Paul McCartney played a clip during his set over the weekend at Glastonbury, the biggest outdoor festival in the UK. I myself have seen it in full 3 times.
Paul even incorporated it into his act
is this soul or soulless Cinemaphile?
I was in the front row of Seattle Night 2, and while you might think it was soulless, I thought it was amazing to hear the last great Lennon-McCartney harmony live even if John's parts were pre-recorded
After the series finished production, Jackson gave McCartney a thumb drive with John’s scenes from the rooftop concert isolated so that the two could technically perform together again. He’s been playing that during his shows a lot.
Completely and utterly soulless, especially the ukulele cover of Something that he does starting with the same jokes and stories. Should just stick to his own beatle songs
Lol that’s funny because I remember reading a quote from Clapton who talked about how Paul didn’t know the words to the George songs that they were going to perform for Concert For George…I don’t think he knows any post beatle songs
I think a lot of musicians from that era do >There had been bad blood between the Kinks and the Beatles since they played together on the same bill in 1964. John upset Davies backstage by saying, “We’ve lost our set-list, lads. Can we borrow yours?” implying that the Kinks, who had only released two singles at that point, were mere imitators. Paul was more respectful. When the Kinks released “See My Friends” in 1965, a track now widely regarded as one of the first pop songs to use Eastern scales, Paul played it over and over at the apartment of John Dunbar and Marianne Faithfull, and when he saw Ray’s brother Dave at the Scotch, he reputedly joked, “That ‘See My Friend.’ I really like that. I should have written it,” to which Dave retorted, “Well, you didn’t. You can’t do everything.” Ray Davies later commented, “Paul McCartney was one of the most competitive people I’ve ever met. Lennon wasn’t. He just thought everyone else was shit.”
2 years ago
Anonymous
based john the banter king
2 years ago
Anonymous
It's insane how funny Lennon was, he had me dying during Get Back
2 years ago
Anonymous
based lennon
fricking based John the king of bantz
[...]
tbh i probably would've cried and clapped like crazy if i was at one of those shows
bassed Lennon shitting on Tom Jones
?t=11
2 years ago
Anonymous
based lennon
2 years ago
Anonymous
fricking based John the king of bantz
[...]
I was in the front row of Seattle Night 2, and while you might think it was soulless, I thought it was amazing to hear the last great Lennon-McCartney harmony live even if John's parts were pre-recorded
tbh i probably would've cried and clapped like crazy if i was at one of those shows
2 years ago
Anonymous
Paul is still amazing. His voice isn't what it was when he was 25, sure, but his instrumentation and mastery over a crowd is unparalleled
He is truly one of the all time hrea5s and we will never see his like again
I'm a Beatles fan and while a 2-2.5 hour movie would have been great _EIGHT (8) HOURS_ was just too fricking long, especially when 90% of it consisted of them sitting around shooting the shit about pretty much nothing.
The fact that so many books still name the Beatles as "the greatest or most significant or most influential" rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art. Jazz critics have long recognized that the greatest jazz musicians of all times are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane, who were not the most famous or richest or best sellers of their times, let alone of all times. Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe. Rock critics are still blinded by commercial success. The Beatles sold more than anyone else (not true, by the way), therefore they must have been the greatest. Jazz critics grow up listening to a lot of jazz music of the past, classical critics grow up listening to a lot of classical music of the past. Rock critics are often totally ignorant of the rock music of the past, they barely know the best sellers. No wonder they will think that the Beatles did anything worthy of being saved.
The usual amount but during this time Ringo and Paul were drinking a *lot* and John was doing heroin. The RS sessions were more dude weed lmao than Let it Be
You can see why John and George were pissed. They literally didn't want to make the album (pretty boring album imo) and they had become session musicians
George was rightfully pissed off by it. Paul was trying too hard with the live camera stunt and he saved the whole album by secretly inviting Preston like he did with Clapton for the While My Guitar Gently Weeps recording sessions.
>play a few 20 minute sets a month >disband after like 4 years >boomers STILL talk about this shit
i mean the beatles are fine but the fricking hype is moronic. they ARE literally bigger than jesus at this point
Thanks for reminding me anon, I can't believe I forgot about this.
It was the best kino of the last 12 months and I can't wait to watch it again.
Good, imagine watching McCartney ai generated propaganda.
The Rolling Stones mog the shit out of the Beatles
1. No.
2. The best Stones era was Mick Taylor era.
>Obsolete blues cover band famous for being stale for over 40 years is better than the innovators who still sound modern today
Yeah yeah... Yeah...
Sounding modern is no aspirational or noteworthy quality. Modern music is terrible
i think you missed the point. the beatles shaped the sound of modern music.
Paul McCartney played a clip during his set over the weekend at Glastonbury, the biggest outdoor festival in the UK. I myself have seen it in full 3 times.
I was in the front row of Seattle Night 2, and while you might think it was soulless, I thought it was amazing to hear the last great Lennon-McCartney harmony live even if John's parts were pre-recorded
After the series finished production, Jackson gave McCartney a thumb drive with John’s scenes from the rooftop concert isolated so that the two could technically perform together again. He’s been playing that during his shows a lot.
Paul even incorporated it into his act
is this soul or soulless Cinemaphile?
Completely and utterly soulless, especially the ukulele cover of Something that he does starting with the same jokes and stories. Should just stick to his own beatle songs
yeah, he should've just covered all things must pass
George is probably taking a piss and rolling his eyes at paul with his machine elve friends
Lol that’s funny because I remember reading a quote from Clapton who talked about how Paul didn’t know the words to the George songs that they were going to perform for Concert For George…I don’t think he knows any post beatle songs
I think Clapton secretly hates Paul
I think a lot of musicians from that era do
>There had been bad blood between the Kinks and the Beatles since they played together on the same bill in 1964. John upset Davies backstage by saying, “We’ve lost our set-list, lads. Can we borrow yours?” implying that the Kinks, who had only released two singles at that point, were mere imitators. Paul was more respectful. When the Kinks released “See My Friends” in 1965, a track now widely regarded as one of the first pop songs to use Eastern scales, Paul played it over and over at the apartment of John Dunbar and Marianne Faithfull, and when he saw Ray’s brother Dave at the Scotch, he reputedly joked, “That ‘See My Friend.’ I really like that. I should have written it,” to which Dave retorted, “Well, you didn’t. You can’t do everything.” Ray Davies later commented, “Paul McCartney was one of the most competitive people I’ve ever met. Lennon wasn’t. He just thought everyone else was shit.”
based john the banter king
It's insane how funny Lennon was, he had me dying during Get Back
bassed Lennon shitting on Tom Jones
?t=11
based lennon
fricking based John the king of bantz
tbh i probably would've cried and clapped like crazy if i was at one of those shows
Paul is still amazing. His voice isn't what it was when he was 25, sure, but his instrumentation and mastery over a crowd is unparalleled
He is truly one of the all time hrea5s and we will never see his like again
>2022 I am...forgotten
I'm a Beatles fan and while a 2-2.5 hour movie would have been great _EIGHT (8) HOURS_ was just too fricking long, especially when 90% of it consisted of them sitting around shooting the shit about pretty much nothing.
Yeah because it’s diluted as frick, listening to the leaked tapes from those sessions is honestly more interesting
I was annoyed they cut around the paulina line.
It was too long, and the image noise reduction made it look rotoscoped.
>I think I'll be leaving the band now
George was relentlessly handsome
Billy Preston was the highlight
Been watching it on repeat for 3 months.
It’s comfy background noise
The fact that so many books still name the Beatles as "the greatest or most significant or most influential" rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art. Jazz critics have long recognized that the greatest jazz musicians of all times are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane, who were not the most famous or richest or best sellers of their times, let alone of all times. Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe. Rock critics are still blinded by commercial success. The Beatles sold more than anyone else (not true, by the way), therefore they must have been the greatest. Jazz critics grow up listening to a lot of jazz music of the past, classical critics grow up listening to a lot of classical music of the past. Rock critics are often totally ignorant of the rock music of the past, they barely know the best sellers. No wonder they will think that the Beatles did anything worthy of being saved.
MUH JAZZ. Please frick off
Anyone who takes that Italian pedo seriously is beyond saving
good because that ai upscaling tiktok filter was horrendous. only the boomers who can't see/hear well anymore thought this shit looked amazing.
a proper bluray release of just the concert in the proper upscaled from the negatives like on the 1s bluray video collection would be the right move.
Did they ever release a performers only rooftop session?
If not why?
How much weed were they smoking bros?
The usual amount but during this time Ringo and Paul were drinking a *lot* and John was doing heroin. The RS sessions were more dude weed lmao than Let it Be
Best part was McCartney playing Maxwells Silver hammer and everyones faces as they listen
for me it was when Paul hands George his telecaster back and he immediately starts cleaning it
You can see why John and George were pissed. They literally didn't want to make the album (pretty boring album imo) and they had become session musicians
George was rightfully pissed off by it. Paul was trying too hard with the live camera stunt and he saved the whole album by secretly inviting Preston like he did with Clapton for the While My Guitar Gently Weeps recording sessions.
femboy george
>play a few 20 minute sets a month
>disband after like 4 years
>boomers STILL talk about this shit
i mean the beatles are fine but the fricking hype is moronic. they ARE literally bigger than jesus at this point
who care about this guys
I only listen to rap like Lil baby and NLE chopa