>A screen adaptation of the memoir Lucky by Alice Sebold also known for writing The Lovely Bones is no longer in production after the man who was found guilty of the crime of Rape at the centre of the story is exonerated
Plans to adapt Alice Sebold’s memoir Lucky, about her rape as an 18-year-old, have been dropped, according to Variety.
>The news comes after the rape conviction at the heart of the 1999 memoir was overturned last week. Anthony Broadwater had spent 16 years in prison after being convicted of the crime in 1982, based largely on Sebold’s identification of him as her rapist on the witness stand, and on microscopic hair analysis by an expert tying him to the crime. The US Department of Justice now rejects such analysis, and Broadwater was cleared last Monday of raping Sebold. “I’m not going to sully this proceeding by saying, ‘I’m sorry.’ That doesn’t cut it,” said the Onondaga county district attorney, William Fitzpatrick. “This should never have happened.”
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
>Tim Mucciante, who has a production company called Red Badge Films, signed on as executive producer of the adaptation, to feature YOU star Victoria Pedretti. But Mucciante became sceptical of Broadwater’s guilt and “started poking around and trying to figure out what really happened here”.
>Now Variety has reported that the film adaptation has been dropped, and that Pedretti is no longer involved with the project. According to the entertainment magazine, a source close to the production said it had been abandoned after “losing its financing months ago”
>Lucky details how as an 18-year-old Sebold was raped and beaten inside a tunnel near her university campus. Later, Sebold writes of how she saw a Black man in the street and was convinced he was her attacker. “He was smiling as he approached. He recognised me. It was a stroll in the park to him; he had met an acquaintance on the street. “‘Hey, girl,’ he said. ‘Don’t I know you from somewhere?’” Sebold writes. “I looked directly at him. Knew his face had been the face over me in the tunnel.”
>Broadwater is given the pseudonym Gregory Madison in the book. The memoir records how after he is arrested, Sebold fails to identify him in a police identity parade, but he is nonetheless tried and convicted. A spokesperson for publisher Scribner declined to comment on the conviction’s overturning. “Neither Alice Sebold nor Scribner has any comment. Scribner has no plans to update the text of Lucky at this time,” they said.
>Sebold went on to write the award-winning, bestselling novel The Lovely Bones, about the rape and murder of a young girl.
>“I never, ever, ever thought I would see the day that I would be exonerated,” said Broadwater after the court made its ruling last week.
>In 2019, a film adaption of the memoir was announced with director Karen Moncrieff. Victoria Pedretti was later selected to star as Sebold.[3] When Timothy Mucciante began working as executive producer on the project, he noticed discrepancies in the portion of Lucky that described the trial. He later told The New York Times: "I started having some doubts—not about the story that Alice told about her assault, which was tragic, but the second part of her book about the trial, which didn’t hang together".[5] He ultimately left the project because of his concerns about the story, and hired a private investigator to review the evidence against Broadwater.[5]
>In November 2021, Broadwater was officially exonerated by a New York Supreme Court justice, who determined there had been serious issues with the original conviction.[14] The conviction had relied heavily on Sebold's testimony, as well as on microscopic hair analysis, a forensic technique the United States Department of Justice later found to be unreliable.[8] At the police lineup, which included Broadwater, Sebold had identified a different person as her rapist. When police told her she had picked out the "wrong person", she said the two men looked "almost identical".[8] Onondaga County District Attorney William J. Fitzpatrick, who joined the motion to overturn the conviction, argued that suspect identification when the suspect is a different race from the victim is prone to error; Sebold is white and Broadwater is black.[5] The prosecutor had also lied to Sebold, telling her that the man she identified in the lineup and Broadwater were friends and that they both came to the lineup to confuse her; attorneys argued that this falsehood had influenced Sebold's testimony.[5] Sebold also wrote in Lucky that the prosecutor had coached her into changing her identification.[4] Sebold apologized to Broadwater after his exoneration
Alice identified the man on the far right in the lineup as her rapist. That man is in fact a police officer used as a stand in. The person she claimed was her rapist she bumped into in the middle of New York was the guy standing next to him. She then said they were near identical and that’s why she mixed them up
Pretty crazy how the ONLY reason he ever got exonerated is thanks to a a fricking movie producer taking the time to read her book, seeing obvious discrepancies and hiring a private investigator on his own dime before he’s willing to fund a movie about this because it sounds like bullshit.
She’s a very successful author, and her career was built on the back of locking a man away for 16 years and putting him on the sex offender registry for nothing
This is a known factor in witness testimony, witnesses consistently find it MUCH a harder to differentiate between suspects when they’re of a different race to them. This works all way around. Hispanics find it hard to differentiate East asians. Chinese find it hard to differentiate generic whites etc
Another reason witness testimony is pretty poor evidence in general
The guy's black, so he may not have raped her but he was almost certainly guilty of rape.
He was a police officer, so he deserved the electric chair by default
Based producer. They should lock her in a room with actual rapists as punishment.
look
false rape accusations are a thing, women should be held to the same standards as men, etc
but you can't tell me you can tell those black ass gorilla Black folk apart
That’s actually a point people often bring up regarding eye witness testimony. People find it much harder to differentiate between people of different races to themselves.
>for nothing
maybe the nignog should not have appraoched white young women on the street smiling, telling them how he knows them from somewhere.
also hair analisis confirmed, and people argue that its 11% false positive rate is too high.
She was probably staring at him making him think she was down to clown
NEVER BELIEVE FEMALES
>Pretty crazy how the ONLY reason he ever got exonerated is thanks to a a fricking movie producer taking the time to read her book, seeing obvious discrepancies and hiring a private investigator on his own dime before he’s willing to fund a movie about this because it sounds like bullshit.
I didn't expect a movie producer to be this thorough in the first place, so the fact that he went out of his way to double-check things is a miracle already.
>When Timothy Mucciante began working as executive producer on the project, he noticed discrepancies in the portion of Lucky that described the trial. He later told The New York Times: "I started having some doubts—not about the story that Alice told about her assault, which was tragic, but the second part of her book about the trial, which didn’t hang together".[5] He ultimately left the project because of his concerns about the story, and hired a private investigator to review the evidence against Broadwater.
This man is a hero.
you need to go back
Not mentioned in this article but in another interview, it was the insistence by the director (the 13 reasons lady) that they race swap the rapist which led to him being fired for 'being difficult' and made him suspicious enough to hire the PI.
What’s wrong with race swapping the rapist? Their race isn’t important to the story. They should cast the best actor for the role. And if that’s a white guy then that’s how the cookie crumbles
Chudbros, our response?
Wait, I'm confused now. I thought it was the left that says race doesn't matter so it's okay to swap whatever white character to whatever race they want.
Obviously it was important to the story because if he was the same race she might have been able to pick the right guy out of a lineup
actually there are cases of rape victims identifying the wrong man even if they are the same race. Eyewitness testimony is very unreliable which is why it was comical when all the leftiod academics were saying that woman who accused bart kavinaugh of groping her in high school could not possibly be mistaken.
honestly i'd even give them points for hiring a white guy for a traditionally black role
Reality is important to factual stories, people need to know that many blacks are rapist
Are you saying that there aren't any good Black actors that could play the role? That makes no sense
>Their race isn’t important to the story
If it's not important, why change it in the first place?
Timothy Mucciante is now working on a documentary called Unlucky based on the dudes case. Hopefully Broadwater can get some money from it
One of the saddest aspects I read about this whole thing is that
>Broadwater spent 16 years in prison for rape, always protested his innocence
>finally got released because his time was up, but he was now on sex offender registry for life
>finds a woman who actually believes him, loves him and marries him
>Broadwater refused to have children even though his wife wanted them, because he was scared the government would take them away since he was on the sex offender registry
Broadwater got $5million from the taxpayers and sebold shifted blame for his conviction from herself to the police and legal system. Because the real villain was 'white supremacy'.
>$5.5M in exchange for 16 years in prison
Would you take the deal bros?
I’d take it but also sue the stupid b***h. 16 fricking years! b***h won’t take accountability. I’d sue her for all she’s worth
I'd rape her if it was me. Already did the time, might as well do the crime.
Does that mean you'd get 1 free rape?
Based. She needs to feel something really terrible for lying about that fricking assault.
>sue
She has book profits? Go get them.
She made that money honestly, and didn’t use his name in the book. It’s her money.
Same as the woman who wrote the CAT PERSON short story, now a movie
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_Person
Wrote a story about this creepy weirdo guy who groomed a girl, used a real guys details. Turns out he was nothing like that and died later. Author acts the victim when people find out she basically stalked another woman and stole details of her life for a story
>CAT PERSON
that one was worse because unlike this case there wasn't any crime or even wrong-doing to justify the story in the first place.
>16 of man's best years wasted because of a cheating lying c**t
Wow that's just like my marriage, where's my 5 gorillion?
That's over $300k a year. Looking at the guy and his background, no way in hell that guy was ever going to make $300k a year. He's more well off now by going to prison than if he would've stayed free. If anything, he was over compensated.
Yes, but it's still 16 years in prison. A man wrongly convicted deserves to be over compensated.
It's not about lost earnings, moron.
It's about spending years and years getting raped and being called a rapist, hated by everyone and being stuck in fricking prison.
Would you live that life for 300k a year? I fricking wouldn't.
Dumbass.
I'd probably take it. Read get some degrees and shit come out rich. Buy cheap overseas property be set for life. Buy a daughter wife.
who the frick wouldn’t
my whole life has been a fricking waste and i’m poor
Five million is the least he could get. homie went to prison for the prime of his life and was on the sex offender list. That case shouldn’t have even gone to trial
still.. 5 million ain't nothing. and he probably would've squandered his prime years anyway like me. i'd kill for 5 mil in the stage of my life where i'm finally actually feeling and appreciating everything slowly draining
That is tremendously sad. Dude said no to making little versions of himself with a woman who loves him, which is the ultimate goal of life. Damn.
you wouldn’t be sad if he was white
I'm crestfallen for ALL men who go through bullshit. I'm not small-minded enough or a woman to go "well, he doesn't look like me so I could never in a day relate to his circumstances and certainly could never learn from his experiences". That's fricking stupid anon.
you just said all that though so it’s in you
you said it not me anon
look in the mirror, bigot
I don't know what shit movies Timothy Mucciante might have made before, but he's a hero for this
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm11877329/
The only other thing on his IMDB is an atrocious looking Muhh Russia animated short.
Clearly, this isn't his real job.
Producers are just rich people with spare time. He probably just has a big portfolio and got asked to splash his cash on this by a friend of his.
Hence why he also had the spare time and money to hire a private investigator over something he has no personal stake in
>There’s more: Mucciante himself is a repeat white-collar felon and a disbarred lawyer with three stints in prison spanning two decades, according to court records. Mucciante said, unlike Broadwater, he was guilty and deserved to be imprisoned.
>In his most famous swindle from the early 1990s, Mucciante convinced people to invest in two million condoms and two million latex gloves from Britain, which were supposed to be sent to Russia to barter for chickens, which would then be sold for a profit in Saudi Arabia. The whole pitch was a fraud, and Mucciante spent 71 months in federal prison, according to court records.
>But that didn’t stop him from two more white-collar fraud convictions in the 2000s that landed him in prison for years more. He was last released in 2010, federal prison records show. Those records also show that Mucciante was convicted of polygamy in Michigan state courts for what he says arose from overlapping relationships with his first and second wives. There was no additional prison time, he said.
Sounds pretty based
How is he still so rich after all this
>How is he still so rich after all this
those are just all the times he got CAUGHT
they should make a "wolf of wall street" type movie about him
>to invest in two million condoms and two million latex gloves from Britain, which were supposed to be sent to Russia to barter for chickens, which would then be sold for a profit in Saudi Arabia
sounds almost too good to be true. what's the catch?
Without looking it up, I'm just going to assume the latex products were never bought, and he just ran off with the money.
Russian chickens taste like shit
I imagine British condoms probably don't taste too great either
For Russians they do
ok
Faustian spirit
>went to prison for the ocarina of time trade quest
Should have gone for the Biggoron sword.
>Mucciante convinced people to invest in two million condoms and two million latex gloves from Britain, which were supposed to be sent to Russia to barter for chickens, which would then be sold for a profit in Saudi Arabia.
this is the funniest shit ive read all year, im fricking crying right now
If the fanfic is good, why not change the title and adapt it anyway? Also, why not make a movie with the whole story including this ? It would be a really good movie.
If there is a movie to be made, that's the angle to take - the plucky citizen who unearths a miscarriage of justice and helps free an innocent man. In fact I'm pretty sure I've seen that movie with Jimmy Stewart as a journalist.
That way the filmmakers could wax lyrical about 'systemic racism' and how dangerous it is to be a woman without upsetting either the black or woman camps too much. I still think the race of real rapist would be a problem for the producers though.
>I still think the race of real rapist would be a problem for the producers though.
They can just not show him.
yeah but the film would still inevitably draw attention to his race, even if he wasn't shown.
Probably be seen as negative towards women who come forward
they should make the movie, release it, publicize it, then release a documentary on the case in theaters as well.
give the man proceeds from both and he gets a cut of everything she makes until death.
arr rook same
>But Mucciante became sceptical of Broadwater’s guilt and “started poking around and trying to figure out what really happened here”.
Yeah, I read that. It's a wild story. He sussed out that her autobiographical account of the rape didn't ring true in certain respects because he himself had been raped in prison and could spot certain oddities in her testimony.
WOW. Fricking wow are you for real? What a twist. That man took evil that happened to him and used it to selflessly liberate another. Wow.
>signed on as executive producer of the adaptation, to feature YOU
I don't even know that muthafricka
What a c**t
>it was a black guy
Well he probably did something else illegal anyway
>it was a black guy
no wonder the producers were relieved to dump the project. can you imagine releasing a film about a black man raping a white woman in current year?
An almost identical case happened in Britain, by the way, except the wrongly convicted wasn't black. The victim identified him in a police line-up, but recently forensic evidence proved it was another man. The police had sat on the evidence for years.
They were already planning to cast a white guy as the rapist, this producer was fired because he objected to that.
>They were already planning to cast a white guy as the rapist
you have to wonder if they were risking something like the Streisand effect with that one. Pre-social-media they could get away with doing that (and sometimes did) because other than a few /misc/ types no one would notice. But in the twitter-age the news would spread like wildfire and it would become a topic of debate in the culture wars. People who'd never heard of the case until the film was released would suddenly know not only that the alleged rapist was black, but also that the filmmakers race-swapped because they don't think blacks can handle being depicted negatively (and because they're perfectly comfortable slandering whites).
I think they could still make a movie about this story. Its very emmet till like with her seeing a black man in public who said hello to her and concluding he was the same guy who raped her. It seems perfect for a Netflix race bait movie.
I could definitely see BLM types wanting to do that. But doing so would mean attacking another victim class (women) and angering feminists, who'll say they're making rape victims afraid to come forward, and also playing into 'far-right narratives' about women lying.
Happens more than you think. DNA evidence freed a lot of men wrongfully accused of rape by women. Guy from that 70s show is in jail for 30
years off 20 year old accusation and zero physical evidence
>no evidence
>except the tapes from scientology where he confessed to it
I hate you water muddying homosexuals so much
This is not even some old rare thing in Britain. Only five years ago or so a bunch of rape trials collapsed all at once because it turned out the police refused to turn out evidence to the defence proving the alleged rapists were innocent (mainly texts from the victim before and after the alleged assault). Even though legally they were required to give this.
Why would they do this? Because the government made a fricking quota that said more rape cases needed to be convicted. So they decided they’d just force it to happen and ignore the evidence.
And I don’t know how it works in America, but in the UK we have a system called the crown court. And the idea is they won’t even charge you with a crime unless the crown prosecution service has a reasonable belief they can win the case. Otherwise it’s pointless and a waste of money (even if they think you’re guilty)
In these cases they KNEW they were innocent. Went into the cases anyway. And either hoped the innocent men would just plead guilty for a lighter sentence or try and suppress the evidence from ever coming out
The fact the prosecutor is solely responsible for transferring evidence to the defense is fricking. Insane. Certifiably insane. The fact it was ever considered acceptable, insane. Probably a bare minimum of 10% of all convictions are entirely based on withheld evidence. It is such a fricking insane precedent to set. That the person responsible for prosecuting is the sole possessor of what evidence exists and the defense just has to take their fricking word for it.
British woman was wrongfully convicted of killing her two babies because the pathologist withheld evidence showing they died from an infection. She was exonerated after 3 years, but the experience led her to drink herself to death.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Clark
That is severely fricked up.
It's doubly fricked because not only are you sending an innocent person to prison, but the actual rapist is still roaming free and might hurt someone else
i dont trust anybody who lacks earlobes
I'm sure the answer is no, but were any of those prosecutors ever disbarred or put in prison for intentionally trying to convict innocent people?
>The US Department of Justice now rejects such analysis
So it's a 60/40 that he did it but holding black people responsible for their crimes is white supremacy, neo-confederate insurrection, and holocaust revisionism so therefore not guilty
No, hair analysis (at least the way it was done back then) is junk science. The same way lie detectors are no longer used, or bite marks to claim they match teeth of perpretators (look up how the evidence used to convict Bundy based on bite marks and moulds of his teeth literally wouldn’t be allowed in court today because it’s nonsense)
But you're supposed to ALWAYS believe the woman.
>Cinemaphile defending nigs
Now I’ve seen everything
half of lynching on blacks were due to white women
a black man could murder a man and he still wouldn't get lynched
white woman - black man's worst enemy
Women... am I right?
we cant let chuds do this
The most amazing thing about this story is how her memoir was obviously utter bullshit but millions of women bought the book anyways and it took over a decade until a male finally read the memoir and realized she was lying
lmfao
amazing, you're right
>lie about your rape
>still make a career out of it
>everyone finds out you lied and got someone in prison for 16 years
>get away with it
>lie about your rape
She was raped though. They did a rape kit and treated her wounds the day of. So either she had some very rough sex in the middle of Central Park then decided to lie, or she got raped, and mistook random black man for her rapist. Which wouldn’t surprise me considering she became a heroin junkie for years afterwards
If they did a rape kit they would’ve collected semon. DNA could’ve freed him
much sooner. Even the 80s they knew DNA was coming out and collect fluids. How eventually caught Green River Killer
>condoms don’t exist
Rapists use condoms hahaha
To be fair she was actually raped it just wasn't by this dude.
So what? That doesn't give her justification for misidentifying a guy and then profiting from it her whole life.
Yes, she was incorrect. But who am I supposed to blame more? Traumatised rape victim who legitimately thought it was that guy, or the justice system which somehow convicted him based on nothing?
Where do you think you are, you fricking c**t? Of course you blame the women first and only
Why do you have to blame 1 more than the other? The woman is just as moronic as the flawed justice system. Imagine letting yourself get raped, then you potentially ruin another persons life over it. Only a woman could be so moronic and make that mistake. Only the American Justice system would be fricked up enough to aid moronic women making moronic mistakes. They both fricking suck so I think we can put accountability where it belongs.
How about I blame the Black folk for ruining the country so it's not really a surprise when we don't really believe blacks are "innocent"
I actually feel for her. I've never been raped but I have been harassed before, and nothing would have made me feel better than knowing the person was behind bars. So she goes from:
>get raped
>find rapist randomly
>send him to jail
>feel safe
to
>get raped
>think you find rapist
>send him to jail
>feel safe for years
>find out you sent the wrong man to prison
>your rapist has been free this whole time
>now youre back in the news for everyone to see
>everyone hates you for being racist
>everyone focuses on your stupidity (maybe rightfully so) instead of your rape
>feel the guilt of destroying a man's life
>your rapist is and has always been still out there
She might kill herself to be honest, I wouldn't blame her
>le...real victims of false accusation is le...women!
ok, hillary
>“I’m not going to sully this proceeding by saying, ‘I’m sorry.’
What the frick? Say it anyway, you fricking weasel
No. I made an honest mistake. White supremacy is to blame. Not me
Yeah, he married a 33 year old. What’s the big deal
>After his exoneration, Broadwater said: "I'm not bitter or have malice towards her."
>A week later, Sebold publicly apologized for her part in his conviction, saying she was struggling "with the role that I unwittingly played within a system that sent an innocent man to jail" and that Broadwater "became another young Black man brutalized by our flawed legal system. I will forever be sorry for what was done to him."
>"the role that I unwittingly played within a system"
They forced her to identify him, chudcel. It’s called intersectionality. The white supremacist patriarchy forces us all to play our parts. In this case she had no choice but to send him to prison because of chuds like you
it's 2024, anon
your time is up
>>"the role that I unwittingly played within a system"
seems like an accurate description tbh. she was raped by a man who looked like him, mistakenly identified him, and then believed prosecutors when they told her they had this fancy scientific evidence proving his guilt.
They found black pubes on her. And he has black pubes, who else could it be?
You can get DNA off pubic hair. Why didn’t they compare it to the guy?
Waste of money, she literally said it was him, or close enough at least.
Yeah but m8 that doesn't help to justify my hatred of women now does it?
She mistakenly identified some random guy she saw on campus and then mistakenly identified a completely different guy in a lineup. The racist “system” is inside her own head.
Although to be fair, if I’d done something this awful I’d probably find a way to minimize my culpability too.
The irony that the producer who investigated this only started looking into it because he got kicked out of the production because he objected to them insisting they change the race of the rapist in the film to not “stereotype” blacks is hilarious
The “anti racist” producers were more concerned with optics in a movie, while the “racist” producer literally exonerated the Black
i was going to joke about the movie probably changing the race of the rapist, but there you are
naturally they were perfectly comfortable stereotyping whites
tik tok chuddies
all your narratives are unraveling
good point. Surely the guy who really raped her was white but she was mistaken because it was nighttime.
I'm starting to understand why islam requires four witnesses to prove a rape
>only rape woman in front of 3 other people
>nobody can stop you
Bravo Muhammed
Didn't Masterson get nailed with four witnesses?
Good morning from Kazakhstan
When are men going to rise up and demand real gender equality?
Here's an idea, still make it, but make it about the miscarriage of justice?
there's still the spicy problem of the real black rapist
He’s a tanned white guy
Reminder that this shit came about because the director wanted it to be accurate but Netflix didn't want a black guy as a rapist like in real life which lead to him getting fired and researching it further and eventually finding out she just picked some random guy
What's the deal with women walking through tunnels in empty parks at 2am?
Also
>She reported the crime to campus security and the police, who took her statement and investigated, but could not identify any suspects. Five months later, while walking down a street near the Syracuse campus, she encountered a man whom she believed to be the rapist
Literally "walking while black"
so will she be punished for making false accusations and having him spend 16 years in prison?
if you kidnap someone for 16 years what do you think the punishment will be?
No she won't, my ex wife falsely accused me of domestic violence when I caught her having an affair, she had me removed from my home taken from my children on false allegations of a threat (to much of a pussy-cat to hurt herself), while I was in lock up she she changed all of our banking details and I was left homeless with literally nothing as she moved her literal homeless boyfriend into our house the same day, what was my big crime, I ran a high needs foster home for 5 years looking after violent snd drug addicted teens, said she felt neglected and destroyed me for it. Proved all of this I court in my defence, that she not only lied to police she used them as a weapon and then chronically financially abused me, judge said her behaviour was abhorrent, cruel and illegal. So I made my own police report after case, the police said I was just being vindictive and refused to arrest her. She still ended up with full costudy, the avo remains because now she's been caught she feels unsafe. I fricking hate women now and I hope every cop has their teeth pulled then forced into their eyes.
She was fricked the moment our age out kids all gave character statements about their time with us, one even saying the way he saw me treat my wife taught him to treat women well. Now I hate women lol
I hope he sues her ass off for a bazillion dollars.
Wait you mean a woman LIED about RAPE?
AKHUTALLY she did not lie about rape, she lied about the wrong Black doing the rape (she may well be an absolute psycho and had been lying all along tbh)
She owes a rape to the convicted guy. Her family should watch too.
Fricking dumb c**t.
Woman is also a israeliteess, if nobody has mentioned that yet.
That explains why she immediately blamed the (racist white) legal system and police even though *she* saw this guy walking on the street and pointed him out to police.
> Sebold publicly apologized for her part in his conviction, saying she was struggling "with the role that I unwittingly played within a system that sent an innocent man to jail" and that Broadwater "became another young Black man brutalized by our flawed legal system.
this life is scripted
Good. Frick this rape loving prostitute. You just now she marched in every blm March and posted constantly about white people need to listen to black people bs
Oopsie
>sorry bro, no hard feelings.
why are these people so psychotic?
>accurately portrayed
In the book she talks about a dna match which never happened among other things
Frankly it's her pushing the blame elsewhere after being found out
I really wish I had never read Go Set a Watchman.
All women deserve to be fricking raped
Based. Imagine--fricking microscopic hair tying you to the rape of some do-nothing ugly b***h.
My desire to be racist is conflicting with my desire to be sexist
what is the Cinemaphile take on this
racism and sexism don’t exist
just search for the truth
My hatred of women made me less racist
Bet she was secretly a coalburner all this time and cried rape when she was caught.
Zoomies don't know this, but it was very common 40-50 years ago for mudsharks to blame the brown people they slept with (they didnt even have to be blacks, just non-whites) when their conservative neighbors and parents found out. This was especially common for town prostitutes in the South.
My guess is this old prostitute got gooseflesh when she realized a white husband wouldn't want her after she went sleazing about, so she cried rape to save her reputation.
TLDR: All prostitutes should be gassed.
b***h ruined an innocent man's life, then doubled down on the lie by turning it into a book - tripled down counting the film version.