stallone judge dredd was abominable even at the time. i think only americans who had no idea what judge dredd though it was good in the slightest.
it was almost as disappointing as the masters of the universe film. or mario bros
>only americans who had no idea what judge dredd though it was good in the slightest.
I mean, it sucked, but it's a pretty accurate adaptation of the source material, aside from Dredd removing his helmet.
Dredd (2012), much better movie, nothing like the source material, aside from Dredd never removing his helmet
The comic is very goofy.
>He's done more hits than misses.
That's not how it works anon, Garland's form has been on a consistent decline for a long time now, and he has more duds/middling works than kinos
So the Rage zombies learnt to drink water, eat food, and take care of themselves? Because I clearly remember the military guys in 28 Days saying the infectees had a few months left at most before dying off
I don't see how Bongland would still be a death zone
>So the Rage zombies learnt to drink water, eat food, and take care of themselves? Because I clearly remember the military guys in 28 Days saying the infectees had a few months left at most before dying off
We see a bunch of them wasting away at the end
it will probably be a new pandemic, like what happened at the beginning of 28 weeks later when society was starting to go back to normal after the infected die off but then the virus resurges
That's not what happened in 28 weeks. Robert Carlyle's wife was infected but she was a carrier, they discovered her surviving in London at the children's old home and bring her in for study since she's the only carrier they've ever found. Carlyle's character breaks into the "secure" area and after he kisses her he gets infected from her saliva and then turns into an infected kills her and then roams around infecting other people starting a new outbreak.
>Robert Carlyle's wife wasn't infected but she was a carrier
Exact same situation with her kid in the movie who then spreads it to France right at the end
>I clearly remember the military guys in 28 Days saying the infectees had a few months left at most before dying off
It would work something like a plague, spread out further and further in waves while the zombies from earlier die off, leaving a handful of survivor behind. A "24 Years Later" movie would be a POST-apocalypse flick about the survivors trying to put shit back together again.
>A "24 Years Later" movie would be a POST-apocalypse flick about the survivors trying to put shit back together again.
That literally what 28 Weeks was until they decided to go full fricking moron half way through the movie.
They still pointed out in 28 Days later that there's no way the infected are going to be crossing rivers and mountains, survive winter, etc. They move at the speed of human locomotion and they can only walk so far before dying of hunger, because these are still living people and not magic zombies.
So the new movie would have to just be another sudden outbreak, rather than a "humanity lost" epilogue.
The zombies weren't still a problem. They had been cleared out enough to begin repopulating part of London and now it was just mop up duty to make sure they got them all. They only became a problem when the military decided to have lax security with the carrier they brought into the city. It goes to shit because the husband is somehow able to get in the holding cell with his carrier wife and nobody else is around.
So the Rage zombies learnt to drink water, eat food, and take care of themselves? Because I clearly remember the military guys in 28 Days saying the infectees had a few months left at most before dying off
I don't see how Bongland would still be a death zone
The plague doesn't turn everything into a violent monster that forgets how to eat. I don't recall us seeing how the rage virus affected animals other than the original chimps so animal carriers might not exist but I'm guessing that's the explanation they go with.
most 5/10 movie i have ever watched, my reaction after watching it was basically "huh, that happened" , genuinely no idea what people saw in it that they found mindblowing
most 5/10 movie i have ever watched, my reaction after watching it was basically "huh, that happened" , genuinely no idea what people saw in it that they found mindblowing
I liked some of the designs but the direction and writing (adaption) were hot garbage and the last monster looked worse than the lawnmower man from 1994
Which would be dumb if that's the intent, since most of Edinburgh is so far above sea level that even the worst case(plausible) scenarios for sea level rise will only screw the people who live right on the coastline.
Why skip Months and go straight to Years? I think society will be back to normal but Rage virus stuff will be pretty prevelant and people just learned to accept it as part of every day life now. Like there could be specialised task forces established to take care of smaller scale outbreaks like how they deal with terror attacks
Because in real life it’s been like 22 years since the first movie was released.
Why skip Months and go straight to Years? I think society will be back to normal but Rage virus stuff will be pretty prevelant and people just learned to accept it as part of every day life now. Like there could be specialised task forces established to take care of smaller scale outbreaks like how they deal with terror attacks
God, you can already tell that it's gonna suck. Just leave it alone. You did great with the first movie, the second was forgettable. It doesn't need to be a trilogy.
It'll be anti-White. It'll be some sort of heavy-handed commentary on anti-immigration sentiment. I'm guessing the plot will be that Europe (and only Europe) has been completely taken over by the rage virus and all the heroes and unaffected are blacks, israelites, and Arabs.
Don't forget some moronic "topical" reference to the coronavirus.
Oh god, that's going to be the plot isn't it? Someone refused to take their Pfizer rage vaccine and now everything's fricked.
>YEH LIKE WE FOWN OWT DAT DE VYRAS RIGHT IS LIKE ONLY FO WIYPIPO COS LIKE YEH WIYPIPO INT EVUN PROPAR LIKE HUMAN RIGHT N LIKE RIGHT WE WUZ KANGZ INIT RIGHT YEH
>YEH LIKE WE FOWN OWT DAT DE VYRAS RIGHT IS LIKE ONLY FO WIYPIPO COS LIKE YEH WIYPIPO INT EVUN PROPAR LIKE HUMAN RIGHT N LIKE RIGHT WE WUZ KANGZ INIT RIGHT YEH
You're mentally ill and your family is afraid of you.
in the early 90s in school, on RE teacher was saying "i always think it' so stupid when people complain about foreigners being here when they're only 2% of the population".
it was a leftist repeated programmed phrase, they'd say "they're only a tiny proportion of the population".
now those fricking c**ts are going to die without having to suffer the hellhole they assisted in the creation of.
Is 28 Days Later worth a rewatch?
I watched it several years ago, liked it well enough, and then never thought about it again.
Will it sucks balls if I watch it again?
I liked it back then, but on rewatch my enjoyment of it decreased severely. I still think the first half of the movie is great, but it gets progressively worst, the end is especially bad with the rapist military. I guess Alex Garland can't help but inject his feminist ideas in all of his scripts.
I think it still holds up as a movie, though the main character kids are unlikable af. Like the young kid I can understand being dumb, but the hot sister is supposed to be older and wiser.
the bit where everyone is trapped in a locked room and the lights are flickering and the dad is let in stands out as one of the best horror scenes I've seen tbh
Oh yeah, I misread it since others discussed Weeks. I still think Days holds up better as a zombie/post-apocalypse movie tbh, though I wish the roadtrip section would have lasted longer and the final bit at the mansion a bit shorter.
...perhaps it's time I rewatch Zombieland.
it's already established that the virus causes the zombies to die from starvation within a few days / weeks of exposure, and that the virus is only dangerous at the initial spread since it spreads rapidly and infects very fast, but this would also mean it burns out so fast you can just bunker down somewhere for a month and be in the clear.
It's just stupid, all you would need to do is quarantine unless there's carriers that are spreading it without being infected themselves, which is what the character's wife was in 28 weeks.
Either way, even lasting 2-3 days would be unfeasible unless the zombies have a source of water and are drinking. Especially since it's a virus that makes them extremely active, running, sprinting, fighting physically with uninfected, the body would become completely dehydrated within a day or two from that kind of activity with no replenishment, and especially since it's shown that they spread the virus by vomiting blood on uninfected people, so they are losing even more water. Their heart rate must be incredibly high, as would be their breathing probably nearly constantly in hyperventilation, which means they are losing tons of water with every breath they take. The zombies would realistically only last 2 days maybe 3 if there wasn't as much activity. Eventually without water they would just collapse like they're shown at the end of 28 days and just die on the spot from dehydration.
So what is the plot of this? 28 years if the virus was uncontrolled in its spread and went around the entire globe, it would have burned out so fast by either infecting almost everyone and then all the infected dying, and then what survivors were left would just inherit a mostly empty world. The only way forward is to have the virus behave completely different in a sequel to make them more traditional fantasy zombies that never die.
I assume it's a completely new pandemic.
I guarantee there'll be some topical plot about the population taking vaccines to stay ahead of virus mutations carried by animals, but some group still stop taking them out of political views and the virus gets out again.
"Hey we got this big hotel with strong doors we can lock. Instead of just telling everyone to go to their room and locking their doors, let's shove everyone into a basement and chain the doors shut."
"Hey, we got the US military here. They totally don't have armored Humvees, APCs, Bradley's, or Abrams tanks that are completely immune to infinite numbers of infected."
The entire movie only happens because everyone reacts in the most idiotic way possible.
>28 years later >civilisation recovered, the plague is a vague memory only the older survivors remember >people feel safe, protected >shady lab people still have samples of the virus, modify it, make more versatile >classic lab accident happens, virus breaks out again >cillian murphy as aged Veteran leads a group of delusional people who thought the virus was a myth >storyline repeats itself but murphy dies in the end to safe the community yadda yadda
Something like that. Making the Zombies survive 30 years is moronic
they need a narritve reset to introduce 28 to zoom zooms.
The first movie is ancient histroy to them, nobody even saw the 2nd. So I think they just start new with le oppenheimer to be recognizable
What the frick is the problem zombie movies have with actually depicting the fun part of a zombie apocalypse?
(The initial outbreak)
I don’t give a frick about what happens AFTER everything falls. Post apocalyptic shit is so boring. I want constant terror and chaos. That’s the one thing world war z and dawn of the dead 2004s opening get right
Hard to shoot probably with so many elements like people running around, police shooting at everything, all that jazz. It's much cheaper to do it post-outbreak, all you need to do is just throw out some litter on the set and put some actors with make-up.
The TWD spinoff for Daryl had some nice flashbacks to when shit was hitting the fan in Paris. 2004 Dawn of the Dead also had a really good newsreel in the DVD.
Much like Dune or Fallout, I'm going to avoid the threads like the plague because Cinemaphile will never give the project it's fair shake, even if it's fantastic.
Did Walking Dead (comic) copy 28 Days Later with the main character missing the initial outbreak due to being in a coma? Or is everyone a hack with a lack of budget (or vision)?
>tho
>Alex Garland
NOPE
He's done more hits than misses.
he's written 1 (one) good film
and dredd gets mogged in writing by the stallone one
>he's written 1 (one) good film
Which one? and both Dredd and the Stallone Dredd are good in their own ways.
stallone judge dredd was abominable even at the time. i think only americans who had no idea what judge dredd though it was good in the slightest.
it was almost as disappointing as the masters of the universe film. or mario bros
>only americans who had no idea what judge dredd though it was good in the slightest.
I mean, it sucked, but it's a pretty accurate adaptation of the source material, aside from Dredd removing his helmet.
Dredd (2012), much better movie, nothing like the source material, aside from Dredd never removing his helmet
The comic is very goofy.
>or mario bros
wash out your fricking mouth now
>and dredd gets mogged in writing by the stallone one
Incorrect
>He's done more hits than misses.
That's not how it works anon, Garland's form has been on a consistent decline for a long time now, and he has more duds/middling works than kinos
He literally made the movie of the year
He made the blandest forgettable slop this side of Netflix
Civil war was kino af
Devs is at least a 8/10 show, possibly a 9/10 if you only count the last 5 years.
because
So the Rage zombies learnt to drink water, eat food, and take care of themselves? Because I clearly remember the military guys in 28 Days saying the infectees had a few months left at most before dying off
I don't see how Bongland would still be a death zone
The British government has a mandate to import infected from Europe as part of its EU responsibilities
>this 30 year dead adult rage zombie says it is a child and therefore should be placed in a primary school class next to your daughter
>So the Rage zombies learnt to drink water, eat food, and take care of themselves? Because I clearly remember the military guys in 28 Days saying the infectees had a few months left at most before dying off
We see a bunch of them wasting away at the end
it will probably be a new pandemic, like what happened at the beginning of 28 weeks later when society was starting to go back to normal after the infected die off but then the virus resurges
That's not what happened in 28 weeks. Robert Carlyle's wife was infected but she was a carrier, they discovered her surviving in London at the children's old home and bring her in for study since she's the only carrier they've ever found. Carlyle's character breaks into the "secure" area and after he kisses her he gets infected from her saliva and then turns into an infected kills her and then roams around infecting other people starting a new outbreak.
>Robert Carlyle's wife wasn't infected but she was a carrier
Exact same situation with her kid in the movie who then spreads it to France right at the end
Did it not mutate by the end of 28 weeks when they invaded Paris
>I clearly remember the military guys in 28 Days saying the infectees had a few months left at most before dying off
It would work something like a plague, spread out further and further in waves while the zombies from earlier die off, leaving a handful of survivor behind. A "24 Years Later" movie would be a POST-apocalypse flick about the survivors trying to put shit back together again.
>A "24 Years Later" movie would be a POST-apocalypse flick about the survivors trying to put shit back together again.
That literally what 28 Weeks was until they decided to go full fricking moron half way through the movie.
They still pointed out in 28 Days later that there's no way the infected are going to be crossing rivers and mountains, survive winter, etc. They move at the speed of human locomotion and they can only walk so far before dying of hunger, because these are still living people and not magic zombies.
So the new movie would have to just be another sudden outbreak, rather than a "humanity lost" epilogue.
the people didnt follow masking and vaxx regulations
Because the movies made money so they have to make another one because it will probably make money
Ever heard of natural reservoir? immune or semi-immune animals retain the virus for an unlimited amount of time
>There can't POSSIBLY be a new source of infection/new outbreak
Paki/cow shit eating, hindu rape ape intellectuals.
28 weeks is 7 months, and the zombies were still a problem in the sequel. So, the military guys were just wrong.
The zombies weren't still a problem. They had been cleared out enough to begin repopulating part of London and now it was just mop up duty to make sure they got them all. They only became a problem when the military decided to have lax security with the carrier they brought into the city. It goes to shit because the husband is somehow able to get in the holding cell with his carrier wife and nobody else is around.
how the frick does a rage virus plague last 28 years? what do the rage zombies angrily grow crops when they aren't chasing the uninfected around?
Looks like wheatposting is back on the menu
That's like asking how there's been multiple bubonic plagues.
There was only one? Are you thinking of the black plague?
>historylet
moron
The plague doesn't turn everything into a violent monster that forgets how to eat. I don't recall us seeing how the rage virus affected animals other than the original chimps so animal carriers might not exist but I'm guessing that's the explanation they go with.
>angrily grow crops
hearty kek
Shoulda saved it for 2031 so it could literally be 28 years later.
is that westeros?
My body is ready.
The ending of this movie sucked.
I liked it.
Annihilation is a solid 7/10
>we are LE SELF DESTRUCTIVE
Wow, bravo israeliteland
most 5/10 movie i have ever watched, my reaction after watching it was basically "huh, that happened" , genuinely no idea what people saw in it that they found mindblowing
I liked some of the designs but the direction and writing (adaption) were hot garbage and the last monster looked worse than the lawnmower man from 1994
The size of the hand wiping out Edinburgh crossed with the one in NW England makes this look like a film about climate change sea levels.
Which would be dumb if that's the intent, since most of Edinburgh is so far above sea level that even the worst case(plausible) scenarios for sea level rise will only screw the people who live right on the coastline.
28 months would have been better. 28 years is moronic
you mean Two Years and Four Months Later?
>you mean Two Years and Four Months Later?
Doesn't roll off the tongue.
Because in real life it’s been like 22 years since the first movie was released.
>JOKER font
homie why?
to symbolize that it's getting crazy out there
Why skip Months and go straight to Years? I think society will be back to normal but Rage virus stuff will be pretty prevelant and people just learned to accept it as part of every day life now. Like there could be specialised task forces established to take care of smaller scale outbreaks like how they deal with terror attacks
>Somehow the rage virus has returned
I think it'll be good jokes aside.
PEOPLE were the real monsters all along.
>they're making a trilogy
WHY
They were planning a 28months later but that obviously never panned out so they're skipping straight to years.
I'm waiting for 28 decades later.
>Danny Boyle
I'm watching
>Alex garland
I'm watching
>Danny Boyle and Alex garland
I'm cooming
God, you can already tell that it's gonna suck. Just leave it alone. You did great with the first movie, the second was forgettable. It doesn't need to be a trilogy.
I genuinely hate modern movies.
No one cares what you hate homosexual
You obviously do, you fricking homo.
The real virus was white supremacy
It'll be anti-White. It'll be some sort of heavy-handed commentary on anti-immigration sentiment. I'm guessing the plot will be that Europe (and only Europe) has been completely taken over by the rage virus and all the heroes and unaffected are blacks, israelites, and Arabs.
Bingo.
But that is what would actually happen.
Don't forget some moronic "topical" reference to the coronavirus.
Oh god, that's going to be the plot isn't it? Someone refused to take their Pfizer rage vaccine and now everything's fricked.
too accurate.
i want off this planet
by the way, i'm never going to take it. never.
>YEH LIKE WE FOWN OWT DAT DE VYRAS RIGHT IS LIKE ONLY FO WIYPIPO COS LIKE YEH WIYPIPO INT EVUN PROPAR LIKE HUMAN RIGHT N LIKE RIGHT WE WUZ KANGZ INIT RIGHT YEH
>zero details about the movie yet apart from roughly when and where its set
>/pol/cels already imagine themselves as the victim
You're mentally ill and your family is afraid of you.
Cumbria bros, we're gonna make it!
28 years later? I wouldn't last even 28 DAYS without sex. There's going to be so much rape in this one.
>Days
>Weeks
>
>Years
ONE FRICKING JOB, GARLAND
They waited too long for 'Months' it would sound daft at this point.
Time is never time at all
28 DECADES LATER
28 MILENNIAS LATER AHHHHH
Black folk are worse than nuclear bombs and engineered bioweapons.
Bloody England!
28 months is not a long time
Because it's a metaphor for the ongoing assisted suicide of the West in general and Britain in particular.
in the early 90s in school, on RE teacher was saying "i always think it' so stupid when people complain about foreigners being here when they're only 2% of the population".
it was a leftist repeated programmed phrase, they'd say "they're only a tiny proportion of the population".
now those fricking c**ts are going to die without having to suffer the hellhole they assisted in the creation of.
what if it's just literally 28 years later and the zombies are all dead. it's a drama about people living in the post zombie world an shit.
Is 28 Days Later worth a rewatch?
I watched it several years ago, liked it well enough, and then never thought about it again.
Will it sucks balls if I watch it again?
It's pretty good on rewatch. The visual style stands out and you find yourself wishing for more post-rock soundtracks in horror.
I liked it back then, but on rewatch my enjoyment of it decreased severely. I still think the first half of the movie is great, but it gets progressively worst, the end is especially bad with the rapist military. I guess Alex Garland can't help but inject his feminist ideas in all of his scripts.
You will suck balls if you watch it again
I think it still holds up as a movie, though the main character kids are unlikable af. Like the young kid I can understand being dumb, but the hot sister is supposed to be older and wiser.
the bit where everyone is trapped in a locked room and the lights are flickering and the dad is let in stands out as one of the best horror scenes I've seen tbh
your talking about weeks, not days
anyway I hope there is no more this main theme https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=ST2H8FWDvEA create something original plz lol
Oh yeah, I misread it since others discussed Weeks. I still think Days holds up better as a zombie/post-apocalypse movie tbh, though I wish the roadtrip section would have lasted longer and the final bit at the mansion a bit shorter.
...perhaps it's time I rewatch Zombieland.
it's already established that the virus causes the zombies to die from starvation within a few days / weeks of exposure, and that the virus is only dangerous at the initial spread since it spreads rapidly and infects very fast, but this would also mean it burns out so fast you can just bunker down somewhere for a month and be in the clear.
It's just stupid, all you would need to do is quarantine unless there's carriers that are spreading it without being infected themselves, which is what the character's wife was in 28 weeks.
Either way, even lasting 2-3 days would be unfeasible unless the zombies have a source of water and are drinking. Especially since it's a virus that makes them extremely active, running, sprinting, fighting physically with uninfected, the body would become completely dehydrated within a day or two from that kind of activity with no replenishment, and especially since it's shown that they spread the virus by vomiting blood on uninfected people, so they are losing even more water. Their heart rate must be incredibly high, as would be their breathing probably nearly constantly in hyperventilation, which means they are losing tons of water with every breath they take. The zombies would realistically only last 2 days maybe 3 if there wasn't as much activity. Eventually without water they would just collapse like they're shown at the end of 28 days and just die on the spot from dehydration.
So what is the plot of this? 28 years if the virus was uncontrolled in its spread and went around the entire globe, it would have burned out so fast by either infecting almost everyone and then all the infected dying, and then what survivors were left would just inherit a mostly empty world. The only way forward is to have the virus behave completely different in a sequel to make them more traditional fantasy zombies that never die.
I assume it's a completely new pandemic.
I guarantee there'll be some topical plot about the population taking vaccines to stay ahead of virus mutations carried by animals, but some group still stop taking them out of political views and the virus gets out again.
>black hands pawing all over britain
Subtle, Alex
Would norfs survive the outbreak?
fake quotes btw x
Would they ever do 28 seconds later?
I made that movie with your mom last night
That was at the start of the first movie.
>mogs everything in your path
>ruined by its completely untelegraphed supernatural serial killer horror slasher 3rd act
>filtered by unbridled power of Helios
28 Weeks Later was so fricking stupid.
"Hey we got this big hotel with strong doors we can lock. Instead of just telling everyone to go to their room and locking their doors, let's shove everyone into a basement and chain the doors shut."
"Hey, we got the US military here. They totally don't have armored Humvees, APCs, Bradley's, or Abrams tanks that are completely immune to infinite numbers of infected."
The entire movie only happens because everyone reacts in the most idiotic way possible.
>28 Years Later- the rise of zombie wiener
i cant wait for 28 decades later where theres zombies but in the future
Studio execs trying to make easy money by reheating old franchises.
>28 years later
>civilisation recovered, the plague is a vague memory only the older survivors remember
>people feel safe, protected
>shady lab people still have samples of the virus, modify it, make more versatile
>classic lab accident happens, virus breaks out again
>cillian murphy as aged Veteran leads a group of delusional people who thought the virus was a myth
>storyline repeats itself but murphy dies in the end to safe the community yadda yadda
Something like that. Making the Zombies survive 30 years is moronic
i hope you're right, that sounds shitty and cliche but at least its not completely silly
>people who thought the virus was a myth
It happened less than three decades ago in-universe, how could they think it's a myth?
Covid happened much more recently and a lot of people think that was a myth or a hoax or a scam
they need a narritve reset to introduce 28 to zoom zooms.
The first movie is ancient histroy to them, nobody even saw the 2nd. So I think they just start new with le oppenheimer to be recognizable
What the frick is the problem zombie movies have with actually depicting the fun part of a zombie apocalypse?
(The initial outbreak)
I don’t give a frick about what happens AFTER everything falls. Post apocalyptic shit is so boring. I want constant terror and chaos. That’s the one thing world war z and dawn of the dead 2004s opening get right
Hard to shoot probably with so many elements like people running around, police shooting at everything, all that jazz. It's much cheaper to do it post-outbreak, all you need to do is just throw out some litter on the set and put some actors with make-up.
The TWD spinoff for Daryl had some nice flashbacks to when shit was hitting the fan in Paris. 2004 Dawn of the Dead also had a really good newsreel in the DVD.
This DVD extra is honestly one of the better pieces of zombie media made.
Much like Dune or Fallout, I'm going to avoid the threads like the plague because Cinemaphile will never give the project it's fair shake, even if it's fantastic.
Okay, what's up with big zombie movies popping up again now? We got I Am Legend 2 in the works and now this coming up soon.
New franchises are ableist or something.. . . I dunno. Just eat your slop.
Did Walking Dead (comic) copy 28 Days Later with the main character missing the initial outbreak due to being in a coma? Or is everyone a hack with a lack of budget (or vision)?
Garland wrote ....28 days later script when he was 20+ years old.
>28 Years Later
Is this a movie about bongs & brexit?
Don't Reddit me.
Why did he make the robot super strong? It should have been weak so in the event of it going rogue it couldn't hurt anyone.
It wasn't that strong
>All that groping.
Are the zombies street-shitters this time?
That would be an improvement in smell