2>1>3. Where do you stand?

2>1>3

Where do you stand, Cinemaphile?

I think Day is shockingly underrated and basically the best one, on a technical/craft level. Night is just so comfy it hurts. As for Dawn, well, the problem is that it's nearly too good.

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

  1. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    3>1>2

  2. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    it's taken 10 years to realize Day as a legitimate sequel, another 10 as a good sequel, now people are waking up and i don' t seen as insane anymore

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Um, what

  3. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Really not a fan of Dawn
    Night is really good
    Haven’t seen Day

  4. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    I like Day the most

  5. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    3>2>1
    Although I would say Dawn is just slightly below Day
    It’s the zombie Apocalypse fully realized and it is hard to explain but it just throws you right in to the chaos. My only big complaint is the effects. They just look like people with blue paint

  6. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    You're missing a movie, It's a quadrilogy

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Not to me it isn't.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        Everything after Day doesn’t exist. Simple as

        C'mon, Land has a couple good moments. The others are of course better.

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          I hear you. Land wasn't completely worthless but still, I treat The Hobbit trilogy the same way. Doesn't exist.

          Always preferred Day for it's oppressive atmosphere and overt feeling of hopelessness.
          Soundtrack is the best and I've never seen a 5 minute intro carry an entire movie so well.

          I'll give you that. Day has the coldest atmosphere and truly feels like a downer. It certainly works.

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          It has a cool concept but the execution is shit. The post apocalyptic city is cool and all with the hierarchies being that the richgays are at a point of normalcy, but I thought going for CGI was a bad move and the sentient zombies. It’s like the dinosaurs that become self aware by nodding at each other in one of the jurassic park sequels

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Everything after Day doesn’t exist. Simple as

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why not go ahead and count the abortions known as Diary and Survival as well? Land wasn't as bad as either of those for sure, but it was such a huge stepdown from the original trilogy that it still doesn't mater. It was like watching an impersonation of a Romero movie.

  7. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Always preferred Day for it's oppressive atmosphere and overt feeling of hopelessness.
    Soundtrack is the best and I've never seen a 5 minute intro carry an entire movie so well.

  8. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    I do love Dawn of the Dead and Day of the Dead.

  9. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Dawn is unbridled kino.

  10. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Days got the best looking zombies and gore but its the least interesting of the 3. They got stiffed on the budget they wanted and had to make a much smaller scale film than originally intended. Its not a bad film but its just a shadow of what it could have been.

    Night is the most important but Dawn is the overall best and comfiest.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      they're all so Cinemaphile as frick

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      >They got stiffed on the budget they wanted and had to make a much smaller scale film than originally intended.
      Having read the original script I'm glad things turned out the way they did. I think Romero got to more or less execute something similar with Land of the Dead, and it was pretty shit compared to the original trilogy. The only thing that would have been kino if it had been saved from the original script was the end where someone has died of natural causes and they sit around waiting to see if he comes back.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      >its the least interesting of the 3.
      I'd say night of the living dead is the least interesting one.

  11. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    1>2>3

    !!!FACT!!!

  12. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    for me?
    it's 3 > 2 > 1

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      moreover
      1 is ok, kinda slow, don't hold up that much.

      2 has a great start, and the second part inside the mall just gets boring

      3 is just paranoia from start to finish, you never know when the situation is gonna blow up.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        >2 has a great start, and the second part inside the mall just gets boring

        Gotta disagree with you pretty strong there. That's sort of the point, to where it even starts driving them nuts and they start bickering due to the boredom. It works.

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          nah, they probably did it for budget reasons, they probably wanted a full speed road movie, but didnt have the budget to.

          It suffers from the first half being great and then changing gears like full metal jacket.

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            >they did it for budget reasons, that means it's bad
            what a pathetic post

            • 9 months ago
              Anonymous

              I'm sorry, it's just boring, if you wanna fix it go and dig out George and give him couple millions for reshoots.

  13. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Day of the Dead is the greatest zombie film ever made and I'm tired of pretending it's not. Don't even bothering (You)ing me with your shitty and wrong opinions over it either, I shan't be responding to dumb dumbs.

  14. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    3>2>1

  15. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    1>3>2
    The first movie is the scariest to me because of the scenes where zombies eat flesh in black and white. Without color it leaves more to the imagination. The lighting is good too. They're all fun and great movies but the first is the only one that gives me chills. The others are too cozy, like being in a blanket fort.

    Also if Land counts, Return of the Living Dead should count too. I've seen 1, 2, and 3 and rank them 1>3>2 as well. The first had cool 80s punks and the crematorium scenes were gnarly. The 2nd movie was kinda boring and silly (the boy's sister was hot though), and the 3rd movie was completely different and a decently made zombie romance.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *