I would have thought Christoph Waltz was a worthless ham if I hadn't seen him in other movies that weren't Tarantino slop. Lousy directors bring out the worst in everyone.
Don’t know why he keeps getting hired. Both Brad Pitt and him have mediocre talent yet they get casted in some of best movies. Must be tremendous good luck
jamie foxx completely miscast, comes across as a sophisticated modern urban guy from the get-go.
christopher waltz reprising his loquacious smartass character from Basterds but this time he's... le good!
inglourious at least had interesting stand-alone scenes (that ultimately worked against each other in terms of tone), this one has none.
TWO distracting QT cameos
dumb Jonah Hill cameo (clearly filmed separately from the sequnce it's in) because why not
shitty distracting hip-hop soundtrack
braindead ending, haha so cool we just massacred a bunch of people, let's laugh about this horse trick and ride into the night
Idris would've been too tryhard. Omar is a literal who. I just can't see a better option than Foxx. Him being something of an ass works in the characters' favor. Otherwise the character would be too much of a "noble savage" type.
fantasy casting is dumb
jamie foxx just wasn't it, thousands of unknown actors could have pulled it off if they had been given the opportunity, it just would have been more difficult for marketing.
QT has enough of a fanbase that he could get away with casting unknowns, or at least not filling his cast with a-list names for bit parts.
There's a bit of a comedic sass that works here, imo. If they just tried to make the most macho character imaginable who is completely infallible like some Terminator shit, it would've been a more annoying picture.
if you say so, for me all the problems start with the screenplay, there's basically nothing salvageable in terms of characters or plot.
jamie foxx completely miscast, comes across as a sophisticated modern urban guy from the get-go.
christopher waltz reprising his loquacious smartass character from Basterds but this time he's... le good!
inglourious at least had interesting stand-alone scenes (that ultimately worked against each other in terms of tone), this one has none.
TWO distracting QT cameos
dumb Jonah Hill cameo (clearly filmed separately from the sequnce it's in) because why not
shitty distracting hip-hop soundtrack
braindead ending, haha so cool we just massacred a bunch of people, let's laugh about this horse trick and ride into the night
i forgot the hare-brained convoluted plan to retrieve the girl from the farm and the dumb handshake standoff that triggers the shootout
zero immersion as well, felt like i was watching a school play conceived by a child
I saw it in theater, was very dissapointed. The entire movie is just weak bait "viral scenes". The narrative is incoherent and shitty, the "historical commentary" is extremely overdone, the acting is weak. Most importantly the story is just not there.
why do people assume anyone with the power immediately turns into some blood thirsty sadist?
most slave owners were normal people. whippings were rare let alone whatever this shit was
QT doesn't portray realistic nuanced social dynamics.
he only does pseudo-witty dialogues that turn into sadistic schlock. without this gimmick, he's lost.
One of cinema's most moronic "reveals" was at the end when Sam Jackson drops the cane and it turns out he's not disabled. K, doesn't mean you're immune to bullets. It might have meant something if Django was out of bullets and had to fight him hand to hand and then finds out he's fitter and stronger than the he looks, but Django just shoots him anyway. >The reveal was that Sam Jackson was pretending to be less of a threat, and that he was the one who had been really running Candyland, and Leo was his puppet
Yeah, that's not a reveal by the end of the movie. That had been made clear to any non-moron like an hour earlier.
>made neo-nazi chuds seethe with Inglorious Basterds >made neo-confederate chuds seethe with Django Unchained >made feminists and antique musical instrument connoisseurs seethe with Hateful Eight >made bruce lee fanboys and asian manlets seethe with Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
What group is he gonna trigger with his next kino?
certainly easier to recycle renowned successful music than creating something new
i like how the first original score music in his films was his pal robert rodriguez's shitty crappy-video-game-soundtrack-tier synthetic slop in kill bill 2.
Tarantino grindhouse slop with no redeeming qualities. Just a hack indulging in visual masturbation while he virtue signals for his boss Weinstein. Your time is better spent using the equivalent two hours to wash your dick.
too many n-words in it
Not enough, you mean.
We call them Black folk around here
Inglorious Basterds was better
True. Hans Landa is just too much fun.
I would have thought Christoph Waltz was a worthless ham if I hadn't seen him in other movies that weren't Tarantino slop. Lousy directors bring out the worst in everyone.
what are his good movies?
I liked him in The Zero Theorem.
why do white people love the idea of blacks getting revenge on them
They don't, it's just cucked and compromised willing gentiles who work for you-know-who.
>cucked and compromised willing gentiles
yeah, i said white people
They're just golems when they perpetuate their lies and cease to be actual white people.
I saw it in theaters, it was awful. DiCaprio didn't do anything to earn praise. Jackson had screen presence but no screen time
Don’t know why he keeps getting hired. Both Brad Pitt and him have mediocre talent yet they get casted in some of best movies. Must be tremendous good luck
Pitt knows how to own a camera, I’ll give him that. DiCaprio though, no fricking clue. Just plays himself in everything
It was ok
Oh wow a slavery movie how original
It’s peak pulp, although not my fav Tarantino flick. Also waltz getting an Oscar for this was moronic
>white people bad
>bravo T
Waltz' character was good though
jamie foxx completely miscast, comes across as a sophisticated modern urban guy from the get-go.
christopher waltz reprising his loquacious smartass character from Basterds but this time he's... le good!
inglourious at least had interesting stand-alone scenes (that ultimately worked against each other in terms of tone), this one has none.
TWO distracting QT cameos
dumb Jonah Hill cameo (clearly filmed separately from the sequnce it's in) because why not
shitty distracting hip-hop soundtrack
braindead ending, haha so cool we just massacred a bunch of people, let's laugh about this horse trick and ride into the night
Who would you have cast instead? Will Smith? That would've been lame. Foxx made it work. Inglorious was a weaker film too.
Idris Elba or Omar Hardwick. Django is supposed to be a heroic figure yet Foxx is a total c**t and can't hide it.
Idris would've been too tryhard. Omar is a literal who. I just can't see a better option than Foxx. Him being something of an ass works in the characters' favor. Otherwise the character would be too much of a "noble savage" type.
Whatever, I just hate Foxx's guts. The movie is worse off with him in it and ANY other black guy would have been a tolerable presence.
I don’t enjoy watching black people massacre white people
fantasy casting is dumb
jamie foxx just wasn't it, thousands of unknown actors could have pulled it off if they had been given the opportunity, it just would have been more difficult for marketing.
QT has enough of a fanbase that he could get away with casting unknowns, or at least not filling his cast with a-list names for bit parts.
There's a bit of a comedic sass that works here, imo. If they just tried to make the most macho character imaginable who is completely infallible like some Terminator shit, it would've been a more annoying picture.
if you say so, for me all the problems start with the screenplay, there's basically nothing salvageable in terms of characters or plot.
i forgot the hare-brained convoluted plan to retrieve the girl from the farm and the dumb handshake standoff that triggers the shootout
zero immersion as well, felt like i was watching a school play conceived by a child
Tarantino wanted Will Smith but he turned it down to do After Earth instead
>jamie foxx completely miscast
he was better than the original choice
>Muh slavery
Shut the frick up already
>le annual slavery movie
why do mutts love these so so much?
burgers are just obsessed with colonialism
I saw it in theater, was very dissapointed. The entire movie is just weak bait "viral scenes". The narrative is incoherent and shitty, the "historical commentary" is extremely overdone, the acting is weak. Most importantly the story is just not there.
why do people assume anyone with the power immediately turns into some blood thirsty sadist?
most slave owners were normal people. whippings were rare let alone whatever this shit was
QT doesn't portray realistic nuanced social dynamics.
he only does pseudo-witty dialogues that turn into sadistic schlock. without this gimmick, he's lost.
>why do people assume anyone with the power immediately turns into some blood thirsty sadist?
The entirety of human history, for starters
t. doesn't actually know anything about history
Gratuitous wigger revenge fantasy, but it sure is fun
One of cinema's most moronic "reveals" was at the end when Sam Jackson drops the cane and it turns out he's not disabled. K, doesn't mean you're immune to bullets. It might have meant something if Django was out of bullets and had to fight him hand to hand and then finds out he's fitter and stronger than the he looks, but Django just shoots him anyway.
>The reveal was that Sam Jackson was pretending to be less of a threat, and that he was the one who had been really running Candyland, and Leo was his puppet
Yeah, that's not a reveal by the end of the movie. That had been made clear to any non-moron like an hour earlier.
he didn't know django had two guns
>made neo-nazi chuds seethe with Inglorious Basterds
>made neo-confederate chuds seethe with Django Unchained
>made feminists and antique musical instrument connoisseurs seethe with Hateful Eight
>made bruce lee fanboys and asian manlets seethe with Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
What group is he gonna trigger with his next kino?
I'm guessing it will be blacks. Or maybe gays. Right? He's not afraid who he goes after.
we know it who it will never be
>made people on the wrong side of the current political climate seeth
wow what an acheivement. What’s next a 3 hour montage about how pedos are bad?
>homosexual ass white liberal simp skull condom
is reusing soundtracks from older films and making them the ost of your own movie cringe or based?
certainly easier to recycle renowned successful music than creating something new
i like how the first original score music in his films was his pal robert rodriguez's shitty crappy-video-game-soundtrack-tier synthetic slop in kill bill 2.
Tarantino's best movie, but racists will disagree
Tarantino grindhouse slop with no redeeming qualities. Just a hack indulging in visual masturbation while he virtue signals for his boss Weinstein. Your time is better spent using the equivalent two hours to wash your dick.
that's Jackie Brown
let's get real is Tarentino a bbc cuck