>Ah yes, we did this sick stunt for real, come see out movie!
>Sike! Absolutely everything is replaced with CGI in the final shot!
I hate modern hollywood...
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
>Ah yes, we did this sick stunt for real, come see out movie! >Sike!
shit gee eye
what am i looking at here, why are there both cg curtains and the real thing?
>what am i looking at here
Top picture: what they shot on camera
Bottom picture: everything is replaced with cgi for the movie
They even replaced Tom, because he's not in the same stance. Pretty good effects in that case.
Tom is cropped out
well thats a shame. i guess they needed to model everything anyway so they could have debris like those chairs flying around and decided to go full cg for consistency maybe?
No, they are lazy homosexuals who completely lost the ability or desire to do anything in-camera and the entire films are made in post now.
They actually do it purely for marketing footage so they can reel people in like OP said.
That and it helps to shoot practical so that they have refenrece footage for the cgi guys. Same reason capeshit still sometimes film scenes with costumes but then replace them with cgi ones in post. They can use the real costumes for reference
The most moronic cope.
>Ah yes, we did this sick stunt for real, come see out movie!
Oh shit, is Jackie Chan doing movies again?
>It's Tom Cruise
Why are morons believing his lies? He had stuntmen for multiple decades.
Jackie Chan had stuntmen for decades, morono
>crashed an actual train from a cliff Back to the Future style
>completely replaced the entire shot with CGI
tragic. doesnt even look practical anymore
ayo ho up
Why didn't they just paint the damn train grey
At least the handles are real.
we did it
it makes sense in this shot. See at the top real shot how the green screen is spilling and reflecting the color especially on the left and the ceiling. Also they had debris and all kinds of object tumble down. So they had to model the train anyway to make the fake objects interact and bump against the fake train. Makes sense
Where they fricked up was with the sky diving scene in one of the previes MI films. They acutally shot the sky diving for real...but then replaced the backround with a fake thunderstorm one, making the whole thing look fake again.
>it makes sense in this shot
No it fricking doesn't. What a moronic thing to say.
>See at the top real shot how the green screen is spilling and reflecting the color especially on the left and the ceiling
This is easily removable without replacing the entire shot with cgi.
>Also they had debris and all kinds of object tumble down.
It's unbelievable but you can make props. and have them tumble down.
>So they had to model the train anyway to make the fake objects interact and bump against the fake train. Makes sense
No, it does not. It's lazy and stupid.
>Where they fricked up was with the sky diving scene in one of the previes MI films. They acutally shot the sky diving for real...but then replaced the backround with a fake thunderstorm one, making the whole thing look fake again.
Wew, it's almost like this is literally the same thing.
honestly you sound like a moronic boomer.
Accounting for random chaotic tumbling is not something you should expect anyone to do when choreographing a stunt past the 70s. They wanted tumbling debris but they didn't want to kill their stunt people, hence they added those elements in post which necessitated turning the rest of the set into CGI'd physics objects so everything could interact
>Accounting for random chaotic tumbling is not something you should expect anyone to do when choreographing a stunt past the 70s
fricking moron
You do realize they've been doing these types of train stunts and the like for dozens of years without the CGI, with fricking debris and everything, and it wasn't an issue? Dmb zooomer Black person.
>noooooo I have to act
moron
Best CGI is invisible CGI, things you can't really tell its fake until someones tells you/you read about it.
>All that shit
Fricking why. we used to have this thing called a location scout who would find a close real world location and they'd work with what they could find
The only thing that can be excused are the aerial/airplane shots, modern city lights would not be authentic either way and you can't really film effectively in an actual plane in flight
Sometimes there isn't a good enough location or you want THE location but it has changed so much over decades so you want it to be more like it was before, like, some old folk could say "yeah it was like that", even little details can make the desire enviroment perfect.
>Ah yes, we did this sick stunt for real, come see out movie
Reminder Hollywood studios actually remove greenscreen from behind the scenes to pretend that everything is "real"
Did this guy finished the 4th video yet?
I remember randomly watching the other 3