The films contributing to the losses include “Lightyear,” “Thor: Love and Thunder,” “Strange World,” “Black Panther: Wakanda Forever,” “Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania,” “The Little Mermaid,” and “Elemental.”
The eight films cost roughly $2.75 billion to produce but only brought in $1.86 billion.
Source: https://worldofreel.com/blog/2023/6/p95n9m49teezhezvf8go18kmp4hmtc
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
how long before studio exec realize that a couple loud-mouth trannies and Black folk on twitter doesn't actually represent the general public of movie goers?
It's definitely all their public relations social studies diversity-hire c**ts that convinced them all this shit was a good idea and they're totally gonna make a lot of money.
I wrote a book and have been querying agents to represent it. Literally on all their manuscript wishlist pages says: Diversity and disability representation number 1 priority. This shit has spread from college campuses to the movie industry to the literary world. I bet I've gotten rejected because my characters aren't "diverse" enough.
Gotta self pub and market market market.
Hey anon. I'm now a working author who got past this problem by adding a POC co-author (my wife). Make a friend who will do this for you or just colonize your way to success as I did.
Yeah what you're saying is correct. It's not the israelites, it's not Blackrock. It's the white women. Querying my first novel really opened my eyes too about how they can take over and destroy an entire medium of art dating back to the Roman Empire. Read any good books lately? How about Legends and Lattes, the one they're all trying to follow up now? You know that book was originally shuffled off to a small publisher before getting bought by Tor because there are literally no more good novels in the industry they've strangled.
It's mind blowing what counts as literature now. Nothing that will endure the test of time. It's all selfish, pandering, created because the author checks a box. That's not to say only white men should write or something, but what's getting made now the qualifications are simply... being whatever box is checked. Nothing more. I'm surprised the industry is even still around, but white women probably buy up this garbage like saps because they believe it will give them personal ESG points or something.
Shut up israelite.
but I was agreeing with you
some rapper is going to steal this for song lyrics
Isn't the point of literature is that you can imagine what the characters look like? That's the excuse the Left used when Aragorn was Blackwashed. "It never says anywhere he had white skin!"
Beautiful, necessary, about time
holy fricking christ that is depressing
>Isn't the point of literature is that you can imagine what the characters look like? That's the excuse the Left used when Aragorn was Blackwashed. "It never says anywhere he had white skin!"
lmao this moron probably voted for this shit and now its all "but i thought i would be one of the good ones" boo hoo gaylord
The saddest part about this shit is that they’re always clinging onto the boot of some other popular franchise screaming “me too”.
There are women writers. Women sci fi and fantasy writers. There are black authors and books. Comics. Why don’t you buy their shit? Why don’t you adapt their works? Because all this shit is performative nonsense deliberately designed to fuel hate and discord in society?
If they actually cared about diversity they’d care about their stories, not try to shoehorn in these fricking retrofits at every opportunity.
Because even with the backing of every mainstream book publisher, and despite being gift wrapped increasingly meaningless awards like Hugos, their original works sell like shit too. An insider anon posted numbers once, and a heavily pushed diversity author getting 40k sales is an incredibly successful outlier. An established author like George Martin would wipe his ass with those numbers every year despite doing frick all but side projects for a decade
There’s a reason why wen originals and self published books, which used to be the real of chuck tingle tier jokes or maradonia level vanity projects, have skyrocketed in the past five years despite the quality not really improving much,
self publish, or try somewhere based like antelope hill
I'm trying small indie presses at the moment.
I've gotten positive feedback on the story despite rejections. It was adapted into a screenplay and I was a finalist in 3 major Hollywood screenwriting competitions. Despite this, I've been rejected by agents so far. Going to try and get published the traditional route but if that doesn't work I'll self publish and aggressively market it. It's a sci fi book similar to the fifth element and the matrix.
>I'll self publish and aggressively market it.
you'll be amazed to hear this, but it's a lot easier to have a tradpub take a risk on you if you've got a proven record of sales in self publishing. ditto good representation.
based. i hope you are successful, anon. we are all rooting for you
>based
based on what? frankly im glad 'they' are going 1942 on the morons, I hope they force more sterilizing cancerizing "vaccines" on all of you absolute mongs polluting my internet and my world with your moronic THOUGHTS
>similar to the fifth element and the matrix.
why cant you make something non-derivitive?
frick you im glad your uncreative garbage got ESG'd
Anon. Nothing is completely original anymore.
For what it's worth, almost every feedback I've gotten from agents is "very imaginative genre work"
>Anon. Nothing is completely original anymore.
this is true if you're a moron
be honest, are you posting from a cellphone?
Outside those made by legacy authors, Self published and even web novels are beating the shit out of traditional published works repeatedly nowadays.
It’s no silver bullet, but you’ve got a very good shot at success, precisely because you won’t be shackled by the moronic quotas put up by publishers
Just make the main character a one legged black polish lesbian and you'll never have to work another day in your life
I believe it, I've started to notice that stuff more in newer books and it's off putting because it stands out even worse than it would in a movie. When you write, everything is deliberate so if you try to force something it just instantly stands out. It's a shame too because there are some books with really interesting premises and themes ruined by it because they need to shoe-horn in a transgender person for 5 pages in a fantasy book or something.
Guise... what if someone made a book publishing company that would accept all the manuscripts that would have been accepted 40 years ago by normal publishers but aren't anymore? Seems like an untapped opportunity.
Sounds problematic
>how long before studio exec realize that a couple loud-mouth trannies and Black folk on twitter doesn't actually represent the general public of movie goers?
I think they already know, bit it's just too late to go back. The trannies and Black folk they spent the past 10 years hiring, exist now in the upper echelons of power. The worst group of all, white women, are at the very top, and refuse to change course.
the money, rather the israelites who control it, will always have more of a voice than whatever black or female puppets they put in temporary power.
And yet it obviously doesn't
Honestly the amount of cope articles saying "get woke go broke" isnt real says theyre in the peak denial stage. Once the losses cement in is when youll start to see change at the studio level. Probably when the shareholders start getting lower dividends.
Saw an article a few days ago saying budlight is recovering despite the fact they've permanently just lost the top spot as the best selling US beer
jews rely too much on presenting an artificial reality through media control
the internet amplified this by a lot because they had websites like reddit and twitter essentially moronifying all debate, but even that doesn't work out so well.
>twitter
Is now owned by a troll who hates democrats
>reddit
Is dying.
Is…is the tide finally turning bros?
twitter was ran by US alphabet agencies and the most active city in the US on reddit was where the US information warfare base is (elgin). none of this shit is organic and i'd be suspicious of what comes next, if there is any change
jews are evil c**ts, never forget it.
Reddit dying is a bad thing because that means those gays will come here
They won’t, and can’t, last here.
They come in droves all the time. They're shitting up Cinemaphile and Cinemaphile right now
Why do they go to Cinemaphile?
It's the perfect place for Redditors to start.
Redditors are gays by default, and they think there are safe spaces within Cinemaphile that they can hide and do their fanfic shipping. Cinemaphile is already kinda gay by default, so it makes sense.
Oh, so all those autistic threads about shipping characters from different shows in Cinemaphile are made by refugees? Now everything makes sense.
Cinemaphile has been Cinemaphilemblr since 2012, its never been good
>Cinemaphile
>now
Cinemaphile is the gayest board outside of /lgbt/ and it's not recent
this
you can tell a ton of them came here when the homosexuals did their homosexual protests
now you see tons of those homosexual snarky posts replying to right wing shit
The newest of newbies. The "go back" meme is just that, because there's massive crossover between Cinemaphile and Reddit.
They have to know. Bud Light and them doubling down is head scratching....
Its not about the money
Bro in the long run they win, wait till the new generations who only know that garbage grow up. All they have to do is avoid bankruptcy for a couple of years
demoralization posters will get the rope first
This is the most important post here
The money is irrelevant. The message is out there and the younger generation only knows this kind of life. Look at how absolutely moronic Gen Z is. Alpha is going to be the epitome of NPC.
You are delusional if you think any of this is about business
You would have a point if Kids actually watched Disney slop. They're all watching YouTube
Jewtube is roughly as israelited as Yidsney slop. So is TikTok. All the same thing.
They don't need to make money. They or their cousins print it anyway, it's just a bonus if they sometimes make a movie people actually like.
It's just mostly replacing every known character with a Black person and when every original version will soon be in digital form, they can just make them available to everyone and when enough time passes the characters being Black folk will be the canon in everyone's minds. There probably exists people who are so young they believe Europe in middle ages actually had 30% of Black folk around or something like that.
it doesn’t work like that, vanguard already bailed and blackrock lost close to $1b in one year. ESG is dying all we have to do is persist. every time you say this bullshit about them printing money you demoralize so knock it off
>$1b
*$1t
Well I'm sure glad if people finally stop paying for shit that's designed specifically to mock them in the face. It's a sort of a whitepill.
I think that's an understated aspect. I made a conscious effort to avoid media that openly hates me and then when you bring it up you're surprised how many people you know felt the same. We may just be seeing the affects of people just giving up on it when they have so many alternatives.
It went on for a surprising long time that people would buy shitty remakes, yearly re-releases in games and woke remakes despite complaining how they are shit. Then pre-ordering the next product first one in the line.
Don’t give me hope anon
cucktino is a homosexual who has never made a good movie
How he has dodged plagiarism suits is honestly mind-boggling. He has straight up stolen scenes shot-for-shot from other's movies.
No law against that
>ghostbusters is worse than ghostbusters 2016
>predator is worse than prey
The hottest of takes from moron pedo foot pervert.
I'm a film scrub. What are the best decades for kino?
He’s right but at least the 80s gave the world some of the best action movies ever.
>ESG is dying
It's not. They're just going to change the name of it and keep it extra quiet.
ESG and Blackrock were set up by Wall Street Neo-Liberals to Stoke culture wars to distract everyone from the wealth transfer to the 1%.
Yes and no. It was mainly set up by israelites to facilitate white genocide.
I know someone who works at netflix and I have a friend who works at an animation studio,
They know, they are aware of it more than the average audience gives them credit.
But they are still dealing with the hungover of the #meetoo / BLM years
There's contracts that need to be fulfilled, people that has to be fired, and the funny thing is, the writrers strike offers the perfect excuse to end contracts and fire problematic people, just wait until Force majeure kicks in and a lot of studios are gonna clean house
They already purged Ava DuVernay thanks to the strike.
Interesting. (I believe you). I mean, just look at how much less celebrated this Pride was by corpos. Only a few changed their logos... no huge we gay we gay we gay messaging. People are over it.
2 MORE WEEKS
The worldwide rejection against TLM says it all. Movies will have to identify themselves as BlackRock PSAs from now on if they follow the woke downward spiral and pay the price in terms of loss of money but most of all loss of relevance.
studio execs ARE loud-mouth trannies and Black folk on twitter
You don't get it, do you?
PROGRESS cannot lose therefore it wont lose.
Period.
But it just did.
You people just don't get it, do you?
The money is fake. They make it up at banks and the federal reserve. They control it in the computer system, they control the funding for companies you're talking about, and they control the product that those companies put out in every single way, shape, and form. They do not "lose" money no more than you could lose Monopoly if you were the only real player in front of the board.
So if it's not about the money... what IS it about? I do wonder.
it's about control. they control the entire game via printing fiat which gives them infinite power. even if everyone stopped watching Goyslop Media, they could just use their fake fiat to pay the right people to fudge the numbers and reviews. however, for some reason they don't do that sometimes. so even though they stopped neg reviews of Little Nigmaid, they didn't use their infinite fiat option to pump the box office numbers. because they don't have to, i guess. they know that only Cinemaphile autists are paying attention to box office vs real net revenue returns. and maybe they want a controlled demolition anyway because it's part of the Great Reset. just look at vice media and buzzfeed going bankrupt and then getting bought up. no one is held accountable, some useless staff are let go and can get another job at Vox or whatver. these woke companies continue. even if DIS stock kept tanking they'd get bailed out.
They know and they don't care. Daddy Fink is always there to bail them out
They don't care it's not for money, not even muh blackrock, the people running the show are legitimate supporters of the progressive cause
>still thinks that this shit is about money
It is, in a roundabout way.
Ask yourself this; how are you going to demoralise people if they can blatantly see your propaganda is failing constantly?
How can you get people to see you as the winners when you do nothing but frick up?
The fact that people went from saying “Samuel L Jackson is in it! Cool!” To pic related in under 10 years shows just how badly they’ve failed.
They boiled the crab too quickly and they’ve utterly destroyed all the work they put in the past 30 years. It’s astonishing how badly they fricked up when they were on course to have the current year shit be accepted without complaint in twenty years or so if they’d just kept at the same pace
>boiled the crab
The frog. It's the frog that you boil slowly.
I can only blame Robert putting crabs in my head for that error
Did you know that lobsters feel excrusiating pain when they're boiled alive?
the crab
>The frog. It's the frog that you boil slowly.
Kek.
They were so close to success. Keep casting the most beautiful curvy Black vixens into shows to spread jungle fever. Cast the actually pretty Asians from Asia, , not the box-faces Asian-americans, to spread yellow fever. But no, they had to also destroy the concept of feminine beauty.
It's never been about promoting diversity and improving race relations, it's always been about creating schizophrenic hatred aimed at groups not part of the cabal.
This isn't about giving movie goers what they want, it's about ironclad branding. A large majority of the people who go to see this sort of slop don't care about diversity, it's just a ploy to drum up fake outrage and create "meaning" for their meaningless product.
Woke shit has never been about putting asses in seats, it's been about controlling the narrative surrounding movies so that nobody is allowed to complain about the slop they're getting served, and people will actually defend it as not slop because of something that adds no actual substance.
It absolutely is, bottom line. We're going to see a crash soon and after the scaleback cinema is going to start healing.
there are more effective means to power than money
Don't worry, Blackrock will pay them to make sure they don't lose money
Blackrock EGS arm is losing money face as frick as well
Racism
don’t forget indy 5 and snow white & 0 dwarves. they’ll be well into a billion loss after those
*snow latinx
Shit Brown
also Haunted Mansion remake that nobody wanted
they have so many movies coming out and all of them look like dogshit
The haunted mansion one is the oeast offensive.
Its a black family
Black folk love scary movies
Its a pg rated black scary movie
There's no iconic characters theyre black washing
>snow white & 0 dwarves.
I think you mean el goblina y los cero gringos
>Thor: Love and Thunder,” “Black Panther: Wakanda Forever,” “Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania,
Im glad even Marvel trash contributed to loss. Maybe they finally stop.
Ant-man contributed but not the others. They all would have broken even at worse
It's also a double insult that every single movie nowadays is a remake or at best it's a sequel. If they made ORIGINAL stories with 100% black cast, people might enjoy them, but they make remakes because 1) it's always cheaper to not have to write and market an original story/characters and 2) to shit on the original stories.
>you are wasting your time anon
>SJW MOVIES AND TV SHOWS THAT BOMBED
Watchman tv show
last 2 star wars movies (solo and skywalker)
Ghostbuster remake
Oceans 8
Charlie angels remake
Terminator dark lesbians
Men in Black: International
Wrinkle in Time
Doctor Who
Black Christmas(2019)
The terror: season 2
Sense8
Cloak and dagger
Birds of prey
Dark Phoenix
Batwoman series
Star Trek Picard
Raya and the last dragon
Tomb raider 2018
Lovecraft Country
The Owl House
Black Widow
NO TIME TO BOND
Star Trek Discovery
NETFLIX BEBOP
DISNEY SIDE STORY
Powerpuff live action - Before launching
Cruela
Halo
Lightyear
Miss Kebab
Batgirl Movie = Before launching
Batwoman movie = Before launching
Legends of cancelation = Before launching
Naomi = Before launching
Blacked Canary = Before launching
First Kill
Politically-Correct Hazard
Wheel of time
King Arthur legend of the sword
Black annie
Eternals
DR Whoaman
WW1974
Cinderella
Kenobi
brah
.>she hulk
G4
gaytabulous Woke Gay Adventures of Harley
ANDOR
STRANGE WORLD
WITCHER PREQUEL
VELMA
ANTM3N
GOTG3
pinochio
we waz mermaids n shiet
disney presents fire crotch and water boy
SJW movies that sold well
>THE LAST OF US II
>LORD OF DA RANGS
>BIG RED REVENGEANCE
Bud Light lost 7 Billion dolars
Gilete lost 8 BILLION dolars
Warner lost 20 BILLION dolars
Netflix lost 40 BILLION dolars
AMAZON LOST 1 T-TRILION DOLARS
BLACKROOT LOST 1.7 T-T-TRILION DOLARS in 4 months
>Get based be graced
Sonic The Hedgehog
Snyder Cut
Demon slayer
Angry BIRDS The movie.
300
RAMBO: LAST BLOOD
Sanic 2
Battle Angel Alita
TOP GUN 2
BLACK ADAM
Wednesday
MUH RIOH
>jurassic world 3???
>SJW movies that sold well
>LORD OF DA RANGS
people hate-watched it, doesn't count
season 2 (if it ever happens) will be the true test
how did Black person rangs sell well when it literally wasnt even sold? what data do they use to come up with increased amazon membership specifically because of rangs? when if someone hate watches it they dont get money, unlike with the cinema
Nobody, and I mean nobody, signs up for Amazon prime for the fricking TV stuff, most people who have prime (for the free shipping) don't even watch it because they already have netflix.
well yeah thats the point im making. the thought is almost comical. how is lawddy dem rangs supposed to make money?
The logic was it would get people signed up for Prime and they would stick around to buy shit. In reality everyone either had the service already or 'borrowed' a password. Or pirated.
>RAMBO: LAST BLOOD
i.e.
>All you old white men need to be prepared to die to make way for your mutt-mexican daughters.
Errm, anon, that was a little woker than you think. Cohencidentally the same plot as Logan, btw. Funny how that worked out.
>cinderella
>movie where every major character is white and the non-white actors play the prince's servants or secondary roles with 2 seconds of screentime
>shamelessly European visuals
>woke
why are you gay
>SJW movies that sold well
>>LORD OF DA RANGS
Bezos pls
>Angry BIRDS The movie.
>based
are you fricking brain damaged?
It's an anti-immigration allegory.
One of the few modern movies where immigration is shown in bad light.
How did black panther fail? all they had to do is releasing it on the day blacks receive their food stamps
>How did black panther fail?
By replacing the male hero by a woman instead of recasting Black Panther?
The most misogynist group on earth are Black folk, you really think they were going to watch a movie about their dead hero replaced by a nigress with no ass? Lmao
But aren't they rewarded by Blackrock for ESG compliance? So they get money on the side. The business model has changed. It doesn't matter if the movie is trash, as long as they complied with ESG by making a black mermaid the box office performance doesn't matter because they'll still profit from ESG reward
See
They don't give a shit if one or two woke movies bomb, but when it becomes a trend and audiences are clearly rejecting your shit and it's obvious you are no longer capable of putting butts in seats then is when the suits start to worry,
It's hard to get Blackrock money for your studio when there's not studio
not any more. Blackrock, Vanguard, and State Street are simply money mangers for a lot of pensions globally. ESG most likely violates Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
some states have already made it illegal for state pensions to invest in ESG.
lawsuits are already in the works and soon pissed boomers will be filing civil suits against the big three for losing their money intentionally.
Larry Fink and company are fricked. no court will ever rule in his favor because fiduciary trust and responsibility are the bedrocks of the financial system. courts always rule in favor of investor supremacy. you'll probably be seeing a lot of money managers taking the banker skyscraper dive in the next few years.
Larry Fink is responsible for the last decade of subversive garbage and he deserves everything coming to him.
he deserves a golden parachute and quiet retirement in Long Island? yeah that's probably what will happen. but yes i agree, these frickers need to get booted out NOW.
Larry Fink and his fellow subversive anti-white israelites/minions deserve cartel style deaths. Literally get them high on the “legal” drugs they peddle and then peel of the skin of their face.
one can only hope
I like to think that they'll learn to find a new appreciation for Christ and his teachings as they find new careers as Christmas ornaments on the national mall.
Why get them high first?
for dank webms
>ctrl f "larry"
>3 results
you three are alright, not reading the rest of these moron's posts but you three, you three are okay
bless (you)
well, one would hope.
>because fiduciary trust and responsibility are the bedrocks of the financial system
If that were the case then we wouldn't have had years of ESG to begin with. He will get a slap on the wrist
We live in a lawless society that worships criminals
The whole "blackrock has infinite money" angle is kind of missing the point. The point in leveraging Disney and using it as a front for wokeshit was its popularity. Attaching the potentially divisive politics to something people already like was supposed to make it go down easier, like how you trick a dog into taking a pill by putting it in a treat.
If they end up devaluing the entire brand because of the wokeshit agenda then it becomes useless, like an undercover agent whose identity is blown. They're willing to lose money to some extent, yes, but if it's just lighting a billion dollars on fire every year to get the message out to a fraction of the intended audience then it's not worth it, even to them.
And like others have pointed out, an asset management company that seems perfectly happy to *not* make money draws the wrong kind of scrutiny eventually no matter how strong their prior position may have been
Good post, which is what I kinda think. Sure their pockets are indeed deep and they are hellbent on shilling, but destroying everything kinda ruins the point.
>“Thor: Love and Thunder,
>“Black Panther: Wakanda Forever,”
These movies made money though
>Thor: Love and Thunder,”
>“Black Panther: Wakanda Forever,”
Deadline reported they made 140M and 250M in profit.
>the Little mermaid
Was a success. Read the article Chud.
Hasn't turn a profit yet, unless all those movie theaters didn't take a cut out of the goodness of their hearts.
1/3 to 1/2 goes to the box office and not the studio. Maybe even more in some countries.
It will struggle to break even.
I just don't understand why these corporations think EVERY movie has to have a budget of $250-300 million where you need to make $600 million just to break even. Do they really expect every movie to gross a billion dollars? How is that a sustainable business model?
Well, I guess it isn't
That is curious. Would it really be impossible to make a movie on a mere 70 million or something
>That is curious. Would it really be impossible to make a movie on a mere 70 million or something
See Deadpool and Joker.
The idea was that they could afford a couple movies that didnt quite break even if they had just one massive success.
Guess they didnt count on a series of flops.
Just have a look at how dominant Disney was in 2019. Most of these films have been in the works since then
Hot take:There is no correlation between a movie succeeding or failing due to wokeness. For every example of a woke flop, you can easily point out a woke success and vice versa.
The audience just wants an enjoyable movie at the end of the day. Politics comes second.
You can only live in denial for so long before reality crashes in anon.
Spiderverse literally is the number one movie of the Summer. Not because it's "woke", but because it's a good movie.
Get off the internet and talk to some friends outside of your echo chambers for once.
>but because it's a good movie
But it isn't.
It’s a successful movie, no doubt, but it’s hardly what Sony was expecting. Given the first movie’s acclaim, Sony expected this to clear a billion like No Way Home, but it’s gonna stall by the time it reaches $600 million. And internationally, it’s doing $100 million or so less than monkey-obsessed USA. It’s still a major success, thanks to its IP, and not because it’s an ad for BLM and LGBTQUITE+. It’s like how whatever Mario game Nintendo publishes, it will always succeed.
What are you smoking? Spiderverse's WOM has been extremely high and is the clear driving force. Literally everyone is calling it one of the best movies in history.
>Literally everyone is calling it one of the best movies in history.
lmao amerimutts are so fricking moronic
>literally is the number one movie of the Summer
Its going to finish well, WELL below Mario and also GOT3 in total box office. Studios just jumped the gun with their best releases this year because they don't even know what works anymore
>number one movie
It’s a Spider Man movie that is struggling to make a billion.
That’s embarrassing no matter how you spin it.
>
#
>Spiderverse literally is the number one movie of the Summer.
That's not a high bar, there are no competitors.
Transformers? The Flash movie? The little Black personmaid? Elemental?
This summer lacks anything but movie competition
That’s pretty diverse number of films. Ppl are just tired of Hollywood
>Makes a fraction of the Mario movie
Wew lad
>but because it's a good movie.
Come on now, it's because of branding, you goose.
the point being, the environment that israeli c**ts cultivate due to their ideological evil is an untalented and nepotistic one. people generally dislike trannies but lack strong beliefs and will still watch something that contains them. spiderverse is woke and terrible and did well, tlm is woke and terrible and did poorly. it's just a matter of it being presented in the right way.
Your problable right. Just doesn’t help that anytime a big movie flops they blame it on the “racist/sexist/nazis.”
Woke movies suck because they put ideology above entertainment, not because people are mad at the wokeness
juraissic park had some woke moments, the big one being the teenage girl being able to hack and solve the computer problem. basically the 90's version of rey bypassing the compressor or whatever. and yet it did well. original JPark also had an unmarried career woman in lead role doing bosslady shit but also having caring tender moments like a mother figure to the two brats. JPark also had LE BLACK SCIENTIST SMART MAN played by mace windu. So point i'm making is that movies were indeed WOKE and feminist back then but it was done more artfully, in a subtle way. and yes, Kathleen was pulling strings in a lot of these cases. she just didn't go full moron like she's doing now and making clearly obnoxious movies.
>woke doesnt mean it'll fail financially
Sure but it does mean it'll 100% be dogshit
serious question, how can we draw any conclusions using data without cherrypicking? you can list a bunch of movies as your sample to show no correlation. anti-woke people can list tons of shit including the oprah flop, the recent pixar flops, little mermaid, etc. to show that "Diverse" cast does not equal profit due to low demand. then some pro-work gay will say BLACK PANTHER made a BILLION. we end up arguing until we're blue in the face without some shared agreed upon and objective way to find the answer.
First you'd need to actually define what woke is. Then you'd realize he's right and "woke" media succeeds just as much as "non-woke" media if it's good. If not a little more due to drawing in more people.
As simplistic as it sounds, Red people like seeing red people onscreen. Blue people like seeing blue people. Make a movie that has enough red people to attract reds without scaring away blues, and you make more money than a movie that only appeals to blues.
Woke media "succeeds" by usurping established IPs. They're called parasites for a reason. I can't name an original IP that was in-your-face woke at the start.
>First you'd need to actually define what woke is.
Anti-white, anti-male, anti-western civilization. Simple as.
Youre missing the bigger picture, which is internal hiring. When you reach a critical mass of ideologically focused diversity hires the enterprise becomes institutionally incompetent and unable to produce enough hits (see OP) to stay afloat.
A few anecdotal woke hits of the past weren't produced by studios filled with dangerhair lesbos and nigs that are currently manning these (slowly) sinking ships. They were filled subversive BUT relatively more competent israelites, who have aged out or now been me too’ed out of the industry.
Bro, why are they always so fat?
Smaller prefrontal cortex which governs impulse control (eating discipline)
If I saw those two ape b***hes in the pilot seats I would scream that I had a bomb. I once had a black stewardess and I declined the peanuts and just glared at her.
The one on the right is kinda cute. Not gonna lie, I'd frick both of them from behind and then blow a huge load all over their big black butts.
Thank you for telling us
No problem
what woke movie was successful?
Super Mario Bros.
In the case of The Little Mermaid that's even worse bc they devalued a formerly popular brand, which has cascading negative consequences for their amusement parks, merchandise, licensing and any short-term prospects for sequels, spin-off, movie or tv animation etc
That is literally, unironically, genuinely nothing. These people have a direct line to those who create the money.
Pretty sure Bud Light isn't taking it to be 'nothing'
Bud Light isn’t the end of the chain though.
It’s owned by Anheuser-Busch whos owned by AB InBev.
Conservatives don’t seem to know how capitalism actually works.
Pretty sure conservatives realize that. What's your point? They are in damage control now yes? They are trying to stop hemorrhaging money right?
My point is all you’ve done is cut one head off the hydra.
ITT: Hope and Cope
israelite on a bike
what happened to all the woketard Cinemaphile shitters who said this was a big hit? were they only pretending to be moronic?
they are mostly just unfunny redditors/twitter users who think they are trolling but dont realise people would be posting the same shit about this garbage either way
Yes, they were unironically pretending to be moronic. It’s a form false flag trolling were you pretend to be a moronic member of the other side to discredit them.
It's funny how that sort of trolling has ruined the internet and culture at large. I wish it would stop already. But it's too late to stop.
Go woke..................................go broke :^) how do you like that lefty homosexuals if you go woke then you will go broke ohohohoho
>woke isn't at fault for a tanking media industry, it's x, y and z
>covid jabs aren't at fault for excess deaths, it's x, y and z
occam's razor has been thrown in the trash and the reasons are everything besides the 10000 pound elephant
Diversity is worth investing and spending money on.
Letting children grow up with people and characters they can look up to and identify with is a good thing chuds.
Why are non-whites incapable of empathizing with anyone who doesn’t look like them?
It's not about making money, that lost $890 mil is an investment.
>It's not about making money
>It's an investment.
not that anon but i think they are implying the currency of the elites is power and destabilizing the west is their investment
worldofreel blog? What analyst?
tv/ is filled with the most iliterate people on the internet.
Funny your the first person to call out the source
Any estimatives on how much they were paid by blackrock for being ESG compliant? Or how much they'd lose if they weren't?
thats a jpg i have not seen for a long, long time
was this the first internet psyop even predating the dress?
i don't think it's about getting paid directly. it's about blackrock maintaining their stock position and continuing to buy more stock, as well as giving Disney near-zero interest rate loans.
>be media company
>publicly traded
>make WOKE shit to maintain high ESG and HRC scores
>blackrock and blackstone continue holding your stock and buying more
>if you need money you literally don't need to work for it or make profitable content, all you have to do is take out a loan at tiny interest rate from blackrock and since you continue pumping niglets, race-mixing and degeneracy, Larry Fink smiles and signs off on the loans
>where does Larry get the money? from the Fed Reserve of course.
>media company pays millions to their WOKE staff, actors, etc. who then go around buying up real estate to rent or to flip, and thus the real estate market goes into turbo-bubble mode like everything else.
>meanwhile joe schmoe and jane doe on Main Street has to work their asses off at their job, be it in manual labor, sales, or whatever, and their job depends on getting real results. if you're in sales you better generate sales or you get axed. if you build houses you have X amount of time to build houses for Y budget or you get fired
>but the same standard is not applied for these woke media and tech companies
>they can operate for decades without profit and still earn a living, in fact they earn millions of dollars and live lavishly
the key is just to visualize not being poor and it just magically happens
i havent worked since 2016 and im neither homeless nor starving, figure that shit out, it makes no sense but it is
manifest reality through consciousness actualized
yeah i'm aware of LOA but don't actively do it. i should. manifestation does work. i'm also not poor but not rich.
>i'm also not poor but not rich
if you have to go to work to avoid homelessness you are a PEASANT whos PARENTS didnt LOVE YOU
deal with it, unironically
i don't work. i mooch off my parents who were peasants and who didn't love me. they were also too stupid to manifest large wealth when they had a chance.
Does anyone here not get that Disney doesn't give a shit how much chump change they lose on their 90-minute theme park commercials?
Bump just to frick with reddi/tv/
look at this thread you zoomer morons, look at it
not enough
these demons should lose their lives for their crimes against humanity
there's a thread about this on /misc/ right now:
this is fake 'ashamed' clickbait
while they are taking in mad cash with
and the goyim eat it up
He's not backing away from shit. This is them panicking that the goys are noticing and it's time to shut it down.
TAX = written off nicely
OP = fricking moronic
> “Lightyear,” “Thor: Love and Thunder,” “Strange World,” “Black Panther: Wakanda Forever,” “Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania,” “The Little Mermaid,” and “Elemental.”
Woke, broke.
Look at these points when Blackrock saves disney's stock from dipping too low. they help maintain a slight upward bottom trend line. each time they backstop declines they can safely sell for profit at top.
Comply with ESG score woke nonsense and blackrock will always have your stock's back. even after declines. and execs can cash out any time they want millions to buy another house.
Not even leftists who defend these movies go to see them
it's because deep down they know these movies are trash
damn grown men on the internet spending their day arguing about the political implications of how well a disney movie grossed.
truly the lowest tier of society lmao
WHO GIVES A SHIT??? you're all moronic
>damn grown men on the internet spending their day arguing about the political implications of how well a disney movie grossed.
>truly the lowest tier of society lmao
>WHO GIVES A SHIT??? you're all moronic
You're here too you dumb homie.
We're vastly better than troons like you.
I'll never understand how trannies can complain about people not liking them when they come to other boards and post shit like this.
Why do you care what other grown men care about?
WHO GIVES A SHIT?? you're gay as frick
so confusing
Here's your answer
How do you know this
There are absolutely sincere shills/ redditors who show up to argue on whatever is the current thing
thor and black panther made a profit, they just cheapened their respective properties
little mermaid's box office is irrelevant when you consider they can't revert to ariel's original design which then propagates to toys, theme parks, etc.
500 million global is the new ceiling for the brand, it only depreciates further from this point
>little mermaid's box office is irrelevant when you consider they can't revert to ariel's original design
They can't? What do you mean?
>The eight films cost roughly $2.75 billion to produce but only brought in $1.86 billion.
this isn't how box office works
>Cinemaphile believes in "experts" now
Bu I was assured here on Cinemaphile half of these were hits. The Little Mermaid was a success according to at least 1000 threads. Would someone do that, just go on the internet and tell lies?
>brought in $1.86 billion.
moron money
Keep coping, chud.
You realize that's a Sony movie, right?