According to Dreamworks co-founder Jeffrey Katzenberg, AI will take over 90% of the jobs held by artists working on animated films within the next three years.
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
lrn2load
not my problem
India in shambles
Isn't the minions studio fully against the use of AI?
Illumination might as well be AI, every film has the same copy-paste grubhub art style
Worse yet Pixar tries to rip it off and somehow looks worse (Soul and Turning Red come to mind)
Studios that are against AI will not be able to compete outside of anything but a niche market of purists.
Seeing as you can’t copyright Ai it would
make sense for every studio to be against it
A.I. please frick my wife
>~~*Katzenberg*~~
It is mo different than how 90% of animation has always been done, except now instead of Japanese, then Korean, then Chinese, then Taiwainese getting the outsourced work of "tweening", AI will be the one doing it.
A human will still create the key frames. This is just removing the human element of manually moving the rigged model a hundred subtle times per frame.
Skeleton based animation is already robotic and lacking in human touch anyway. This changes nothing.
Whose even gonna bother with them when you can just write the prompt:
Make Shrek 5
>cgislop
>animation
>cgislop
>artist
>all those redditor animators that got covid jabs and got lifelong injuries then lose their jobs anyway
couldn't have happened to a nicer people
Maybe we shouldn't bring about momentous change to society, the consequences of which we can't even begin to imagine, just because it might hurt people we don't like.
Why contain it?
Yes, yes we should. It was the artBlack folk who wanted to bring about momentuos societal changes, but now they'll have to Learn2Coal.
Just desserts.
great
And then live action is next, 5-15 years after that thanks to Sora AI.
Genuinely could not care less
If your job can be off shored to little people throughout Asia, then it can be taken over by AI. That applies to every job that fits that description.
Basically none of you are safe from AI.
Now to be fair, this guy also thought people wanted to steam vertically shot short films entirely on their phones and blew through $2bil. in six months trying to make it happen.
learn to plow
TICK TOCK ARTIST WAGIES.
I did a lot of memetic warfare with the DALLE AI and I found out there are real limitations with the interactions of style and action. You can have certain actions, and certain styles, but often times you cannot have both. Mixing styles is near impossible too. After awhile you start to restrict your ideas because you know the model can’t actually make them properly.
Like I was only able to generate anime girl operating a buck breaking machine once, completely by accident.
It's limited now, but considering the leaps and bounds AI has made in the past 5 years, realistic portrayals of prompts with some human adjustments to it will be indistinguishable from any man made creation from scratch.
why would an otter need a lifejacket
>The Prince of Egypt
>The Road to El Dorado
>Chicken Run
>Shrek 2
>Shark Tale
Animation movies with Katzenberg as the executive producer.
Is there literally any piece of fiction ever that predicted that AI and automation would decimate clerical and creative labor BEFORE it did so to blue collar labor?
1984 touched on this:
>Julia was twenty-six years old... and she worked, as he had guessed, on the novel-writing machines in the Fiction Department. She enjoyed her work, which consisted chiefly in running and servicing a powerful but tricky electric motor... She could describe the whole process of composing a novel, from the general directive issued by the Planning Committee down to the final touching-up by the Rewrite Squad. But she was not interested in the final product. She "didn't much care for reading," she said. Books were just a commodity that had to be produced, like jam or bootlaces.
I find it hilarious that blue collar labor will probably be the last jobs AI takes over simply because the AI has to adapt to different environments, work in in variety circumstances, and solve problems on-the-go.
We would need an AI that is as fully autonomous and self-aware as a humans. And by that point, ALL careers would be in jeopardy, not just blue collar jobs.
I kept hearing from my generation and younger that people shouldn't be part of skill trades or physical labor because that's dead careers that AI and automation will replace in the near future. It's not even close, and all the menial jobs most don't want to do are the jobs that won't be replace by AI while most the creative jobs can be because those jobs are static, repetitive and have stationary solutions.
go to a factory moron. its been automated away before AI
yeah look at dem robots go
thats asian blue collar. its cheaper than automation thats why it hasnt been automated yet, thats it.
Apple pays some chinese 250 Yuan a day to put a left and a right air pod into the case because its cheaper than having a machine do it. Clearly it could have been automated away.
Just like Marx, you have never seen an inside of a factory, held a blueprint or had to deal with any kind of automatic process and you have no idea what you are talking about.
>Just like Marx
Youre clearly just bringing any of your personal insecurities to Cinemaphile with your posts. kek
you could automate blue collar jobs if you wanted, but paying poorgay workers is still cheaper in the long run
IF that were true (it's not) independent projects would be insane. Imagine not needing animators to make any animation. The internet censors are going to become insanely authoritarian
Cgi was never “art”