Its not very good but that's a big statement. Not even one of the worst big budget horror movies of all time, in fact its pretty average.
I wouldve called it 28 Days Later Part II, frick 28 Weeks Later
I dont think it really fricks up anything the first movie did. It leaves off with the virus spreading outside of the UK which isn't a bad place to pick up IMO.
People can't into basic math. Ask them how mamy years 28 months is and their heads explode.
they'll need to be careful not to film any contemporary technology, the film will be set in 2030
if I see someone with an iPhone I will ree
[...]
Almost 30 years after the rage virus plague is unleashed on the world the setting is guaranteed to be post-apocalyptic so no modern tech since the survivors will be reduced to pre-industrial levels
My guess is that Europe/Africa/Asia have fallen completely and are back into pre-industrial times while the US and South America are fine. Alternatively only North America is fine and there is constant warfare on the southern border. So there would be massive disparity in tech between those that managed to wall themselves off successfully and whatever groups have survived in the infected areas.
>My guess is that Europe/Africa/Asia have fallen completely and are back into pre-industrial times while the US and South America are fine. Alternatively only North America is fine and there is constant warfare on the southern border. So there would be massive disparity in tech between those that managed to wall themselves off successfully and whatever groups have survived in the infected areas.
this seems most likely
I don't think there's any canon confirmation about the severity of infection elsewhere besides "reports of infections in France and USA" but assuming it's as bad then most of Europe/US would fall with pockets of survivors mainly in areas separated by terrain and climate. it's likely that the entire states of Alaska and Hawaii are going to be untouched by the virus. then again think about how fricking deadly and crazy LA or San Fran could get when the world's supply shuts down in conjunction with a global zombie breakout. some cities would burn to the ground without a single infected and others would manage to acclimate to the new world and keep a semblance of society and function amidst the ruins of technology and infrastructure not longer capable of being powered
creating this world realistically 28 years later is going be much more challenging than 28days in a specific area
Australia sitting pretty thanks to having no land border and that it takes days to drive to most remote towns, let alone run through the heat without your body shutting down.
Are you so upset that Australia is geographically a good place to survive a zombie apocalypse you're posting race baiting?
11 months ago
Anonymous
any place where temperature are below 10C or above 40C are going to be ez mode
even if a zombie can walk hundreds of miles they are not going to be able to run through Death Valley without getting heatstroke
if society goes Mad Max mode you might have madlads attacking with cultivated/stored rage virus as a bioweapon
28 months would make the film set in ~2004. The movie won't actually release until at least 2025 at best. Such a time gap makes it a little more complicated to write and film, as everything has to be circa 2004.
28 years makes it take place in the early 2030s, which gives you a lot more flexibility as to what you can do with the story, and less hassle with making all the sets and props period accurate. It also means you can have the original actors return if you want, since their ages will be a rough match to their characters.
>28 years makes it take place in the early 2030s, which gives you a lot more flexibility as to what you can do with the story, and less hassle with making all the sets and props period accurate
thing is even if it takes just a few years to eradicate Rage the complete fall of London to a plague of such horror would cause such an intense butterfly effect. there would still be matchsticks but no PayPal or Twitter
First movie already stated that the outbreak had been contained to Britain. While London is a major financial center, the assets themselves aren't physical so it wouldn't be that hard to move operations from London to elsewhere. Besides, we saw in the second movie that they had actually evacuated people to France ahead of the virus reaching London so evacuating any financial assets as well would've happened as well.
I agree there isn't much need for the actors to return as far as the story goes, but Cillian is a pretty big name now so I can understand why they might want to involve him.
True and checked. Maybe combine something more local with him and a wider story across the world. Could work. I'll take anything at this point, rage virus infected are great.
>they'll need to be careful not to film any contemporary technology, the film will be set in 2030 >if I see someone with an iPhone I will ree
THIS
Almost 30 years after the rage virus plague is unleashed on the world the setting is guaranteed to be post-apocalyptic so no modern tech since the survivors will be reduced to pre-industrial levels
>Almost 30 years after the rage virus plague is unleashed on the world the setting is guaranteed to be post-apocalyptic so no modern tech since the survivors will be reduced to pre-industrial levels
Sound deeeeee-cent. Will watch.
>survivors will be reduced to pre-industrial levels
I hate this trope so god damn much. there is just no way that people would simply be unable to produce electricity, radio communication or even a steam engine. you can do all of these things on a smaller scale if global society collapses. and you can substitute almost any fuel with charcoal. knowledge like this will never be lost, it would be even more valuable for surviving groups and repairing a diesel generator is something a 12yo can learn
Technology on a wide scale is incredibly fragile. A couple EMP nukes in the atmosphere can rurn the US into middlle age country overnight according to OFFICIAL STUDIES.
a middle ages with working tractors and solar panels. Frying power grid transformers doesn't mean that Joe the handyman forgets how to turn an old washing machine into into power generator.
Joe ate his wife after he was bitten by Mike the plumber.
Now you have Anna the insta thot and George the WH40K tabletop player. Which ine of those will make the generator?
11 months ago
Anonymous
>implying Mike isn't a survivor with an infinite supply of lead pipe
11 months ago
Anonymous
Anna. She wanted to research the "quirky DIY instathot" niche and ended up binging Chinese inventions tiktoks for 3 months. Also working with resin casting is basically the same as doing her nails.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Also working with resin casting is basically the same as doing her nails.
>EMP strike >would fry literally every electronic device and PCB used for keeping society working >no more electricity >no more ground water supply >no more communications
well yes of course. dont need some fricking study to come to that conclusion
1st one was a decent zombie movie that turned into a rape the e-girl movie, yawn
2nd one I know I watched but literally cannot remember a single fricking thing about other than it being too dark
Sure sign on for a 3rd shitfest, not enough of THAT going around this year
wrong.
its 2 days old.
https://movieweb.com/28-years-later-discussions/ >"We’ve just started talking about it seriously” he told IGN. “We’ve got an idea. Danny [Boyle] and [producer] Andrew [Macdonald] and I have been having quite serious conversations about it so it is a possibility. It’s complicated. There’s a whole bunch of reasons why it’s complicated, which are boring so I won’t go into, but there’s a possibility.”
>He added, “It’s more likely to be 28 Months than 28 Years. 28 Years gives you one more place to go. 28 Decades is probably taking the piss.”
>28 hours prequel
would be cool to see the shit go down after the dumbass people freed the monkes. >28 minutes prequel
could be a neat 1 season small TV show, or short film, that takes place immediately after 28 weeks showing all the places that got fricked up from the tunnel zombies. I say places cause weren't there multiple shown at the end with zombies coming out the tunnels? I don't know but it'd be neat.
also checked
i was thinking more like 28 minutes would be all the lead up to the first outbreak ending with 28 minutes of pandemonium. 28 hours would show the total breakdown of civilization in england and the rest of the world going nuts to keep it in england.
the first one is pure kino, the comic is good too, the secuel is very boring and not feel as tense or scary as the first one, a post-apocalypse set and maybe see bad soldiers as the first one can be interesting, but i think 28 years is a lot of time difference
the problem is zombies only work if its a surprise. there cant outbreak after initial containment because the rules of engagement change and they firebomb entire cities at the first sign of trouble.
if it's 28 Months I think we'll see another zombie outbreak film
if we see 28 Years I think it will be apocalypse aftermath film with maybe not a single infected on screen
if it's 28 Months I think we'll see another zombie outbreak film
if we see 28 Years I think it will be apocalypse aftermath film with maybe not a single infected on screen
just say birds or reptiles can carry the virus non-symptomatically or something. Boom. Endless rage
IIRC people already carry it asymptomatically in 28 Weeks. A blood test could detect it, but it's very plausible that it could get through quarantines that way. Especially if the asymptomatic people fear for their life and have a reason to hide it. Mutation is also an easy and very plausible plot device.
Presumably other primates can be infected too, as it originally came from lab monke.
>Everyone getting excited over Danny Boyle returning
Did you guys just forget how badly he fell off? Came out swinging with Trainspotting and 28 days but then somehow ends up making something like Yesterday in 2019.
Who’s to say they can’t follow 28 years later with 28 months later? Once the setting is established as post-apocalyptic, it takes a couple of years to squeeze another sequel out anyway. Make the follow up set 28 months after this one.
I wouldve called it 28 Days Later Part II, frick 28 Weeks Later
28 weeks is legitimately one of the worst horror movies ever made
It's basically just running to music, but the soundtrack is pretty good.
>*beep boop*
>Don't change your name, keep it the same, I fear I may lose you again
It's not a good movie but it's far from one of the worst horror movies. Horror movies are bad in general.
Its not very good but that's a big statement. Not even one of the worst big budget horror movies of all time, in fact its pretty average.
I dont think it really fricks up anything the first movie did. It leaves off with the virus spreading outside of the UK which isn't a bad place to pick up IMO.
>28 Years confirmed
>Danny Boyle is making it
thank frick it's about time
kino gooning station
Why did they skip months
Boring sounding probably.
Btw it was Cinemaphile that lit a fire under the asses to get this done, but they won't admit it.
good?
>it was Cinemaphile that lit a fire under the asses to get this done
wat
I'd rather not tell you how I know.
good point my autism is flaring up
They don't own the rights.
People can't into basic math. Ask them how mamy years 28 months is and their heads explode.
My guess is that Europe/Africa/Asia have fallen completely and are back into pre-industrial times while the US and South America are fine. Alternatively only North America is fine and there is constant warfare on the southern border. So there would be massive disparity in tech between those that managed to wall themselves off successfully and whatever groups have survived in the infected areas.
>My guess is that Europe/Africa/Asia have fallen completely and are back into pre-industrial times while the US and South America are fine. Alternatively only North America is fine and there is constant warfare on the southern border. So there would be massive disparity in tech between those that managed to wall themselves off successfully and whatever groups have survived in the infected areas.
this seems most likely
I don't think there's any canon confirmation about the severity of infection elsewhere besides "reports of infections in France and USA" but assuming it's as bad then most of Europe/US would fall with pockets of survivors mainly in areas separated by terrain and climate. it's likely that the entire states of Alaska and Hawaii are going to be untouched by the virus. then again think about how fricking deadly and crazy LA or San Fran could get when the world's supply shuts down in conjunction with a global zombie breakout. some cities would burn to the ground without a single infected and others would manage to acclimate to the new world and keep a semblance of society and function amidst the ruins of technology and infrastructure not longer capable of being powered
creating this world realistically 28 years later is going be much more challenging than 28days in a specific area
Australia sitting pretty thanks to having no land border and that it takes days to drive to most remote towns, let alone run through the heat without your body shutting down.
>australia
You mean the country with a shit load of shit skin asians? Lmao dumb troony
What did he mean by this?
Australia is a Chang and SEAmonkey colony now.
Are you so upset that Australia is geographically a good place to survive a zombie apocalypse you're posting race baiting?
any place where temperature are below 10C or above 40C are going to be ez mode
even if a zombie can walk hundreds of miles they are not going to be able to run through Death Valley without getting heatstroke
if society goes Mad Max mode you might have madlads attacking with cultivated/stored rage virus as a bioweapon
28 months would make the film set in ~2004. The movie won't actually release until at least 2025 at best. Such a time gap makes it a little more complicated to write and film, as everything has to be circa 2004.
28 years makes it take place in the early 2030s, which gives you a lot more flexibility as to what you can do with the story, and less hassle with making all the sets and props period accurate. It also means you can have the original actors return if you want, since their ages will be a rough match to their characters.
>28 years makes it take place in the early 2030s, which gives you a lot more flexibility as to what you can do with the story, and less hassle with making all the sets and props period accurate
thing is even if it takes just a few years to eradicate Rage the complete fall of London to a plague of such horror would cause such an intense butterfly effect. there would still be matchsticks but no PayPal or Twitter
First movie already stated that the outbreak had been contained to Britain. While London is a major financial center, the assets themselves aren't physical so it wouldn't be that hard to move operations from London to elsewhere. Besides, we saw in the second movie that they had actually evacuated people to France ahead of the virus reaching London so evacuating any financial assets as well would've happened as well.
London was one of the first places hit as the epicentre of the outbreak was Cambridge.
>It also means you can have the original actors return if you want, since their ages will be a rough match to their characters.
That's neat. Lines up perfectly. I would still rather see a more global view this time though.
>footsteps in the background
>EY RIG
I agree there isn't much need for the actors to return as far as the story goes, but Cillian is a pretty big name now so I can understand why they might want to involve him.
True and checked. Maybe combine something more local with him and a wider story across the world. Could work. I'll take anything at this point, rage virus infected are great.
I think the 28 year gap will allow for the introduction of new mutations of the virus, new strains that can affect the body in different ways
>slow zombies
>Super-strong zombies
they'll need to be careful not to film any contemporary technology, the film will be set in 2030
if I see someone with an iPhone I will ree
>they'll need to be careful not to film any contemporary technology, the film will be set in 2030
>if I see someone with an iPhone I will ree
THIS
Almost 30 years after the rage virus plague is unleashed on the world the setting is guaranteed to be post-apocalyptic so no modern tech since the survivors will be reduced to pre-industrial levels
how convenient
>Almost 30 years after the rage virus plague is unleashed on the world the setting is guaranteed to be post-apocalyptic so no modern tech since the survivors will be reduced to pre-industrial levels
Sound deeeeee-cent. Will watch.
>survivors will be reduced to pre-industrial levels
I hate this trope so god damn much. there is just no way that people would simply be unable to produce electricity, radio communication or even a steam engine. you can do all of these things on a smaller scale if global society collapses. and you can substitute almost any fuel with charcoal. knowledge like this will never be lost, it would be even more valuable for surviving groups and repairing a diesel generator is something a 12yo can learn
When the grown ups die off who will teach the kids said knowledge and how will they apply it surrounded by zeds? moron.
Technology on a wide scale is incredibly fragile. A couple EMP nukes in the atmosphere can rurn the US into middlle age country overnight according to OFFICIAL STUDIES.
a middle ages with working tractors and solar panels. Frying power grid transformers doesn't mean that Joe the handyman forgets how to turn an old washing machine into into power generator.
Joe ate his wife after he was bitten by Mike the plumber.
Now you have Anna the insta thot and George the WH40K tabletop player. Which ine of those will make the generator?
>implying Mike isn't a survivor with an infinite supply of lead pipe
Anna. She wanted to research the "quirky DIY instathot" niche and ended up binging Chinese inventions tiktoks for 3 months. Also working with resin casting is basically the same as doing her nails.
>Also working with resin casting is basically the same as doing her nails.
absolutely based
>EMP strike
>would fry literally every electronic device and PCB used for keeping society working
>no more electricity
>no more ground water supply
>no more communications
well yes of course. dont need some fricking study to come to that conclusion
1st one was a decent zombie movie that turned into a rape the e-girl movie, yawn
2nd one I know I watched but literally cannot remember a single fricking thing about other than it being too dark
Sure sign on for a 3rd shitfest, not enough of THAT going around this year
wrong tho
that old shit, OP's interview is from yesterday
wrong.
its 2 days old.
https://movieweb.com/28-years-later-discussions/
>"We’ve just started talking about it seriously” he told IGN. “We’ve got an idea. Danny [Boyle] and [producer] Andrew [Macdonald] and I have been having quite serious conversations about it so it is a possibility. It’s complicated. There’s a whole bunch of reasons why it’s complicated, which are boring so I won’t go into, but there’s a possibility.”
>He added, “It’s more likely to be 28 Months than 28 Years. 28 Years gives you one more place to go. 28 Decades is probably taking the piss.”
should do a 28 hours prequel and a 28 minutes prequel instead.
that would be kino
>28 hours prequel
would be cool to see the shit go down after the dumbass people freed the monkes.
>28 minutes prequel
could be a neat 1 season small TV show, or short film, that takes place immediately after 28 weeks showing all the places that got fricked up from the tunnel zombies. I say places cause weren't there multiple shown at the end with zombies coming out the tunnels? I don't know but it'd be neat.
also checked
She's a cute
i was thinking more like 28 minutes would be all the lead up to the first outbreak ending with 28 minutes of pandemonium. 28 hours would show the total breakdown of civilization in england and the rest of the world going nuts to keep it in england.
>28 decades later
That shit would be high fantasy with zombies
if they drop the zoomed in shaky cam editing of the first 2 movies i might be able to enjoy this one.
How does the virus still exist after 30 years? Infected die from starvation weeks after.
>Infected die from starvation weeks after.
Proofs? Also, new people get infected all the time.
>Proofs?
Are you a fricking moron or what? Go watch 28 days again.
>someone digs out some old bones
>the newly created totalitarian dystopia crumbles
the first one is pure kino, the comic is good too, the secuel is very boring and not feel as tense or scary as the first one, a post-apocalypse set and maybe see bad soldiers as the first one can be interesting, but i think 28 years is a lot of time difference
the problem is zombies only work if its a surprise. there cant outbreak after initial containment because the rules of engagement change and they firebomb entire cities at the first sign of trouble.
if it's 28 Months I think we'll see another zombie outbreak film
if we see 28 Years I think it will be apocalypse aftermath film with maybe not a single infected on screen
just say birds or reptiles can carry the virus non-symptomatically or something. Boom. Endless rage
IIRC people already carry it asymptomatically in 28 Weeks. A blood test could detect it, but it's very plausible that it could get through quarantines that way. Especially if the asymptomatic people fear for their life and have a reason to hide it. Mutation is also an easy and very plausible plot device.
Presumably other primates can be infected too, as it originally came from lab monke.
shit both kids in that family were immune
you would have entire families who know they are infected and immune trying to hide
The frick I randomly decided to listen to the soundtrack today and this pops up, LOOKS LIKE KINO IS BACK ON THE MENU BOYS
It’s only 21 years later. Not watching it because of that glaring error
>Everyone getting excited over Danny Boyle returning
Did you guys just forget how badly he fell off? Came out swinging with Trainspotting and 28 days but then somehow ends up making something like Yesterday in 2019.
He made Trust
this gay owes us and we're not ready to give up hope
28 Days is 1 of the few good zombie films out of 5000
I think he's still a good director. Yesterday is okayish but he can still direct the shit out of a scene when he feels like it. T2 was proof of that.
?t=118
T2 still felt like a sequel that didn't need to be made, not a good sign for 28 years later
>inb4 it's the same plot of 28 weeks later where everything has gone back to normal and we get to watch the zombie pandemic start anew because reasons
did they ever explain the virus origins? i don't really remember 28 weeks later.
monkey testing rageb
>Opening shot
>It's Rick Grimes
>"A friend once told me... it ain't like it was before. I'm beginning to think, he was right."
So what's after that? 28 decades later? 28 centuries?
honestly I'm up for films to 28 Decades
could do 5 more movies
Prequel
28 Hours later
>28 minutes later (a miniseries of two episodes)
>28 seconds later (webisode)
at this point it might be better as a video game like what ghostbusters did
Who’s to say they can’t follow 28 years later with 28 months later? Once the setting is established as post-apocalyptic, it takes a couple of years to squeeze another sequel out anyway. Make the follow up set 28 months after this one.