You usually say to trust the audience over the critics, so I guess that means the movie is really good. Or do you have some kind of cope excuse?
 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
|
You usually say to trust the audience over the critics, so I guess that means the movie is really good.
>verified reviews
lol
lmao
rt hasn't been worth shit since the site changes they made for marvel.
In order to understand the audience, you have to embrace, sniff, lick, wash and BE the audience.
too arrogant.
Wrong in every detail as always, atalker
Based patposting homie
Excuse me, do you hold the rights to that image?
Got it on license from Dan Mullen
Jesus, how many sinks did that set you back by?!
I’m not down any sinks, stlaker.
You. Are. Enjoy wet wipes.
You gays know "verified reviews" simply means people who bought the movie's tickets right?
and were willing to go through the trouble of proving that they did just to review a shitty flick
Nope, it's people who watched the movie. Why would they waste money and gas just to give a movie a positive review?
>
>source: my shill script
And look how that claim turned out.
Rings of Power was the most successful Amazon original, therefore its audience liked it. Which also means the low score are from people who didn't watch it and were just trying to sabotage the show.
The audience *didn't* like the Rings of Power. It had a 37% series completion rate, along with abysmal reviews across every platform.
B-b-but it only got negative reviews because of "angry chuds." And RT totally wasn't caught rigging the numbers. Neither were Amazon and IMDB.
It doesn't just mean that. It means people who decided to buy tickets in the U.S. through Fandango (no other ticket agent is accepted) before opening weekend and decided to leave a review. That creates selection bias as the people who are most likely to do that are super fans or even the crew who worked on the movie.
The newest God's Not Dead has a 100% verified audience rating. Does that mean it's an absolute crowd pleaser that no one on earth would dislike?
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/gods_not_dead_we_the_people
Good post.
I don't get why normies value RT at all. IMDB is the only one that matters.
>site owned by Warnermedia
>"they made the changes for Marvel!"
Get a cope that makes sense.
>"verified" ratings
There's my cope excuse. There are many like it but this one is mine.
You added an extra zero to the number of audience reviews. You also didn’t bother changing the filename here
I’m not angry at you, but I am disappointed, and I’m even more disappointed at everyone taking the bait.
Omg he is literally me
>OBJECTIVELY GOOD VS OBJECTIVELY BAD
fixed
If critics and audiences like a movie then it has a 50/50 shot of actually being good. If critics are the only ones who like a movie then we are looking at a pleb-filter OR a movie that critics were paid to defend. If critics hate a movie and audiences love it them we are looking at a movie that critics hate for poltitical reasons or a movie that critics hate because they don't know how to turn off their brains.
a movie you have to turno off your brain to enjoy is a bad movie
so black little mermaid is the movie all you /misc/gays have been waiting for then. The critics hate it while audiences love that shit. God you polyps are moronic. Go like black mermaid now to be a contrarian piece of shit I guess.
meanwhile, on twitter
black good
white bad
blackwash good
whitewash bad
What exactly are they saying? Are they actually reviewing the movie? Or is it all just "movie diverse, therefore good, im not racist" with no other details?
>verified reviews
🙂
>verified reviews
samgayging here to mention one more thing
There will never be a woke movie with a bad audience score ever again, unless it's so absolutely trash it would be too obvious to try and hide that.
Movies pretty mid. Not the worse of the live action Disney movies but not really the best either. It's perfectly in the middle. Scuttlebutt is still the worst song of the film.
Are you forgetting what they were caught red-handed doing when Rings of Power first came out?
>they
take your meds schizo
I mean Rotten Tomatoes. They were openly deleting negative user reviews. It was all over this board when the show dropped.
sorry, they/them*
Why are you defending Disney?
Story - 0 - no originality
Casting - 0 - the turtle is not black
Visuals - 0 - no colours
Average: 9
There's at least one colored
inb4 a bunch of newbies breaking rule 3
sigh...
do good reviews make that b***h less hideous?
I never trust rotten tomatoes on premise.
It is a choice of either good or bad, and most normies will pick good ass a cope so they don't feel stupid for paying for a movie and not liking it.
>do you have some kind of cope excuse?
pic 🙂
Disney really spent even more money to buy fake ratings? Did they learn nothing from Miss Marvel?
The people going to see it that would even be bothered to leave a review HAVE to give it a good review or else the CHUDs win.
You make this thread like six times a frickin day now.
And let's save time because this image always gets the same butthurt cope responses.
>Captain Marvel-
Was riding the success of a shitload of other successful movies, but it was the end of that. It was after this movie MCU shit started bombing. Brie Larson's career collapsed, her following on youtube died, Ms. Marvel is the least watched show ever on Disney+, The Marvels has the most dislikes of any MCU trailer ever.
>Black Panther
The merchandise sold like shit, and it's been documented beyond question that hundreds of celebrities and charity organizations raised money to buy up theaters worth of tickets to manufacture a success, but the toys didn't make money because there is no organic following, just rich narcissists who tried to tell kids what to like by buying up theaters.
>The Last Jedi
Rian Johnson's trilogy was cancelled, he was taken off the movies, the merchandise sold like absolute shit. There are piles of Rose and Finn dolls sitting in landfills that had been marked down to fifty fricking cents. Each sequel made less than the previous and by the time they got to Rise the audience for the biggest franchise on Earth had dropped by two thirds. They just shut down the Star Wars hotel taking a loss of billions.
>Wheel of Time
Genuine oversight, I thought they cancelled it, I mean the ratings are pathetic. I'll probably change it to reflect that, but I'm lazy. It's like "No one's watching that show, so it's as good as cancelled anyway."
>I liked Annihilation
Then you have bad taste for feminist slop with literal "I cucked my husband with a black man" subplots. You liking it is irrelevant, it ate shit at the box office.
Now if you call out any one of these but don't address the other 32 properties mentioned, that's kind of you acknowledging they all 100% failed, isn't it? Lying by omission.
Nobody ever bought out theaters. That's just Cinemaphile in denial over the movies being successful.
>Nobody ever bought out theaters.
Why the frick do ignorant frickwits like yourself make these claims without bothering to google so you don't look like complete idiots when someone else shows you how incredibly wrong you are?
https://filmschoolrejects.com/30000-kids-will-see-black-panther-thanks-charity/
https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2018/02/189738/octavia-spencer-buys-black-panther-screenings
https://www.billboard.com/music/rb-hip-hop/black-panther-challenge-kendrick-lamar-travis-scott-8220786/
https://thegrio.com/2018/02/14/black-panther-challenge-t-walmart-give-black-panther-tickets-atlanta/
https://popcrush.com/celebrities-black-panther-kids-screenings/
Completely fake, manufactured success. A bunch of wealthy celebrities bought out theaters because they thought the movie *should* be successful. And your b***h ass just ate your fricking words. Google next time to save yourself some embarrassment, stupid. Tired of ignorant asses like you.
Wow, the gave away a few thousand tickets to people. That sure affected the box office results a lot. 95% of your image is spot on, but to pretend Black Panther wasn't successful is just pure cope and denial. Surely there's something else you can replace it with.
>a few thousand people
The first item there alone spent 400k on buying tickets. If it's not a manufactured success why did all the merchandise sell like shit?
Oh shit, 400k out of 1.35b. You're right, how could it have ever succeeded without somebody buying out 0.03% of the tickets. Look, I know it's hard to admit that the superhero movie with black people in it was successful, but you can't always win.
No goalpost is being moved. Even if they bought out half the tickets, the movie would still be successful.
>Nobody ever bought out theaters. That's just Cinemaphile in denial over the movies being successful.
go to sleep kid
>Raya
Still made 130 million in theaters despite being released on streaming simultaneously, and ended up being the third most streamed movie of 2021.
You should put Mulan on there instead. It did much worse financially and got a far worse reception from audiences.
>chud trying to argue Captain Marvel and Black Panther flopped
Chuds will never admit they are wrong about something, kek.
I liked Men.
Saying that, I'm surprised it has a score that high.
one pic to btfo them all
I didn't (and won't) see any of those movies.
I haven't been to a theater in probably a decade, and I do not subscribe to a streaming service; in fact, I never have.
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_lion_king_2019
audiences are actually braindead. They gave the other live action remakes glowing scores despite being objectively the death of creativity and being complete wastes of time. When it comes to nostalgia, audiences are completely compromised.
If it's a big, heavily marketed movie, then both critic and audience scores are useless. The only indicator of quality is what I see of the movies themselves in the trailers.
Shills, troons and chuds can argue all they like itt about what has essentially turned into a propaganda tool (movie score sites), but the fact is most people are not interested in seeing this movie and think it looks shit. It will flop, whether they gaslight you or not with review scores detached from reality.
It's like those shitty evangelical Christian or Indian nationalist movies that have overwhelmingly positive reviews. Nobody but people who've drunk the kool-aid are going to watch something like that and leave reviews for it, so scores get very skewed and don't have the people who find the whole thing too repellent to watch.
Excellent examples.
>I liked Annihilation
Then you have bad taste for feminist slop with literal "I cucked my husband with a black man" subplots. You liking it is irrelevant, it ate shit at the box office.
You got filtered. The movie could not bang you over the head harder with the point that the protagonist was a self destructive person who set her own happily married life on fire, to the point that when the Shimmer copied her it just decided to kill itself.
>The movie could not bang you over the head harder with the point that the protagonist was a self destructive person who set her own happily married life on fire, to the point that when the Shimmer copied her it just decided to kill itself.
Not that anon what you said doesn't say anything about the movie's stance on interracial relationships. The writer-director is a mindbroken feminist who doesn't look down interracial relationships, cuckoldry and especially not feminism.
>The writer-director is a mindbroken feminist who doesn't look down interracial relationships,
Letting the nursing home hospice ward have an internet connection was a mistake.
>cuckholding
A movie having a character cheat on their spouse does not make it pro-cuckholding any more than portraying a murder makes a movie pro-homicide. The infidelity was clearly a negative thing with devastating consequences for their marriage and got both the protagonist and her husband killed/corrupted by the Shimmer.
>feminism
When (if) you have kids you're going to realize a lot of that is not actually bad, HR morons aside. Also, the book was about a group of women. They kept losing teams; if your previous expeditions are all dudes and the supernatural entity is making them go insane and kill each other it makes sense to test if women are affected the same way.
>Letting the nursing home hospice ward have an internet connection was a mistake.
He's quite literally a massive vocal feminist and all his films are given a feminist perspective. You should be in r/menslib not here, third rate homo.
> When (if) you have kids you're going to realize a lot of that is not actually bad, HR morons aside.
All of it is bad. That being said, let's get back to this.
> to the point that when the Shimmer copied her it just decided to kill itself.
I knew you were lying homosexual. It doesn't decide to kill itself. Lena kills it. This crux of this movie wasn't simply that Lena was self-destructive but that she should forgive herself for her mistakes(aka cuckolding her hubby). Her hubby forgives her as well.
>Her hubby forgives her as well.
3rd party, I don't remember it that way but I was high AF when the dubstep monster showed up
>I knew you were lying homosexual. It doesn't decide to kill itself. Lena kills it. This crux of this movie wasn't simply that Lena was self-destructive but that she should forgive herself for her mistakes(aka cuckolding her hubby).
Watch your own video again, after the wife sets the mimic on fire it passively stands there for a moment accepting its fate, then walks around first setting the husband's corpse on fire, then deliberately reaching out a burning hand to the (fungus?) on the wall and setting the lighthouse on fire, then crawling into the Giger-esque lair and laying down to die in the middle of all that. It stopped copying the protagonist after she handed it the white phosphorus grenade, setting fire to everything and passively accepting death rather than just ditching that particular mimic. It was able to handle the husband burning himself to death in the same way in the same room without destroying the Shimmer; the Shimmer kept going after the husband killed himself but accepted its destruction after copying the wife.
>Her hubby forgives her as well.
I don't recall this. As the husband kills himself, he tells the mimic copying him that "If you ever get out of here, find Lena."
That's pretty ambiguous and I don't read it as forgiveness. He's just been mindfricked by an alien bodysnatcher and he's telling the thing that corrupted and ultimately made him commit suicide to go find her. It's like if you were a victim of Dracula and told the vampire to go find your ex. If you mean how the husband and wife hugged at the end, at a minimum the husband was a replacement mimic and the wife was infected.
>Watch your own video again, after the wife sets the mimic on fire it passively stands there for a moment accepting its fate
Because it's barely human and doesn't know what to do. In fact, it often obeys the orders of the original which is what her husband's mimic does. A mimic copies almost everything you have....except your memories. It's not functional or even emotionally similar to the original nor has any of their baggage. They're their own person.
With Lena she killed her mimic but what got out of the shimmer wasn't her as well. The shimmer changed her and that change is forgiveness. As if a male feminist wouldn't redeem a female character.
It really depends on which one I agree with. If I like it and the critics do not, the audience are correct to like it, and vice versa
It's ok if people don't like something you do anon. It's ok, everybody hurts sometimes.
That JUST fish face
There's literally no way this score is legit. There's just not enough audience for the film itself. Even normies are sick of live-action remakes and getting tired of them. If anything it should have lower ratings solely because China would review bomb it. Reminder that Pinocchio got 27% and Peter Pan & Wendy got 11% rating. You do the math.
no not the verified reviews oh no no no
It is ma'am.
Sorry yidsney, I don't care, I won't give you money and I won't see your goyslop. Thank you.
>"""Verified"""
lol
lmao even
It's probably a great movie for black audiences.
Selection bias. Only people who already know about and like the worst thing about this movie would voluntarily go see it.
>verified audience, all 5 star ratings
>switch to "All Audience", well over half 1-star ratings
topkek
>YOU HAVE TO LISTEN TO THE RACIST CHUDS WHO NEVER WATCHED THE MOVIE!!!
How do you know they didn't watch the movie, though? And why can't I see an aggregate of "All Audience scores"? Could they be curating reviews at the behest of a favored set of studios? Hm...
>PEOPLE HAVING FUN WATCHING A MOVIE? IT’S A CONSPIRACY
>no argument
What argument would you like me to make to debunk your schizo delusion?
>What argument would you like me to make to debunk your schizo delusion?
You claimed all the people who aren't "verified" didn't watch the movie and are all racists, despite the fact that the negative reviews mention nothing about race. So prove your claim.
How much do verified reviews cost?
The movie is good. Stop being racist and enjoy some fun Disney kino. Let people enjoy things
You're so right anon. I'm a chud and I've been btfo. You should definitely go see The Little Mermaid this weekend. Better book your tickets now if you want to be guaranteed a seat
~~*Verified*~~
Imagine being a 28 year old black male culture warrior and having to go support The Little Mermaid this weekend. A pyrrhic victory if there ever was one
What's the process to get "verified"?
Sure hope its an open process where everyone can see what's going on and why it is verified.
>What's the process to get "verified"?
You purchase a ticket through an affiliate like Fandango. It doesn't necessarily mean that someone has even watched the film. The shenanigans to look for, though, is when the "verified" score is hugely disparate from the "all audience" score. This almost always correlates with films that flop at the box office.
I have never told you to trust anything, you disingenuous frick. Glad you liked a movie, now off with you.
I only shitposted the audience score to make Cinemaphile watch Mario. Now that it got a billy and is about to dethrone the top 3, I don't care anymore.
>girlboss peach
>"am i not based for doing shilling for free for japanese israelites?"
Nintroony.
If you are going to think about talking about possible flops do the math
>‘The Little Mermaid’ To Be Part Of That World With $180M Global Start This Weekend – Box Office Preview
OH NO NO NO Zaslav nros
>trusting RT at all
Why should I?
It's an anti-White movie. Simple as.
Disney really locked it like The Rise of Skywalker lmao
>Source: Youtube
Disney is getting lazy, people going to see this movie is hurting the film industry because it will lead to more soulless cash grab remakes. by not supporting this movie I am showing that I expect better. They fired their 2D animation dept btw. None of the remakes add anything to the original, they usually remove stuff from them. These are just awful awful cheap movies. we have fallen far from the legacy Disney created from their original works.
>'verified' reviews
okay
Sorry, I couldn't hear you over how wrong you are.
Metacritic allows anyone to give a score, it isn't like RT where only people who bought the movie's tickets can give reviews. Metacritic isn't trustable.
Also.
>53 ratings
Lol
>RT
>Trustable
Holy frick lol
It is. Only people who watched the movie can write a review. There's no review bombing by angry chuds.
>Chuds
Knew it. It wasn't just a shill but a troony too
>Noooo you can't call me a chud
>But I can call you shill, troony or any other buzzword in the book
>shill, troony or any other buzzword
thse are accurate tho. Chud is nothing
rottentomatoes was posting "verified reviews" before the movie was even released.
hmm...
It has Awkwafina and people love her so of course it gets high audience score.
I do trust the audience score over the critics. Maybe it's good. But I feel like this is fake and gay. It has been known before too that these companies pay for positive reviews. Metacritic is more trustworthy imo.
>Metacritic is more trustworthy imo.
No it isn't, anyone can give a score. In Rottentomatoes you need to buy a ticket to review a movie, therefore preventing reviewbombing.
>therefore preventing reviewbombing
Top fukken kek. It doesn't prevent "reviewbombing" from paid shills. It's shit you can sub out to Chinese clickbait farms for pennies over the cost of a ticket.
>studios bought tickets
Source: Youtube
>angry racist chuds reviewbombing are why the rings of power had such a low audience score
>source: my shill script
And look how that claim turned out.
the source is my eyes
>buy tickets online
>almost sold out
>go to cinema
>me and 3 others only people there
paid shill
just part of the marketing budget
>I do trust the audience score over the critics.
Why not trust yourself?
The audience can be piss easy to please sometimes. Look at Suicide Squad, which was pure unfiltered garbage.
Audience score ALWAYS starts high because the core fanbase goes to see it first. It then decays naturally over two months.
you mean because it's an alternative fake metric studios pay for.
Reminder: since TLJ, rt only allows audience reviews of theatrical releases if you:
a: buy a ticket via fandango
b: rounds any audience review under 7/10, to 7/10
No, RT changed their policy after Captain Marvel, because angry chuds were reviewbombing it BEFORE the movie was even released.
>no arguments
>the marvels has been delayed 4 times
topkek
It took 14 years to release The Incredibles 2.
Delaying a project 4 time in production is not the same as waiting years to release a sequel.
>chuds
its funny how only ESLs say this anymore, as the trannies who originally forced it have all killed themselves and are buried under headstones with their given names on them
>Tracking to make less than $200m worldwide over 4 day weekend
>Completely flopping in Asia, which have been key markets for the other remakes
Reminder this has a confirmed $200m production and $100m marketing midget and needs over $500m to break even
So basically the movie is a giant fricking fail........
I think it does poorly in asia because asians don't like black people.
Nobody likes black people.
doesn't rotten tomatoes delete reviews or edit the scores or something I remember it getting heavily shit on before for something like that
No.
Rotten tomatoes is a marketing scheme
Real reviews of new movies don't exist until at least 6 months after release, and even then you're wading through paid shills and initial hype.
Replace Trinidad crab who sings the best song in Disney’s catalog with gay Black person from Hamilton doing a generic fake Jamaican accent who sings Under the Sea like a slow tempo smooth jazz cover. Absolutely unforgiving.
Kek
Non-verified audience is meaningless because of review bombing. You made this bed, now sit in it.
>nobody can "review-bomb" verified reviews because no company has ever purchased bot and clickfarm services to fake their numbers
It goes both ways, sweaty.
High-rating bombing an people calling it good because it stars a black person
>Out for two days
>Still no imdb rating
We're really doing this, huh?
"Audience" score is obviously being astroturfed. Likewise critics but rt couldn't twist their criteria too much so it hangs at a very mediocre 68%
>at least 500 ratings
Wow! Is that how many people are actually going to see it?
There's no chance, at all, that I'll read opinions from 190 people about "The Little Mermaid 2023."
Like, how in the utter fricking frick would a website "verify" 500+ unprofessional reviews???
>You usually say
Who are you quoting?
DELETE THIS! IT ONLY WORKS FOR MARIO REEEEEEEEEEEEEE
good joke anon, but i wont age your thread
>the audience
Kill Disney gays. Behead Disney homosexuals. Roundhouse kick aDisney homosexual into the concrete. Slam dunk a Disney homosexual into the trashcan. Crucify filthy Disney homosexuals. Defecate in a Disney homosexual’s food. Stir fry Disneygays in a wok. Launch Disney gays into the sun. Toss Disney gays into active volcanoes. Twist Disney gay’s heads off. Feed Disney gays to piranhas. Curbstomp Disney homosexuals. Judo throw Disney gays into a wood chipper. Karate chop Disneygays in half. Pee in a Disney gay’s gas tank. Crush Disney gays in a trash compactor. Trap Disney gays in quicksand. Liquefy Disney gays in a vat of acid. Dissect Disney gays. Exterminate Disney gays in the gas chamber. Stomp Disney gays skulls with steel toed boots. Cremate Disneygays in the oven. Lobotomize Disney gays. Grind Disney homosexual children in the garbage disposal. Drown Disney gays in boiling grease. Vaporize Disney gays with a ray gun. Kick old Disney gays down the stairs. Feed Disney gays to alligators. Slice Disneygays with a katana. Strap Disney gays to an artillery shell.
Disney owns rotten tomatoes
All of this is just to prop up the actress, it has nothing to do with the movie. They realized they cast a legitimately mentally challenged person for this and are just now realizing they have to pump good reviews so she doesn't feel bad.
I only trust Armond
what site is that?
https://www.nationalreview.com/author/armond-white/
Oh, I see we have a self-proclaimed expert here who can't handle the fact that audiences might actually have their own opinions. Trusting the audience over critics doesn't necessarily mean the movie is 'really good,' but it acknowledges that different people have different tastes and perspectives. Maybe instead of searching for 'cope excuses,' you could try embracing diverse opinions and realizing that not everyone sees things through the same lens.