EXCEPT...
>Song of the South
>The Wild
>The Nightmare Before Christmas
>Mars Needs Moms
>Frankenweenie
>A Christmas Carol (2009)
>The Small One
>Planes
>Valiant
>Doug's First Movie
>Recess: School's Out
>Make Mine Music
>Dinosaur
>The Thief and the Cobbler
>Paris 2054: Renaissance
>Roadside Romeo
>Arjun: The Warrior Prince
>Phineas and Ferb the Movie: Across the 2nd Dimension
>Teacher's Pet
>Pepper Ann
>The Shnookums & Meat Funny Cartoon Show
>Mighty Ducks
>Bonkers
>Walt's secret hand-drawn animated porn stash his company's vaulted away since the '1920s
What a crock of shit.
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Walt having his animators make silly porn animations to laugh at is a myth and the only source is that one shitty book that made everyone believe he was anti-semetic.
It's supposed to be Walt Disney Animation Studio only. And Dinosaur is there.
where's the alice in wonderland cartoon from 1923 that started it all, then
Alice Comedies doesn't count. That was live-action combined with paper cutouts.
THIS is the one that pisses me off. The entire company was founded to distribute the Alice Comedy shorts, and the date celebrated was the day the first once released. Yet the series that started the company is such old shame they won’t allow just one character to represent it while Chicken Little gets 5
Mary Poppins penguins are featured so this is invalid
If Pete gets in, he'll technically count since he originated from the Alice Comedies.
I thought Pete was already in
>The Thief and the Cobbler
Not under the main Disney branding
>Paris 2054: Renaissance
Not even a Disney movie
>Roadside Romeo
>Arjun: The Warrior Prince
Disney just did North American theatrical. Not considered true Disney films.
>Phineas and Ferb the Movie: Across the 2nd Dimension
>Teacher's Pet
>Pepper Ann
>The Shnookums & Meat Funny Cartoon Show
>Mighty Ducks
>Bonkers
No DTVA productions. Theatrically released shorts and films only.
>>Walt's secret hand-drawn animated porn stash
...come again?
It all comes from a book called Walt Disney: Hollywood's Dark Prince which is why you see so many joke about Walts anti-semitism, apparent pedophilia and the "totally real" story of Walt watching an animation of Mickey and Minnie frickin' real hard for his birthday and instantly firing the people who made it.
It's total bullshit.
>the "totally real" story of Walt watching an animation of Mickey and Minnie frickin' real hard for his birthday and instantly firing the people who made it.
Didn't Harlan Ellison claim he got fired from Disney on his first day by joking about a Mickey and Minnie sex tape complete with voices? Then he didn't realize Walt was in earshot?
No that was Roy Disney.
There's also the story of the post-Snow White celebration company-wide party at a hotel that turned into an orgy overnight
Walt paid the bill for everything, so booze flowed, animator guys and colorist girls got drunk, swam naked in the pool, and went bed-hopping
Walt left on his own the next morning and forbade anyone to mention it again
it's a funny book, even if it's 100% wrong
out of all the things walt has been acused of, the idea of a funny back-room screening of mickey sex is the only one I can really conceptualise.
Young Walt liked saucy stuff.
I just want to see Pete.
>Controversial
>Not Disney
>Not Disney animation
>Motion captured
>Not Disney animation
>Motion captured
>Religion
(1/3)
Fair I guess
>Not Disney
>Legally iffy and Disney TVA
>Disney TVA
>Controversial
>It's IS in the short
>Legally iffy
>Not Disney
(2/3)
Fricking hell I give up. Even breaking it up Cinemaphile thinks it's spam.
Song of the South is in Roger Rabbit and no one gives a frick.
but tiktok discovered it so it's a no-no
The 80s were a different time...
Speaking of Roger Rabbit, he's not in this short either
Because Roger Rabbit was animated by Richard Williams Animation, not Disney.
and published by touchstone
and touchstone is literally just disney, but touchstone means disney doesn't want to be associated with it.
Breh... The movie had Mickey, Donald, Goofy, Snow White, etc. It's not like it's a big secret. Roger Rabbit even appeared in that Pinocchio remake last year. The actual reason is because the animation and effects weren't done by WDAS. It's the same reason why there's no Pixar, even though Disney has been distributing their stuff since Toy Story 1.
Roger Rabbit is co-owned by Steven Spielberg. He has a say in every project Roger is a part of.
>Roger Rabbit even appeared in that Pinocchio remake last year.
Because both movies were directed by Robert Zemeckis. He was also in the Chip & Dale movie, which required Spielberg's permission.
It has absolutely nothing to do with who did the animation, just if it was released in the mainline Disney films (which RR is not a part of).
>Roger Rabbit is co-owned by Steven Spielberg
>Because both movies were directed by Robert Zemeckis.
I know.
>It has absolutely nothing to do with who did the animation, just if it was released in the mainline Disney films
Those are the exact same equation.
WDAS animated the theatrical shorts featuring the character
I never really thought about that, but I suppose they simply just don't count it. I dunno.
Because it was released by Touchstone. Every film in the short must be a theatrical release under the main Disney banner.
Just want to see more of my pretty noodle wife.
Almost all of those aren’t Walt Disney Animation Studios.
Can’t wait to see Rapunzel’s feet again
Cool