>read article >it's just apartheid clyde whining that companies don't want to do business with him and begging his simps to do a boycott (with no evidence that a boycott is actually happening)
It would take too long to explain what the deal is with the “Critics” Choice Awards and you don’t care any way. Just so I can leave the thread in peace, the short version is the Critics Choice don’t actually match what real critics call the most acclaimed movies of the year and exist solely as a sad attempt to predict what they think will get nominated at the oscars so they can invite those people to the awards show and attract viewers.
They'd have to be stupid as hell not to at least nominate a minimum of one Disney movie each year, let alone 100th anniversary movie, Disney still has a lot of push in the industry AND owns >60% of the media.
Pissing off Disney is literally angering their boss's boss's boss, so they have to placate them by at least nominating their super-duper-special movie.
Same thing happens in the gaming industry, but the main difference is that game companies don't (usually) own the journalists doing the reviews, but game companies love buying ads and handing out free swag and flying reviewers to huge stage shows and big prerelease events full of exclusive demos and free shit with free hotel stays and free flights and free food in some foreign country (often just Japan or some expensive city in Europe somewhere).
Pissing off the game company means you risk them cutting you out of all this free shit, dropping your ad revenue and not letting you try the games in advance, which directly damages your own company directly and increasing the chances your rival reviewers will get all this shit and put out their own reviews before you, so most of the big-name, gets-invited-to-events reviewers softball scores and thus you end up with the "8.0, it's irredeemable shit not worth being given for free" mentality where an AAA game getting a 7.5 means the game is so bad that you should never, EVER play it, even if it's being sold for $1 on sale.
Disney is always nominated, and will almost always win awards. Come on, keep up.
They already have Elemental
One is about a brown girl rebelling against a white man.
The other is about asian girl family trauma.
Do you really expect critics to be able to exclude one?
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Did you think they were going to nominate Paw Patrol or an actual indie film that wasn't backed by GKIDS, Apple or a big streamer?
?????
based
lame
Disney managed to piss off everybody at once this year.
>read article
>it's just apartheid clyde whining that companies don't want to do business with him and begging his simps to do a boycott (with no evidence that a boycott is actually happening)
Dewey got molested by producers that now work at diddlesney.
spider man will win
Duh, it did the most virtue signaling by far
Didn’t this shit already happen and Miyazaki won? Am I taking crazy pills?
Disney will always get at least nominated no matter what
>itt Cinemaphile is surprised critics will actually favor a movie when they're paid to do so
>Critic's Choice Awards
At least post the Oscar list, so I can bash how the judges don't even watch all the animated films
I remember how some of them openly wrote about how they didn't watch ANY of the animated films and picked the one their kids wanted them to.
>implying they would nominate an actually good recent movie
you are giving power to them by giving them attention.
I don't know why I must always be reminded Hungary has a surprisingly strong animation industry
It would take too long to explain what the deal is with the “Critics” Choice Awards and you don’t care any way. Just so I can leave the thread in peace, the short version is the Critics Choice don’t actually match what real critics call the most acclaimed movies of the year and exist solely as a sad attempt to predict what they think will get nominated at the oscars so they can invite those people to the awards show and attract viewers.
>No Leo
Fricking rigged
They'd have to be stupid as hell not to at least nominate a minimum of one Disney movie each year, let alone 100th anniversary movie, Disney still has a lot of push in the industry AND owns >60% of the media.
Pissing off Disney is literally angering their boss's boss's boss, so they have to placate them by at least nominating their super-duper-special movie.
Same thing happens in the gaming industry, but the main difference is that game companies don't (usually) own the journalists doing the reviews, but game companies love buying ads and handing out free swag and flying reviewers to huge stage shows and big prerelease events full of exclusive demos and free shit with free hotel stays and free flights and free food in some foreign country (often just Japan or some expensive city in Europe somewhere).
Pissing off the game company means you risk them cutting you out of all this free shit, dropping your ad revenue and not letting you try the games in advance, which directly damages your own company directly and increasing the chances your rival reviewers will get all this shit and put out their own reviews before you, so most of the big-name, gets-invited-to-events reviewers softball scores and thus you end up with the "8.0, it's irredeemable shit not worth being given for free" mentality where an AAA game getting a 7.5 means the game is so bad that you should never, EVER play it, even if it's being sold for $1 on sale.