One thing that always triggered my autism is that, despite physical clues being a central part of the story for the characters to find, there's never any behavioral clues for the audience to find, no real implications in the script or performances that put suspicion on any of the characters directly and allow the viewer to speculate, which is usually a big part of whodunits. They all have plausible motives but none of them act like they might be guilty, even just a little. They can't all be such masters of deception, can't they?
They all acted like they were guilty or hiding something. That's why the multiple endings sort of work. Now could they have sold it a little better by throwing in some more obvious clues or flashing back to earlier scenes? Probably but that might've taken some of the comedy and maids breasts out of it.
> friend sees mousetrap > b***hes endlessly about how amazing it is, wont shut up about the plot, but makes a big deal about how he can't tell anyone who did it because the cast makes the audience promise not to at the end of the show > guess who did it because it's the most obvious cop out bullshit ending possible, aka a standard christie ending > he gets mad and claims I looked it up
> He disappeared!
Well, he was a magician.
> But he never reappeared!
He wasn't a very good magician.
>He was an illusionist
!
Never watched the movie but why was it always the candlestick in the hall? I swear thos fricking cards were loaded.
The candlestick was a RED HERRING
i could never finish the game because my parents would always get board and quit
> Play board game
> get board
You may not like it, but this was peak Tim Curry
You rang?
All Curry is peak Curry.
His audiobook of abhorsen is fantastic
I was so surprised when I put on A Series of Unfortunate Events audiobooks and it was him reprising his role as Lemony Snicket.
Didn't he absolutely hate doing those audiobooks? Or was it the other guy?
The author did books 3-5 and despised doing then which is why Curry came back to finish the series.
Ah, my mistake then.
Nah. Three Musketeers was
Clue is near peak Curry but honestly the tip of the mountain for Curry was Home Alone 2. He hit that outta tha park
His character in that movie was literally just Wadsworth but meaner
One thing that always triggered my autism is that, despite physical clues being a central part of the story for the characters to find, there's never any behavioral clues for the audience to find, no real implications in the script or performances that put suspicion on any of the characters directly and allow the viewer to speculate, which is usually a big part of whodunits. They all have plausible motives but none of them act like they might be guilty, even just a little. They can't all be such masters of deception, can't they?
Characters missing from certain scenes didn't count for you? You didn't notice how every character acted like a crazy person?
They all acted like they were guilty or hiding something. That's why the multiple endings sort of work. Now could they have sold it a little better by throwing in some more obvious clues or flashing back to earlier scenes? Probably but that might've taken some of the comedy and maids breasts out of it.
Ending C is objectively the best
This anon is correct and is going to go home and sleep with his wife
look Im just gonna say it
Ten little Black folk AKA ten little indians AKA and then there were none is shit as a mystery.
> friend sees mousetrap
> b***hes endlessly about how amazing it is, wont shut up about the plot, but makes a big deal about how he can't tell anyone who did it because the cast makes the audience promise not to at the end of the show
> guess who did it because it's the most obvious cop out bullshit ending possible, aka a standard christie ending
> he gets mad and claims I looked it up
>none of the characters wear their namesake color
it's trash
>Mrs. White
>not her namesake color
???
WEAR, moron, WEAR
Frick off spooky homie I am wearing my skin and so is she!