>2006
what the FRICK happened to CGI?
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
>2006
>2006
what the FRICK happened to CGI?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
|
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
CGI is best when used sparingly. It's WAY too common nowadays.
i wouldn't really call the OP example sparingly, there's a ton of CGI
Turns out, people will happily give their wealth to pedowood regardless of quality.
Not really. Less people are going to the movies than ever in the past 30 years.
>1999 CGI
It's embarrassing. over 24 years later and movies are getting mogged.
If you give ILM a good budget and don't stretch them for 30 films, they can do a good job, yes.
this also looks shit
Does it frick. For 1999, Watto's cgi is immaculate. That cgi alone is older than a lot of anons on this board.
it held up so well they didn't need to do a special edition 20 years later.
>1999
>Get to work on revolutionary new CGI tech for a well respected director (this was prior to the RLM hit job on George Lucas for being a successful white man)
>dedicate self to craft and work hard to create a work of art
>2023
>CGI is a commodity
>Be told by mystery meat boss that the mystery meat character needs to start glowing after making generic quip
>Could be done in an hour but decide to drag the work out over weeks because who gives a shit
>It comes out and looks looks terrible
Turns out despite how much technology grows it can't replace passion when it comes to making works of art that are meant to be enjoyed by people.
The difference between years of CGI work by passionate animators vs "Well, Rajesh, we need you to hurry up so we can get our 10 yearly CGI-slops out the door before the end of our fiscal year."
>10 yearly CGI-slops out the door before the end of our fiscal year.
>that moneys not gonna lose itself!
I pray every single person working for yidsney dies a horrific death
>Rajesh
It really is them. My gf loves capeshit, so I'll watch it with her, including the post credits scenes, and the credit names are all pajeets past a certain point.
The most offensive piece of CGI used was that Freddy Mercury biopic. That one shot of the camera swooping down what was supposed to be a recreation of Queen's iconic Live Aid performance is the biggest piece of shit I ever saw.
And what I find so offensive about it was it was likely that lead actor's 90 some cousins who worked on it.
this looks like shit. it's bad quality is hidden by the character being wet and not human
>character being wet
So the CGI is hiding the bad CGI? Your fricking moronic zoom zoom
I'm saying this level of cgi would not hold up if the character was fully human. They're just good at hiding how bad it is
>They're just good at hiding how bad it is
lol your a fricking moron
>it's bad quality is hidden
sounds like they did a great job then, moron
Keira Knightley was really hot in these movies
There has never been a more attractive woman on film while also being a "strong woman"
Portman mogs her pretty hard in episode 1
If you honestly think Natalie mogs her at any point in her life then you are a israelite
Then Im a israelite. Shalom Goy
Can you get me a loan?
of course! only 4000% interest for our 100 year mortages!
I can loan you dese nuts
Peak Keira was in The Hole
there used to be artist vision and talent
now it's a team of 1000 people making she hulk's cellulite illuminate correctly when she twerks
People who are passionate and give a shit tend to make better art than people who don't give a shit and are only in it for the money
CGI is there to help tell the story, not BE the story.
There ae several examples of CGI being used in scenes that will very much surprise you that it was.
To answer your question, the industry has been outsourced. Not that it already hasn't been or anything, such as graduates from the Vancouver Film School went to work on CGI in the first Transformers movie in Singapore. Its just that its now being exclusively done by third world coders and not by the States with their vision and drive. It was also found that audiences stopped caring as much as they were and ow have come to expect CGI as the norm and not be like visionaries like Lucas or Cameron who are the very last to push this to its absolute limits and keep dazzling people enough to want to pay for the price of a ticket. They got comfortable and too lazy and to a degree, that's extended to the audience who are fine with PS2 cutscene tier computer graphics and CGI armies attacking each other without strategy. Complacency, and it also being another side-effect of the thempark factory farmed movies that come out of Hollywood.
We're now getting to a point where we won't even need actors, alive or dead, anymore. Their voices and their likenesses and the scene you want to have them in and the things you want them to do will be now easy enough for anyone to do in a matter of hours through rendering.
kino
Bootstrap anon you are a liah and you will spend an eternity in this board!
Once in awhile we'll get some pretty good CGI.
?si=KfX7SfxUKtHVnsQU
Thats not CGI racist! Those are strong POC!
They started marketing movies primarily to shitskins like Indians and Black folk who do not care as much about quality.
That's a point, too. Its not just CGI, its movies in general that has degraded because they are no longer catering to American audiences and ideas and values, but to the worldwide audience of third worlder brownoids who have no concept of western slang, notions, speech or language. It all has to be dumbed down enough for them to understand mixed in with the carefully placed and time quip that comes after.
It's all become:
>"You bad."
>"I good."
>"We fight."
And then your senses get bombarded with a bunch of colourful computer barf. And because most of these companies are more concerned with agenda pushing rather than the quality of their movies being the absolute top priority, it just continues to get worse and the video game industry makes more money than the film but that same brain rot is infesting that at an assured pace as well.
Overworked korean sweatshops aren't as good as the dedicated artists who invented cgi in the first place.
Even Bollywood is better than todays Hollywood garbage
Diversity hiring
Outsourcing
Cutting cornerd
Considering the outlandish costs, maybe embezzlement/money laundering schemes
2023 had 3 mov8es only whose effects are remarkable; MI 7, The Creator (which is an otherwise awful movie btw) and Oppenheimer which has minimal if any CGI
>what the FRICK happened to CGI?
Outsourcing it to pajeets and chinks.