Are normies moronic? Post your evidence
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Are normies retarded? Post your evidence
Are normies moronic? Post your evidence
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
>verified audience only
Now everyone can ignore this bait thread
Normalgays* you newbie
Normies, you board crosser.
That's absolutely a reddit borrowed word. Even ignoring Reddit paranoia, or whatever, it really is.
Not that this shit hole has any hope remaining, but some fricker being proud of using it is the a new low.
What is this show about and why do critics love it?
I enjoyed it, but Episode 9 was a chore to get through. If the dream theory turns out to be true, i'll be pissed.
>Verified ratings
>The Audience
lol, lmao even
>media literate
Rian Johnson is one the worst fricking writers I have ever seen in my goddamn life. The whole point of subversion is to provide an alternative to a formula that has gone stale, not leave nothing in it's place. His writing is sophomoric and base, and he has the media literacy of a fricking toddler. No, not even a toddler because toddlers at least have an aura of innocence around them. He has the literacy of goddamn middle schooler that thinks what he writes is hot shit when it's hot garbage that's been done before and done far fricking better.
Glass Onion was a godawful mystery movie and the Last Jedi is a movie that talks a lot without saying anything of substance.
I like that glass onion fails at THE fundamental rule of a whodunnit
>The audience should have the same information as the detective and has a chance to figure it out before the story concludes.
Glass Onion cheats on this so many fricking times.
Agatha Christie never tells you the necessary information.
Agatha Christie doesn't tell you everything, but it tells you enough you can come to the same conclusion as the characters. And Then There Were None is pretty famous for this. Sure, you don't get the backstory or motives until the end, but if you pay attention you can figure out the central figure of it all same time as everyone else.
>I like that glass onion fails at THE fundamental rule of a whodunnit
>>The audience should have the same information as the detective and has a chance to figure it out before the story concludes.
What about Columbo?
Columbo is generally characterized as a howcatchem. I haven't seen the Glass Onion so I don't know if this is relevant, but there's more than one sort of detective story.
Columbo is almost flawless as a series in terms of communicating information to the audience through action on screen and Columbo's actions except in the case of a couple episodes
Columbo isn't a whodunnit- you know who did it, and Columbo usually has the right idea who did it right from the word go. It's about how he confirms his hunch and how he tricks his mark into slipping up with their lies.
It’s a whodunnit from the culprit’s perspective.
And an example of how to “subvert expectations” non-moronicly.
That's why they refer to Columbo as a "howcatchem" instead of a "whodunnit"
>Glass Onion cheats on this so many fricking times.
Glass Onion shows it's hand at the very beginning when Daniel Craig solves the dinner party game instantly. Not Zuckerberg was always the prime suspect.
Glass Onion is a movie that thinks being moronic is clever. There never was a mystery, just an elaborate revenge story against a character they want you to hate because he's dumb and stupid and an idiot. Braindead normies ate it up, however, because it didn't require them to actually pay attention and search for clues or figure anything out on their own, because they couldn't and they'd never be able to because the entire plot hinges on the second half giant flashback exposition dumping everything.
First Knives out is only slightly better by comparison, but is still another mystery story that cannot be solved without a laundry list of last second ass pull reveals
Both movies are shit and critics/audiences can be right and wrong on different movies.
>media illiterate
Star Wars isn't about higher artistic ideals. If it were, it would have been let go after the original trilogy. It's about being entertaining, and that means appealing to a mass audience. In this case, the audience scores are by all rights more important than the critic scores, putting aside any pressure for critics to support Disney or get pushed from the industry.
>Hating on Robin Hood
Absolute dogshit site
Wtf are those Robin Hood ratings?
I assume most of these are contemporary at the time of the film's release reviews from some archive sites, I never knew it got such mixed reception when it came out.
>Somebody likes something I don’t?
>REEEEEEEEEEEE FRICKING NORMIES
Tomatometer posting should be punishable by death.
Also, normalBlack folk love being told that their boring, soulless lives are somehow profound and meaningful when all they're doing is going to work and then going home and binging netflix every day.
>still takes critic sites seriously even though it’s public knowledge that film studios buy firms to keep a high audience score rating and pay off critics for their slop.
>Post your evidence
OPs post is my evidence
>7 critics
>"Fewer than 50" audience
Seems like they're perfectly intelligent to me. Even they knew to avoid this hot garbage.
OP
>post your evidence
OP's post