28 Years Later
Are we in for kino?
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
28 Years Later. Are we in for kino?
28 Years Later
Are we in for kino?
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
I hope people use AI to upscale the first movie because the moronic director used some early 2000s shitty camera to shoot the whole thing. The quality is horrible. Pretty good movie though.
Yea they need to re release both of these with better quality t b h
It's fine and makes it even more kino. I hate current 4k smooth looking movies. Bring back film grain
>Bring back film grain
it was shot on a shitty digital camera, there's no fricking grain
It's real in my mind ok.
But I have never watched the movie on anything but a crt
BRING BACK MEGAPIXELS
Ho to bed moron.
>begging for soulless ai
zoomer or thirdy
you want them to use an ai to add fake details to the frame? why?
He wasn't moronic. It made them do guerilla shooting on the streets for its most memorable shots.
They already did that and the movie looks like Picasso paintings
But that was part of the charm. I instantly recognized it as early 2000s kino during the first scene. It felt like a post-apocalyptic early season of Peep Show.
I really like that first movie (haven't seen Weeks) but holy shit, shooting on video did not complement the cinematography
People have tried that for ages with upscale ai and it always look like crap. Also been fair to Boyle they didnt shoot the first movie on tape because he wanted to but because for the sequence in the totally empty city they needed 40 cameras for coverage, which the budget couldt afford if they were to shoot on film.
James Cameron did that with The Terminator remasters and it looks fricking terrible. Peter Jackson ruined Get Back using the same shit too.
I loved 28DL in the theater but I can't watch it because the video quality is so poor.
It still holds up
>to upscale the first movie
Upscaling wouldn't change anything.
the low quality digital was an aesthetic and practical choice
if they filmed in high detail the empty London shots would be fricked up and you would see people in office windows and stuff
the way they pulled off those shots with limited budget and cooperation with the city is impressive
you morons always forget the final scene with Jim waking up from the crash is shot on 35mm and looks pristine. almost like the ugliness is the point.
Also london in 4k is just horrifying. They live like that
Putting humans into depressing hellscapes is how you force them to produce kino escapism.
>not 28 months later
you had one job
Yeah wtf???
That's all we wanted. 28 years is too big of a time leap
28 fortnights
>American date format or something
That's being saved for the prequel to the sequel
this
OP kys
the frick did op do??
kys
>28 scores later
this, frick them for making me wait this long only to be disappointed
28 YEARS???? what's it gonna be about? cleanup crews looking for infected mummies in the city ruins? kids learning in history class about the great epidemic? some bullshit about those that are immune/adapted to the virus vs the normal humans?
THIS
checkin' these quads
Half the population doesnt think it was real and rebel agaisnt the protocols in place to keep them safe. News reports and scientists are dimissed as false news, and the virus spreads like wildfire and millions die. The conflict is pockets of survivors vs dumb rednecks who fight over being allowed into the syrvivors safe zones, bringing chaos
mite b cool but hard to see how it will be zombies
rage burns out fast like a fuse. it's not likely to sustain itself steadily over 28 years or come back unless it's stored or recreated
how long does rabies stay viable in a corpse anyway?
They only die if they don't get food. It's plausible that some group captured some of them to study
>28 days later
>28 weeks later
>28 fortnights later
>28 months later
>28 trimesters later
>28 semesters later
>28 years later
>28 olympiads later
>28 decades later
>28 scores later
>28 jubilees later
>28 centuries later
28 millennia later
Your thinking too small.
28 multiverses later, we can mix with the mcu and whatever
28 seconds later- YouTube short video showing Patient Zero getting infected
28 minutes later- Patient Zero going on initial rampage infecting dozens before being put down. Basically a pilot episode.
28 Hours later - 28 episode TV series about the initial infected spreading across the UK. Finale shows an infected perspective of the chase scene from the first film's intro.
>28 seconds later
already covered in the movie but kino idea anyway
book it
28 Hours actually sounds good, I wouldn't mind seeing the actual downfall instead of after. Stuff like this always gets infinite worse the further you get from the actual outbreak event.
What if the infected in the 28 Years Later sequel have evolved into something similar to the Crossed zombies/infected from the horror comic book series?
We already had The Sadness.
I'm not watching asiatic shit
You forgot the Crazies.
?si=XmtR0KCKz1_IIADF
This is The Crossed with the numbers and "jerking off onto bullets and slitting holes in pregnant bellies to frick the fetus" ultra-moronic edginess filed off.
That film was fricking terrible.
True to its source material!
That movie was just the jailhouse scene from TDK, complete with "getting caught was part of my plan" and useful hothead idiot who helps it all unfold by being a useful hothead idiot tropes.
Any anons be warned that it all takes place in a single set with a glass holding cell in the middle.
They would have starved or rotted away after a few years anyway
Crossed is unbelievably shitty
I miss voodoo zombies. Disease zombies just aren't as spooky.
biologically feasible disease zombies like 28 Days are my favorite. it's surprisingly one of the only films to do it justice
supernatural reanimation like TWD can be cool too but it needs to make sense in a grand scope kind of way to be worthwhile and TWD is shit
TWD isn’t supernatural.
>Alex Garland writing the script
What do you mean, he wrote the first movie
You just know they'll frick it up by making it about black lesbians. If you think Hollywood is fricked, London films are ten times worse.
i dont think you even want it to be anything else just ao you can cry and seethe and shit your pants some more about your personal boogiemen.
Listen homosexual, you can stop gaslighting. We all have seen movies. We all know it is a physical casting requirement required by guilds, studios, investors, and award ceremonies. You can come out of your reddit bubble and talk about it.
The average woman cries less than you do.
What am I looking at here?
Sort of looks like the Georgia Guidestones?
>Meant to survive the collapse of human civilization
>One schizo breaks them.
The official start of WWNWO.
I'm moronic and druk what was this webm about again..?
globalist monument being btfo'd
He's not wrong though, is he?
Amen, brother.
Makes more sense, in the UK half the population is black.
moron
They already did that in the prior ones, moron
>first movie: MEN ARE LE RAPISTS AND SHIEET
>second movie: MEN ABANDON WIFE, MAN BAD
>third movie: ??
not a completely fair appraisal considering there are good men in it too, however they do seem more kind to female characters in general
The White guy was a sissy who had to be lead around by the stronk blaxk womanz who dont need no mans in the first movie.
28 Years after the original rage outbreak London has become a utopia free of crime and misery thanks to the diverse immigrants that repopulated the city. Until one day a cabal of cis white males...
To be fair, that kind of was the plot of the first two movies.
>Humans are... LE REAL MONSTERS?
>first movie: British military goes nuts
>second movie: US military comes up with a "lockdown" system that will 100% infect all the British civilians with just one infected, just so they can wipe out the few remaining Brits who want to repopulate the island, finally turning it into Airstrip 51
>third movie: military goes nuts and releases the rage virus on an enemy country so they'll have a justification to invade
>MEN ABANDON WIFE, MAN BAD
Don couldn't have done anything. There was a pack of infected between them and he didn't even have a weapon, not that it would have mattered. She had time to escape and if she would have left the kid he probably would have been able to hide and it was her fault the infected found them anyway because she let the kid in so really she's the one that got everyone in their group killed.
Don's only real flaw was breaking quarantine to kiss her.
>breaking quarantine to kiss her.
>hey guys I know we're a military-run operation spearheading a colonisation and using strict rules for everyone's movements, but it's fine if the random janitor has access to our most secure rooms, right? I don't want to empty my trash bin by myself.
You could probably make up some bullshit as to why he had universal acces but the fact that they didn’t have his wife under constant surveillance is completely unrealistic and ruins the film for me
Each movie is about the military fricking up
>military saves some of the infected to study them
>spend years trying to turn the rage virus into a super soldier program
>due to their training and the evolution of the virus the infected are now smarter and live longer
>dimwit guard slips up and infected break free
Just make another Resident Evil for fricks sake.
Different IP. It's not a matter of one or the other
Picrel proves you wrong
Some of the journalism around 28 Days Later is weird to me because it feels like journalists prefer to credit 28 Days Later with the revival of the zombie genre, but IMO Resident Evil did way more. The 2002 film made undead zombies cool again. 28 Days Later was so embarrassed of being a zombie movie it refused to have undead zombies. The sequel in 2004 laid much of the groundwork for modern "city in flames, zombies everywhere" iconography. Even I Am Legend copypastes those scenes from the second RE film where Umbrella is sealing the city and shit is going wrong. The third RE film in the desert from 2007 is the template for most post-apocalyptic zombie cinema. It might be a loose remake of Day of the Dead, but it is its own, very influential thing.
Same with Zack Snyder's Dawn of the Dead in 2004. Is it influential? Absolutely. The Resident Evil movies later deconstructed/paid homage to it. But you watch a modern zombie movie, and it more likely resembles one of the RE films than DotD '04.
It sorta feels like film writers turn up their noses at Resident Evil in favor of creating a zombie canon of more "respectable" franchises.
the opening of 28 days later alone revived the zombie genre
You mean the opening with the monkeys in cages? Or the opening with the empty city? Because RE did that a full seven months earlier.
?si=B2lDqCVYFdb-2xjc&t=93
It doesn't matter who technically did it first. What matters is which one caught on.
>What matters is which one caught on.
Uh... it was Resident Evil. In terms of pop culture and film industry influence, Resident Evil absolutely beat 28 Days Later.
David Ayer and Kurt Wimmer just released The Beekeeper, which is about a highly trained killer whose job is to "Protect the Hive". Where do you think Kurt "I made Ultraviolet with Milla Jovovich" Wimmer got that story idea? Gee, I wonder. It's a complete mystery. If only there was a billion dollar zombie film franchise where the main character is an elite killer whose job was to "protect the hive". Gee, I wonder if there's anything else that connects The Beekeeper to Resident Evil. Some kind of common factor. Once you see the patterns, you can't ever see the world the same way again. It's all connected. It's just surprising more schizos don't notice it.
>third movie: trans people are the heroes who can save us all
third movie: men are black women
TAKE THE VACCINE
AND DIE
Everything bad in the second movie literally happens because of the idiocy of women though.
What you've gone a whole 28 fricking days without the touch of the fairer sex?
third movie will be remake of first movie, do you even know hollywood?
why can't they portray these post-apocalyptic scenarios realistically?
and pic related is being generous
in reality women will be what they really are; property
and their value will be based on how many previous owners they've had and their age
Crossed kinda does that. Like a guy keeps his zombie daughter locked up, he fricks her whenever he wants and has impregnated her, when she gives birth she eats her own baby straight away and begs for more of daddy's wiener
What crossed issue?
That's interesting
watch The Survivalist
Literally the truth. Men are filthy rapists who feel no need to stick around for anyone else.
he (alex) also wrote MEN. He is clearly an anti man anti white piece of shit
in third movie they have to go full circle somehow, so: men abandon their manhood and become >women (then they experience oppression and are raped by the military)
+
>in third movie
It's the first movie in a new trilogy
I'm hoping for more post apocalyptic CRUST kino
>rage zombies
Fricking lame.
>covid lockdown propaganda 28 film
I'll pass
The zombie market has been thoroughly squeezed dry, this is like getting blood from a stone. The whole genre now feels like a cultural artifact from 2010. Even The Last of Us, a ''prestige'' show by "artists", feels extremely late to the party and corny.
Oh god it will be a lot of that won't it.
Yeah, at this point, if we got another "infected" movie, it'd be better to avoid being outright zombies or anything other comparable type of infected. Personally, I'd love to see someone take another stab at something like the original Crazies.
> Even The Last of Us, a ''prestige'' show by "artists", feels extremely late to the party and corny.
No, it was just shit.
28 Days was shot on a $500 1998 Canon XL 1 DV camera (512x492 resolution) with a budget of $8m. They used sharpening and other processing to try and improve the quality but it's inherently limited. One of the reasons for using such a camera was the constraints of filming inside brief windows with minimal London traffic.
Probably impossible to make today.
It was virtually all English then. Now poo has ruined the world. Everywhere is africa. It's over. Nice resolution though.
>Probably impossible to make today.
There are feature films made today with iPhones.
The point is that you would be unlikely to get the shots of London without people now.
They will just CGI that shit and/or shoot at odd hours to have no people. And who says it has to take place in London?
>implying movie companies didn't shoot hundreds of hours of footage like that in every big city during the small hours of the morning during covid
why do you think the pandemic happened? They did it for the kinos. The world was running low on stock footage and big Hollywood decided to pull the plug to make it happen
What?
You just do the same as they did back then: Just do it too fricking early.
And redo the shot if you frick up and get a taxi/baker doing some form of morning commute in the frame.
You got a fricking timeframe of 3-4 months where its light enough in the morning to shoot the film at early morning.
>And redo the shot
>implying they wouldn't just CGI them out
London does get empty at night with nothing but bums loitering around Piccadilly
Bullshit, no way a Canon XL-1 was $500 back when they shot 28 Days Later in 2001. It would have been closer to $5 grand, if not more. The XL1 and XL2 MiniDV camcorders were Canon's flagship models and were both considered ground-breaking tech at the time of their respective releases.
It retailed for 588,000 yen at launch, adjusted for inflation that’s about $4100 and some change. You kids can google this shit, you know that right? Also Mini DVs were 480i but there were ways around this quality issue. Didn’t really matter though, this was so far pre-720p that 480i was considered high quality enough for prosumer cams until the EX-1 and the HVC-200 dropped in the later ‘00’s.
Canon XL2 was $7 grand AUD brand new in 2006, and the high-definition Canon XL H1 (which couldn't even do 1080p) was $14 grand AUD. Sony EX1 was $7,499 USD in late 2008. All that camera tech was prohibitively expensive for a normal person just 15 years ago, it's only because of smart phones that people are able to get "good video" for cheap these days.
thumbnail looks like a baby dino skeleton humping a soccer player's leg
Can't wait for the cast and crew to get stabbed by shitslime dingy divers and bame nogs.
I watched it for a millisecnd. Or that might have been a picture I looked at. Either way it's shit.
Doesn't feel like they could do much with it. The movies already did really well to cover characters, concepts, and where shit could go with this kind of infected, and the infected can't really go anywhere as-is because they're depicted as having zero self-preservation skills and die of starvation within 5 weeks. Any change they could make or any attempt to re-contextualize/evolve the infection would be uninspired, contrived, or overdone.
>Doesn't feel like they could do much with it.
I disagree. The first one worked because it was easy to isolate an island, the virus spreading to the mainland is a fine idea. The second movie (which generally sucked, don't get me wrong) introduced carriers. Both movies implied some infected might retain some semblance of intelligence or planning.
I think 28 months later set in mainland Europe would have been a better idea.
How the hell has the rage virus continued to spread for 28 years if the infected all starve out or die of exposure like normal people in the first two movies? Do they just wait like one week too little when they try to start repopulating a place and have an infection break out every year?
Could just hae nothing to do with zombies and only focus on the fallout of it. Seems unlikely though considering people's expectations.
>implying the military wouldn't have gotten samples of infected blood to "study"
JUST TAKE THE JAB, CHUD!
It will be 28 years the first infection. A new outbreak.
Chuds refused to take the 28th booster shot, it was inevitable.
>zombies learn how to farm
If you've seen the second movie why are you even asking this
It's not gonna be a tlou world
hopefully it's not pozzed.
28 years later is too unbelievable of a time period for the virus to still be an issue. 28 months later would have been good as you could see the effect it had on Europe after poots brought it there or something I forget.
>zombie movie
>in 2024
Yeah, nah. Moment's passed.
An rage epidemic wont even last longer than a month, since the infected are not actually dead. They all will die of dehydration and exposure after a two or three weeks.
How is this going to work after three decades?
It was a virus created by the government. They could just use it during war. The movies were never an apocalypse. It was always a contained virus.
what did he mean by this?
No roastie or rugrat is worth getting bitten for.
went to go get some milk
He did nothing wrong
The moment that homosexual got bitten by his wife in that age zone I turned the movie off. It was too rage inducting at that point. My patience for moronic characters doing moronic shit was exhausted. Still haven't finished the movie to this day.
>Still haven't finished the movie to this day.
Noice. Checked.
why didnt she run too?
>DON YOU GET BACK HERE AND FIST FIGHT THESE INFECTED THAT WILL KILL YOU WITH A SINGLE SCRATCH
>DON WHERE ARE YOU GOING?
>DOOOONNN
Why do people call Don a coward when he fought off the infected in the beginning? At that point he didn't have a weapon, what did she want him to do? He literally gave Alice more than enough time to escape but she was fricking around looking for the kid.
the most kino shot of the whole movie and right in the beginning. the scene where they start blasting civvies is good too, really too bad the moronic helicopter zombie grinder scene is in this film. 28 days is infinitely better.
also the theme for weeks was made for a single scene in days, if they just used it once in the beginning and then not again it would have been fine as a call back to the previous film. the fact it's the theme for the whole movie is just laziness.
>the most kino shot of the whole movie and right in the beginning.
IIRC danny boyle directed that scene and fresnadillo did everything else.
Honestly I would've just jumped out the window instead of just giving up.
When 9/11 happenedI did the same and it worked out.
>When 9/11 happenedI did the same and it worked out.
mark pls
>SHE TURNED THE WEANS AGAINST US
>THE WEAN TURNED HER AGAINST US
what did she think he was going to help with?
running from the responsibility of 'manning up' for a brave single mother and her child
>The only good scene in the entire movie
>absolute kino and mogs every other zombie movie
Its a shame the entire movie wasnt as good as it started.
I love that pic
She disobeyed his orders in favor for a strangers child, obviously she was defective and no longer wife material - and let's be honest, all women like that deserve to die being ripped apart by feral Zombies.
TBF, she did basically kill the half dozen inside the house just to give the kid a couple more minutes to live.
BE A STEPDAD, SAVE MY SON!!
WEE LASSY GOT GLASSED AND IM LEAVIN
"I told you we were leaving at 8am!"
A new trilogy???
There was an old trilogy?
Mad Max with zombies.
I was gonna comment something but everyone ITT are fricking moronic so I'll just complain about that instead.
I think 28 years could work if the world basically solved the rage virus problem but 28 years later it came back somehow and could even follow Cillians character re-experiencing it all over again, this time seeing it as it happens vs being in a coma
This is what the plot will most likely be like and it's gonna be boring shit, but I'd be pleasantly surprised if they pulled a WWZ narrative true to the book instead and it would be a collection of stories how the virus spread throughout Europe and how they eventually stopped it.
Would not this make no sense? These zombies starve quickly to death, a couple of years would be enough to clean the entire world, and if they are starting a new virus what's the point of using the franchise name?
Could be just the Rage Virus getting loose again, like small pox or ebola have outbreaks every so often.
So is there like a person with ebola like hidden for 20 years and one day the dude decides to take a power walk and frick up everything?
someone shags an infected monkey, innit?
More like gets shagged but if that's the plot then again, why not just start a whole new franchise.
Because a new franchise won't have people go to the cinema just because they recognise the title...
I'd be interesting to see a sort of sci-fi alternate future in which zombie outbreaks are just something people have to live with in Europe while the rest of the world goes on as normal in America, Asia and Africa. I do admit that I am more interested in that setting than in any story you could tell in it. But this could honestly be a good shot in the arm for zombie movies by making the infected another gear in the machine rather than the entire machine itself.
>I'd be interesting to see a sort of sci-fi alternate future in which zombie outbreaks are just something people have to live with in Europe while the rest of the world goes on as normal in America, Asia and Africa.
It's worth noting that the Resident Evil Netflix show was literally set in a post-apocalyptic future. As in, the apocalypse happened, billions died, and now Umbrella are in charge of a big chunk of territory. The zombies are "contained", and life goes on -- different organizations run different countries. It's one the few pieces of zombie media to be genuinely post-apocalyptic, as opposed to mid-apocalyptic. It was an ultimately underdeveloped story concept.
>Netflix show
I have never seen or heard of anything made by Netflix be worth watching.
The Netflix RE show was cancelled after one season. Has major problems, but some neat ideas. Most of its good ideas were copied verbatim from the movies (they even copied the "let's use zombies as slave workers" idea), but it has a few neat ideas of its own like Umbrella being on the rocks financially so they start peddling a dangerous behavioral modification drug (that has an undisclosed side effect where behavioral changes can be programmed by using flashing lights after taking the drug), and shit goes sideways. And of course the whole "What happens after the apocalypse?" idea. Zombie fiction is generally scared of showing the fall of civilization, and how civilization rebuilds. They prefer civilization in a permanent state of zombie-fearing moronation.
>has major problems
>doesn’t mention the shitty cast of diversity hires
Kys
>billions die
>future is still full of diversity mutts and nogs
still never watching it
kek, this.
I've always said that someone should make a show about how the world would change if everyone who dies comes back as a raving cannibal, after the initial outbreaks were squashed by the military firebombing cities and shit. Emergency personnel would all have to pack guns because any car crash or house fire could result in another zombie epidemic and people would shun old and sick people because they'd worry they'd die in line at the grocery store and attack them. Laws would be set up so that everyone must sleep alone in a locked room in case they die in their sleep, all hospitals would handcuff the patients to their beds etc. etc. Not to mention all the religious fanatics creating powerful factions because they think we're experiencing The Rapture and society need to fall completely for Jesus to arrive, or people starting to believe in various forms of magic.
Everyone might be packing heat too. But that could also increase the chance of people dying and more zombies showing up. It'd set an interesting social dynamic that would easily result in totalitarianism. There's a lot of potential in this.
I think guns would be strictly forbidden except for people highly trained in hitting headshots, because any missed shots could make the outbreak worse(or guns designed for 'euthanisations' with little risk of killing anyone with a missed shot). But people would 100% be encouraged to walk around with blunt weapons, which would in itself cause deaths when people inevitably escalate fights. Push a guy and he falls and hits his head on the curb? Well shit he's not getting up right away, better make sure his brains are mush for the safety of society! It's either that or people become incredibly wary of any physical altercations because it's hard for a single person to kill a recently turned zombie and so killing someone by mistake is a death sentence.
Rough sports and lots of outdoors activities would probably be outlawed as well, because we can't risk little Timmy being killed on the football field and causing an outbreak of helmet-wearing zombies.
There are dozens of books about this kinda shit.
Any good one you can recommend?
Are we on Cinemaphile?
yea but someone with ebola or smallpox could feasibly travel on ships/planes and subtly infect hundreds of people. rage presents instantly
>2002: Resident Evil mogs 28 Days Later.
>2007: Resident Evil Extinction mogs 28 Weeks Later.
>2012: Resident Evil Retribution mogs Dredd.
>2025: ????
Big moron Black person gorilla.
I think this might be the worst taste I have ever seen on Cinemaphile. Are you that anon convinced that Anderson is an auteur?
>are we in for kino?
No. The only good thing about the "28 <TIMESTAMP> Later" franchise is the one song.
How would that work? Don't the zombies starve in this?
no one cares about post-postapocalyptic schlock, just look at the walking dead. all the fun of a zombie outbreak is within the first year of it happening
Got to agree with you. I'd be more interested in 28 hours later, a prequel about the escaped chimps spreading rhe virus in London and the breakdown of civilization.
>28 hours later
also a much better idea
Frick them. Films should be made because of a single good idea, not as a system to print more money. The Dark Universe thought them jack shit. Can't wait for 28 Slops Later to fail as the second movie.
Why are you 'waiting for it to fail'? If you're not interested in something then just ignore it
>First declaration about the movie is to make a new trilogy, not another movie
First red flag
>Most of the good ideas were already used in the first movie
Second red flag
>The second movie was not so good
Third red flag
>B...BUT... THIS SLOP WILL BE DIFFERENT, I SWEAR!!!!
Why is Cinemaphile always like this?
>hates the idea
>won't leave the thread
>"why don't you all share MY opinions? Don't you know we're supposed to be a hivemind??"
Frick off
>How dare you respond to my questions with sound arguments!!!!???? This is my thread!!!!!! You are supposed to love this slop to post in here!!!!!
kek
>sound arguments
What the frick happened to 28 months later?
They skipped 28 Fortnights Later, 28 Months Later and 28 Seasons Later. What a rip.
kino? in this day and age? there is no such thing my dear anon, every movie that comes out today is trash with subtle and more often that not, not so subtle propaganda.
My guess the reason for 28 YEARS later rather than MONTHS is because the crew are all 22 years older, so to bring them back in a 28 Months Later movie, they would all have to be de-aged for the entire movie, which is gay.
I just hope they bring back my little semen demon Megan Burns, and she has big booba and sucks wiener.
meant to say cast, not crew***
Both the movies had different casts, the third one should too.
They did it for the first one, why do you think they can't now? It's expensive but it can be done.
>Both the movies had different casts, the third one should too.
I disagree.
Heard they are going to bring back the Jeremy Renner character from 28 Weeks Later and have him be a retired spec ops dude who lost his penis in a friendly-fire accident unrelated to the rage virus.
At this point they should just wait until 2030 to put it out
28 genders later
>there are no actual zombies
>the soldiers have just gone 28 years without sex and turned into cannibals
could it work?
>without sex and turned into cannibals
Huh?
You don't frick the cow that you gonna eat, right?
Reason 28 Days Later was so great was because it was a slice of life psychological action horror film disguised as a normie zombie movie. 28 Weeks Later had the same atmosphere in the intro and the divulged into a shitty run of the mill zombie movie. Alex Garland lost his edge and has fallen off hard. Don't think this will work.
shut up homosexual nobody would've of cared about the movie if it wasn't for the zombies
>would've of
moronic Black person, take ESL classes
ehh 28 Days could have still been good without a single live zombie
108 countries later
>Oh boy, I hope its a heavy handed allegory for current year politics
>Danny Boyle and Alex Garland
Kino confirmed
I hope they ignore 28 weeks later. Terrible film outside of the intro.
I would actually like it if there were very few zombies and the movie was about a world in which Europe ceased to be an economic power and all the aftermath that comes with your population turning into rabid beasts.
28 fricking years?
that's almost three decades, that's like the how long ago the 90s were to us
What's next, 28 fricking decades?
28 years after the first film which was set in 2002 so 2030.
2002 was 28 years ago
>Roight lads, 5 hours without pussy innit? The Queen has fallen, start up the slave farms
Kek, every time.
If anything remotely serious happened in the UK, after 28 days it would be literally just farmers and parts of the military left. No one else has a clue. There wouldn't be "survivors" in cities, just a load of dead fat people with NHS rainbow badges and foreigners eating their flesh
How about 28 Thousand Years Later and it's just a low budget sci-fi not related to zombies in any way.
28 Thousand years later and it's just a future spacefaring human race coming back to Earth and discovers a literal zombie frozen in iceblock like a cartoon and unleashes the virus again
Kino
28 BAMES later
If I recall the only way they made the plot of 28 weeks later happen is making the character act so unbelievably moronic that it wasn't worth finishing . I remember being angry that the movie wasted my life.
28 Weeks Later was by a different team. It wasn't even written by the same people as the original. Why did that happen?
28 years later they should have a vaccine ready for this Rage virus
no, danny boyle is past it
No. Stop with the pathetic MEMBER shit. Just non stop memberberries. Make something new.
28 years later
The virus is forcibly mutated so the movie can become apocalypse kino
Lol
Shit I forgot about that. TWD basically ripped this right off.
You should watch The Day of the Triffids then, 24 Days Later rips off that novel and film step by step. Alex Garland is a plagiarist piece of shit that should be kicked of any production to be made. Frick him,
I only found out right now the guy who directed 28 Days is the same fricking guy who did Trainspotting
looks like Cillian's Murphy is nothing special
Why can't we ever get 28 minutes later? I want to see the fall of humanity.
>Alex Garland writing the script.
RIP to the third act
>film opens on a beach
>an aged ragey wanders the beach having survived 28 years eating people
>the virus has progressed to make the rage insatiably horny
>he spots a human cis white male (straight btw) in the distance with his daughter
>ragey brutally rapes both with a seashell before cumming in the conch
>Alex garland has drew the scene for himself and maaturbates furiously to the storyboard every night while zapping his nipples
>Danny Boy edits it so its "just implied you don't see anything"
it will be much worse than godawful 28 weeks. im not even going to pretend to consider watching it
they should have stopped with the first movie
28 LIGHTYEARS LATER.
28 Gays Later
28 NEETs Later
28 Beers Later
2 was absolute shit because they wanted to please the burger audience, if they follow the same formula this movie will have car drifting zombie blender crap F&F tier action.
> if they follow the same formula this movie will have car drifting zombie blender crap F&F tier action.
?si=FTtqV65n4ikuHj2E&t=62
This was genuinely good news.
We have been in a zombie film drought
zombie films genuinely take themselves seriously are so hard to come by in the past 6 years
>days
>weeks
>fortnights
>lunar months
>months
>years
>trilogy
Its gonna suck. Damn near every fricking movie sequel baits, its tiring and souless. That zombie, rebel moon Snyder mess is the gameplan for every sci-fi movie.
Opinion.
Don, from the second movie, did the right thing. No way he could save his wife.
Of course he did the right thing. I'm not gonna listen to a bunch of armchair moralgay redditors talk about how heroic they would have been. The fact she "survived" it is a freak fluke and the film is moronic for making it out like he did the wrong thing. These are HIGHLY overrated zombie films and I love when I say that the Hive comes out with
>AKSHUALLY they aren't technically zombies so-
Shut the frick up
For how cucked Garland is after all these years, 28 years later will be only about women who frick blacks and non-whites fighting white people who enslaved zombies to have them as sexual slaves, so the strong women fight for free them from their white masters.
>Alex Garland
Oh great, so a completely shit third act.
>with the hopes to launch a new trilogy
Danny mate it's been 21 years and you haven't even finished the first one
Whenever I'm reminded of these movies this is all I think about
wouldnt it be months not years? then years then decades. maybe sneak in a quarters if you dont wanna jump that far
The first 10 minutes of 28 Weeks Later is fantastic, the rest of the film is dogshit
28 CUMSHOTS LATER
FUND IT!
My first date with my wife was to see 28 Weeks Later in theaters, so I am looking forward to it
Your poor wife, a marriage founded on a shitty movie
28 years a slave. it’s gonna be a crossover movie
Cillian
If they get Cillian, he will be expensive now, and the movie will be big budget and probably play it safe/have a lot of exec meddling. Make it cheaply without major stars
I want to be redone, the concept is good, raged based zombies are better than the walking dead because the threat will last much longer than decaying dead. American version would be cool.
How the frick are these zombies moving so fast and sprinting inhuman speeds even after the characters shoot their knee caps or a large part of their legs? If I shoot your kneecap, you're not getting back up and standing up again, let alone running.
I don't care about zombies. They're done to death.
>Not a zombie virus
>more like an advanced form of rabbis virus.
The fact that this shit is still an issue 28 WEEKS later is bullshit
It's clear by the end of the first film that the infected eventually starve to death because the virus doesn't let them eat.
2(8) more weeks
Why can't we get a zombie epic w/ escalation as the theme? Going from Contagion to full blown apocalypse.
28 Queers Later
28 Boosters Later
What are the chances there is a vaccine theme? EG there is a cure but non-lefties don't take it because they think it is not safe and is causing the disease
I can see them doing it. As if people really wouldn't get one vaccine that works 100% in preventing them to turn into zombies. It would only make sense if it had a fairly high chance of some serious side effects.
There won’t be any side effects just le evil right wing conspiracy theorists. And when people say “that isn’t believable” the writers will reply “but it happened during covid”.
I was going to say kino, but the "with the hope to launch a new trilogy" ruined it. Spastic morons, just focus on doing a good movie. Also you never did a trilogy before either.
I would like 28 hours later. Military/government vs people/zombies is kino but they never do it properly due to budget.
Same, this is always my part of any zombie movie/show. Especially when it first hits the news
my favorite part*
>My men hasn't had sex in 28 years
NOW we're fricking talking
>Years
you fricking moron
what was that zombie movie where a black zombie dude took the lead of the horde?
i remember a scene where he helped a zombie aim a rifle, it was really weird
Land of the Dead.
Frick you for making me remember that scene where the zombies grab a guy by the fingers and rip his arm in two longways.
I can't wait for the sequel, 29 Years Later
>28 rapes later
>Imogen Gay Poots[1] (born 3 June 1989[2]) is an English actress. She played Tammy in the post-apocalyptic horror film 28 Weeks Later (2007),
imagine being named "gay farts"
only if Poots is in it
Cant wait for 28 seconds later
If it's going to be Years and not Months bring Cillian Murphy back.
>movie/game director returns to their most famous work many years later in an attempt to relive their glory days
name a time this ever worked
Where's 28 MONTHS? They had ONE job.
>28 decades later
>A team of archaeologists seeking to discover if white people once existed in England travel down into the ruins of Old London and make a terrifying discovery...
>this is a white woman...
>this dogs skeleton...its weirdly positioned...
Stop right there
No.
The theme is awesome but how would a trilogy go? 28 decades later?
Need more zombie media
Any recs?
Movies, TV shows, anything really.
>28 letters later