And then, with a single tweet, the fragile ego of the whole audience was destroyed.
And then, with a single tweet, the fragile ego of the whole audience was destroyed.
And then, with a single tweet, the fragile ego of the whole audience was destroyed.
This tweet makes me uncomfortable in a way that I can't explain.
It's an adult projecting his fetish over an underage cartoon character, there's no fricking mystery to why that would make you uncomfortable.
He has the stereotypical balding fat pedo phenotype down to a T and that has a lot to do with it.
nah that's not it
Cartoon people are weird because they're often poorly socialized, that's why they get into cartoons in the first place. The culture there creates a feedback loop where they think it's okay to post this.
It's cringe and possibly pervy. The exact motives and what he meant will forever be unknown and that's both frustrating and scary.
Probably because it's a bald+beard twitter onions going full mask off about how much he fetishizes brown people and getting emasculated. Why wouldn't it be uncomfortable
>and getting emasculated
It's funny because that post is pretty cringeworthy and whatnot but I don't see any gender attached to it
Far as I can tell the guy's trying to go "oh she'll totally destroy you, whoever you are"
Probably because the poster looks like a common "feminist ally" pedophile.
He clearly wants to have femdom sex with a cartoon duck teen.
The dude definitely had an election while typing it out + peak SJW brain by talking about fragile male egos in relation to a duck
I can. It's pedo raceplay. From a public account with a real name. From what used to be the most socially safe company in the world.
I mean that's the sort of thing you expect from Chris Chan.
POSSIBLY? No possibly about it. I'm not going to pull out the e-girl femdom doujins where this shit shows up.
Because they checked off a box when they filled out their DEI reports.
If you want to pivot the thread, which is actually a good idea, I suggest latin coomers, but of legal age.
>From what used to be the most socially safe company in the world.
When lol
If you go to Twitter it's to get cancelled by society.
Say, 30/40 years ago. They were the nostalgia, the trailing edge of culture. They didn't have a lead black princess until 2009. They were watched over by ultra christgays back then.
How is this duck latina?
Her pussy is spicy.
She has brown feathers, I guess.
This is a legit question I had because I’m Hispanic and enjoy Hispanic representation and how is she Spanish.
Her randomly saying some Spanish word? Her white father figure? The non existent mom? Fricking Donald’s friends and Don Karnage are more Hispanic than she is.
I'm Hispanic and I do not enjoy Hispanic representation. It's always done so very wrong it's insulting. I'd rather have them all be purely English than hear more garbage like "mijo" that only chicanos trying to pass off as foreigners because it's trendy now say. Those garbage contractions are an English thing. Spanish doesn't have any other than "del".
Literally everyone outside of Cinemaphile just says he sounds like a pedo
>the whole audience
so like 2 people?
Most people are self-aware enough to not post about it with their real name on social media, though.
>paint someone brown
>instant latinx
kek
It's really funny that you went with that.picture given who his real father is and what you just said.
Most find this dumb but how should they have portrayed Latinos in this show?
Before you say “I would not” Caballeros were going to appear regardless
She should wear a sombrero and eat burritos and constantly repeat words in Spanish and mention having illegal immigrants in her family.
a board where people post anonymously with enough self-awareness to not think people generally would feel the way as he describes
How do the exotic homegrown chilies factor into this?
I found this amusing the first dozen times it was used to make a thread but now it's just tiring to see. I don't even feel like posting an image of someone yelling and typing in all caps about my ego being shattered.
NOOOOO, MY EGO!
No matter how much anons will defend themselves anonymously, they know deep down they are fricking weird and nearly everyone who isn't terminally online is going to think that they are degenerate
It's not a matter of legality, it's about public opinion
Keep fetishes to yourself or in your niche community
I genuinely wonder what kind of person can write a post like that on an account that has his real name, with a profile picture that shows his real face, and then actually click on the submit button.
Am I to assume that you publicly do that IRL with your own name attached to it? Are you Frank?
>ducktales thread
>THAT image hasn't been posted yet
must be a new record
I used to give him the benefit of the doubt and say that this was just him trying to say she's a girlboss who "pwns male ego" or some shit, but the more I think about it I can see how it's a sex thing and he's just trying to paint it as a girlboss thing as an excuse.
>Cinemaphile users constantly complain about Twitter threads and Twitter users and Twitter this and Twitter that
>Still harp on a tweet that happened 4 fricking years ago
Unca Dinnah
>the whole audience
Those 15 people must've been so mad.
holy shit it's been years
Cinemaphile cares about this post more than the people they think should be offended by it
This was a crazy time. It was peak TDS/Resist era.
all the terminally online people posted shit like "JUST REMINDIN Y'ALL THAT CAPN' CRUNCH IS A BLACK feminist GENDERQUEER NATIVE BIPOC MUSLIM BADASS ALLY WHO SCREAMS TRANS RIGHTS 24/7 FRICK 12!!!" and the like and it bled into everything.
I don't even like Trump and I see how nuts it was.
Autism.
This isn't funny, anon. A part of me died that day.
Ban Twittershit
>Leonard, I'm on DuckTales.
How much child porn do you think is on this guy’s computer?
At least 2 questionable pictures of real children
None.
I'll tell you who has it though: the people in here that are overreacting to him being impressed by his own "bossgirl" / "badass girl" character
Maybe it's a guess but I wonder if this was the reason his Darkwing Duck spin-off never got greenlit
This is the type of Cinemaphile drama people here would want to believe. They aren't cancelling something because of a horny tweet only this site cares about now.
It's mundane but it's just that Ducktales was successful but not the mega-hit level they were hoping, so a spinoff didn't make much sense to do alongside liking the rival pitch for a revival
How different the outcome would have been if he just hadn't
Not much better. "Teenage" and "Latina" sound like porn categories from this fat shit.
Darkwing duck probably would be released
>Gosalyn from Nu-Ducktales
>Nu-Ducktales
>again
why the FRICK are you homosexuals still dredging up this tweet from aeons ago.
if i had a dollar for every single fricking time i've seen that stupid twitter screencap i'd be a multimillionaire, OP for the sake of society i think you should have a nice day
But isn't DW's whole deal is that he wouldn't care if people made fun of him and did it anyway? He would do it for the attention and wouldn't break because some little boy smirked at him