org/2017/06/straight-mens-physiological-stress-response-seeing-two-men-kissing-seeing-maggots-49217

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >make a movie that appeals primarily to 5% of the population
      >surprised when it fails because 95% of the population doesn’t want to see it
      They literally said this isn’t a “gay movie for straight people”. If straight people don’t watch it cause they don’t think it’s for them, who will?? There aren’t enough gays in the whole fricking country to make this movie a box-office success.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      We're well past negotiation. I don't support you.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Right?!
      It’s almost as if 98% of the population actually thinks homosexuals are absolutely disgusting and would rather watch a sheep get butchered then two fey and repugnant men act like 12 years old girls

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Straight people will never let LGBT films into their little safe spaces
      society at large is not a "little safe space" you stupid shitposter. normal people don't relate to gay culture or humor, so gay films fail in a market of 98% normal people. go figure.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      good. I hate you

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I've had a few gay friends in my life. I always said I don't care what you do in the bedroom but that doesn't mean I want a front row seat to the show. That is especially true these days when you guys literally have to flaunt it in front of everyone unashamedly, including innocent children. Go back to acting like gay men did in the 50's while in public and no one would have a problem with you.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >safe spaces
      >gays march down the most public street in every city in america waving flags, wearing strap ons and assless chaps once or twice a year
      >Leftists can't pass a federal bill creating an actual right to gay marriage so they have to abuse the Supreme Court to create an imaginary right that the people don't want
      >Pride weekends have turned into pride months
      >gays invade disneyland once a year

      It's never been about having "rights". It's just a bunch of mentally ill losers whose fetish has become their whole identity. T

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >ask for any support.
      >you have to buy movie tickets to support the cause.
      Bizarre narcissism

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    how long until he pulls the antisemitism card too when he gets noticers tweeting him replies?

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don't even like straight romcoms, why the frick would I watch a gay one?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This. No straight man is going to watch any romcom, and no straight woman (romcoms’ primary demographic) are going to watch a movie where all the characters are men and all the romance is between men. That leaves just the lgbbq homosexuals (5% of population).
      That’s simply FAR to niche to succeed in Hollywood.
      There’s a reason most big movies are samey, mass produced goyslop made in a corporate boardroom - it’s to appeal to the lowest common denominator possible. It’s also the reason R rated films make less money - families with children are about 30-40% of all moviegoers. Any movie that is R is basically accepting a 40% cut in its box office revenue.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Lgbt is far less than 5%. Its barely 10% in democratic cities. Now imagine taking a sample of humans from democratic cities where they get these stats and add normal humans across the first world and even worse third world where they don't need to pretend to be gay for brownie points yet.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It’s probably something like 10% in liberal areas, 5% in moderate areas and 1-2% in conservative areas.
          This is probably the reason everyone overestimated this movie. Hollywood is a liberal bubble filled with gays. Just because your gay movie does well at its LA premiere doesn’t mean it’ll fly in Utah or Kentucky.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >it’s to appeal to the lowest common denominator possible
        i.e. Cinemaphile users
        who have the delusion their edgieness and having the gays rent free in their head makes them special (if anything it's pretty obvious a lot of them are gays in the closet if they have so much gayness rent free).

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        How did broke back mountain become successful bros

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          did it even??

          but let's say it did - I could list a bunch of reasons:
          >ang lee had a great reputation as a director
          >one or both of the protagonists are bound to be every woman's type
          >it was about "classy" romance and tragedy for the most part so fairly easy to tolerate even as a sane man (i don't remember being disgusted by it and I'm disgusted by most homosexual stuff, even just two dudes holding hands)
          >had a good soundtrack
          >got rave reviews
          >most people who saw it liked it as well

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You wouldn't like me when I'm Ang Lee.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The time of troony is over. The time of the chud has just begun

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This is how we win. Stop watching Rings of Power, House of the Dragon, The Witcher, superhero movies, nuhorror movies, etc. If we just stopped paying the israelites to make demoralizing and antiwhite propaganda they'd stop making so much of it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yep, it's so incredibly easy.
      Stop crying about it on social media.
      Stop review bombing shit.
      Stop giving it ANY publicity whatsoever.
      Just don't give them your money.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Nice try sodomite israelite

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The israelites (aka, you) love the bad publicity. Any publicity is good. They can shit out stuff like Rings of Power, and blame racism for why it's doing so poorly. The average person believes it and demonizes white males.

          Any racist post on social media just fuels their ability to portray it as such. Stop falling into their traps, you idiots.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >The average person believes it and demonizes white males.

            no, no they don't

            twitter bots are not real people

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              This. Too many people use Twitter as a barometer for the real world when it's not even close.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I love the complete idiocy that leads to people believing this.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You deny that’s true?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Anon, you're posting an edited twitter cap as if it's true information.
                Please don't be so dense.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's only inaccurate as we now know that only 5% of Twitter users are actual people, so it's even worse than that.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's bullshit but I believe it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Can't tell if you're trolling but it's well-known information by now.
                https://nypost.com/2019/04/24/twitter-doesnt-reflect-how-most-americans-think-study/

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >2019

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Ah yes, three whole years.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's post Trump now moron, everything has changed for the better.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >inflation
                You only think that because you unironically live in your mothers basement

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                His policies still effect us a few years on moron

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It wasnt trump printing money this year that started the inflation.
                How is it you people have laser precision political talking points for people you hate yet never bother to keep up with current event?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                What do you mean " you people"?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                you unironically live in a sewer like a ninja turtle

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                see

                It wasnt trump printing money this year that started the inflation.
                How is it you people have laser precision political talking points for people you hate yet never bother to keep up with current event?

                What do you mean " you people"?

                >What do you mean " you people"?
                Idiots who dont keep up with current events

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >ignoring what caused these events
                Why are you people unable to think back to cause of the effect?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >trump out of office
                >Biden now in office
                >Biden passes bill to print billions of dollar
                >This causes inflation, he is the cause, the effect is inflation
                >this is trumps fault
                Because trump can't time travel

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The trump defence force is here lol. Absolutely obsessed all these years on.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                i didnt vote for either of them i actually voted for Hillary im just not moronic enough to think Biden is a good president.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Did you pokemon go to the polls lol

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >seething so hard he doesnt even make sense anymore

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >he

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >seething so hard she doesnt even make sense anymore
                As expected from a woman

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Rule 3 covers sexism too.
                Last warning

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                What was sexist about the comment moron?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Hmm let me explain, maybe the derogatory stereotype you fricking virgin

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                What was the stereotype you braindead frickwit?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                See

                >seething so hard she doesnt even make sense anymore
                As expected from a woman

                I'm talking to an idiot hah

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Point out which part is the sexist part? You should be able do that if you have two braincells to rub together.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >more stereotypes
                Incel vibe

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >troony couldnt answer a simple question
                Confirmed you don't have two braincells to rub together
                And you will never be a woman

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Lol fricking virgin hahahaha

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >seething so hard because you met your intellectual better
                lol lmao

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >save me jannyman!
                pitiful

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >inflation happens in a week
                moron

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Who said it happened in a week? Are you demented or just moronic?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                naturally most of the content is going to come from fewer users. that's just how things work. I had a twitter to follow mr robot and get free shit and I've never once posted.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                In truth even those numbers are inaccurate because 90% of all twitter posts come from astroturfing bots and paid shills.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >twitter bots are not real people
              HR bots are

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              huh, wut you mean?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                what is with the double first names?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                They are literally bots. Look at the usernames too.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Frick off. Calling out the israelite and degeneracy is the only way forward

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Keep the review "bombing"

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Hotd is pretty good

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    you are not owed my money, homosexual

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >hold my hand
    >no, that's not my hand

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    how does this homosexual know straights aren't seeing his flick? is he offering to suck off every dude who bought a ticket to see his gay rom-com, and literally every single person said yes? who the frick tabulates this shit

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Won't make movies that arent marketed towards me. washed up director judd apataw with 2000s tier humor + gay homosexual rom com? Yeah thats pretty fricking cringe.

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >actually believing that the vast majority of people aren't repulsed by gays

    This is your brain on Twitter.

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >"you are not the target audience"
    >"diverse representation so that not only white people watches things"
    >"don't like it? don't watch it"
    >wooow why didn't you watch my movie/show?
    White people literally have to do NOTHING to make others seethe. Based.

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    He's unironically 100% right. It IS because of straight audiences not wanting to see homosexualry that his film flopped. Thankfully most of the world's audiences are still straight

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I'd quite like to see a troony romance movie held up in the same way by critics just to see general audiences reject that too...

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Sorry Hollywood, I just didn't feel represented by this movie. Representation matters!

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Cinemaphile is actually gonna pretend like gay people aren't shitting on this movie too.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I mean if he's going to pretend that only straight people are shitting on it why should I disagree?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Cinemaphile is actually gonna pretend like gay people aren't shitting on this movie too.
      They're too busy shitting on each other to shit on this movie.

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    A gay comedy was never going to work, if a double act is going to be funny one of them needs to be the straight man.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      hehe

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >going to the movies as performative allyship
    These fricking lying morons, trying to believe that people go to movies to support causes instead of going to the movies to literally forget the outside world. If I’m straight, I don’t go out of my way to pay to see gay shit. Make it good like Moonlight and I’m there. Make it actually funny and then I’ll go to laugh. But I’m not paying you just because you are gay

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Im a straight man, and i dont go out and watch any rom-coms. Like wtf? Straight men have NEVER been the target audience for rom-coms. Why isnt he blaming women, the traditional target for romantic comedies?

    this is clearly an example of WOMEN being homophobic, not men. This shit completely blows me away. Im not going out and watching traditional rom-coms, why would i go out and watch gay rom-coms? Fricking hell. Im sick of being a target just because im straight and white, i cant help who i am, why must i be made to feel awful for being myself, when im supposed toncelebrate everyone else being themselves?

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If he put more truckers in it, the gays would make up for the lack of straights, for sure.

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >consume shit or be called homophobic
    I'm ok with being a homophobe.

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don't like seeing gay people in real life, so why would I pay money to watch a movie about sodomy?

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    He's only partially right, but isn't afraid to say the full truth. Yes, straight people are not going to see this movie. But who's fault is it actually? The same people who are responsible for most problems.

    Women.

    Rom Coms are made for women. No man, straight or gay, wants to go see a rom com. They go because women like to self insert into them and it works for their primitive brains. Women can't self insert into a gay romance and are disgusted by gays, so they aren't going. And if they aren't going, men aren't going with them.

    But you can't say this out loud. How well do you think this would be received if he said "Women are to blame for the movie's poor performance"?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      But I like wedding crashers and am a man 🙁

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      women love gays moron, 90% of lgbt support is from women while the vast majority of men hate gays

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        lol no, you've spent too much time on Twitter. Women love to support theoretical gays, the gays they never have to see or meet or give money to. They absolutely are disgusted by real gays and hate them.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >women love gays moron, 90% of lgbt support is from women
        only libcuck women, normal women thing of gays as inhuman

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        they like gossiping with them not watching them buttfrick each other

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They love gays as the sassy friend to the female lead, not the actual lead.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Dumbass

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Women will pay lip service to the gay cause to appear virtuous (and out of fear of social ostracisation otherwise). They don't, however, want to see two men kissing on the big screen.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It's the same way they pretend to support Black folk.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            That Karen would be wife material if she didn't feel the need to lie about her intentions

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            not a single thing in this comic is false or unjustified.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            It never bothered me too much until I see my sister making problems in her own life completely by choice which ruin my neices lives too

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            even worse than pretending is actually doing it. some mothers want their children to suffer because of their white guilt.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >sister gets £300 a week from council
            >doesn't work
            >instead of looking after her kids she sends one to nursery three days a week for four hours at a cost of £100 a week
            >bills per week are £35
            >has £165 to feed her and two kids and get everything else for them
            >still orders £30 takeaways each night
            >she went down to the council to demand more money because she can't survive
            I hate women. I hate them

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      No its his fault and the networks fault for ever thinking there was demand for this. Blaming women either means you're a shitskin or a closet homo. Him blaming people his product was not intended for for not buying his product proved he's a dumb gay who should kill himself and should be a homeless dumpster diver not a director.

      >make wheelchair
      >those who can walk don't buy it
      >oh my god why so lamephobic

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >No man, straight or gay, wants to go see a rom com.
      40 Year Old Virgin was kind of a fluke, and Apatow has been spending the rest of his career trying to catch lightning in a bottle twice.

      I think it was so popular because it was kind of a rom com disguised as a bro comedy.

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Lol he's not going to win with this angle. Even Reddit caught on to the narrative he's trying to push.

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Search billy eichner on Twitter and it seems literally everyone despises him lel

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    THAT'S WHAT YOU GET FOR FRICKING WITH ME ON THE STREET

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Just watched the trailer out of morbid curiosity and I have no idea how they are surprised it failed. All the characters are caricatures of what straight people thought gays were like in the 80's and it constantly mocked straight people. He should be more surprised anyone went to see it at all.

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    how much homos are there even? it must be like below a percent of the world population, makes you wonder why the alphabet gays are so loud on the internet

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They make solid points, most people with functioning brains can see that and agree, even if they're straight

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >1999: we just want to be able to get married
    >2022: if you don't want to pay to watch gay porn in the theater you are a bigot

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >le slippery slope fallacy is not real!!
      it's hilarious how quickly we were proven right.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        it already happened in the past under the mantle of sexual revolution

        https://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/the-sexual-revolution-and-children-how-the-left-took-things-too-far-a-702679.html

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Remember when these same people that are stripping in front of children were insisting that they were doing things in the privacy of their own bedroom and it wasn't your business?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      someone post that leftist comic from like 20 years ago with the list of "things that wont happen if gay marriage is legal" and they all came true after gay marriage was made legal.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          oof

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Back in the ‘90s gay marriage wasn’t even really an actual debate. The vast majority of people both left and right understood that the whole concept was fricking stupid.
      The first country to introduce gay marriage (Netherlands) didn’t even do so until 2001.
      Gay marriage didn’t enjoy majority support among liberal voters until around 2007.
      In 2008 even fricking CALIFORNIA voted against gay marriage.
      Gay marriage is a concept that didn’t even fricking exist until ~25 years ago, and didn’t gain majority support until ~10 years ago.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        When Obama ran for President, he was against gay marriage

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Exactly. At the time (‘08) gay marriage was sitting at about 50% liberal support but less than 20% support among moderates. No matter what stance he took he’d alienate half the Democrats’ base, so he went with the option that pleased the moderates.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        No one gives a shit about marriage. It's an outdated and irrelevant system

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >t. "I just don't understand why society is collapsing around me"

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        muh traditions muhh keep it old
        morality is based but dont turbosperg out about it i guess. two humans, both adults? have at it morons

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Degenerates need to be stopped. Spreading aids and monkey pox along with all matter of STD's is spreading misery too.
          >but muh tradition
          is rooted in common sense sometimes. Dont stick your dick into every hole you can get your hands on should be basic b***h level of self awareness but for some reasons homosexuals think they're being oppressed when you tell them to stop fricking.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            i agree, i heard in canada they have homosexuals smoking blunts, naked - in front of 12 year olds during pride parades. its simply gone too far. this is an absence of religion really

            >your brain on neoliberalism

            i dont think any adults should be stopped from marrying, simple as

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >adults
              You will be a bigoted chud in approximately 5 years

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                i already am despite having a bf

                nothing wrong with nudity and nothing wrong with marijuana.
                >absence of religion
                sounds like a utopia to me

                yeah but its in front of impressionable minors who shouldnt be seeing that sort of thing at their age

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You boyfriend fricks other men and he doesn't consider it cheating.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                weirdo, we've been monogamous from the beginning... a decade now? and our body count starts and ends with each other
                coomers get the fricking rope

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Sure it does bud

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                not many people are blessed to have relationships that last thing long having both parties being virgins
                should make a cute rom com about it

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Have either of you fricked a woman?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                reading comprehension is not your strong suite, our body count before meeting each other is 0, nothing, nada, hadn't had a lick of sex prior to it.
                Cinemaphile morons barely have a grasp of how some homosexuals operate, and it's not entirely based off stereotypes either so slow your role

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                So you're both currently virgins

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                pretty much, we'll both be homosexual wizards soon enough ruling Cinemaphile, gayest of boards.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Are you the bottom?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                we're both bottoms, i'm the shorter manlet at 5'2 so i guess so

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >we're both bottoms
                That sounds annoying.
                And you dont get a vers or a top for both of you?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                either of us can vers depending on the mood. hes physically tiny but hes as big as a monster can down there. i'm more of a power bottom but this is conversation is getting silly so ill close the thread and continue doing laundry & go shitpost on Cinemaphile

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >either of us can vers
                Vers is not a verb, it is a noun. Top, bottom, and versatile.
                If you are both bottoms, then you are not vers.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              nothing wrong with nudity and nothing wrong with marijuana.
              >absence of religion
              sounds like a utopia to me

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >this is an absence of religion really
              No one wants to admit it either

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >your brain on neoliberalism

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Really the issue here is women not turning up. Men weren't anyway

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >my movie failed because of the people who didn't watch it
    Pretty much, but it's so obvious that there's no need to state it.

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why didn't the Elegy Beaty community turn up

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How does he know his movie didn't flop because enough homosexuals didn't to come out to see it?

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Can't wait for all the death camps for the straights who don't consume gay media.

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    HHHHNNNNNNNNNNNRRRRRRRNNNNNNNNNNN *plop*

    FRICK YOU TROONS, FRICK YOU homosexualS, FRICK YOU LEFTSHITS

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >FRICK YOU homosexualS,
      post dick

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The evolution of a story like this:

    >Reporter: do you think more straight people could have come out to see the movie?
    >actor: well that could be a component but there are other things at play here like XYZ
    >"""news website""": actor implies homophobia is to blame for movie bombing
    >Cinemaphile: why do you hate gays? look you ruined his movie
    Guaranteed 400 replies.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >implying things that never happened
      why are animegays such morons?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Could have been 399 replies if you would learn to ignore shitposting.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      There is no reporter, those were his own fricking tweets.

      But of course the animegay can't read and makes shit up. Don't you have more child porn to go download?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >The evolution of a story like this
        >like this
        Why do you hate literacy? Anons are killing the reading industry

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Anons are killing the reading industry
          >reading industry
          Black person, shut the frick up you write like absolute dog shit, you don't have any place to talk about literacy.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Shut the frick up and lurk more. Don't ever reply to me again without coming off so stupid.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >using a bunch of equally moronic headlines to justify yourself
              you need to stop posting

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Lurk more newbie. It's embarrassing that you can't recognize those headlines.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >I was only pretending to be moronic
                nice defense moron

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              millennial here. I had no idea we were so powerful and fearsome. based.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >actor

  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don't really like watching anyone kiss, let alone gays

  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How many straight men clamor to see ANY romcom?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I enjoyed Cashback.

  50. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    All they needed to do was make a gay capeshit and it would be the top selling movie of all time

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >gay capeshit
      Please.

  51. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I went and saw this by myself at a matinee. I am based.

  52. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I can’t believe the Chinese bot farm accounts that mass-liked all the promo for this movie didn’t go out to watch it

  53. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I have unironically watched an hour of gay porn with my buddies a few years ago and out of 4 of us 3 got a boners several times it's just natural instinct

  54. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I was hanging out with a gay guy and a women and the girl said that she would suck my dick if the gay guy did it first. So I said what the hell, and let him suck my flaccid penis for a while. No boner whatsoever. The girl then took over and it was like instant erection. I ended up cuming in her mouth.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You may not technically be a homosexual, but you’re still a degenerate

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        no lies there. I've also fricked a ladyboy raw dog (among several other female hookers) when I went to Thailand and came in "her" ass. Interesting how I had no problem getting it up that time.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Neat.
          I wonder if a bloke could get you hard with a handjob

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Gaylord

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It may be even gayer to engage in homosexual acts without actually being attracted to men.

  55. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    there weren't enough boos to keep my attention sorry,LGBTQRSTUV community

    ya wanna get married? fine ya wanna raise kids? fine
    but goddamit all dont blame me for your movie tanking..Disney does that shit all the time and Disney can eat it

  56. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    still at it with the outrage marketing huh

  57. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    oh free support
    going to stop by the support tree for a free giving of support

  58. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    just make the couple a tall man and a bratty manlet, shaved of course, not the "im gay xD" personality, just normal guys, age gap and boom there i saved your shitty movie

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
  59. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    When will gays learn? no one wants to watch you beig homosexual, go away

  60. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It wasn’t made for me.

  61. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Perhaps if every ad I heard didnt start with an insulting joke about straight people.
    I'm a homosexual and this movie sounded insufferable.

  62. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >i blame everyone who didn't see my movie for not seeing my movie
    *fart*

  63. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >DONT LIKE IT THEN DONT WATCH IT
    >flops
    A tale as old as time

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Morbid curiosity, girlfriends, social pressure

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        For

        How did broke back mountain become successful bros

  64. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Romcoms aren't exactly blockbuster hits in the first place.

  65. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The vast majority of people don't want to watch the homosexual movie? You know what the solution to this problem is in democratic countries with free markets, right? You put homosexualry and gratuitous homosex in EVERY Movie and remove all depictions of heterosexual relationships, that way, the people will have to consume it if they want to watch a movie. You will eat the goy slop.

  66. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Look. I have a gay family member. I don't judge people for being gay. It's your life. I may not agree with what you're doing but who am I to judge you? That being said....why would any straight person or couple go see a movie that is literally about homosexuality? Pic related, a friend of mine who isn't as tolerant as I am texted me this morning about the movie. They made gay movie about gay people doing gay things and they're mad that straight people didn't want to watch it?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What the frick did you mean there?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I was implying that watching the gay movie turned me a little gay and made me start walking around like Mr. Burns from The Simpsons.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Frick leftists and frick the woke.

  67. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Just watch the damn movie so they will stfu

  68. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    If they've sunk to the point of spamming Cinemaphile they are well past failure. This place doesn't move the needle at all.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >doesn’t move the needle
      it doesn’t do anything other than being forgotten and cast aside as footnote.

  69. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I dont watch rom coms and i dont like movies about homosexuals.

  70. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Evolution wise, why do gay people exist?

    Literally only thing I can think of is

    >tribe is breeding too much
    >get extras baby sitters/workers who don’t breed

    But nobody wants gays around their kids so that doesn’t work

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Evolution isn't real.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        So God makes sure people are gay.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          God gives you free will, and some turn from God.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            If God gives free will, then he doesnt know the future, and is not omnipotent.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Of course he knows the future. He gives you free will, and he sees what you will do with it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                If he knows the future, then I have no choice.
                unless I can prove God wrong.
                At which point - again - that is no God.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Evolution wise, why do gay people exist?
      Not every mutation is based on survival necessity. Especially in humans, we've spent millennia tossing the natural order out the window.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      So now I'm obligated to see movies?

      Some think the following
      >"Behavioral sink" is a term invented by ethologist John B. Calhoun to describe a collapse in behavior which can result from overcrowding. The term and concept derive from a series of over-population experiments Calhoun conducted on Norway rats between 1958 and 1962.[1] In the experiments, Calhoun and his researchers created a series of "rat utopias" – enclosed spaces in which rats were given unlimited access to food and water, enabling unfettered population growth.

      >Following his earlier experiments with rats, Calhoun later created his "Mortality-Inhibiting Environment for Mice" in 1972: a 101-by-101-inch (260 cm × 260 cm) cage for mice with food and water replenished to support any increase in population,[8] which took his experimental approach to its limits. In his most famous experiment in the series, "Universe 25", population peaked at 2,200 mice and thereafter exhibited a variety of abnormal, often destructive, behaviors including refusal to engage in courtship, females abandoning their young, and homosexuality. By the 600th day, the population was on its way to extinction. Though physically able to reproduce, the mice had lost the social skills required to mate.[6]

  71. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Lol I don't hate gay people but I love when "woke" shit fails and the creators blame everyone but themselves. Why would a "straight" guy watch a romcom at all?

  72. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    homosexualry is white supremacy

  73. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >this guy has literally eaten his own poop off of penis that just jizzed in his butt
    Lmao grosss

  74. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They keep calling him white. He’s israeli

  75. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I would rather watch Top Gun again.

  76. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >NOT ALL CONTENT IS MADE FOR YOU!
    >w-why aren't straight dudes watching our movie about ugly middle-aged israeli men having butt sex

  77. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >make movie pandering and relatable to a very small percentage of people
    >make a very small percentage of money

  78. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    poopdicks seething because no one cares about their disgusting lifestyle

  79. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >watch milk, call my by your name, bad education, tinker tailor solider spy ect
    >essential gay core because they’re interesting films.

  80. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Y-you're just homophobic. It's not the fact that my movie was shit at all.
    Yeah, I'm sure that was the reason. Brokeback Mountain was a movie about two gay guys, and it was highly successful. Imagine using your sexual orientation as an excuse for your own failure.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      No but it's like HISTORIC because it is technically a STUDIO MADE movie and not just a movie MADE by a pretentious indie label and DISTRIBUTED by a big studio!!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      did it even??

      but let's say it did - I could list a bunch of reasons:
      >ang lee had a great reputation as a director
      >one or both of the protagonists are bound to be every woman's type
      >it was about "classy" romance and tragedy for the most part so fairly easy to tolerate even as a sane man (i don't remember being disgusted by it and I'm disgusted by most homosexual stuff, even just two dudes holding hands)
      >had a good soundtrack
      >got rave reviews
      >most people who saw it liked it as well

      I just thought of another VERY IMPORTANT reason brokeback mountain was received very differently:

      gay stuff was not shoved in your face every day every where.
      >a movie about GAYS? sure, why not, never seen that before.
      meanwhile 14 years of woke big bank propaganda later it's
      >ANOTHER movie about gays?? who the hell keeps making these and who is supposed to watch them? certainly not me.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        That is stupid and overly complicated.
        Brokeback did well for two reasons:
        >it wasnt a romcom
        >it was a good movie

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          t. not yet sentient when brokeback mountain came out
          you don't realize that things really were different, even after 9/11. "western" society has changed RADICALLY over the last decade.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I'm almost 40.
            How old are you, child?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              31

              if you're 40 how do you not remember that sentiments on this sort of thing were vastly different in the late 2000s?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I remember better than you the reception for Brokeback when it came out.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                what was it like then?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Here, refresh your failing memory.
                Brokeback Mountain appeared on numerous American critics' lists as one of their favorite films of 2005.[98]

                1st – Stephen Holden, The New York Times
                1st – Joe Morgenstern, The Wall Street Journal
                1st – Rene Rodriguez, Miami Herald
                1st – Ruthie Stein, San Francisco Chronicle
                1st – Scott Tobias, The A.V. Club
                2nd – Peter Travers, Rolling Stone
                2nd – Lisa Schwarzbaum, Entertainment Weekly
                2nd – Noel Murray, The A.V. Club
                2nd – Desson Thompson, The Washington Post
                2nd – Kevin Thomas, Los Angeles Times
                2nd – Mike Clark and Claudia Puig, USA Today
                3rd – Owen Gleiberman, Entertainment Weekly
                3rd – Kenneth Turan, Los Angeles Times
                3rd – Shawn Levy, Portland Oregonian
                3rd – William Arnold, Seattle Post-Intelligencer
                4th – David Ansen, Newsweek
                4th – Keith Phipps, The A.V. Club
                4th – Michael Atkinson, Village Voice
                5th – Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times
                5th – Mike Russell, Portland Oregonian
                5th – Michael Wilmington, Chicago Tribune
                6th – Alison Benedikt, Chicago Tribune
                6th – Ella Taylor, L.A. Weekly
                7th – Nathan Rabin, The A.V. Club
                7th – Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle
                7th – Richard Roeper, Ebert & Roeper[99]
                8th – Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle
                Top 9 (listed alphabetically) - New York Film Critics Online
                10th – Michael Phillips, Chicago Tribune
                Top 10 (listed alphabetically) – Manohla Dargis, The New York Times
                Top 10 (listed alphabetically) – Steven Rea, The Philadelphia Inquirer
                Top 10 (listed alphabetically) – Peter Rainer, The Christian Science Monitor
                Top 10 (listed alphabetically) – Carina Chocano, Los Angeles Times

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                "great reviews" was literally a point on my original list of differences.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                And then you went moronic and sperged about how things was different back when I was young.
                The answer is simple and uncomplicated.
                >not a romcom
                >was a good movie
                Doesnt take society drastically changing and woe to your memberberries to figure it out.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >gay stuff was not shoved in your face every day every where.
        >>a movie about GAYS? sure, why not, never seen that before.
        Films about Gays or with characters that happen to be gay were already common by 2005 though. The only difference is that none of them ever felt forced and overly manufactured like they do now. Makes you think.

  81. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm bi and didn't give a frick about this movie. I know I can't be the only one.

  82. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I dont really know of him that well but he's probably trolling with this. How many guys want to see a romcom in general let alone one with gays?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >How many guys want to see a romcom in general
      This, that should be pretty obvious

  83. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >DUDE STRAIGHT PEOPLE ARE FINISHED LMAO
    >w-why wouldn't straight people watch our movie
    Uh huh

  84. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >make thing that 99% of the population doesn't identify with or relate to
    >no one comes out to see it because there is no appeal
    >WOW WHAT THE HELL WAY TO SHOW SUPPORT YOU OWE US

    why is this the reaction?

  85. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >homosexuals, led their whole lives by progressives to believe they're the most important people on the planet, discover they're actually a very small minority and nobody cares about them
    God I hope trannies are next

  86. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >I hate gays!
    >*jerks off to lesbian porn*

  87. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Gay men aren't gay enough to watch a romcom

  88. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >make movie that appeals to less than 2% of the population
    >cry when it doesn't make 10s of millions

  89. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The one single ad I saw for this made me want to pull a Juicy Smollett

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >made me want to pull a Juicy Smollett
      A fake hate crime? That's fricked up.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yes except this time I'd prank then by making it real halfway through. They'll never see it coming!

  90. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    no one wants to watch disgusting fricking homosexuals.

  91. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why is Cinemaphile so homophobic now? Other boards like Cinemaphile or Cinemaphile aren't like this.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Cinemaphile
      >not "homophobic"
      so you've never been to Cinemaphile huh?
      let's keep it that way.

  92. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Gay romcom
    >Isn't about a buff guy and his femboy bf who he makes wear a wiener cage

  93. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What a fricking manchild

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *