>3 HOURS AND 30 MINUTES
>THREE HOURS AND THIRTY MINUTES
>210 FRICKING MINUTES
Why can't this senile old frick get an editor?
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
>3 HOURS AND 30 MINUTES. >THREE HOURS AND THIRTY MINUTES. >210 FRICKING MINUTES
No way in hell I'm sitting in a theatre for that long. Old man can go frick himself. For the record, I wouldn't happily sat thru a 3 hour 30 minute cut of Avengers Endgame.
What you don't want to sit through nearly 4 hours of WHITE MAN BAD?
you know he browses Cinemaphile I don't think he'd appreciate that.
more=better
Well that’s really disappointing. I’m going to have to wait until it comes out on streaming just like Avatar 2. Fricking nobody wants to sit in a theater that long anymore.
Why is this movie so under-marketed? Its releasing in a few weeks and literally no one I've talked to knows about it
Studio realizes it's shit and doesn't want to waste the marketing budget.
Market fragmentation makes it harder to reach people and nobody's figured out how to solve that.
Also they might be cutting their losses.
>nobody's figured out how to solve that
What if we all got constant amber alerts that were actually just advertisements for the newest movie book videogame rap album or show. Eh?
My university used it's emergency alert number to advertise a concert once and then everyone on campus blocked it and they got sued after there was an active shooter and nobody knew kek
most American comment I've read in a while
it really has everything
Because you're most likely comparing it to the level of marketing Oppenheimer had.
it's an Apple + movie
they dont release it for the money, they do it to win awards
>Expecting people to care about injuns
It's a flop
>Why is this movie so under-marketed? Its releasing in a few weeks and literally no one I've talked to knows about it
You should spend less time here relying on morons to tell you what to see.
I too have ADHD
>all these brain fried zoom shits that can’t handle a long movie
I’m going to breed you fricks behind the theater
No movie needs to be 3 and a half fricking hours long
Says fricking who? I want more content, kudos to Scorsese not bending over for brain fried zoom shits and cutting content.
Not all of us like movies to drag on for twice as long as they need to. Like 95% of 3+ hour long movies have at least 45 minutes of nothing happening. If you can't make an entertaining movie with good pacing that's under 3 hours long just make a fricking show at that point.
>>3 HOURS AND 30 MINUTES
HOURS AND THIRTY MINUTES
Same length as the Irishman, big deal. I watched that in one sitting and was never bored. Most movies I watch these days bore the shit out of me after 20 minutes. Last capeshit I tried was Black Panther, turned that crap off after half an hour and never went back. Nothing of value was lost. Movie length isn't a problem for me as long as it's good, hopefully this one is.
These basically.
It's bad storytelling with a meandering plot.
>2 of the most overrated actors in history in a single movie
shan't be watching
what a dogshit fricking take
quality over quantity you dumb nig
homosexual.
Back in the 1950s, a movie this long would have one or two intermissions.
I don't know if I'll watch another Scorsese film after The Irishman. It's time to retire, grandpa.
>always does intermissions on anything longer than 3 hours
>unlimited popcorn, straight from the mines
>booze
>food
not my problem, simple as
>we need to save cinema!!!!
>releases another turd that makes you hate cinema
is he a schizo?
>makes fun of capeshit
>hasn't made anything other than the most contrived, soulless garbage in a decade
When he dies he's going to take cinema with him. AI, writer's strikes, nepotism, diversity hires, and manchild audiences mark the end of the road.
Silence was kino.
I agree Silence was really good but the Irishman was a total fluke.The de-aging ruined the movie and why not just turn this into a mini-series.
Irishman was great
The de-aging was shit and ruined a lot of the movie.
The deaging wasn't good but there were only a few scenes where it really bothered me. If he had just cast younger actors it could've truly been great
Amazing capeshitter cope
>Amazing capeshitter cope
Scorcese is capeshit for boomers
>wasting 3,5 hours on a modern movie (even if it's Scorsese)
I can't get the thought of 3-4 hour classics sitting in my backlog just waiting to be watched while I'm watching some popcorn flick
How does one kill a flower moon? Is it a euphemism for pussy?
I like long movies. I like it when a movie feels sprawling and literary. I miss David Lean style 4 hour epics.
Lawrence is 4 hours and feels like 2, the Irishman, on the other hand, was 4 hours that felt like 10. It was worth it for the last 30 minutes, though.
Irishman was the fricking longest movie I have ever seen in my life, and I've seen way longer movies than its actual runtime. They should use that movie in CIA torture camps. I'd spill the beans just to stand up and feel my legs again.
what are you talking about? it dragged in a few places but overall it was pretty good. a solid 7/10
I can watch casino all day, which im pretty sure its like 16 hours long
but he can frick off with the irishman and if this new one makes me fall asleep too he can frick off
>video game buyers complain if you get lower hours to cost ratio
>movie goers complain if you get higher hours to cost ratio
You didn't complain when your big capeshit movie was this long with the purple man
>zoomie can't sit still without using his phone for 3 hours
He should just watch the movie on his phone, then.
I don't think an average person from any generation would find a 210 minute runtime reasonable.
split it in 4, call it a miniseries on netflix and they'd slurp it right up in one go though.
Then you’re as solipsistic as you are stupid.
We don't even know if the movie's any good anon, why are you shitting on people being skeptical of potentially throwing four hours down the drain?
you're paying to be entertained and it sounds like you get more value for your dollar
if the movie is shit, nobody is stopping you from walking out
If it's mediocre? There should at the very least be an intermission. Avatar 2 didn't have one and that movie wasn't worth sitting through. A nearly 4 hour run time is a big ask unless your movie's a guaranteed banger. This one isn't.
>avatar 2
If you were dumb enough to go to the theater for that slop there's no way you'll have the taste or patience to sit through this
I read the book years ago and plan to see the movie. My point is there's no reason to be hostile against people's entirely sensible skepticism regarding the length.
>taste or patience
Movies aren't high art. Get off your high horse.
Are you saying no one ever seen Lawrence of Arabia?
Seeing how intermissions existed long before film, I see no problem with it. Stop being a b***h
You're losing your cool, Marty.
so whats it about?
I hate the movie title btw
Based on a popular work of non fiction. White dudes want Native American land. Scheme to have one of their own infiltrate via marriage. He marries the chick and plots to kill her. Shenanigans ensue.
sounds like a movie version of my playthrough of crusader kings 2 with game of thrones mod
so its Pocahontas/Avatar
No, it’s partially fictionalised movie about real events where white people basically massacred a native tribe because they happened to own land that was originally considered worthless until they found large deposits of oil and turned the tribe rich and that made white people want to steal it for themselves. Which they did through what was essentially a murder campaign
sounds like it will greatly improve the USA's already stellar race-relations
>history makes me uncomfortable
at some point you have to wonder if constantly bringing up things people of one race did to another long ago is making the present and future a better place for everyone, or is just increasing identity-politics driven division.
I'm not saying history should be hidden or altered, but the level of focus on some things could be questioned.
Native Americans absolutely deserve more focus. If it weren't for twittards crying about costumes every now and then I wouldn't even remember they exist, and they've had it way worse than all the glorified Black folk.
>and they've had it way worse
"had" being the operative word. right now their main problem is the behavior of some of them on their own private land, and that looks likely to continue to be the case in future.
brown hands trembling from alcoholism typed this post
>Noooo, you cannot show something that actually happen!!?
>think on white people's feelings
>Which they did through what was essentially a murder campaign
Based, what good is wealth wasted on some dirty redskins anyway.
It’s about people murdering Indians under the flower moon.
From Michael Cimino I accept a three and a half hour film. But from Scorsese? Scorsese is not worthy of three and a half hours of my life.
Not interested unless there's several extensive scenes of squaws being raped by white chads.
Have you seen Wind River? You might like it.
frfr thankfully I have my tiktok and instagram reels
with me otherwise my brain would probably met lmaooo
I like long movies
>3 1/2 hours of DiCarprio's serious face
no thanks
Three hours is the kino threshold.
Bring back intermissions so I can stretch my legs for a little bit.
>Why can't this senile old frick get an editor?
he does, her name is thelma schoonmaker and you are a moronic zoomer
she makes shoons?
3 hours should be the minimum length for a film, so many films I wish were longer.
>muh 3 hour runtime
does your theatre not have intermission?
it did, but then it turned out that some singles were using it to sneak in so they had to legally rescind the practice
For half a movie? What kind of psychopath would want to watch just the latter half?
People do that all the time, been doing it for decades
if you're not in a loving relationship then you're effectively only half a person, so it makes sense.
I always enter another show room after my film ends. Usually there's 5-30 minutes left and then I loiter around the theater for another hour.
>3+ hours of leonardo dicrappio's bloated fat face
>3+ hours of cheap instagram photography
>3+ hours of leftism
no thanks
>takes 3-4 years to complete a film
>N-NOOOOO I NEED M-MORE TIME TO TELL MUH STORIES!!!
the irishman was boring as frick
I hope they won't cut out Tom White from the movie cause they don't need white saviour or some other leftist bullshit.
>more movie = better movie!
>Who cares if the plot is bloated and made worse? There's more movie to consume!
>I'm getting my money's worth!
>If you can't condense a story into a movie that's under 2 hours you're a terrible filmmaker
You must get blown away when keys get dangled in your face
>3 1/2 hours of ytpeepo bad
>from the director of the irishman
Yeah I’m not watching this shit
>from the director of the irishman
"You like-a the bread, Si?"
"Si. The bread, she is good."
For three hours....
>3 HOURS AND 30 MINUTES
Oh yeah. I'm thinking it's kino time
There is absolutely nothing about this movie that makes me want to watch it.
Why would you advertise your pleb homosexualry so loudly?
Who the frick wants to watch native american homosexualry.
I would not watch this if it won 10 academy awards.
And btw they are going to give Gladstone the oscar for this for reparations of that native american c**ts speech at the oscars way long ago.
>damn these dumb superhero flicks are ruining cinema
>you know what's not ruining cinema? self-indulgent wankfest of a film where i scream HYWITE PEEPOO BAD N SHIETT for three and a half hours
seriously though, what did marty mean by this?
>getting this triggered by a film you haven't seen because it's based on a real historical atrocity committed by white people
kek
pretty sure if we made half a dozen September 11 movies every year since 2001 American Muslims would start to get pissed off after a while
Name the half dozen films made about this incident this year.
the analogy is "bad stuff whitey did"
all kino movies are long, just like lord of the rings
This movie will be bloated because scorseses longest movies are bloated. Casino for example was kino but dragged on a little too long in my opinion
>current day Scorcese
>current day Leo(fat, ugly, talentless)
>no Deniro
No thanks
>no Deniro
If you thought Scorsese would make a movie without DeNiro in the current age you have to think twice.
>literally every Scorsese film from the last 20 years except this and The Irishman
Has anyone here read the book?
I can't read.
If you live in a country that has intermissions it's fine.
This movie looks so fricking boring. I can’t believe the reviews it getting
>OH MY HECKIN SCIENCE WE NEED TO STOP CAPESLOP
>here 3 hours of white men are.....LE BAD
Hollywood is a cesspit, capeshit or not. This Greatest Generation boomer should've retired after The Departed.
If people are making longer films can we bring back intermissions?
cucksese prouds himself of the fact leo cucked him in pre-production by forcing him and roth to rewrite the screenplay. also, he nonstop braggs about muh le cooperation with the osage indians as if that's anyhow relevant to the end result. i heard from a cannes guy that the movie is very episodic and repetitive. could be like 40 min shorter
the irishman was just too much. deniro's saggy muppet face and his goddamn MOLE were in literally every scene of that 210 min long flick. just horrible. waaay too wienery of a move
He doesn’t know how to edit anymore or can’t be bothered. That’s why
>having the attention span of a child
have a nice day
How come intermissions dont exist anymore? That shit used to be kino.
FFS guess I'll just read the book then