But the question is, how? The technology is not perfected yet. Any functional human being can tell an AI drawing when they see one, let alone on moving pictures. What are they worrying about? Do they really think we're that stupid?
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Semen Pig was in and wrote for Nu-Trek. He was part of the problem to begin with, he just couldn't see the trajectory of where it all ended.
Original movies -> unoriginal remakes, sequels, and prequels written by committees -> computer generated slop
I have no sympathy for Pegg after he shit on the prequels but bust a nut at the opportunity to star in The Force Awakens
Pegg was absolutely perfect in the "blood and ice cream" trilogy. It's a shame that he had to be a woke butthole. He does know that the reason why he gets so few roles now is because he's the whiteness Hollywood seeks to replace, doesn't he?
Obviously you strike before the tech is perfected and rolled out everywhere, depriving you of whatever leverage you still have
AI is gonna acutely reduce the amount of work there is. As the population continues to rise this is gonna drive unemployment. We are probably heading for a UBI dystopia a la Judge Dread
like the way many jobs in supermarkets and fast food restaurants have been subsumed by self-service counters, something similar will happen with things like customer service and creative media. Speaking to a human will be harder and more expensive and it's gonna cut more people out of the labour market
The thing about fast food and supermarkets is that no technology replaced anyone. They simply got rid of people and told the customers to do it themselves. Bit like the petrol pump guys. What would the Kinoplex version be? They just give you the script and tell you to act it out yourself? Would actually be kind of fun.
Automation means more work not less.
More "work", yes. A lot of white collar work is already just pretend email jobs, and its just going to get worse.
Someone admitted to me they spent 5 years at their last job playing windows solitaire at $34 dollars an hour. Office work is a meme.
Every boomer in my office is a pretending to be productive, and is only there because the 70yo+ grannies are even more moronic with tech.
Its a card house of upcoming replacement.
Only populations like Nigeria are rising still.
Guess we should kick the brown peepo into the sea then
AI will make more jobs, you just dont get it.
The great depression was followed by a period of almost universal bounty. The system corrects itself.
Rich can only get rich if someone is buying.
It's the new flavour of the month thing to hate. Next month they'll move onto something else.
>Brian Cox
His best performance was in a video game!. A fricking game!
correct but wrong game
He was a great Major Hogan.
Not when Succession exist.
Dey terk errr jerrrbs!
I can see Matt and Trey doing this. All they can do is do the writing and just have animators and AI do the rest.
Time for them to get real jobs.
AI took those too
I don't think it's possible for AI to "take" anyone's job when you can just work for a company that doesn't use AI. Even if companies used AI from top to botto0m there would still be a demand for normal actors.
It does create a situation where talentless hacks will suddenly be out of a job. I have no doubt in my mind AI can do a better job than JJ Abrams or Melissa McCarthy. That's ultimately what these strikes are about.
AI is gonna take everyone's fricking job. Welcome to the club Black folk at least ur millionaires
i've yet to work out what's hilarious about this picture
all these people are useless, but having one editor checking out AI drivel is even more disheartening.
I learned in my 4th grade that you shouldnt repeat "and" or any word too often in mine essays and she just spams that shit
She's a writer, she knows when the rules can be broken.
>and, and, and
>the room is filled with (things) and THIS PICTURE (how?)
>hilarious (it isn’t, but is because I say it is)
And writers wonder why studios want to replace them with AI. AI would not make these kind of amateur writing mistakes, take mundane selfies, or drink champagne on the job.
Your average joe is a fricking moron midwit, but I would like to give more credit to people than that. Some will buy it, some won't, but enough will buy into it for there to be a financial incentive.
AI is literally just a distraction issues planted by the studios to keep the strike from focusing on pay and royalties. some real occupy wallstreet tier playbook, why focus on unpaid taxes and offshore accounts when they can dangle diversity quotas in front of everyone and act like anything changed
Why are actors such anti science chuds
fighting against AI, is fighting to keep the status quo in hollywood. the strike was supposed to be about royalties, the only thing that would real change. simon pegg and brian cox only support the status quo
Nobody would be fighting AI if they were paid a one-off estimate of a lifetime's salary in exchange for their full digital voice and likeness. watch the fricking Congress (2013)
Instead, they've watched a bunch of autistic nerds create content production engines that run entirely on theft and piracy being embraced by the Hollywood producer elite.
Lol its amazing when these hollywood upper echelon types dont give a flying shit when blue collar workers lose their jobs to automation but as soon as it happens to them its suddenly the end of the world.
The funniest part is that the AI hype train is mostly bullshit. These AI programs are are a mixture of a database and a LLM which is essentially a word predictor based on pre-programmed parameters. These mongs thinking an AI is anyway near outwriting a real human being is moronic. Its basically a real life ask jeeves search engine with a bit of programming trickery in there to make it appear intelligent.
Also all of the morons saying :
>b-but look at this short story an AI wrote!
>l-look at the southpark episode!
it just pulls markers and parameters from your query and looks through a database of existing stories and basically word-swaps your query with certain words in the existing story, and remixes it. Its why when you ask for certain things the AI bugs out and gives repetitive responses. Because there isnt enough existing data there for it to pull from and regurgitate in to a new story.
The image/video generation AI does the same thing but just with images instead of text.
How anyone thinks that AI is going to be a game changer for script writing is beyond me.
I haven't used the text AI. Image AI repeats output when the size is larger than the model was made for. There you can fix by generating the base composition of the image and then upscaling all or part of it.
that south park thing was kinda impressive but also really shit in a lot of ways
for one, the characters just stand there lifeless the entire time while real animators try to at least make them walk around or make expressions with their hands or something
and the characters take turns talking with the exact same gap between sentences, like there are no long pauses or cutting off another's sentence, so the dialogue drones on and sounds artificial
Ai is just a tool, gives you a general direction, now let this software slightly change one or two elements to not fall under intellectual property litigation and youll get 100s of south park clones by independent studios, and thus without spending a dime on the technology to make one
lol at you homosexuals pulling the 'BRO ITS JUST A TOOL' card whenever someone points out the limitations of AI. You could give an AI program all of the prompts in the world and it still wouldnt produce anything near as good as a pre-season 9 episode of south park.
Except if you use AI not for scripting scenarios but for improving graphics, you could even make a pre-season 9 style episode with the right tool. Now as for the scenario you just need to mix trending personalities with movies you used to see as a kid, 3/4 of south park episodes were just that
It doesn't have to compete with Lawrence of Arabia, it just has to be better than the current crop of slop which is an extremely low bar. And this is the worst the technology will ever be.
>it just pulls markers and parameters from your query and looks through a database of existing stories and basically word-swaps your query with certain words in the existing story
That's not how it works at all imbecile.
these writer wagies are starting to run low on money
I’m afraid a bunch of them will be evicted
> a word predictor based on pre-programmed parameters
You just described how the human brain works.
lmao no.
Our understanding of how the human brain works is actually pretty shitty. We think that just because we can map which parts of it light up when we do certain things we have an understanding of it, which couldnt be further from the truth. Nature is so much more infinitely complex than we give it credit for. Trying to compare a search engine/word prediction program to the complexity of the human brain is an insult to nature. Absolute hubris from brainlets like you.
and as we all know about Technology, sometimes it just stops developing and advancing despite opposing economic material interests!
The writers likely already use AI and just do a little editing and slap their name on it.
THEY TOOK OUR JOBS
i cant believe how stupid people have become
Maybe it's time actors take the skills they acquired in Hollywood to the streets
Their fears are a moot point anyway as AI will kill Hollywood itself. Within a decade (two tops) there will be infinite AI-generated content. Everyone will be able to generate their own feature-length Star Wars or Indiana Jones movie with 80s Hollywood production values and Harrison Ford in his prime. If you can't be bothered to do it yourself, there'll be review websites where you can browse the most highly-rated AI-generated movies.
>Automate all of the creative work so humans can focus on labor
>creative work killed by ai
>low skill work killed by automation
>people demand ubi
>elites have to think up new ways to cull the population
>elites have to think up new ways to cull the population
Turn healthcare into an automated free-for-all, make the majority of people so fat, sick and weak that they beg for slaughter. Many would be encouraged to take up jobs as "handlers" and "caretakers" for these pigpeople. They know this is the easiest path but they're too scared of smashing the dollhouse they created with modern medicine
Aged care is already the most in demand job in my country. It pays utter shit. After the massive shortage during COVID did they raise wages to attract more workers? Nope, they just changed immigration laws to bring in more desperate third worlders. Writers love this shit. Any objection is nazism.
I was never talking about the elderly or COVID, I was discussing universal automated healthcare and Nauru-levels of obesity but good on you to skim for keywords like a good little robot should
I still don't know what you're talking about other than coconuts are fat fricks
>laugh when an "immigrant" takes hard working peoples jobs
>up in arms when a computer program starts taking theirs
They are preparing for the eventuality. AI can already produce, albeit in limited form, animated content. The speed AI generation has been progressing, it won't take that long before it can do even more complex content.
CIA wants AI gone because once you can deepfake blackmail videos they lose all their power
These are the same people that wanted me fired for not taking the vax. I say they can get fricked by the big AI dick
learn to prompt.
Kinda funny they are acting like the rednecks in south park with the "They took our jobs." Not so funny when it happens to you, huh?
>Any functional human being
there are very few of those left now, and they rarely watch movies.
>companies hire immigrants who will do jobs for half the pay and lay off regular workers
>smug liberals laugh at the plight of the laid off
>companies use chatgpt which will do jobs for fricking nothing and lay off smug liberals
Maybe they can learn to code...THEIR OWN WORKERS HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
should make a fictionalized movie based on these events (with a twist)
>blue collar workers threatened by automation
>elitists tell them to learn to code
>they do
>they code ai
>ai takes elitist jobs
delicious poetic justice
Rest in piss loxist israeli Hollywood. Heather O'Rourke is smiling in heaven at your demise.
Fricking A
>yet
movies are pre-vis'd already and it is less work to take the low poly pre-vis and then get it recreated in UE5 with a modelled actor and AI voiced speech than to go out with a crew and take over a NY street for 3 days.
it is largely scare mongering and people don't know is coming, plus it presents an opportunity for people to improve their own position which is what everything is about anyway.
DEY TUK OUR JERBS
>A.I. is taking our jobs
Is it though? That seems a long way off, if ever.
These things move very fast if you want them to. Progress has cooled off in the past few months because everyone collectively decided things were moving too fast, but if a studio put money on the table and said "codemonkeys type me a screenplay robot" it wouldn't take long, the tools already exist, they just haven't been applied.
>AI is taking our jobs
Weren't these frickers laughing when robotics and automation was replacing regular jobs in industry and manufacturing? Maybe they should take the advice they were giving out at that time and learn to code instead of complaining about the industry using automation to become more efficient
Yep.
>we're importing Mexicans to take your jobs chud lol
>we're sending your jobs to slave camps in Asia, chud lol
>Just get a degree in creative writing and move to L.A. loser
Now globohomosexual comes for them and it's a problem?
When they thought A.I. was coming to take out truck driving it was hilarious and great. Now A.I. may take on a teeny tiny, miniscule fraction of theit job, it's a problem?
>took er jerbs!
Why don't they learn to code?
these are the people who mocked truckers by advising them to learn to code when the truckers were worried about ai. the "creatives" were supposedly immune because muh human expression
well now they are the ones who are vulnerable. they should all learn to weld
Self checkouts practically took the jobs of all cashiers at the Walmart here. It happens
If you actually set foot in a walmart you'd see there are still a dozen blokes up at the registers making sure shit doesn't frick up.
>set foot in a walmart
No thanks
Are self checkouts the greatesy psyop in history
>Hey customer, how would you like to work for us, for no money?
>frick off
>Well, you will
>Fine, since I'm doing the work myself, my groceries are cheaper right?
>No. They will be more expensive
>Oh. Thanks.
I'd rather check out the 4 items I buy rather than wait in a line of people with full carts which is what those self check-outs are for.
As a reatard, I have a qiestion. What do people actually expect to achieve with rallying against AI? If it's cheaper, easier, and mlre time efficient for a job to be done with AI, then companies are going to use it probably. If a company chooses to do so, then what do these gays hope to accomplish outside of a boycott? You can't really ban AI.
Nobody thinks like that in the real world when their livelihood is on the line. They might understand that it's inevitable but they want to postpone it until they at least have been able to retire. And then the next generation can get fricked instead.
It happens every time there's major innovation. People seethe as their jobs are made obsolete
You cant ban media share, you can still hire a legion of lawyers and paralegals to save your corporate interests by making it illegal.
>People are doing jobs
>AI comes in to make their work obsolete
>Society hasn't prepared for this and just tell these people "I dunno. Get a different job?" despite the numbers of jobless people keeps growing as AI replaces more jobs
Governments should have prepared for this the second unemployment via AI replacement started popping up in their charts. And because there's nothing set up to deal with this, people are pushing back against AI as there's no way to help all this sudden unemployment. Can't blame illegals on this one.
Did they ever prepare for this? Hell, the gubment signed NAFTA in the 90's explicitly to make entire regions of the country obsolete and their advice was
>uh...learn to code?
The lack fo solution to the economic dead zoning was part of the plan. Same shit happened in the UK when Thatcher ended the subsidies to British mines which just destroyed them, there wasn't some grand plan to replace the mining jobs with service jobs or other industries.
tragic
Why shouldn't the AI take their jobs?
It was fine when machines btfo factory workers.
I like how jobless Cinemaphileners are happy about this shit to the point they make shit up about people just to justify it
“Um well maybe don’t celebrate self driving trucks” as if ANYONE did that ever
We don't watch movies, but we do obsessively follow writers, critics and D list actors/comedians on twitter. So yes, they have been gloating about the destruction of chuds.
>we don’t watch movies
Could’ve stopped stopped talking right there, that shit should be the Cinemaphile banner
>Oh no we need le humans to create our movies!!
>meanwhile almost every movie is a direct remake of something else or a sequel.
The sooner people realize that white women control hollywood and it's not "le jooz" the sooner everything starts to make sense.
They're moronic alarmists. We are not even 10 years close to AI taking writing or acting jobs away