Aside from the shoehorned in Jordan Peterson shit, what did I think of this?
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Aside from the shoehorned in Jordan Peterson shit, what did I think of this?
Aside from the shoehorned in Jordan Peterson shit, what did I think of this?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
|
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
>see this at a right wing meet up at my college
>JP comes out
>Every one cheers like they're seeing iron man show up in some capeshit
Cringe. Made me question why I was even there.
This movie has existed for like 12 days and your fake college has been out of session for a month
>everyone lives in the continental USA
Kek. Hilarious because when he showed up I immediately thought it felt like an MCU cameo. I don't dislike the guy by any means but he has a weird cult of personality around him. He's right most of the time though as long as he's not trying to debate political philosophy.
if it makes californians seethe then am oke with it
>t. things that never happened
why was JP so angry bros?
Peterson has gone insane after his detox shit in Russia. Having a sociopath as a daughter also doesn't help (seriously, look her up, she's deranged and probably reponsible for her father's poor mental health).
She seems cute to me
She left her husband and kid for some pimp. Not even joking.
Typical female behavior. Never, ever trust or have sympathy for a female, lads.
From memory she went back to the husband but only because apparently he is literally a psycho schizo and that turned her on
She's a ho that has a father that perfectly articulates the disastrous emotional and mental consequences of being as much. A known cheater that cucked her fiance while simultaneously insisting on the perils of the current dating culture and using her father's rhetoric to cash in on his hard work. JP takes all the heat, has his credibility and career dragged through the mud; she giggles during a podcast with him periodically. That's just how I hear it, though.
>cucked her fiancé
Husband actually who she has a kid with and supported her when she was a nobody and depressed
Had dark triad features. Do not trust.
That's because you've been conditioned to see any outpouring of genuine enthusiasm or excitement as "cringe". You'd likely have a difficult time giving any example that merits that type of reaction because you can't relate to allowing for that raw expression of emotion. You can only default to feeling second-hand shame. This is your brain on cynicism.
I thought it was badass when showed up on screen. Someone sane in all the clown world shit you just saw
>go to any political meetup
>it's the most embarrassingly unbearable homosexuals on earth
wow who could have seen that coming? it's almost like cool people are out living and not fighting each other for the right to install their favorite israeli overlord.
>no you can't feel emotions CRINGE CRIIIIIIIINGE
Go play Minecraft, homosexual.
JP is legitimately cringe though.
>preaches strength, stoicism, honesty, pull yourself by the bootstraps shit
>wife gets cancer
>loses himself in a morphine haze (which he took from her) instead of being by her side while she's dying
>refuses to admit he fricked up
>lying on the internet
ywnbaw
sneed
Pretty sure my second kid is coming tonight, lads. It sounds like it's going down. In other news: BEHOLD, A CAT!
Yep it's happening. By this time tomorrow Anon #2 will be here
Nice blog homosexual
Steps in the right direction. Commies didn't take over Hollywood overnight, but they did so for good reason.
>what did I think of this
You thought just posting the image would be enough for a 300 post troll thread
It will be if the mods don't remove it.
I don’t know, but I do know that if you think male circumcision is genital mutilation (which it is), then Matt Walsh thinks that YOU are “RIDICULOUS.”
Real tough pill for some guys to swallow, and women are psychos. Will be hard to turn it around.
Let me just say - if you're circumcised you have no idea in the world what you're talking about.
And no, it's not the same the other way around. I know what it's like to have a glans.
Roasties and cucked men are the only reason cutting still exists in the US.
Cucked and they don't even know it. It's like arguing with men that had the part of their brain that even knows what cucking is removed.
>good goy, Matt.
He's an imperfect messenger but the best we got at the moment.
>mom I posted it again
I understand that in your circle you’re not allowed to disagree with each other on literally anything without being cancelled, but that isn’t how normal people are.
>NOOOO, IT'S ONLY GENITAL MUTILATION WHEN THEY DO IT!
He sounds like Bowers when he got flabbergasted at the idea of people willingly blinding themselves and chopping off limbs.
You can call it genital mutilation, but getting it done cured me of my phimosis, so I don't give a frick. I know how it feels to have a foreskin before and after, and it's not a big deal. It was a medical procedure to remove some skin, which I don't equate with turning my penis inside out because twitter told me I should.
He's clearly talking about preemptive circumcision for babies, not the ones needed for medical reasons.
>You can call it genital mutilation, but getting it done cured me of my dysmorphia, so I don't give a frick.
incels and trannies truly are two sides of the same coin. the /lgbt/ vs /misc/ civil war and its consequences have been a disaster for this board.
>phimosis
There's a difference between cutting off something for medical reasons and doing it for funsies. It's like comparing women with breast cancer to FtMs.
>WELL THEY YEET THE TIT
>cured me of my phimosis
The only reason you should ever amputate the foreskin is in a medical emergency, which happens occasionally when a tight foreskin gets trapped around the head of the glans and begins to cut off blood circulation. Even then, if a doctor isn't completely incompetent, a dorsal slit should be performed instead.
In every other case, it's completely inhumane. If stretching doesn't work, the best option is a preputioplasty. Sorry you got hacked up by a israelite or a israelite slave.
They should interview him in the same way he did with the troony doctor.
>you think circumcising babies is fine, correct?
>Yes
>it's not amputation because it's just a small part of the penis, correct?
>yes
>so what if a father asked your opinion about cutting off the tip of his newborn's finger?
>I'd think he's crazy
>....
>....
>...you really don't see it do you
1. People don’t have to agree on everything. Even if you think he’s wrong about this, it doesn’t invalidate every other opinion he has.
2. He didn’t say that at all. He said calling circumcision amputation is foolish, which I would agree with. Even if you think circumcision is bad, which I do, exaggerating doesn’t make your argument stronger.
>s-stop calling it an amputation! that's a meanie word! i have a non-conforming penis!
He's also saying that you aren't infringing the liberty of your child by cutting his foreskin off, because parents are supposed to make decisions for their children. This is the exact same clown rhetoric the parents of transitioning children use.
While I agree that it doesn't invalidate his overall points, him not being fine with parents cutting their sons dick off but suddenly being 100% fine with cutting the tip of their dick off makes him a little bit of an hypocrite. Whatever happened to the man who kept claiming to just "want the truth"? He definitely sounds like he cares less about muh children's safety and more about the political compass of this travesty.
>calling an amputation "amputation" is exaggerating
Enjoy your callus of a glans
Whatever makes the far left seethe is ok in my book, I agree on the Jordan memerson cult thing but I won't blame the guy, it looks like he wants to see a better society in general, his books have some solid advice imo
trannies suck and all but this is bottom of the barrel culture war shit
Stop being a turbo simp for femoids.
This documentary actually convinced me that gender theory is more right than wrong. The main premise this guy went around asking was for a definition of a woman. He can easily get that from a dictionary.
But when humans say they are a woman, for example, they are referring to their gender identity and not their sex assigned as birth. Yet, for some reason he keeps harping on that woman = female. It's apples and oranges.
Even the chicken example was ridiculous too. Our understanding of gender for humans has superseded biological definitions for sex, yet he purposely conflates it as well. We don't call female chickens "women" - they're not fricking humans.
Overall it was a pretty disingenuous piece of commentary but can totally get the appeal if you're still someone living in the past.
>But when humans say they are a woman, for example, they are referring to their gender identity and not their sex assigned as birth.
They are one and the same, though. If the entire opposition to this relies on the separation of gender and sex, there's a lot of explaining to do.
Why do "transgenders" opt for SEX hormone therapy and SEX reassignment surgery? Why are they not happy being identified as "male women" and "female men"?
No he didn't keep harping on it. Even if they're referring to their gender identity, they can't define what a woman is.
Yes he can find the definition of a woman from the dictionary but everyone he's interviewing doesn't subscribe to that
>Even if they're referring to their gender identity, they can't define what a woman is.
It's the feminine gender identity. What else is there to define?
pretty good pasta for modern Cinemaphile standards
>when humans say they are a woman, for example, they are referring to their gender identity and not their sex assigned as birth. Yet, for some reason he keeps harping on that woman = female. It's apples and oranges.
So everything would be exactly the same if we just retired the words "man" and "woman" and only used "male" and "female"
Male and Female bathrooms, Male and Female sports teams, Male and Female stereotypes. Nothing would change then if we just got rid of "woman" and only referred to them by their sex, as males.
>Nothing would change then if we just got rid of "woman" and only referred to them by their sex, as males.
Clothing
>you can't wear that, you're a boy
>i disagree
that's literally all that needs to happen. but child minds can only go to opposites.
>you can't wear that, you're a boy
>i disagree
That already happens but you people lose your shit over it and reject it, so functionally that's still incorrect.
>you people
who?
Don't play dumb, you are not letting your 5 or 7 year old son wear a skirt or dress
and what makes you think that?
I love it when you morons play dumb as if you think your slick, it's so fricking vindicating.
what are you even talking about?
Why would he he doesn't want his son to grow up a homosexual
Would trannies object to being called "male" women? Genuine question.
They might temporarily disagree on the internet in order to further their argument, but in real life if we just stopped using the words "man" and "woman" and used "male" and "female" instead, they would start calling themselves transsex and behave exactly the same because gender and sex are the same thing
There was a lot wrong with the documentary. So much that I wonder why it was edited that way at all. Maybe the dude can't help himself, I don't know.
He frames it so his interviewers are moronic (they might as well be) but he also keeps interrupting and goading them into a verbal fight. He has 3 people on his side in the whole documentary. One is a dude that literally says he "lost his daughter, but kept his beliefs" like it's something to be proud of as a parent. The other one is a doctor who feels like she majored into /misc/ infographics and the last one is the only decent person in the whole thing, which was the actual trans dude that got fricked by pharma.
The ending is fricking ridiculous.
I fast fowarded when they showed the wolf moron. It brought nothing to the documentary. It was just him making fun of a dude that has a mental issue.
The end was also insufferable. It was like 20 minutes of him jerking off himself over the book he wrote and the one interview he managed to land. The deal with his wife was also cringe as frick. "A woman is a female that can't open a pickle jar." lol.
You can be a snowflake, you can be a chud, I don't give a shit. Objectively as a documentary it was ass. It would be better if he either went full satire like idiocracy or did tried to make a serious informed piece.
>He frames it so his interviewers are moronic
He's the only interviewer, moron. But you were right about the pickle jar scene, major cringe.
This post actually convinced me that bait theory is more right than wrong. The main premise this Redditor went around asking was for (You)s. He can easily get that from posting Sneed.
When when redditors say they are anons, for example, they are referring to their posting identity and not their account assigned when they signed up for reddit. Yet, for some reason he keeps harping on while he reddit-spaces. It's apple and oranges.
Overall it was a pretty disingenuous post but can totally get the appeal if you're still someone living on reddit.
Stale pasta
Nice pasta homosexual
>We don't call female chickens "women"
Correct, we call them hens. Female chicken = hen, male chicken = rooster. Just as female human = woman, male human = man
A woman is an
1.adult (sexually mature, legally speaking 18)
2.human (homosexual sapiens)
3. female (lack of Y chromosome and SRY gene, produces large gametes)
source: laboratory geneticist
>bringing up sex in a gender discussion
mmkay chud
WHYYYY can't I marry her??
him
>or it
at a certain point, the insane can be declared not legally competant to enter into a contract such as marriage.
8/10, guaranteed at least another 10 (You)s
It's fine, but it could've easily been made 3-4 years ago without any differences. It feels like 2016-era culture war crap and it's still mostly preaching to the choir which makes it sort of pointless. He was right, though. it's a shame we even have to say most of the stuff he says in this doc, but here we are.
the movie misses a few easy marks
>in the sports section, doesn't trap the fat homosexual into saying there were no physiological differences between men and women, allowing him to (correctly) state that being trans, unto itself, is not an advantage
>doesn't go into how lobbyists had GID removed from the DSM so as to preempt any sort of attempt to sue for misdiagnosis
>makes no mention of how dictionary definitions of words can't include the word they're defining.
that's just off the top of my head.
had the movie taken a deeper dive and actually made some attempt to engage with and refute the delusional mindset of transgenderism, it could've been meaningful. but as it stands it made no real attempt to even argue with the concept. just framed opposition as rhetoric, thus served to only deepen one of the many us vs them screaming matches that make up current US politics, where two sides with different viewpoints will use the same words to describe different things.
>the movie misses a few easy marks
>>in the sports section, doesn't trap the fat homosexual into saying there were no physiological differences between men and women, allowing him to (correctly) state that being trans, unto itself, is not an advantage
't go into how lobbyists had GID removed from the DSM so as to preempt any sort of attempt to sue for misdiagnosis
no mention of how dictionary definitions of words can't include the word they're defining.
>that's just off the top of my head.
>had the movie taken a deeper dive and actually made some attempt to engage with and refute the delusional mindset of transgenderism, it could've been meaningful. but as it stands it made no real attempt to even argue with the concept. just framed opposition as rhetoric, thus served to only deepen one of the many us vs them screaming matches that make up current US politics, where two sides with different viewpoints will use the same words to describe different things.
Bait or extremely moronic
Post body
Seen the trailer. Guy just seems like a smug c**t. The whole trailer did. I don't get this obsessession with trannies. If you don't live in a degenerate city, the whole thing is a non-issue.
>If you don't live in a degenerate city, the whole thing is a non-issue.
They are coming to your city, and teaching at your child's elementary school. And if a parent questions the curriculum, they will put you on a watch list.
how many of those cases are a teacher fricking some 17 year old Black person?
it's about authority, not age
its also about the fact one entity doesn't report crimes committed by its members to anyone.
>relying on the perpetrator to confess
>tell me you have no idea how the criminal justice system works
its depressing that you thought that was a relevant reply
it's the victim's responsibility to report the crime (parent in the case of a minor), not the perp. we have no idea how many teachers are being "transferred" after an allegation instead of opening an investigation, and expecting school administrators to be honest and upfront about it is naive or willfully ignorant. just ask canadian indians about their dead schoolkids.
game theory teaches us that any high trust society will inevitably create lapses of due diligence, thereby removing the disincentives against abusive behavior.
with the school system, anyone with knowledge is compelled to get the police involved, because the school system doesn't try to self-regulate.
with the church, no one is compelled to get the police involved, they think they're a higher authority.
but thanks for really putting in the effort to map out your idiocy for me.
Make it % based and then we could talk about it aka per Capita , just posting that doesn't take into account how many kids nowadays are going/forced to church compared to the gigantic pool of kids in school
still pissed that his parents used to take him to church
Nah, I despise people trying to push troonyhood especially to kids, but if data is not per capita then you can't make a really solid argument from there
Wait is that real? 30k each year?
>abolishing genital mutilation is good because ... it empowers women!
>but splitting your dick is good because ... it empowers "women"!
i thought it was weird the israeli woman didn't bring up weimar germany as the start of transgender ideology
i liked how she just regurgitated century old slander of kinsey.
Why is the guy from YIIK on the cover
>"what is a woman?"
>a collective societal projection of gender identity informing our values and roles in said society
>therefore if im a woman i actually mean i'm just being girly by your terms
why didn't anyone say this in the movie? furthermore why didn't the creator think of this? most people aren't as educated as he is, and still have it on the tip of their tongue "a woman is someone who believes they are delicate" that lady sounds moronic but yeah, thats basically what troons think to themselves.
Whats so hard to get about that?
Am I missing the point of was this a bait-tier anti-trans movie?
because he's either stupid or knowingly playing to a stupid audience that will laugh at his horrible fishing joke and laugh and clap at "adult human female who needs this opened"
Knowingly playing, he is trying to expose themselves as stupid, if you see other of his videos/interviews he is always trying to BTFO trannies...actually in one, the absolute madman uses that closing remark people love to post in Cinemaphile of "if someone sees your bones hundreds of years later they will know if you were a male or a female" https://youtube.com/shorts/nRACHDlZMZA?feature=share
They won't say that because left wing activists are still trying to court feminists, and if you define womanhood by sex stereotypes then undecided feminist may think
>hang on, maybe the TERFs were right about this whole trans thing
>a collective societal projection of gender identity informing our values and roles in said society
That's not a woman, that's a gender role
its funny when you realize john money's entire thesis is just the idea that gender roles aren't tied to sex.
I know that when I want to what what the definition of a woman is, I ask a bunch of dudes.
See the movie and his other interviews in YT, he actually talks about it with a wide variety of people and they always deflect or fall into circular arguments
none of the dork in the film are qualified to give an authoritative opinion on anything except what the best D&D edition is
lmao
it's 3.5 btw
made me check
>So Jay, what did you think of What is a Woman?
>I HATED IT
>Really, I think it's my favorite movie of the year
>Well, I didn't haaaate it...
I marathoned the first 10 minutes of this and turned it off. Alt-right garbage.
Trump lost.
Lol pretty much everyone lost after Trump, only moronic people defend Biden decisions/leadership
ok, but what is a woman?
>Elon Musk knows of the doc'
Troonbros...
>ctrl-f "circular"
>only one result
another troon joins the 45%
RIP
Walsh is a conservative christcuck, so it's fricking funny he's against a group of people because they're an authoritarian cult that believes people are actually entities that exists outside of their body... I mean, he's not wrong for calling out the trannie religion, but he has obviously never looked in the mirror. We need actual liberals to stand up against this.
>they're an authoritarian cult that believes people are actually entities that exists outside of their body
Wrong. They think a female brain was born into a male body and vice versa. Basically during the pregnancy it got mixed up.
This is false of course because they have no way to differentiate a male and female brain. There are certain wave lengths that seem off in some trannies but that doesn’t mean they have a female mind. They are just rightfully insane
DEBONKED CHUD!
>I'm willing to acknowledge that some young people are probably trying on transness like a hat and proclaiming identification as trans when they really aren't who knows and don't start throwing all this kids being mutilated stuff at me I said absolutely nothing whatsoever in my video about children undergoing surgery and quite honestly don't really support it
Ok cool, a video about some morons arguing about nothing really important.
Frick trannies. Frick females. Trannies are just doing to females what feminists have been doing to anything male for decades. Trannies are a tiny, small dose of karma for femoids.
Anything that gets astroturfed as hard as this shit is a no-watch from me, regardless of the subject. Frick off, chang
We are simultaneously being told that gender differences do not exist and that genders are so profoundly different that irreversible surgery is the only option.
Perhaps someone wiser than me can explain this dichotomy.
The counter argument ive heard is
>The stereotypical role of female and male is so ingrained, that people need to transition to change “roles”
>while we leftists abolish these rules, transitioning is a short term solution until society becomes genderless
However this still contradicts the female brain born in a male body concept. It’s just bullshit upon bullshit. It’s such a over complicated needless concept.
Based Fesh Pince poster
I think it's a missed opportunity to really examine this as the danger that it is, from a compassionate and kind point of view. By engaging in the same kind of modern gotcha journalism that the left uses, where everything is adversarial and built around embarrassing others, it's just further spreading their methods. It's just talk show level pandering to those who already believe it. It's not going to win anyone over and so what good is it? It's fart sniffing. What we need is something that really opens the eyes of the average left leaning person caught up in the momentum of bizarre far left degeneracy.
>What we need is something that really opens the eyes of the average left leaning person caught up in the momentum of bizarre far left degeneracy.
Beatings. Public beatings gets everyone's attention.
It really wasn't that aggressive.It's just that those clowns literally throw a fit over simple questions. I think the section with the ex-trans guy saying how it literally ruined her life did the job. They can't really offer any cope to that besides "t-that was just an exception....."
>the ex-trans guy
that's a woman who transitioned to a man. hence her giant ass.
chud thread
Watch this
https://archive.org/details/Hjernevask_Brainwash_EngSub
>So you perform surgeries on kids
>yes
>and you cut their penis off just because they asked for it
>yes
>what would you think if one of them asked to cut his arm off?
>I think he'd be crazy
>....
>....
>... you really don't see it do you
made me kek
the key point that walsh didn't hit or mention there is marci bowen still has a penis
because he'd just get pissed, wouldn't answer, and the interview would be over
that happened anyway a few times. having marci bowen on video either refusing to answer or, by some miracle, answering, would end his career.
>incels need to Film to know what a woman is
Touch grass+have sex
Okay but what is a woman though?
what's a woman, no one is telling me, just tell me what is a waman!
It was alright. The bit with the congressman who decided to leave in the middle of his own rambling was funny
>"I just want to know what a woman is..."
>"And you won't find out!"
I can't fricking wait for this troony shit to go down the way of lobotomies.
At this point, we can't attribute it to naivete anymore. They have to know that they're doing more harm than good to these people. Imagine going to a shrink for whatever issue you're having, and coming out of it neutered, condemned to a lifetime of medication, and with an infection-prone wound that you can't ever allow to heal. It doesn't just frick up people with gender identity issues, it's also eroding everyone's faith in medicine and psychology. I know it made me way more hesitant to "trust the science, bro".
the problem is the existence of people with deeply motivated reasoning to want this stuff to be true. lobotomies just had career minded people performing them, wanting to believe they're doing the right thing. the lobotomized couldn't protest after.
I want to believe that they're not evil, but it's hard. How many more decades of suicides and surgery/hormone related medical complications do these experts need to realize that they went down the wrong path? They must know, but they won't change course. Either out of greed or pride, but certainly not because they believe that they're doing good. No one who isn't mentally ill themselves can see these people dying and suffering, and think that this is a better alternative to talk therapy.
it's a matter of time
every community college psychology class in the year 2090 will look back on this period of time, and use it as a warning of giving in to mass cultural deluision
On the one hand, you have giant corporations trying to make a profit and controlling the narrative about what it means to be trans, even going so far as to buy the testimony of unscrupulous doctors. On the other hand, you have people who genuinely buy into that narrative. The message right now is that if you want to be a good, morally upstanding person, you have to be on board with all this, and it’s hard for most people to swim against the current.
It might eventually be thought of the way we think of lobotomies today. But if they can buy studies and control the narrative today, what makes you think they won’t be able to tomorrow? What’s going to change?
>giant corporations trying to make a profit
the problem with this is the profit margins of trannies are so utterly tiny compared to default margins of big pharma. they got the opium trade legalized for just them. they'll make enough fentanyl in a day as a hundred trannies will be worth in a year.
I guess that the only option is that the damage they're doing becomes too great and too obvious to sweep under the rug. Trans becoming trendy might do it, but then again, they'll probably blame it on social media and no true scotsman their way out of it.
>those kids weren't REALLY trans
the non-binary trend is already the end of it. basically kids saying "i'll wear what i want thanks"
non-binary is just a term straight white women use so they can larp as lgbtqia+
no different than how they called themselves bi ten years ago
100% this. Actually just watched a 'Trans relationship' implode when the man decided he was a woman and the non-binary decided that's not okay after all and bounced. Good times.
>What’s going to change?
china taking over the rest of the international markets and forcing them to behave to do business. the only bright side to a future of living in subservience to changs.
You CHUDS are STILL spreading toxic transphobic misinformation? That's it, no more Mr. Nice Guy.
MAYONNAISE CHUD, your toxic rhetoric will NOT divide us.
Mayonnaise CHUD, we do not forget. We do not forgive. You have been warned.
We are the Chudbusters. Mayonnaise Chud of Chuddonnaise, consider yourself WARNED. This is ChudWATCH.
Chudbuster OUT!
apparently, the chicken crossed to road to get run over by a truck
Based movie calling out mental illness.
Watched it for the first time tonight. It was great - just let those freaks do the talking and show how dangerous they are. I like how it lures in normies at the beginning with the simple "what is a woman?" premise, before the dark tonal shift showing all the physical and emotional damage caused by transitioning, how fricked up Kinsey was, forcing viewers to face the reality that's always being hidden from them. Seeing the social contagion on display with all the tiktoks made me feel a profound sadness
bruh its from a christian news outlet, and the filmmaker is also an outspoken christian.
no one who doesn't already have an opinion will ever watch it
I've formed an opinion and I'm still not gonna watch it, and I agree with the opinion people are parroting here. Either way just because only certain people will see it doesn't mean he's wrong.
he's "wrong" because he doesn't actually do anything to refute the idea. he maintains a distance and doesn't engage or even agree on terms from which to debate the concept.
This isn't a debate though lmao. Are you really taking things so seriously that you think this is a formal interaction? Also you don't need to give someone a chance to defend themselves to be right. You also don't need to do anything to refute an absurd idea, and it's folly to debate a nonsense concept.
i'm talking about how this christian movie doesn't do enough to attack/refute the concept.
not sure how you missed that.
My comment was explicitly about the poster you were responding to lol. Learn to read, dipshit.
feel free to elaborate on that. because it really just looks like you're about to start spamming troonjacks at someone who's calling transgenderism a delusion that could've been refuted, but wasn't.
Holy frick learn to read. I'm not even in the pro-troony camp. Calm down, bud. It's much easier to think clearly without rage clouding your judgement.
reminder they are not real women
how do you talk about transgenderism with marci bowen and not point out he still has a penis?