pilot/cartoon with anthro characters
made by Twitter users
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
>>Another pilot/cartoon with anthro characters. >>Mostly made by Twitter users
pilot/cartoon with anthro characters
made by Twitter users
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
So this guy self inserts himself as a main character?
>the femme fatale is taller than the MC
Wouldn’t you?
the guy who did this is obviously a furry.
No shit
Yes but only because of that
ok but why do we care?
>its bad
>you dont like it
>its made by a literal-who
>its indie which means we dont have to hear about it if we dont wanna
why post it then? i dont come here telling you guys what a dogshit picture my 5 year old niece drew, do i? leave it
You don't understand, OP has to get his daily (you) fix
>It's bad
>We don't like it
We had a thread when the pilot first came out and we LAUDED it, the frick are you on about?
post archive link or it didn't happen
Sigh
*unzips
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/detective-cat-animated-pilot-series
Looks great judging by the creator's indiegogo page.
>asking for $40k
>raised $2,845
>campaign closed
why are we talking about this?
OP is a schizo with a massive hate boner for some literal who
Those are called vendetta-chains. Weird to see one outside /cgl/.
I appreciate the guy's enthusiasm and he clearly has some talent but the early 90's cartoons esthetic and lack of creativity make me want to retch.
One again needs to ask, who is the audience? Who is supposed to show this on what platform? You cannot just go out and try to waste time making a pseudo-mid 90s Nick/Kids WB looking show if there is no one to watch it or have an interest in it.
Creators like him think we're the audience. Like that's somehow going to get him his adoring praise and a successful career. They want to be a messiah to judgemental contrarian animation nerds and are too blinded by their own egos to see the madness of their desire. We b***h and moan about the state of the animation industry sure but trying to appeal to us so blatantly is a huge mistake. No bills for shills.
If I had a product to shill, I’d just come here for honest to god criticism. Not this attention-seeking bullshit because I want my shit to actually be good.
Anyone coming here also needs to have an understanding of the culture around this place. Half the replies are going to be insults and people making fun of it. There is no point in expecting nothing but pure praise no matter what they are showing off.
It reminds me too much of Benthelooney.
Pure cringe.
The "toon" style of the Spielberg shows and the later Disney Afternoon shows is so, so ugly. It makes me irrationally angry. Too much stuff trying to recapture Roger Rabbit's lighning in a bottle.
This another one of Carrozza's low effort pitches?
Oh my god it's this. The creator of this came to Cinemaphile to shill the trailer and had a meltdown.
Found it in all it's salty goodness.
https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/131751388
I love how indignant he gets over the other more compelling cat detective show idea.
>I'm not the creator of the show....but here is some inside information on how the show will be made
...how did he not really see this playing out in his head?
It took him like 17 replies before breaking down and raging.
Which is ironic since Charles Moss also has never worked on a production in his life either so the argument of
>You never worked in animation
really holds no weight at all
>the other more compelling cat detective show idea
I found both that guy and Charlie to be full of themselves. He was just begging drawgays for art of his hollow furry coom and taking advantage of Charlie's sperg attack to get it.
>begging drawgays for art of his hollow furry coom and taking advantage of Charlie's sperg attack to get it.
I respect the hustle. I would have gone The Thin Man route myself.
It's compelling because of the barely covered cat boobs
Why the frick are cartoon creators like this on Cinemaphile? Like do they not understand that shameless plugging their shit and then getting SUPER defensive about their cartoon does not work at all when it comes to Cinemaphile board culture? Like making a thread to shill your stuff is already bad but to take criticism with such impotent rage is only ever going to make people hate a work regardless of it being justified. It's not like it's even hard to shill your stuff right, hell people love OC here, you just have to not force it on people and take criticism with a level head.
How do you present a new show here properly? Just post a threat saying “new show?”
No, you have to be subtle about it. If you want to share your cartoon then find an already existing thread where it would be appropriate to share. The most appropriate ones are obviously ones showcasing indie animation but you could also share based on content. Like say you have a cartoon about aliens, share it in a thread discussing scifi cartoons. It's really not that hard. Just don't create a thread dedicated to your shit yourself. If your content is good enough someone will make a thread of it themselves and then you can jump into that.
I don't know what these anons are talking about. You can shill your cartoon in its own thread as long as you're polite and you don't get offended at criticism.
Sounds like a great way to grow it organically.
My main problem with this show is how, for lack of better words, cringe and tryhard everything is. From the humor, to the influence, to the voice acting of the titular character, everything just feels like a DeviantArt kid trying to make it in the entertainment industry not so nicely
pic related (somehow) getting two full seasons convinced a lot of the most uninspired and creativity-averse "cartoonists" out there that they have a shot in the industry.
The thing is that Mighty Magiswords at least has the appearance of being marketable what with the fact it's about a variety of Magic Swords. That's the kind of shit an executive eats up as being marketable from a toy line side of things
What did Freakazoid call it? Toyetic?
Yeah it was based around a hard push for the CN App where kids interact with the shows. I think they had it so a qr code would pop up and the kids would collect a sword. It's not a bad idea on principle, reminds me of those old games where you'd scan scanbars for different monsters. But the show itself just wasn't entertaining and I feel like that concept would go better with something like a Pokemon ripoff.....but at the same time they'd totally given up on action shows.
Getting Arin Hanson must’ve been the death knell
You don't. If the cartoon is good enough someone else will make a thread.
Nah, I’d rather have it grow as organically as possible. Posting a budding show on a relevant thread seems like the best compromise.
>I’d rather have it grow as organically as possible
Advertising it directly is the opposite of that.
I said as organically AS POSSIBLE. What you also need to realize is some things need help with getting advertised.
Like with Earthbound. That game was a cult classic because the advertising was terrible
>trailer of this pitch mentions "boundary breaking" and a return to "animation" which is literally a golden rosed patriotic view of 50-60's animation, which in turn has already been succeeded by literally anime out of all things.
>it's just literally your generic in-cartoon show featuring some of the most boring tropes in a reused setup done by billions of cartoons before it.
If he badly wants to make it. The ship has already sailed literally decades ago. Nobody isn't interested in that show. This homosexual clearly doesn't give a shit about current animation. Just a fetishy wankery over a decades old style that has fallen out of relevancy many decades ago for good reasons.
>but-but Cuphead!
That shit is just a literal novelty, and is successful because it's a video game and by that alone. The animation process came with extremely slim profit margins and would've sent the team into homelessness if it didn't succeed without Microsoft.
Cuphead succeeded because the creators painstakingly drew each character frame and lived like they WERE homeless.
And what does this homosexual have on them? Not talent, obviously
Pain doesn't make it a success, dumbfrick.
Go back to school and learn some fricking business and marketing.
>and is successful because it's a video game and by that alone.
No one would've cared about Cuphead if it didn't have that style, though. It would just be seen as another forgettable run-of-the-mill indie game.
I think you're missing the forest for the trees here, the real problem is that the guy doesn't have the talent to emulate that style so it comes off as amateurish. Look at this shit
it looks like it's made in MS paint, if the Cuphead guys made their game look like that no one would've cared either.
Everything about ti just openly advertises his inexperience. A first glance shows that this is someone who has never really worked on any major productions and is about the same level as some 14 year old tumblr artist claiming their idea is going to be a show some day.
There is no real target for this, no demographic, no audience, no interest base at all to work with here. Who is this made for? I'm sure the OP never once thought about it and assumed it will just attract one because it's entertainment
What is the basis for it? Is it adapting stylings or ideas from some old film series? So far it looks like no character has any actual depth or description to them at all. It also smells of childish idea guy when each character has the traits, personality and faults as
>Is Detective
>Is Mexican
>Is Woman
You need to define everything about a character, their likes, dislikes, what they do
What is a typical episode? Can the OP even make a professional two sentence long elevator pitch?
All of these things are the earliest concepts of any production, long LONG before we even get around to does OP even know the production pipeline? Because one is not going to have a damn thing made if they know nothing about that. When their ideas have nothing but holes in them, the answer is very likely no, they have no idea what that is.
I think the pitch was detective cat’s personality and “zany” antics but it’s already grating the second he speaks and moves. Damn.
Animaniacs doesn't get enough shit for inspiring a generation of toon autists who have this shallow, deconstructive mindset about cartoons.
Somehow I don't think a guy in a suit and tie is really all that "zany" his design betrays the intention. And the fact that he apparently has a job too, it just does not really fit the description.
Checked. I don’t know what the best description is for this, but I want to call it “theatre kid hamming up the acting while being “self-aware” to look cool”.
Most autists forget that Animaniacs, while rarely ever funny, told jokes with setups however weak they may be. Like that one episode they stalked the Dalai Lama to as a stupid question about hotdog packaging
I hated those kind of episodes so fricking much.
Understandable. I call them “harass the celebrity” episodes where they bother societally important people.
Because it’s the easiest thing for them to wear that’s “fancy”.
how did suit vests become such an immediately recognizable 'theater kid' staple?
Oh good, I wasn’t the only one who felt like the main character was less “kooky and funny” and more “so annoying I want him to not be the main character”
Earlier in the thread, someone said he sounds like Zap Brannigan and I’m starting to hear it myself. Imagine an entire cartoon told by Zap Brannigan after watching the Animaniacs.
Meanwhile 50s-60s era is considered one of the worst times for the medium when budgets were slashed everywhere and they made mostly forgettable shit.
Not really no, Cuphead imitates the 1930s era of overdone, hugely expensive era of animation that the industry has tried to make a renaissance return to a couple times in history now, due to the fact that it was such a successful era with some of the highest quality work ever made. Meanwhile the 1960s is considered the era of animation going into the shitter and not to return to any level of prominence until the late 80s.
If a creator comes here just to have a meltdown, they deserve all the vitriol.
Slylock Fox is infinitely better, if the creator comes here.
Charles, did you really come here to somewhat backdoor grab attention to your pilot?
I thought this was a Kyle Whatshisname idea, like....what is that name? Did he even try?
>femboy pixies
what
They're not even femmy enough
Why is the main character such a weird color?
He's the same color film subtitles are. You know, that deep muted yellow that they universally decided subtitles should be, because it always stands out, because of how rare it is in actual film, because of how visually unappealing it is. That color.
It looks like a knockoff of Kyle Carozza's knockoff of John K's style. It's a knockoff of a knockoff.
Which is itself a knockoff of Harveytoons early 50s stuff.
>Another
Do we really have that many? Nothing comes to mind besides Lackadaisy.
>the very first word out of his mouth
>he’s already insufferable
No wonder he’s making this hate thread. What a cheap-ass tactic for a cheap-ass production
>we have Cats Don't Dance at home
Precisely
>Pain doesn't make it a success,
>dumbfrick.
Ain’t ghat the truth. At least they were rewarded for their pain this time.
that cartoon cat detective from Last Action Hero mogs the hell out of this guy
This guy would job to Ace Hart so hard.
I smell a death battle
I wanna see the incredible adventures of that woman's humongous bazongos
Is he voicing his own trailer
He sounds like Zap Brannigan. I dkn’t want to watch a show starring Zap Brannigan but not funny.
>”Hey, you don’t know me most likely, but please give me money for me to make a webcomic/pilot I can easily make for free just cause, okay?”
Many such cases. Do these people not realize the breakout crowdfunding hits happened because there was either already a product or because the organizer was someone who was already known for something and trusted to finish it?
My anthro autism cartoon is better because they are sexy in a weird way
Charl, is that you?
>inflation rape dingos
Where?
https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/136782494/
Oh…that’s a lot more interesting than detective cat
I'm genuinely curious what his plan is now. The protagonist of his children's cartoon is openly associated with the word "rape", can he still pitch it?
How did Rebecca Sugar get away with shota porn and still make SU?
People are gonna say "because she's female" but Camtoonist is black so he should have similar privileges
Because people didn’t start flipping shit about that til the last few years. She was already established by then. It seems like people generally started getting way less upset about real life pedophiles and more antsy about drawing around 2019/20 after the whole Epstein thing happened- I’m sure that’s all just a coincidence though!
You do realize people that draw children in sexual acts find children attractive. That is the definition of a pedophile. lemme guess you jerl off to e-girl and think its fine don't you pedophile?
I never said it was a good thing? Just that it’s concerning how people broadly care much more about the ages of cartoon characters than they do about the (still ongoing!) network of pedo blackmailers pulling the strings of America’s government and entertainment industry and financial sector, which to me seems like a much bigger deal.
She was underage when she drew it.
The characters were so ugly no one sees them human let alone a child. She also shared the art with the creator who laugh at it so the media could only see it as an off-color joke.
>I'm genuinely curious what his plan is now.
>implying he had a real plan to begin with
Well his plan seemed to be
>crowdfund expenses
>get pilot done
>show pilot to networks
No harm done, that's life.
Benny "if she screams fill her to the seams" Dingo
Benny "pump up the jam til she goes KERBLAM" Dingo
Holy shit
what a shame
it might've been fun to draw the femme fatale as a pedo a few times
Can you draw?
yes
Draw something Mr. Drawman. Draw Charles literally malding (mad and balding)
nah i'm not gonna waste my time on a dead pilot
K, then just draw whatever you want. I just want to know your artstyle
The designs are okay, but the color pallettes for these characters seem strange, especially for some of the other characters shown on the indiegogo page
Why are independent creators so creatively bankrupt?
Pride.
I think Boxtown could actually be good. I at least want to see the pilot. Whatever this shit is that OP posted? Not so much.
stop making low effort cartoon pitches challenge: Failed
why... just why... why would someone with so much animation talent do something so stupid and double down on it... fricking why
Sunken Cost fallacy probably. I'm still holding onto ideas I came up with years ago. If I genuinely put blood sweat and tears into them, you bet I'd never let go on trying to make it work.
What confuses me is why he went for making content for kids instead of doing animated inflation porn commissions. He could be making bank, modern kids cartoons are unprofitable enough without him being dumb enough to root the pitch in fetish porn. And he doesn't seem to understand how to make a kids cartoon beyond the visual aesthetic, Benny Dingo looks good but it's empty and meandering. There's no hook. This post about DC
strongly applies to BD too.
My guess is that he went for the kids' show angle because he unironically believed there is nothing wrong in basing one of the main characters on a porn artist's rape gremlin species.
I'm reading the archived thread and one anon hit the nail right in the head when he mentioned how a lot of people with these not outwardly explicit fetishes, either voluntarily or involuntarily, get off on purposefully deceiving the general public and "corrupting" others into becoming attracted to it. I have one of those fetishes and the communities for said things are fricking insufferable because it's either buttholes playing coy or complete fricking imbiciles who actually bought the propaganda, like that dingo guy.
That said, if I'm allowed to get more serious, I genuinely think it's just a facet of a much broader issue. Erotica (and most media really) has a really bad fricking problem with non-consensual actions being depicted and encouraged. For example, notice how much fetish shit is characters being fattened/inflated/tickled/etc. against their will, even though the purpose of the piece isn't to cater to a rape fetish). Or for a more normie example, look at how many romance novels and self-insert fanfiction involve the female character getting sexually abused by the domineering chad male lead and it's not treated as creepy because the guy is hot and has money.
I believe most non-con shit is latent guilt or shame manifesting as part of the kink. Feigning you're not into it absolves you of responsibility for partaking. It's not your fault, you're totally a normal sane person who doesn't want it, it's entirely on the pervert having his or her way with you. Or maybe I'm overthinking it and rape is just hardwired from our caveman days because it was the most efficient way to make babies and it keeps translating across fetishes that have nothing to do with breeding.
Or it's just fricked up individuals.
>he doesn't seem to understand how to make a kids cartoon beyond the visual aesthetic, Benny Dingo looks good but it's empty and meandering. There's no hook.
Benny Dingo was kinda eye-opening for me since it made me realize you can be extremely talented at art yet still creatively bankrupt. Makes me feel slightly better about being an idea guy/writer, I'm not totally worthless to a production.
Well, I'm a firm believer that creativity can be shared or implemented in different ways. There's nothing wrong with getting inspiration for something from a pre existing source.
It wasn't just the fact he used someone else's character design. Benny Dingo is a dulled down retread of oversaturated cliches with pacing like molasses, carried only by its nostalgic artstyle. The plot and characters are cute and wholesome but just not standout interesting. It's not cleverly written. Windows of opportunity to do something funny or creative are constantly missed, like in the first minute of Up a Tree. His alarm wakes him up, he gets dressed and brushes his teeth. None of these sequences are funny or memorable, they're just very plain, straight forward things that happen.
Compare that to 1 minute of Jimmy Neutron
Benny Dingo is full of scenes where very plain, straight forward things and conversations happen, despite marketing itself like a loveletter or return to 90s toon culture. I've watched Up a Tree and Cookies several times by now and they are still so forgettable, the only reason I even remember Benny's name is because of Camtoonist making an ass of himself and turning the character into a meme. Don't you think there's a reason why people keep mistaking it for a toddler show and not a family show? I mean come on, Benny literally learns a moral about friendship at the end. Up a Tree and especially Cookies have the vibe of something like Paw Patrol, sure at least with soulful 2D animation instead of soullessly cheap and efficient CGI, but there's not much enjoyment anyone older could get out of it other than admiring the pretty animation if it was cleaned up and finished. Benny Dingo is a poorly thought out, bare bones pitch. It doesn't know who it wants to speak to, it doesn't really have anything to say at all. Its only unique selling point is the animation style since fluid traditional frame by frame is hard to come by in the modern era. It's an impressive portfolio piece to show off his technical skills but it is not TV show material.
It's always a pretty dreadful sign when something can be compared unfavorably to Jimmy Neutron.
I just realized they edited that bathroom scene for the Jimmy Neutron intro, he screams when he gets the mohawk hair instead
Someday when the right independent project comes out I'm gonna make a fake shill thread and lash out at anons so that the person will have to deal with that for the next couple of years on top of having to work on the cartoon at the same time making that whole time period shitty for them hahahaha lol screencap this
You think anyone at Cinemaphile holds that much power?
Shit, same.
Call me optimistic but I'm pretty sure the Detective Cat thread was fake and the OP just did exactly this. Could've been the bathing suit cat guy's plan all along.
People already tried this with Lackadaisy and Murder Drones. It didn’t work.
I’m not going to claim to be some expert on the business, but I think most of these creatives who want to make their own cartoon are better off starting with a comic.
They’re relatively cheaper and faster to make (especially webcomics), it doesn’t require these big teams (anywhere from one person to a few friends), and it’s a good way to build up both skills and an audience, and in the most successful cases, get bigger companies to notice.
It might not let the creator have as much bargaining power than if they made the animation themselves, but I imagine it’s still better than pitching it to a studio.
Seen this recommended to a bunch of would be animators over the years and they never take it well. Like it’s beneath them or something.
Frick them, they’re beneath the industry anyway.
H-how do you shill your webcomic?
Post it on Cinemaphile while lying about not being the creator
/hyw/
Another thing is that comic skills make you good at pacing and storyboarding. A lot of amateurs who jump straight into animation are awful at those.
I feel like that sentiment stems from the fact that a lot of these wannabe animator/showrunner types come from some kind of industry history or are prospective to joining the industry (if not are just outright delusional) so they probably do think it's beneath them. They want to be the big boy Alex Hirsch/Pendleton Wards of the next generation, but they want to do it without the networking skills that springboarded the former or the existing body of work of the latter.
Look at
as a perfect example, it was a crowdfunding attempt that's biggest selling point was famous VAs (and Hirsch) attached to it being lead by a guy who has some industry experience, sure, but has no body of work of his own that isn't twee "haha adulting is hard and everything sucks!!!" vent comics. I don't doubt he has the skills to at least get a pilot up and running, but he wants to do the whole studio setup route with him as the auteur essentially and. Nobody knows who the frick this guy is, and thus nobody actually put money down for it.
Webcomics require you to not only invest your time, but to do it for free essentially if you want it to reach anyone. They're not glamorous little projects you can pay people to do and sit back as the bossman and watch the magic happen, you need to put in the effort to make something good, be front facing when your readership says it sucks or get obsessive over it, advertise it to hell and back and actively keep a healthy updating pace if you don't want the thing to get anemic and die off unceremoniously. It's hard work, is what I'm saying, and it's hard work without the benefits of working for someone like a studio (and not to mention little to no money is involved at the start if you're still paying off your student debts like the Boxtown guy 100% is wew)
>you need to put in the effort to make something good
How can you say this while shit like Bittersweet Candy Bowl exists?
Wew. I mean, most of the time, the effort will show off if you're actively trying to make something good. I can't help you when it comes to slow burn will-they, won't-they shit that half the readerbase are mind broken to still keep up on if they fricking hate.
*even if they fricking hate it
Someone’s gotta be jerking their bean to that
This whole time, I thought Boxtown was a new show Hirsch was trying to get off the ground.
Her tail is stupid long, gonna trip ppl up or hurt herself.
Do these ppl think about the world they live in? Fricking christ!
>horny perverts put busty ladies with fat asses and sexual innuendos in cartoons for decades
>Cinemaphile praises it and misses those good old days
>guy puts a dingo in his cartoon based on silly balloon animals
>Cinemaphile clutches their pearls and cries grooming
I see the internet's irrational furry hateboner is still in full swing, years after cringe culture was dead and buried for strangling artistic creativity and encouraging normalhomosexual conformity
Yeah, that what fricking happened
Find me one show aimed at kids whose main character has been confirmed to be based off on a fictional species whose sole defining trait is essentially being the goblins from Goblin Slayer.
I think making something explicitly aimed for kids with the character is the point of contention. Most normal people who aren't pearl clutchers won't give a frick to look into it, and the people who do would just treat it as a silly fun fact otherwise. Bruce Timm made horrendously horny porn with Harley Quinn back in the day, but because BTAS wasn't explicitly meant for kids, most people rightly shrug at that.
I agree that the guy comes off as more autistically unaware/indignant than anything rather than trying to be a secret groomer, but anyone with half a braincell would play it safe for any project designed explicitly with small children as the audience in mind. It's like how Artoria from FSN or Arcueid from Tsukihime are just kind of accepted as a cool anime heroines to most normies and look over their eroge origins. The current body of work they're in is not meant for literal babies, so most people don't give a frick and just accept what is the text of the current thing they're reading/playing with them. It would look a bit skeevy if TM/Nasu were to try to unironically appeal to small children
Would you say the same about Tiny Toons/Animaniacs?
No? Did the staff working on those make a bunch of heinous furry porn beforehand? Were they the stars of early fandom smut zines before their designer went "yeah, let's make this for kids"???
You're confusing the situation here for fandom produced fetish/smut shit which literally never matters in terms of the actual product looking sus. Otherwise, horse show would not have lived to see the light of day after those first two seasons.
It doesn't matter if they did or didn't draw porn of her, what matters is that they deliberately drew a sexualized character on a children's cartoon
Okay, I'll level with you, anon.
I'm very lax about where people get their inspiration of if they use their characters for weird fetish shit. When I sit and play a game/read a comic/etc, I try not to let my biases affect my perception of what the author presents me is the intended narrative of the character over whatever heinous fetish shit they make on the side I'd be throwing stones in a glass house otherwise
It's fricking difficult to not let the biases win out with something made for little babies with characters explicitly designed for fetish fantasies. Like, the dingo character is not sexualized for being attractive like a Minerva Mink, they're sexualized for what they do to others against the female characters' agency. Again, if this was aimed at anything other than small children, this would matter less. If it was something he was just doing as an indie project, great! He's not gonna be beholden to anyone, even if I'd personally think it's distasteful.
He wants to make a cartoon for small children starring a fetish porn character and have it be sold and worked on by a big studio production.
I'm sorry, that's just not feasible in any shape or capacity.
Who are you to crush a talented man's dreams?
Oh wait, i'm a fricking moron
I thought you were talking about Detective Cat
I don't believe in censorship, he can draw whatever he wants and put it wherever he wants. But I believe in free speech and therefore I have the right to call him a fricktard for thinking in the middle of a jerk off session
>hmmm... kids would get a kick out of this little rascal!
and actually wanting to pitch it in a professional setting
This argument falls apart immediately because it implies that being attracted to cartoon women is on the same level as being attracted to cartoon animals flattening and/or inflating each other, which is not true by any estimation.
Furry fandom goes on
You go to /trash/, how about that
Something about this artstyle reeks of autism, and not just normal furry autism either.
It's "cartoonist" autism. Think Benthelooney, that one dude with the belly dancer fetish who's name escapes me, guys who really wanna ape Tex Avery, but lack the actual edge and personality that made Tex Avery stand out. They're a dime a dozen and are usually allergic to anything resembling something either modern or popular, but they'll never actually really get as raunchy as something as Red Hot Riding Hood or as deranged as any Bob Clampett early Looney Tune.
animator320?
Thank you, that's the guy.
Toon autism is some kind of mental stunt thing, that's why it's unnerving
It’s because the art all seems really derivative, but each character seems derived from a completely different style of thing
>cat guy looks vaguely Animaniacs-ish
>badger (?) girl (?) looks like a Goof Troop
>fox woman looks like Slylock Fox run through the bimbofication machine
>hippo guy just looks like some cereal box mascot
it’s not just unoriginal, it’s unoriginal to the point where there’s no ‘original’ style working as a sort of mesh or framework for taking all these various influences and mashing them together. Even someone like Bleedman, as autistic as he is, can do that. This just looks like a bunch of schoolkids coming up with mascots for their school paper or something, it’s actually hard to believe they’re meant to be from the same thing.
This doesn't have anything to do with how good or bad this show looks or might end up being, but has anyone else noticed that it doesn't seem like people make cartoons with furries AND regular people anymore? Feels like it's mostly one or the other nowadays.
The only show I think does something similar is Smiling Friends, and those are just weird gremlin things not furries.
Regular Show's a big one. I'd also count Amphibia, We Bare Bears, and Adventure time, but I'm not sure if they match the kind of setting that you're describing
Aren't you both forgetting something?
Gumball too, but studios do it all the time. It's individual twitter and tumblr artists that want the strong divide of furry show, not furry show.
It's interesting how my audience has gone from "explicity for kids" to "small children" to "little babies". It's not good to exaggerate when pushing a real point. If you checked out any of my pages, you'd know my particular idea is aimed at all ages or a family/kids show.
For those making assumptions, just come and ask about it through emails or something. I'm here to talk about it. I would do more here, but this site, while having some cool and positive stuff, also can be very cynical and dark. Most of this thread is just that.
Perhaps I can speak more confident about "Benny Dingo" due to my beliefs and what I've talked with others about, but I see nothing wrong with this show idea. The main character's written conception and intent has nothing to do with anything else, despite any likenesses. Those fanboys are not rapists. Yes, they're weird and mischievous, and take advantage of certain other characters in Grey's works, but by definition, nothing they do is rape.
Why do people think they can just put on someone's name and we'll buy it without question? You sound more like guy than cam, and why would he magically be here when he hasn't posted on Cinemaphile since the incident?
Nah, it's really me. Am I supposed to just be up here posting all the time?
Make a post on the community tab on your channel
Hate to say it but I think LS Mark's pilot is better than this.