In just a few years anyone with a regular computer will be able to generate movies with virtually no limits, you'll be able to craft you own characters, stories, visuals with little effort and no limits.
What will be your first masterpiece?
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
>anyone
Ha, Cinemaphile still seems to believe this.
No, for the next decade or so only the big media companies will have the resources to do this, and and they'll fight tooth and nail to get it regulated before others have.
They'll use it to pump their streaming services full of infinitely meandering parametrized serial slop, month after month. The "content" will get fine tuned according to product placement and DEI requirements: just a touch of a slider and your capeshit will have more trans people or Bud Light in the next episode.
i believe a kind of black market will eventually develop
jewlywood won't be able to keep it to themselves forever, and they will start to lose out as independents spring up
People post their short film projects here all the time and only 5 people respond or bother to view it. And some are really good. Without millions of dollars of marketing, no one will bother with your project regardless of how good it is. It will always come down to marketing. Even the top YouTube and social media creators have Hollywood agents and publicists. The top two movies this year, Barbie and Oppenheimer, each spent over $100 million on P&A. Without a large marketing budget, no one will see some random AI project.
Don't you know "the mark of the beast"?
You won't be able to acess the internet unless you have a biometric implant checked. Everything you do will have drm and will be logged. Bad actions will affect your social-score.
nightmare fuel
You seem very ignorant of how technology evolves. Open source solutions are already equals to closed products, and they evolve just as fast, no one can stop open source, all you need is training data which is virtually unlimited and free to download (they never managed to stop illegal torrents of movies, they won't stop models).
Regulations can't do shit, sure, many people will still pay $30 to see slop at the kinoplace but most people will just stream movies. Everyone around me is already telling me they're tired of paying a ton of subscriptions for shitty shows filled with DEI.
>Open source solutions are already equals to closed products
name a free image generator just as powerful or better than bing
ill wait
It's so fricking over, bros
>No, for the next decade or so only the big media companies will have the resources to do this
Stable Diffusion already makes video, slowbro.
Anon, the bit about “government/corps have access to technology the average person will never see” is based on the idea they can have customized construction. AI is software. It’s also open source. The only difference between an individual’s generated content and a big corporation’s will be how long it takes to generate.
and we’ll all have flying cars and the robot butlers to help us
>a regular computer
You're gonna be waiting a long time for the norm to hit 4090/A6000 class GPU power (even longer if you wait for H100 class compute).
No, they won't. Get off the copium.
So what you're saying is we'll be flooded with low quality slop that no one will care about, just like AI generated art now.
There will be a very visible difference in quality between the slop anyone can generate, and actual films made conventionally, and people will overwhelmingly prefer the latter.
AI is a useful tool that will assist in some aspects of filmmaking, that's it. The idea that it will transform filmmaking into something anyone can do is fricking moronic and doesn't hold up if you actually stop and think about it.
>just like AI generated art now
It's a quantum leap compared the stuff we could make a year ago.
has there been a quantum leap in anyone giving a shit about any of it?
This lol. The White House made a statement about the dangers of AI because some black guy reposted AI images of Taylor Swift that were posted on Twitter by some Indian guy who downloaded them from /aco/ and claimed his own AI had made them and now Microsoft Designer has been neutered.
He downloaded them from here, don't lie
No, they were first posted on /aco/, not /tv.
Why call it harassment?
Call it homage, tribute
If someone did lewds of orange man, it'd be protected speech under parody. But since they made lewds of a woman, it's a sex crime.
If a woman doesn't like something then it's harassment
women need to make up their minds - AI taylor swift nudes are harassment but the dude using AI to cover up ethots' actual nudes is also harassment? seems like some bullshit.
a year and a half ago, we were generating 512x512 dogshit images with whirlpool faces and nubs for hands.
Wow dude nice. I'm sure if you just get the hands looking good enough everyone will start loving AI art
>But since someone raped MrPotatoParty's style into a LoRA for me I don't have to learn anything any more
I trained the LoRA actually, i'm not sure what you're getting at though.
you're right but even if you can get the look and aesthetics correct, you'll still need script and directorial skills to produce something of value.
i'm not going to pretend i could write even a shitty short story let alone the rest.
Your Guts is too Asian, your Griffith too Masculine, and your Casca too Indian.
A wacky comedy about Calvin Coolidge and his pet raccoon
AI will never get human footage totally right and no one will want to watch a whole movie of weird uncanny valley people
There's image AIs that do nothing but fix mistakes made by other image AIs.
What an unbelievably stupid post you just made
never is a very long time and AI upscaling and image generation is improving very quickly
improving towards what end? AI-generated images are single usage slop. Instantly generated, instantly posted, instantly forgotten.
That's true of most photos ever taken, which are of people standing in rooms doing nothing interesting and even if they're doing something interesting its typically only of interest to maybe a dozen people in the world at best. Most art people make is only interesting in the sense that someone actually took the time to make them despite not having any artistic talent or intent.
yes but some human paintings and photographs have broken through and reached a place in widespread cultural consciousness. I'm not aware of a single AI-generated picture that has done so at the moment.
Swift getting gaped by Oscar the Grouch is the thing that has/will defined the 2024 election.
post it
>post it
In what way? I am a Euro.
Yeah because there's a tons of people who devote their entire lives to creating paintings and photos while these art forms have existed for over a century. Image generating AIs are like three years old. We're not even close to seeing the full potential of the technology never mind the adoption of it.
i don't think it's a question of technology maturity.
Of course it is. The only way for these things to have any level of artistic merit to them you need to dramatically increase the level of control the users have. Right now the level of creative input the user has is basically just writing out a sentence and some details and the thing spits out an image which if it has even the slighest flaw from your desired result you have to manually edit them. The editing can be as easy as just throwing the image in mspaint and cropping the image or it can be so extreme that you need several years of digital image editing experience and professional level software. The most advanced versions that people have access too basically just asking a chatbot to make a new image.
art will always require the human element to truly resound with people. large corporations could always propagandize at large with AI-generated art and most people won't be able to stop it, but genuine people will inevitably more or less turn it off in their own minds.
>art will always require the human element to truly resound with people
Yes, that's what I just said. What do you think I meant by "dramatically increase the level of control the user has"?
you're talking about the process, i'm talking about the end result, the content.
No, clearly technological progress will cease as of this moment. Computer hardware and software is famous for being nothing but technology that suddenly stopped seeing any kind of improvement after a brief period of hype and development despite billions of dollars being poured into it by both consumer and business companies, government intelligence agencies and the military.
>new breakthrough in AI image generation
>"this is it, AI can finally generate totally realistic human footage!"
>some time passes and we realize nope, the uncanny valley is still there
>"just wait, it's gonna, it's gonna IMPROOOOOOOOOVE
repeat ad infinitum. and furthermore the mere knowledge that something is AI generated will turn people off from watching it. We want to see real people, and things real people have made.
>just wait, it's gonna, it's gonna IMPROOOOOOOOOVE
Unironically yes. This is how technology works. It is only a matter of time.
You're the equivalent of a guy in 1910 saying that cars are shittier than horses and will never become faster or more comfortable or cheaper to build.
technology can improve but it eventually plateaus to a point where no more gains can be made. There is a ceiling to most technology
Dumb analogy. If you want to draw an analogy with another technology then look at CGI. There's been huge improvements over the decades, you can now make a fully CG human that looks really really good technically, but you're still nowhere near being able to fool anyone into believing a CG human is real. We'll just keep making incremental IMPROOOOOOOOVEMENTS but we'll never get there.
but the mystery meat brown mutts all over TV and film are the same thing.
>a computer will never be smaller than a car and nobody will ever pay to have one in their house!
you're comparing appliances and art
>people said x was impossible and it wasn't, so this implies that all "x is impossible" statements aren't true
low iq
>people said x was impossible and it wasn't, so this implies that all "x is impossible" statements aren't true
>low iq
Seems pretty low IQ to claim AI will never be able to recreate realistic images.
>and no one will want to watch a whole movie of weird uncanny valley people
but they already do
Hey! You have to be nice to bl*ck people, it's the law.
Most people are sub 90 IQ, they won't notice.
Other will just rarely or even never see real footage.
>Most people are sub 90 IQ
Roughly 25% are, as per definition, but you appear to be one of them.
It'll be heavily stylized like Spider-Verse and goysloppers will slurp it up.
This technology is like, 2 and a half years old. Only a moron would make assertions about the limits of this field.
the same goes for morons making predictions on the contrary like OP
AI generated movie will allow people to be great filmmakers just as much as AI generated images currently allows people to be great painters
Didn't all the talk about AI art hit a fever pitch because the AIs were winning art competitions?
most of the comments on here are probably AI generated, sheeiiiit
Has there been a single AI-generated image that has had a shelf life of more than four hours?
Ai will never cover up your failings as a man
being somebody who could and would actually make AI movies i can tell you right now that's the reason it will never happen. sorry guys. if it fricks me over then it's bound to pan out that way. in a year's time from the release of a program that let you make movies from pure AI generation i'd have the biggest number of completed works under my belt of any director ever. fantasy, scifi, horror, romance, action - i would do it all and i have writing for it all. it'd be my fricking life's singular dream to have the power of an army of film crewmembers at my fingertips and total creative control - that's too sweet and ichor to pour out from the cancerous wounds of this homosexual, Black person earth, to EVER be possible.
best i can offer you is literally the exact day i die probably an hour later some really beta phase, rudimentary software will come out. there will be no joy until i'm not here to be able to experience it
obviously, you have a pile of scripts ready to be generated.
and i am going to burn them all before i die. i won't let some little moron try and make them and produce shit on my name after i'm gone. i'm not talking about scripts either, i have novels worth of shit that ranges from "would have to be an animation to really work best" to "completely unfilmable and impossible in reality."
skipping all the israelite bullshit and funding and actors and focus group nonsense through AI generation would be perfect for me and many others like me but they don't want that. they want braindead normalgays making santa claus and han solo drink together in a biker bar run by the muppets and they want braindead trannies and fringe types on Cinemaphile or what have you making gooner cringe shit all day and evola/world of warcraft mashup larp pictures - all while they use the traffic to hone their real desires with ai:
>tracking you and your personality
>tracking your movement
>tracking your online activity
>tracking your relationships
>conjuring fake domestic and foreign events, figures, interviews, etc
>more generally evil shit
i don't think you have to worry about anyone working on your scripts or produce shit using your name after your death.
i know that, because i'm going to destroy it all before i die if i don't get to chance to do what i want with it. are you reading what i'm saying you moron?
i'm saying you don't need to worry about destroying anything for it to be so.
trying to shit talk me doesn't work when you mince like a redditor. just baselessly say my work you've never seen is trash and get it over with you absolute midwit homosexual. you are bitter i can produce art and you are doubly bitter that even with the hypothetical creative equalizer of magic AI movie making software that i'd still blow you the frick out
Its up to you to prove your "work" is even real. Until then, its reasonable to assume amateur hour trash. If you had the drive to actually write decent scripts or screenplays you could be making a comfy niche living being a self published author.
you don't sound bitter and whiny at all
A second season to monster musume
I've been trying to do some Berserk fanfiction with midjourney but so far I find it very hard to keep the consistency of the people it generates. They end up looking different
>generate movies with virtually no limits
you can't get them to nword without 30 minutes of prompting and then you get flagged for account removal
hardcore VR pov sex starring me and emma watson
what happens when you tap that out and it gets inevitably stale?
then i generate another scenario in which i impregnate her while skydiving
>Guts destroys Griffith
>Casca commits suicide
>Guts, depressed and lost, wanders the lands of Midland
>Comes across Jill
-They get married
the ending we deserve, but will never have.
We'll see the decline of television and film when that happens. It will become an oversaturated trash art form. There'll be a reactionary return to stage plays and live music.
Depends on the kind of AI. AI with freedom will be a stark upgrade. The controlled AI we're seeing now is just another method of demoralization
>will become
>What will be your first masterpiece?
A real star wars sequel trilogy
so with generative AI, do we just keep asking to make the Star Wars sequel trilogy better till it gets so good we forget to ask it to make a better iteration?
did you enjoy that de-aged cgi harrison ford in the last one?
>actually watching tros
lmao what's wrong with you?
didn't see that one, was thinking of indiana jones 5
It's so much harder than you're implying. Just doing the AI Audio side of things, you end up needing the skill set of someone who wasn't using AI. Same with high level AI art. You end up needing to work with layers that don't exist.
AI will speed up trad workflows, and bar some short but viral cool shit you upload to tiktok or YT, you won't have a 1 man band making a movie that isn't crap just with AI
>AI will speed up trad workflows, and bar some short but viral cool shit you upload to tiktok or YT, you won't have a 1 man band making a movie that isn't crap just with AI
Remember in the 1970s when computers existed but you needed an entire music studio and production staff to make a music album?
>anyone with a regular computer
Just wait until those get outlawed and you are only allowed to own a phone.
That Griffith isn't pretty enough.
Did painters shriek this loudly about photography not being art?
Yes but there was no internet back then so it was easier to ignore them
Yes and photographers shrieked about films not being art because the collaborative nature of the projects somehow lessened its artistic merit since "true art" is made by an artist with a single vision. Musicians shrieked about synths not being real instruments and the music not being art because all they heard was bleepbloop noises.
I’d make a second season to the berserk (1997) anime. We got a taste of it during the first episode.
The Ring Cycle
>80s casca
neuron activation
Bro you know there's fanfiction since forever and absolutely nobody reads that trash
Nobody is gonna watch your janky piece of shit
Full blown feature film where I rape Jennifer Connelly in every single frame, through a mind control technique learnt from a israeli elite book
I can't wait to watch Chrome Lords
AI art will never be real art because art is about expressing yourself and AI art will never express anything
>Recorded images will never be real art because art is about expressing yourself and recorded images will never express anything
Agreed.
What a shitty cope argument, AIgays only like AI because it owns le porn artists they have to pay $50 for furry porn
I guess you're right; the technology has plateaued and there's no improving past this point.
>AIgays only like AI because it owns le porn artists they have to pay $50 for furry porn
pretty sure AIgays like AI because it lowers the bar for creating bespoke content of acceptable quality, both in terms of skill required and effort. If I want to jack off to a text adventure wherein I play myself and a 37 year old Emma Watson plays my mommybangmaid, I can have that up and running in less than a minute. No programming, no hours of prose work, hardly even any conceptualizing, and I can play a very acceptable game, complete with images and text to speech in her voice.
Genuinely, the future is bespoke content on demand. I'm not saying it's gonna happen tomorrow, or run on Bob's work PC, but that's where the market is heading.
>If I want to jack off to a text adventure wherein I play myself and a 37 year old Emma Watson plays my mommybangmaid, I can have that up and running in less than a minute.
Not if you're using a machine with TPM.
Remember how in the 1980s, factories manufactured radar detectors for cars so you could see when the highway patrol was picking you up on radar to avoid speeding tickets, even though many states said it was illegal to own radar detectors?
Not really sure what all there is to that, but I have a B450 motherboard and a 3090, running linux, and it works just fine. If regulators somewhere down the line institute some hardware block on local AI, that bridge will be crossed when it comes to it.
The game shows from the /aco/ slop threads
I remember like 6 months ago when people were screaming "IT CAN'T EVEN MAKE REAL HANDS! IT'LL NEVER CATCH ON!" It's the same old song and dance every single time new technology develops. A bunch of moron normie ludites wave their fists in the air saying how that newfangled automobile will never replace the horse, or that dastardly printing press will never beat hand written, or how computers are just a fad. And how does it turn out every single time? The technology advances despite your limited viewpoint and then in 10 years you'll all be using the shit you said would never happen.
>Two more weeks and we'll all have FLYING CARS AND FOOD PILLS and we'll all be BITCOIN MILLIONAIRES
Anon ai content generation went from completely incoherent images to video in about 14 months.
No you won´t, but enjoy your delusion.
This is what early AI images looked like almost 2 years ago. Compare that to what we get today. See the exponential growth. This technology will continue to grow.
I’ve been thinking about this for the past two years. Feed a script and it will make a movie including the likeliness of living and dead actors.
I think there is a very small window upon the tech being released where you have a chance to be one of the memorable early kinos. Afterwards it will be a free for all of bullshit