Just Jared says after test screenings they are doing reshoots with Momoa and Nicole Kidman (Queen Atlanna) to replace her parts (probably exposition shit)
>During the shocking new interview, the actress insisted that she's going to 'stand by every word of her testimony until the day she dies,' less than two weeks after she was found guilty of defaming her ex by claiming that he abused her during their marriage
>zero photographic evidence >zero police reports of DV >zero medical records of treatment for multiple assaults >zero evidence of her being beaten on audi recording >evidence on audio recordings that she hit Depp, throws vases, pots, pans >evidence on audio recording of her berating and cussing at Depp because he always ran away when they got in arguments instead of facing the problem >same photographs as "evidence" that claimed to be on different days >bought Depp a bowie knife as a gift during a time he allegedly was beating her
This is a lying b***h. She demonstrates the war on men the leftists have been waging in our society for decades, and that men have zero chances of clearing their name in this society, no matter how much evidence exists. Any broadcaster giving this lying c**t a platform to continue to spew her lies should lose their FCC license for broadcasting propaganda.
Because they don't care about truth, all they care about is narrative that supports their belief and attacking and demonizing all those that oppose it. They are insane. You can't reason with them. Facts and truth don't matter.
Deppgays are really moronic, every single time that this rumor comes out you believe it every
time
If Hollywood Report, Vanity Fair or WB doesn't confirm its fake
She loses a court case for saying defamatory things about Depp, costing her $8M and her reputation, then she goes on TV and says the exact same thing that got her in trouble. How dumb is she?
She has every right to reaffirm her belief over her past statements, even if she lost the case. Depp can't do anything, because she's protected from double jeopardy.
I'm no lawgay but that doesn't seem right, lol. Like if someone ran a red light, and got in an accident and had to go to court, they can now run all the red lights they want?
>Like if someone ran a red light, and got in an accident and had to go to court, they can now run all the red lights they want?
They can't be put on trial for running the first red light.
I think that other anon was wrong. It's no double jeopardy to put her on trial for another statement she made about Johnny recently, since the trial she just lost was about what she said in 2019 or whenever
>Like if someone ran a red light, and got in an accident and had to go to court, they can now run all the red lights they want?
She's doing the equivalent of saying >Yeah, I ran that red light, and I don't feel guilty at all.
Litterally nothing anyone can do over such statements after the punishment has been meted out over that one instance of running a red light. The equivalent of running another red light is amber making up a new story of Depp abusing her.
>Litterally nothing anyone can do over such statements
Wrong. If all the requirements of defamation are met, than she can be sued again exactly for defamation. However, one of the factors required to prove defamation is that statements had a negative impact on the personal or career life of the victime, and at this point, I don't think people believe that b***h, and therefore it should have an impact on Depp from a legal stance.
She still has a right to an opinion, lol. She can say she still believes in her own story as long as she doesn't quote her own defamatory statements. She's walking a very dangerous road.
That's not how double jeopardy works. She can't be tried again for the SAME incidend of defamation that had been tried already. So in this case, the incident in question was the WaPo article published in 2018. However, she can be sued for any other incident of defamation, including defamatory statements she is making in the press recently.
I doubt Depp will bother to sue because she's already fricked, but I would definitely have my attorneys send that b***h a cease and desist, and if she keeps talking her bullshit, I'd sue her ass again.
That fricking lying b***h needs to learn and be held accountable for her lies.
>Litterally nothing anyone can do over such statements
Wrong. If all the requirements of defamation are met, than she can be sued again exactly for defamation. However, one of the factors required to prove defamation is that statements had a negative impact on the personal or career life of the victime, and at this point, I don't think people believe that b***h, and therefore it should have an impact on Depp from a legal stance.
I wonder if affirming you believe your previous testimony under oath counts as defamation, though
Obviously you can't say the opposite, "lol I was just making it up" cuz then the cops show up to arrest you on a hundred separate charges of perjury
>wonder if affirming you believe your previous testimony under oath counts as defamation, though
The statement is just one element. Damage from the statement must also be made and demonstrable, so if her crazy rambling don't have a demonstrable impact on Depp, which at this point I don't think they will, then the standards of defamation have not been met.
So unless Depp starts to lose professional business opportunity again after this most recent Heard media circus of lies, then he probably won't sue, and wouldn't be able to prove defamation again in court.
>cops show up to arrest you on a hundred separate charges of perjury
Perjury is rarely ever pursued against people outside of federal courts involving testimony made to the FBI and other federal agencies. Heard obviously lied her ass off on the stand, and she will suffer no criminal charges as a result.
True. Defamation is used for written statements, like the WaPo article, while slander is used for spoken statements, such as Heards interviews. Both are hard to prove as there are elements that must be met before they can be prosecuted. I'm sure his legal team is assessing the situation to determine if they can take action against Heard to shut her lying ass up.
>How dumb is she?
She is not used to losing. She can't accept it. The entire concept is foreign and unbelievable so she reacts like this and lashes out. If anyone tried, they would be attacked and lose their well being. Now multiply that by every woman and minority in the west currently and you can understand why we are basically screwed.
Maybe five years ago. These days nobody wants to see Pruneface McGee in the sexy sidekick role, hire someone that doesn't look like a fricking shar-pei when she smiles.
watching her try to force emotions over a made up traumatic event was really hard to watch. I cannot believe these companies will let you star in movies if you're pretty and suck the right dick
They have to pay her anyway
Then pay the reshoot her scenes
By the time the film comes out no one will remember the trial >no it was really important
And in a month zero people will care
For such a small paycheck, I can only assume she negotiated a percentage of profits, but I don't think Amber has that kind of pull. If by some miracle she scored like a quarter of a percentage (which would be like another 2 million if the movie earns 800 mil) would she still be entitled to that if they completely cut her scenes? I suppose it's up to the terms of the contract, but I wanna know what's standard.
I don`t really care about her as an "actress" or Aquaman for that matter... i mean, it`s Aquaman, i was never going to watch that regardless. I`m just here to know if she is bankrupt now and if there is any chance for her to start making scat porn to pay the bills. She may be crazy but she is still a niece piece of meat.
They can't be sued, like Hamada said in the trial, they can take her out of the movie entirely and it'd be totally legal as long as they pay her the wage they agreed to pay. So they might bite the 2mil in return of all the ppl that'll watch because it's so heckin epic
Her upcoming films say they’re already in post-production. Are they going to digitally scrub and replace her in the movie? I don’t even care that she still got paid for the role, being such box office poison that they edit her out of every scene she rehearsed and memorized lines and went through makeup for seems far more humiliating than being fired. It’s probably the last movie she’ll ever be in and she can’t even be seen in it.
Still it doesn't quite stroke my suffer boner correctly because she definitely has a few millions somewhere after all this rolls over. She can retire and just be an alcoholic,drug snorting NEET the rest of her life and do some interviews here and there for a few tens of thousands.
she behaved absolutely crazy and still keeps behaving like that, wouldnt be surprised if they edit her out completely, tho this would be an extreme move.
Amber said in the last interview that Depp convinced the world he had scissors for fingers. Whoever is close to Amber and is not separating its name from her like the plague is dumb as frick.
Can she pay that? What if she doesn't have enough money? She is forced to sell properties and still doesn't have enough. Will she be forced to pay half of everything that she earns in the future to Depp until she pays all of it?
Jury awarded 10 mil in compensation and 5 mil in punitive damages. Virginia state law limits compensation damages to $350 K, so Depp is entitle to $10.35 million in total damages.
Since the Jury also awarded Heard $2 mil in punitive damages, that $2 mil can be deducted from the total Depp was awarded, which would be $8.350 million.
I feel like this case was nothing but a charade to get people distracted from the economy and how the world has gotten worse because of some Chinese fricks wanting release population control viruses that don't even kill everyone. Crackhead counterfeiting Black person does everyone riots, drug dealing EMT that happens to be a Black person does everyone riots, and now we have some war between Russia with a country nobody really gives a shit about yet somehow affects all of the world. Why aren't people rioting now? Distraction by whatever stupid shit they put on TV to entertain morons from the problems the government have created.
fake.
lol, simp. She gone.
Just Jared says after test screenings they are doing reshoots with Momoa and Nicole Kidman (Queen Atlanna) to replace her parts (probably exposition shit)
Nah
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10916907/Amber-Heard-CUT-Aquaman-2-role-recast-sources-claim.html
>During the shocking new interview, the actress insisted that she's going to 'stand by every word of her testimony until the day she dies,' less than two weeks after she was found guilty of defaming her ex by claiming that he abused her during their marriage
The absolute mad woman.
>zero photographic evidence
>zero police reports of DV
>zero medical records of treatment for multiple assaults
>zero evidence of her being beaten on audi recording
>evidence on audio recordings that she hit Depp, throws vases, pots, pans
>evidence on audio recording of her berating and cussing at Depp because he always ran away when they got in arguments instead of facing the problem
>same photographs as "evidence" that claimed to be on different days
>bought Depp a bowie knife as a gift during a time he allegedly was beating her
This is a lying b***h. She demonstrates the war on men the leftists have been waging in our society for decades, and that men have zero chances of clearing their name in this society, no matter how much evidence exists. Any broadcaster giving this lying c**t a platform to continue to spew her lies should lose their FCC license for broadcasting propaganda.
>femail
Actually relegated to the lesser part of the news. The part about women.
>trusting dailymail """journalism"""
>ever
This is just a shitty Where's Waldo.
>dailyfail
I like it when beautiful women who live life on easy mode experience challenges. It makes them relatable.
This. She could coast by, but she's intentionally making things tougher
I respect that.
Amberbros.... not like this....
is that guy confusing amber heard with bree larson?
White women literally all look the same
Nah that’s Black folk
Indeed. They’re the standard of beauty on this planet because they’re so plain
>furious israelite cope
jej
Based Gohanhermano
>gohanbro
>ESL
oh....
>Gohanbros are morons
What’s new?
In fairness to him, they are both dumb b***hes
>Gohanchads are geniuses
Who knew?
he's ok for a weebshit
?t=6
YOUR NEW MERA HAS ARRIVED
SHANSHA
PLZ
More for MCU Namorita
No, needs to be a black woman. Too many white people being mermaids.
Based 20f + 43m paring. Reminder that mamoa is aryan even though he’s not white so it’s ok
gonna age like milk
Needs to be a Black woman
I literally cant look at a picture of a white women with the flash on, without thinking BLA…
You've been mind broken. Fix yourself. You can do it anon!
kek based!
I cant look at white women i low lighting dark interiors with the flash on either
why do lefties believe obvious, straight-to-your-face lairs like this c**ts and the black homosexual in Chicago
you don’t think chicago is MAGA country?
Not when it's -20F/-29C outside at 3 in the morning
Because they don't care about truth, all they care about is narrative that supports their belief and attacking and demonizing all those that oppose it. They are insane. You can't reason with them. Facts and truth don't matter.
Deppgays are really moronic, every single time that this rumor comes out you believe it every
time
If Hollywood Report, Vanity Fair or WB doesn't confirm its fake
>inaccurate, insensitive and slightly insane
Just like Amber is!
THE PROJECTION IS PALPABLE
>redditroons are projecting about projection now
It's projectception!
Wrong, Amber is very insane clearly
>A Heard spokesperson
Can you really trust their word either, though? Lol
>heard spokesperson
That means Eve Barlow. You know, the insane friend who got banned from the court.
When it ends up confirmed you're just going to say "W-w-well like I said, we had to wait for REAL confirmation" kek
> loses $2m role'
didn’t they already pay her?
Yes, she has already been paid.
Yes this is very poorly worded. I guess they meant she won't ever get another check from Warner.
She loses a court case for saying defamatory things about Depp, costing her $8M and her reputation, then she goes on TV and says the exact same thing that got her in trouble. How dumb is she?
She has every right to reaffirm her belief over her past statements, even if she lost the case. Depp can't do anything, because she's protected from double jeopardy.
I'm no lawgay but that doesn't seem right, lol. Like if someone ran a red light, and got in an accident and had to go to court, they can now run all the red lights they want?
>Like if someone ran a red light, and got in an accident and had to go to court, they can now run all the red lights they want?
They can't be put on trial for running the first red light.
I think that other anon was wrong. It's no double jeopardy to put her on trial for another statement she made about Johnny recently, since the trial she just lost was about what she said in 2019 or whenever
>Like if someone ran a red light, and got in an accident and had to go to court, they can now run all the red lights they want?
She's doing the equivalent of saying
>Yeah, I ran that red light, and I don't feel guilty at all.
Litterally nothing anyone can do over such statements after the punishment has been meted out over that one instance of running a red light. The equivalent of running another red light is amber making up a new story of Depp abusing her.
>She's doing the equivalent of saying
What are you basing your opinion on, with specifics? Laws, civil procedure, case law, what specifically is your basis?
>What are you basing your opinion on
The first amendment.
>Litterally nothing anyone can do over such statements
Wrong. If all the requirements of defamation are met, than she can be sued again exactly for defamation. However, one of the factors required to prove defamation is that statements had a negative impact on the personal or career life of the victime, and at this point, I don't think people believe that b***h, and therefore it should have an impact on Depp from a legal stance.
double jeopardy applies to criminal law. If she republishes her defamation she can be sued again for it
She still has a right to an opinion, lol. She can say she still believes in her own story as long as she doesn't quote her own defamatory statements. She's walking a very dangerous road.
I know. That's why she won't call him an abuser anymore and is just saying bullshit like 'stand by my le testimony :DDD'
Saying it again is a new act of defamation. She can be sued for it, just like before.
That's not how double jeopardy works. She can't be tried again for the SAME incidend of defamation that had been tried already. So in this case, the incident in question was the WaPo article published in 2018. However, she can be sued for any other incident of defamation, including defamatory statements she is making in the press recently.
I doubt Depp will bother to sue because she's already fricked, but I would definitely have my attorneys send that b***h a cease and desist, and if she keeps talking her bullshit, I'd sue her ass again.
That fricking lying b***h needs to learn and be held accountable for her lies.
I wonder if affirming you believe your previous testimony under oath counts as defamation, though
Obviously you can't say the opposite, "lol I was just making it up" cuz then the cops show up to arrest you on a hundred separate charges of perjury
>wonder if affirming you believe your previous testimony under oath counts as defamation, though
The statement is just one element. Damage from the statement must also be made and demonstrable, so if her crazy rambling don't have a demonstrable impact on Depp, which at this point I don't think they will, then the standards of defamation have not been met.
So unless Depp starts to lose professional business opportunity again after this most recent Heard media circus of lies, then he probably won't sue, and wouldn't be able to prove defamation again in court.
>cops show up to arrest you on a hundred separate charges of perjury
Perjury is rarely ever pursued against people outside of federal courts involving testimony made to the FBI and other federal agencies. Heard obviously lied her ass off on the stand, and she will suffer no criminal charges as a result.
But these are new allegations still being spewed to the media, b***h won’t leave Johnny alone
True. Defamation is used for written statements, like the WaPo article, while slander is used for spoken statements, such as Heards interviews. Both are hard to prove as there are elements that must be met before they can be prosecuted. I'm sure his legal team is assessing the situation to determine if they can take action against Heard to shut her lying ass up.
>double jeopardy
Stick to watching Law and Order you dumb moron lmao
>How dumb is she?
She is not used to losing. She can't accept it. The entire concept is foreign and unbelievable so she reacts like this and lashes out. If anyone tried, they would be attacked and lose their well being. Now multiply that by every woman and minority in the west currently and you can understand why we are basically screwed.
>How dumb is she?
She is insane.
>How dumb is she?
She's a woman!!!FACT!!!
To anyone who followed this did they ever find a reason why Amber went insane?
RELEASE THE AMBER CUT
I wonder if she took a shit on the water tank where filming took place too
I havnt seen the first one but I will watch the second one IF she's not in it.
do it
Just let it go
No.
Maybe five years ago. These days nobody wants to see Pruneface McGee in the sexy sidekick role, hire someone that doesn't look like a fricking shar-pei when she smiles.
wow rude
one of them is clearly a dog
Now who's being mean about Emilia.
Ugly, walled, cringe, fat hag
good
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/amber-heard-denies-cut-aquaman-johnny-depp-defamation-trial
>Amber Heard denies...
You actual believe a word she says at this point? Yikes!
>WB declined to comment
OH NO NO NO
Why wouldn’t they say they were cutting her out
They're still screen-testing.
A beautiful woman like her shouldn't have to deal with all that malarkey and nonsense. She should be cherished and treated like a princess.
>a beautiful woman
Yes
Nope, not this roastie, cope, her career is toasty.
t. Female
watching her try to force emotions over a made up traumatic event was really hard to watch. I cannot believe these companies will let you star in movies if you're pretty and suck the right dick
Disgusting.
florence pooh?
>who farted
>when she sees an unshat bed
She's an animal.
Amen. When did we go so wrong? I’m the days of Troy we would start wars over her
She still shits once a day at least, and her vegana stinks after doing excercise.
Sounds pretty hot to me.
DEGENERATE
>A beautiful woman like her
she will always have a place in my heart~ and in my home if she ever needs a kind place to stay. #amberheardinnocent
And her friends? Family? Random hookups invited?
Only WB would do something this stupid
nothing stupid about it, it's based
They have to pay her anyway
Then pay the reshoot her scenes
By the time the film comes out no one will remember the trial
>no it was really important
And in a month zero people will care
>loses $2m role
She already filmed it a long time ago, she's still getting paid even if they cut every scene
For such a small paycheck, I can only assume she negotiated a percentage of profits, but I don't think Amber has that kind of pull. If by some miracle she scored like a quarter of a percentage (which would be like another 2 million if the movie earns 800 mil) would she still be entitled to that if they completely cut her scenes? I suppose it's up to the terms of the contract, but I wanna know what's standard.
I don`t really care about her as an "actress" or Aquaman for that matter... i mean, it`s Aquaman, i was never going to watch that regardless. I`m just here to know if she is bankrupt now and if there is any chance for her to start making scat porn to pay the bills. She may be crazy but she is still a niece piece of meat.
attention
dailymail has put a question mark now so we dont know for sure.
If only Amber had been smart enough to put a question mark in the title of her article.
warner brothers could be sued for cutting her, and may have to pay her the salary anyway even if they do cut her
WB can do whatever they want since her b***h ass signed the contract, shot her scenes, and snort cocaine from Cara Delevingne's butthole.
No they couldnt. Actors get cut from movies all the time. This is Amber Heard level denial. You are an Amber Heard.
They can't be sued, like Hamada said in the trial, they can take her out of the movie entirely and it'd be totally legal as long as they pay her the wage they agreed to pay. So they might bite the 2mil in return of all the ppl that'll watch because it's so heckin epic
Why hasn't the closest male relative committed this hysteric harpie to a mental ward yet. She is not competent and perhaps needs shock treatments
That redhead big ass from Riverdale should take her spot
>reddit lawyers have shown up
jannies, take this thread out of its misery
Ambros.. we lost
We really do have no choice but to suck off Deppsisters, huh?
Well, alright, I'll go first..
AQUAMAAAAAAAAAN
I can't believe Johnny is getting away with all these lies. How dare he abuse this lady now ruin her career!
I also can't believe how many people believe this garbage.
He's gonna have her wacked soon too.
Donnie Brasco wins again
I want Amber to sweat bullets everytime she spots a Honda Civic nearby.
more like ACKwa-Man, amirite?
What does a woman have to do before you finally believe her for once?
You fricking chuds.
>What does a woman have to do before you finally believe her for once?
She has to stop lying.
OUT AM I?!
Her upcoming films say they’re already in post-production. Are they going to digitally scrub and replace her in the movie? I don’t even care that she still got paid for the role, being such box office poison that they edit her out of every scene she rehearsed and memorized lines and went through makeup for seems far more humiliating than being fired. It’s probably the last movie she’ll ever be in and she can’t even be seen in it.
They already cut down a lot of her time, there might not be much more of her left in the movie to take out.
>movie about fire
>name is Burnham
hehehehe
I thought the same thing.
Ha I hope so.
Still it doesn't quite stroke my suffer boner correctly because she definitely has a few millions somewhere after all this rolls over. She can retire and just be an alcoholic,drug snorting NEET the rest of her life and do some interviews here and there for a few tens of thousands.
shes pretty fricked tho, especially considering that people like her crave attention.
>turd gets cut from aquaman 2
>we get a post-credit scene with depp dressed as mera saying "AQUAMAAAAAAAANNNN"
best movie ever
she behaved absolutely crazy and still keeps behaving like that, wouldnt be surprised if they edit her out completely, tho this would be an extreme move.
she only in like for 10 minutes or less
it wouldn't be hard to cut her out completely
would be really funny if it happens, it was also definately mean that shes done with hollywood forever.
I hate men.
same uwu
Omg sameee, can i put my wiener in ur bussy?? Plz
It's irritating that she's still alive
Amber said in the last interview that Depp convinced the world he had scissors for fingers. Whoever is close to Amber and is not separating its name from her like the plague is dumb as frick.
So I'm reading that she won't have to pay the 10.350.000$ that she was sentenced to.
So what is the point of the sentence if she isn't going to pay?
>10.350.000$
its $8,350.000 she has to pay not 10
Why? I read that she was sentenced to pay 10$ million for the defamation and then a fine for 5$ million more but that was reduced to 350,000$.
Amber Heard won one (1) defamation thing and gets 2 mil from depp
So 8,350,000$ then.
Can she pay that? What if she doesn't have enough money? She is forced to sell properties and still doesn't have enough. Will she be forced to pay half of everything that she earns in the future to Depp until she pays all of it?
What's certain is that she can't declare bankruptcy and never pay anything, since the jurors stated she acted with malicious intent.
Jury awarded 10 mil in compensation and 5 mil in punitive damages. Virginia state law limits compensation damages to $350 K, so Depp is entitle to $10.35 million in total damages.
Since the Jury also awarded Heard $2 mil in punitive damages, that $2 mil can be deducted from the total Depp was awarded, which would be $8.350 million.
>Expert says Amber Heard's new interview could result in third lawsuit
THE RIDE NEVER ENDS
>Another cobbled together shitshow "movie" by Warner Brothers
Fricking hell are they run by morons
What happened to increased time, did people react that bad?
lmfao what happens if you defame someone again after your remarks were already determined in court to be libel?
She is still appealing the sentence so that have to be resolved first to know what happens.
She isn't appealing. Elaine talks a lot of shit, but Amber doesn't have enough money for the bound needed to appeal.
>THEY WANT TO MICROWAVE MY BABY!
Real talk. If someone really said that on Twatter, I'm convinced it was someone from her PR team trying to spin shit.
I feel like this case was nothing but a charade to get people distracted from the economy and how the world has gotten worse because of some Chinese fricks wanting release population control viruses that don't even kill everyone. Crackhead counterfeiting Black person does everyone riots, drug dealing EMT that happens to be a Black person does everyone riots, and now we have some war between Russia with a country nobody really gives a shit about yet somehow affects all of the world. Why aren't people rioting now? Distraction by whatever stupid shit they put on TV to entertain morons from the problems the government have created.
"Mera Actress given the hook"
"Flash actor on the Run"
now all we need is:
"Superman Actor deemed a flight risk"
Don't do it Henry! Behave!
What did she mean by this?
I've no fricking clue mate.
How old is this specimen? Don't lie to me anon.
umm, bro?
MOOOOOOOOODS