99% of movies people claim to be "pushing the limits of the PG-13 rating" are tamer than the actual reason the PG-13 rating was created.
99% of movies people claim to be "pushing the limits of the PG-13 rating" are tamer than the actual reason the PG-13 rating was created.
which is?
look it up moron lmao
So you don't know?
IIRC it was poltergeist or indiana jones
Ratings are very strange. One frick or two. This rating in general bothers me. It just feels like you're watching an edited film. I don't love violence in particular but guns and knives with no blood is too ridiculous for me.
The ironic thing is that if the rating was used the way it was actually intended PG-13 violence would be significantly less "bloodless".
80s PG movies: Faces bloodily melted off onscreen
Modern PG movies: Fart jokes and violence on par with the average Y7 Nickelodeon show
Are there any PG-13 movies with bare breasts?
Titanic.
Oh dang huh I thought it was rated R
Doc Hollywood, but that was an older one.
I've actually seen deranged marvelets saying blade will work as a PG13 because "you can do more in a pg13 today"
Despite the fact that just 2 years ago Sony had to digitally alter bloodpacks to be bright blue in Morbius because they couldnt even show him drinking blood from a plastic bag at PG13
The only standard MPAA uses to determine movie ratings is how much they like the director.
>Despite the fact that just 2 years ago Sony had to digitally alter bloodpacks to be bright blue in Morbius because they couldnt even show him drinking blood from a plastic bag at PG13
And just a few months ago, Fnaf showed the bloody corpse of a guy whose face got eaten onscreen at PG-13.
That corpse was on screen for less than 2 seconds and its still got nothing on the end of Raiders.
It being shown at all is still further than what some b***hes believe a PG-13 allows.
>its clearly less gore than the 80s PG13
>this somehow proves that PG13 haven't gone soft
Alright zoomer. back to your FNAF lore videos little one.
Not even remotely close to what I said.
so whats the conspiracy theory about movie ratings?
Not really a conspiracy theory, just a fact that the meaning shifts over time due to perception. G used to mean "nothing objectionalbe" but it became known as the "baby movie" rating so now every kids movie is PG. PG-13 has become what PG used to be. And we're starting to see the same thing we saw before PG-13 was invented, where actual violence in PG-13 movies is making stupid parents mad but it's still not enough to justify an R rating.
I think it's all ratings in general. Someone posted a screenshot in one of the DB super threads and I noticed an TV14 rating. There isn't any blood and the fights have the impact of marshmallows hitting a pillow, it's y7 garbage.
OG Powerpuff Girls was Y7 and had blood in the intro lmao
Isnt Jaws PG rated? Still confused if ratings are either a set check list of what you can and cant show or if its just whatever the censors feel like.
Cause then theres movies like Planes trains and automobiles that got the R for the saying "frick" multiple times in a scene
Yes, jaws predates the PG13.
And if it were made today it might honestly struggle to get even that. Because the censors have definitely got more squeamish about blood specifically these days, the kid on the raft who turns into a blood fountain or Robert Shaw caughing up blood after he gets gut chomped would likely be toned down today.
The Batman felt like the only movie people said that about where I actually understood why they said it.
It's pretty brutal ngl.
That Dukes of Hazzard with Jessica Simpson was in the news and stuff about the rating. I can't speak to the film but I do remember it being discussed on CNN.