No, and they are so stupid they took online jokes about how stupid morbius was as a justification to rerelease Morbius in theaters to results that literally anyone with a sliver of a brain would have seen coming.
Amy Pascal is maybe the dumbest human alive.
No, and they are so stupid they took online jokes about how stupid morbius was as a justification to rerelease Morbius in theaters to results that literally anyone with a sliver of a brain would have seen coming.
Amy Pascal is maybe the dumbest human alive.
I was about to say that Pascal hasn't actually been a part of Sony for a while now, but I just looked it up and it turns out that even though she got fired after the leaks, she was still attached to production on all the Spider-Man and Venom films
Fricking hell, some people really do just fall upwards
>and whenever Spider-Man's not on screen, everyone should be asking where Spider-Man is
Why are you people like this? Especially when the current live action Spider-Man sucks. You know most of these characters have their own solo material in comics.
Julia Carpenter has had a miniseries at least, and that movie also has other characters who had ongoing books in it. Kraven has no solo material, but his comic origin would have worked well as a solo movie, it's just a shame that's not the story they're telling.
>these are Spider-Man characters
None of them are characters whose lives revolve around him, and most of them except Kraven do have their own solo material to draw on. No series of Spider-Man movies is ever likely to run long enough to ever use most of these characters except Venom, so Sony trying to get some use out of the characters they've paid for the rights to isn't hurting anyone except these turbo-autists who have a problem with these characters even existing outside of the context of Spider-Man stories, despite them doing exactly that in the comics.
>and building a cinematic universe around a character you refuse to even mention is moronic.
It's not a cinematic universe built around Spider-Man. It's a cinematic universe built around the other characters Sony also has the rights to. If anything, they should be building it around Venom.
it's built around Spider-Man in that they are literally building around Spider-Man shaped hole. They keep dancing around him because he's so integral to all of these characters (yes, even Venom), but refuse to actually just rip the band-aid off and commit because they don't want to mess with the actual MCU Spider-Man movies that have made them more money than any of these movies ever will.
Please elaborate on how Spider-Man is so integral to Morbius, Arana, Julia Carpenter, etc.
Even Venom has been reimagined in a way that works without him, and a Venom solo movie like that has been planned as far back as the 90s.
If you're not interested in these movies, fine. But stop acting like them existing or these characters having stories of their own is some kind of affront. If you actually think having these characters interacting with MCU Spider-Man would be better, and just can't tone down your Spider-Man fanboyism until we get a better live action Peter, seek help.
6 months ago
Anonymous
>Even Venom has been reimagined in a way that works without him
Sony Venom is a joke character, but hey I'm a half full glass kind of guy, and I can totally see him team up with Deadpool, granted the Secret Wars movie(s) will finally merge the sonyverse with the MCU
>What if...No Way Home was a woman >What if...Venom and Eddie were dating >What if...Kraven the Hunter wasn't a hunter but was actually an animal rights activist who got bitten by a radioactive lion also Spider-Man still isn't in this one lol
Can't wait for these to all make another morbillion each
Sony just so good at making films with beloved characters!
Sweet.
At least they won’t the same Marvel formula
Snoysirs?
>Disney when Madame Web sells a trillion tickets
Was there a Venom 2???
lol yes
it's the only sony-verse movie I seen and it's insanely weird. Woody Harrelson is Carnage lmao
They're still trying to do the sinister six sony verse or whatever?
Have they not learned from morbius?
No, and they are so stupid they took online jokes about how stupid morbius was as a justification to rerelease Morbius in theaters to results that literally anyone with a sliver of a brain would have seen coming.
Amy Pascal is maybe the dumbest human alive.
I'd have preferred to have Blade fight Morbius like what Blade 2 was supposed to be.
The movies were already in development. So they just keep going till the end.
>Sony
>learning
I was about to say that Pascal hasn't actually been a part of Sony for a while now, but I just looked it up and it turns out that even though she got fired after the leaks, she was still attached to production on all the Spider-Man and Venom films
Fricking hell, some people really do just fall upwards
Madame Web will be a huge bomb, Kraven will flop, Venom 3 (if it doesn't have Spider-Man) will disappoint.
Venom 3 is supposed to have a young Peter Parker that Eddie's supposed to protect from whoever.
Nah, that was fake.
isn't madame web's plot "evil spider-guy wants to kill baby peter parker so spider-women have to stop him" or did that get debunked?
That's odd. These movies have the same name as three Spider-Man related characters but I don't see him anywhere.
>and whenever Spider-Man's not on screen, everyone should be asking where Spider-Man is
Why are you people like this? Especially when the current live action Spider-Man sucks. You know most of these characters have their own solo material in comics.
I am like 90% sure Julia Carpenter and Kraven have never had solo series
these are Spider-Man characters, and building a cinematic universe around a character you refuse to even mention is moronic.
Julia Carpenter has had a miniseries at least, and that movie also has other characters who had ongoing books in it. Kraven has no solo material, but his comic origin would have worked well as a solo movie, it's just a shame that's not the story they're telling.
>these are Spider-Man characters
None of them are characters whose lives revolve around him, and most of them except Kraven do have their own solo material to draw on. No series of Spider-Man movies is ever likely to run long enough to ever use most of these characters except Venom, so Sony trying to get some use out of the characters they've paid for the rights to isn't hurting anyone except these turbo-autists who have a problem with these characters even existing outside of the context of Spider-Man stories, despite them doing exactly that in the comics.
>and building a cinematic universe around a character you refuse to even mention is moronic.
It's not a cinematic universe built around Spider-Man. It's a cinematic universe built around the other characters Sony also has the rights to. If anything, they should be building it around Venom.
it's built around Spider-Man in that they are literally building around Spider-Man shaped hole. They keep dancing around him because he's so integral to all of these characters (yes, even Venom), but refuse to actually just rip the band-aid off and commit because they don't want to mess with the actual MCU Spider-Man movies that have made them more money than any of these movies ever will.
Please elaborate on how Spider-Man is so integral to Morbius, Arana, Julia Carpenter, etc.
Even Venom has been reimagined in a way that works without him, and a Venom solo movie like that has been planned as far back as the 90s.
If you're not interested in these movies, fine. But stop acting like them existing or these characters having stories of their own is some kind of affront. If you actually think having these characters interacting with MCU Spider-Man would be better, and just can't tone down your Spider-Man fanboyism until we get a better live action Peter, seek help.
>Even Venom has been reimagined in a way that works without him
Sony Venom is a joke character, but hey I'm a half full glass kind of guy, and I can totally see him team up with Deadpool, granted the Secret Wars movie(s) will finally merge the sonyverse with the MCU
>3 shitty Sony films
Impressive.
IMPRESSIVE
>three spider-related movies without Spider-Man
>What if...No Way Home was a woman
>What if...Venom and Eddie were dating
>What if...Kraven the Hunter wasn't a hunter but was actually an animal rights activist who got bitten by a radioactive lion also Spider-Man still isn't in this one lol
>Sony wants to build their SPUMC but not actually build it at all
Why didn't they just make Kraven's Last Hunt be about him hunting Venom instead?
>1 Marvel film (Deadpool 3
If you think about it, this is the first year without an MCU movie since it started.
they skipped 2009 and 2020
hell no, own The Marvels, you dont get a free pass on that crap
Predict Madame Web's post-credits scene.
>Vulture approaches Ezekiel in prison
>I'M PUTTING TOGETHER A TEAM
>2023
sorry
*2025
Kraven film could be kino, but knowing Sony it will be shit.
Sony has interns?
And they can't even spell or get their years right?