>ai art discussion has completely died
Knew that trash was never gonna take off, has their ever been a bigger grift than AI art and animation?
>ai art discussion has completely died
>ai art discussion has completely died
Knew that trash was never gonna take off, has their ever been a bigger grift than AI art and animation?
>off-topic FOTM bait discussion died out
yeah no shit thats because 90% of the people spamming it here weren't legitimate AI-NPCs, they were just homos like you looking to post about it for outrage bait
now go join em
>ai art discussion has completely died
Because the prompters are all in the AI art generals, and most of the anons who were making AI threads here(including you) didn't care about AI, they just used it as an excuse to stir shit since it was the next "big thing".
Because there is no reason to give a frick about another tool, it's exactly the same as being mad at CGI movies, most small artists and every major studio will use it and there is nothing wrong about that.
>will use it
Every major studio is already using it.
>>ai art discussion has completely died
He says the week the discourse has been stronger than it's been in months due to those dumbass swirly "paintings"
>died out
a few boards have ai dedicated threads. there is no discussion anymore because it already integrated into normality and because of that many people are polishing it and living with it
remember when photoshop went all the way to the supreme court back in the 90s to get it banned?
>already integrated into normality
Imagine trying to argue that about any other FotM shit.
This isn't the same thing, and there's still plenty of people who don't buy ai stolen shit
>buy
thats the point. the harry potter threads in /aco/ and /vg/ is pretty much ai only because they dont want to pay to get their Legacy/awakened characters commissioned.
The anti-ai outrage literally never made sense to begin with, everybody was having fun with ai voices, ai songs, ai animation and ai art for a few years now then suddenly it turned into the most controversial shit ever the moment that current union president started to double down on it out of nowhere, a guy who is openly use literal paid shills to push his opinions as facts on his union and outside of it
Remember how morons bullied that young man for making a fan animation with a couple of AI voices?
>a guy who is openly use literal paid shills
ESL red flag.
It's true though
ai voices
ai songs
ai stories
>He made a typo in his post by not including one letter?
>He must be an ESL! There is literally no other explanation!
As always the problem was OP being a gay. When you start a thread going
>here's a cool thing I made
nobody gives a shit
when you start it with
>[group] is on notice. they're getting replaced, they're seething.
it's inflammatory and poisons the well. And now that I've stated this you'll probably deny gays were baiting.
I was talking about all the drama in general like the Springtrapped fiasco not shitty bait on Cinemaphile
Cinemaphile isn't a super secret club all the opinions espoused here are just repeated from twitter/reddit and the bait was there too with the same gays making the same "artists are dead long live tech" posts and then playing the victim when people told them they were being obnoxious.
But that's like 30% of the problem, it's pushing out real artists with visions, voices, stories, you know, the type of artist people will use as a keyword in a prompt, and replacing them with what if spongebob lasted for ever? What if ghibli met lord of the rings? What if you had a thousand ai generated fakemon in a pokemon clone game. And when they're done, there will be nothing worth talking about. Why would you seriously engage with the artistic merits of ghilbi lord of the rings when there are none, a computer did it, the prompter has no idea how to do anything without a computer and by virtue of complete lack of talent has no artistic voice, and the computer program has no artistic voice either because it's a computer program.
If all the "what if spongebob sang queens bohemian rhapsody", "wouldn't it be cool if t swizzle covered bob dylans entire discography" weirdos fricked off and stopped uploading there crap to the internet, we'd be better off.
the anti-ai outrage was pushback against the people trying to replace human artists, which is perfectly understandable if you're not a grifter, a spiteful hack, or a moron.
The hype died off once people realized it was only pajeets using it to cut corners and that the "art" is only as good as what it samples from.
We had a successful AI thread a few days ago that was just an imagedump so it turns out the "discussion" was the actual problem.
Turns out if you make a thread where the OP isn't being disingenuous or arguing in bad faith, you're more likely to get productive discussion. Funny that.
>If it doesn't get discussed all the time on Cinemaphile it means it didn't take off
Terminally online moment
the people who actually care about got contained in /h/ and Cinemaphile, the spergs that spammed for (you)s got tired and moved to the usual
It died because twitter trannies took the L and accepted that AI's numerous applications are not going to be stopped.
The problem with AI art is the same as the problem with NFTs.
At the end of the day it doesn't matter if a tool is useful or not, if 95% of your community is insufferable sigma hustle grindset dudebro who have no interest in art and soul and just want to shit out as much schlock as possible to try to make a penny out of it it will drive away everyone.
The AI art market got over saturated in a month with crappy low effort coomer bait and pop culture shitpost who all look the same, none of the people using it ever had any intention of making something profound with it.
Tools/communities/beliefs live and die by the quality of the people partaking in them.
>Tools/communities/beliefs live and die by the quality of the people partaking in them.
*looks at twitter*
The quality of drama on twitter is nonpareil. No where else can you find such a fine collection of clueless morons duking it out over irrelevant bullshit.
>none of the people using it ever had any intention of making something profound with it.
People tried, but various artists shut them down or shamed them out of doing it. Heck, I still remember that one guy who used AI voices for some background voices, and yet he was threatened with being blacklisted by the entire industry and Cinemaphile acted like he used some nonexistent DALL-E Video to create his stop motion thing. Why bother publicizing your efforts if you're going to get the wrath of God raining down on you?
Discussion has died, yet the whining continues.