I see these movies talked about constantly but the math doesn’t line up
About 1M people saw each movie WORLDWIDE.
Why is this nonentity of a movie getting a fricking trilogy?
Why is it talked about so much?
What other movies punch above their box office weight like this?
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
booba
Do they actually show Mia Goth’s breasts in these?
She’s funny looking but in Cure For Wellness they show her breasts and they are impressive
How hard is it for you morons to use aznude?
How hard is it for you to post her breasts?
Not gonna spoonfeed a moron like you.
I'm not him. I know IP Count # doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things, but the moment it was removed, all these psycho homosexuals start believing everyone is samegayging like them and they're having 1:1 discussions.
Mia Goth gets naked in everything, she gives a handjob and lets a guy suck her titty in Infinity Pool
Yeah Mia is like an American Eva Green or Lea Seydoux. I think they have to force her to keep her clothes on when she's on set.
she is british thoughbeit
Oh shit, I thought she was a burger this entire time
she has a lovely british accent
>Do they actually show Mia Goth’s breasts in these?
>She’s funny looking but in Cure For Wellness they show her breasts and they are impressive
Even better, she gets fricked by a BBC in X and you see everything.
Based. I also like how Jenna saw the BBC destroy Brittany Snow's vegana and was like, "Damn, I need a ciggie right now! That was hot!". And when her boyfriend ran out of ciggies, Jenna was like, frick you then I'm gonna bang this BBC. I don't smoke but that's why I always carry a pack of ciggies in case I run into Jenna irl.
a girl is not gonna frick you just because you give her a cigarette
this moron is talking about bbc and you think it's a serious poster who will read your reply and correct course
They will if they're British.
the only time Ive seen people talk about this movie irl was some girl at a shitty homosexual party where ppl were tripping off fricking poppers. the girl was bragging about stealing the Pearl Blu-Ray from the local Target.
gay parties suck wtf were you doing at one anon
These movies are ridiculously cheap to make, they are more profitable than most current big budget productions, and came out when theater attendance was still down because of covid.
Also, these movies go really hard as home media. Someone is making a lot of money of these films, it's not strange that they're making a new one.
Practically all online 'discourse' is driven by a tiny proportion of the population, less than 5%.
Something can be popular online but not really irl because it's more of a niche thing among people who spend their entire day's arguing on leddit or posting on twitter.com when everybody else goes to work, looks after their family or just generally has a life.
Sounds a lot like this board's obsession with trannies, gays, and vaccines
Theaters are dead
Some influencer must have watched the movies on the current hottest streaming service and the rest of the fan base probably experienced them through tiktok, reels, memes, and YouTube video essays about media literacy
>why is it getting a trilogy
X and Pearl were shot at the same time and released the same year, they only cost 2 million together and made ~ 25 million together. Essentially this is the same as a single film making around 25 million on 2 million budget. Undeniably a success and of course they would greenlight another sequel, especially if it's also not very expensive.
Also, obviously a lot of people watched it when it hit digital and physical releases, which added to the overall profit.
>X and Pearl were shot at the same time and released the same year, they only cost 2 million together and made
I've seen that unsourced "$1M" quote in several places and the only official mention I've actually found of it is someone calling it bullshit
It also doesn't include marketing and I'm telling you that I see these fricking movies advertised everywhere I go, which is why I checked out the box office figure thinking that it would be around $100M to justify the constant chatter.
I assume this made "some" money but it's not some box office miracle like Blair Witch that made 4000x its production budget
Maybe, but even so there would be no green lightning if it didn't make money.
Also, any money is good money, just cause it wasn't Blair Witch doesn't mean it's not worth anything in terms of profit. I also assume Ti West wrote MaXXXine long before, the trilogy was planned from the start, but he could only shoot two movies at once because MaXXXine takes place in a city while Pearl and X in the same rural area. So A24 is just fulfilling the vision Ti West had from the start for three films.
Are any of these movies actually good?
I liked midsommar even though it wasn’t scary and hereditary creeped me out a bit.
>X
mediocre, the horror really starts only aroudn the last third, literally has BBC cuck subplot, but when the killings start it's entertaining, plus the overall style is good
>Pearl
an improvement, main character has a pretty engaging arc, and even tho like X most of it is not really horror, it's more interesting to watch overall, and the stylization is yet again good
>and I'm telling you that I see these fricking movies advertised everywhere I go
literally nowhere. They've spent close to zero on marketing. Thread on Cinemaphile or some youtuber making a videoessay doesn't count as marketing
instead of wondering why ridley scott or guy ritchie are getting money for their movies, you are wondering why microbudget movies that were popular are getting a sequel. You're a special kind of moron
Terrorfier series
horror fans are the worst
They were good movies, generally well liked. X and Pearl were shot back-to-back. After their success A24 greenlit MaXXXine.
X was fricking dogshit.
>good movies
Jesus fricking Christ such shit opinion havers need to be forbidden from the internet.
>X was fricking dogshit.
Considering how tiny the budget was it's actually a really impressive film
And that makes it good how? Frick off with these useless tidbotrs.
>Its shit. But at least it was cheap!
It made money, critics liked it, audiences liked it, it was a breakout role for Mia Goth and Jenna Ortega. It's a successful and good movie by every metric, you probably can't even explain what's wrong with it.
Bad acting
Bad story
Boring kills
Drawn out
There is nothing good about it. The masses are wrong and so are you with your irrelevant garbage.
all untrue, you're malding
Zoom zoom
cope and seethe lil cucky
Do you have a vocabulary outside 4chin memes? Didn't think son you adhd zoomer homosexual.
You're still seething in the cuck corner? kek
Zoom zoom
Bet $1 on a game. Win and get $15 back. Why wouldn't you keep doing this?
>Why is this nonentity of a movie getting a fricking trilogy?
blumhouse strats: make for 1 milli, gross for 7-10
are you seriously that fricking dumb to imply people can only watch movies in cinema? Both X and Pearl were popular on streaming and on torrents too
>Why is this nonentity of a movie getting a fricking trilogy?
A24 doesn't care that some incels are triggered online. Two movies that cost basically nothing, made tons of money, critics liked it, audiences liked it and you're wondering why they are making a third? You literally can't believe how dare they make a movie that triggers your sensitivities. World doesn't revolve around you, mate
Because they're shown only in small arthouse cinemas which only exist in big cities. And then they only run for like a week or two.
Pearl and x had really tiny budgets so a lot more probably went into marketing and horror sucks at the moment. barely any solid horror movies have come out in the past couple of years.
i'll take pearl or x over the absolute garage horror movies we've had over the past couple years
>horror sucks at the moment.
horror is the only genre still pumping out good movies consistently
late night with the devil and immaculate were ok. longlegs and cuckoo look interesting but that's about it. most horror movies at the moment are just really bland possession movies or blumhouse.
I'm actually enjoying horror a lot lately, the slowburn arthouse style of the 2010s has declined a bit and directors are embracing a certain amount of schlock again
it's not good slop though. it's just kind of bland slop that isn't too rememberable
>When Evil Lurks
>Talk To Me
>Evil Dead Rise
>Smile
>Barbarian
>Malignant
a majority of these were also over a year or two ago and when evil lurks was just ok
I dunno, I still remember Terrifier 2 and The Pope's Exorcist just fine
they were both over a year ago though
first omen is great
talk to me is good
>Chuds are getting triggered by a movie that mocks them
heh