Jim is the same in that his entire personality revolves around "I'm better than everyone else because I pretend not to care about the office" but his life does revolve around it
let's not be so harsh. that's probably the most competent stuff she has to offer. it's not her "artistic statement" it's just an offering of her works and skillset.
It's definitely not very good and there's some poetry in her art revolving around her work, but Gil's take was pretentious as frick. He's a stand-in for an art critic, the most pompous people imaginable. Comparing his homosexual partner's coworker's debut offerings at a community showcase to fricking Van Gogh is so lame it's unreal. Oscar is gay; Gil is a homosexual.
>show depicts an attractive woman as fundamentally mediocre >she makes attempts at greatness before taking an honest assessment of herself and realizes she doesn’t have it >goes back to office job and finds happiness in husband and family
If this was made today would it be destroyed?
She is mediocre because she didn't put in the effort. She wasn't passionate enough about art like, for example, Fuhrer. Despite having the drive and skill for a career in art, he was denied his rightful place in the halls of the masters for reasons beyond his control (jews). Pam is the mirror opposite of Hitler. She never would have been great. She never was great.
His mistakes werent even that big, people who dont know its him always like the paintings, not to mention he wanted to study to GET BETTER, if he was already good then why would he go to learn shit.
Only reason he was rejected was because modernism was all the rage/wasnt a rich kid
>force people into a shithole for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week like human cattle so they can make money for their bosses >gee i wonder why their art isn't inspired
Yes, the point of the scene was a bonding moment between Pam and Michael where Michael compliments her after she got trashed by the gays. If the paintings had been objectively beautiful and everyone praised them the compliment wouldn't have meant as much.
I preferred Karen. Her father was a G.I.
Still laughing that this mulatto b***h was cast as an italianx and nobody noticed kek
Probably southern Italian
that's the point
Impressionist? More like ImpressionSHIT, am I right?
Those gays were right about Pam's art
Uninspired I think was the word they used. I would have just called in dumpster trash to her face myself.
When your right you're right.
I found it very depressing that a nobody reception centred her life around work that her inspiration for art is the every day items at work.
Jim is the same in that his entire personality revolves around "I'm better than everyone else because I pretend not to care about the office" but his life does revolve around it
let's not be so harsh. that's probably the most competent stuff she has to offer. it's not her "artistic statement" it's just an offering of her works and skillset.
It's definitely not very good and there's some poetry in her art revolving around her work, but Gil's take was pretentious as frick. He's a stand-in for an art critic, the most pompous people imaginable. Comparing his homosexual partner's coworker's debut offerings at a community showcase to fricking Van Gogh is so lame it's unreal. Oscar is gay; Gil is a homosexual.
decent bait
I think the implication is that she was doing the art while at work and this is what she had an easy reference for
Reminder that your only purpose in life is to produce value for your corporate overlords.
>show depicts an attractive woman as fundamentally mediocre
>she makes attempts at greatness before taking an honest assessment of herself and realizes she doesn’t have it
>goes back to office job and finds happiness in husband and family
If this was made today would it be destroyed?
She is mediocre because she didn't put in the effort. She wasn't passionate enough about art like, for example, Fuhrer. Despite having the drive and skill for a career in art, he was denied his rightful place in the halls of the masters for reasons beyond his control (jews). Pam is the mirror opposite of Hitler. She never would have been great. She never was great.
>about art like, for example, Fuhrer
his art was amateurish and boring
>like, for example, Fuhrer
homie exclusively painted architecture and yet somehow fricked up the perspective in all his drawings
His mistakes werent even that big, people who dont know its him always like the paintings, not to mention he wanted to study to GET BETTER, if he was already good then why would he go to learn shit.
Only reason he was rejected was because modernism was all the rage/wasnt a rich kid
He had no potential. If he had any passion worth fostering, he'd have continued painting. But he didn't. He's a failure.
Even funnier that Jim actually does get his dream job, too.
i thought that was naruot
she watched too many indy movies
>midwest culture
>force people into a shithole for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week like human cattle so they can make money for their bosses
>gee i wonder why their art isn't inspired
Jim didn't have the balls to call her bullshit art out
this is the kind of thing moron 3d artists always make too
These look like a teenager's paintings.
Were they supposed to be so bad?
Yes, the point of the scene was a bonding moment between Pam and Michael where Michael compliments her after she got trashed by the gays. If the paintings had been objectively beautiful and everyone praised them the compliment wouldn't have meant as much.
Reminder that there are at least 3 scenes in this show where the joke is "adult man wants to frick underaged girl haha"