Girls are always the pursuer, every time.
It's natural, if they aren't pursuing, you haven't aroused their interest and probably never will. >But men are supposed to pursue the women
That's the grand facade, women want to feel like they are the ones being pursued, even if it's not true.
If the men aren't the ones to pursue, then theyare betas. Women naturally want a male to lead because it shows strength and stability. If the woman led in the relationship, she'd lead it off a cliff with her monthly periods
Men are the pursuers but need a signal from the woman that they are open to being pursued. That's where the "dropping the handkerchief" came from. Women couldn't pick up the handkerchief because of their dresses so a man would have to do it for them. This became a way for women to invite engagement by purposefully dropping the handkerchief for the man to pick up and greenlight an interaction between the two.
That whole interaction is different from a woman being aggressively affectionate and breaking the physical barrier first.
My point still stands, the women pursued the man first, she dropped the handkerchief.
She made the first move,
now it's just a dog and pony show.
No, evolution dictates that females has the most autonomy in chosing a mate but, across so many species it is down to the male to put forth the best display.
A female may be in heat and visibly show the male she is ready to humour his advances but giving a green light to be approached is not pursuing shit.
Else animals with horns/antlers wouldn't need to do shit, the female would approach the ones that had the best antlers/horns without a fight needing to happen to show it's not just pretty.
This is a gross over simplification. They have 17x less testosterone which means they have 17x less of a sex drive. They are also hypergamous and only want a small fraction of the total men. This is why they are so picky. This is why we need legalized prostitution. And why throughout time it was legal.
Regarding the hankerchief example...... it is half-good. There is a real difference between passive aggression and aggression. Making a slight gesture and then waiting for the man to make his move, is not the same as jumping on a man and tearing his clothes off.
No, it was more in line with Bugs Bunny dressing as a woman and kissing men, it was a "haha you are not suppossed to do that! that´s why its funny" thing.
Litterally untrue.
Women heavily pursuing a man was a normal thing.
Bugs bunny dressing like a woman was a cringe funny thing that played on the troony trap aspect that men feared
Women should be taller, thicker, and heavier than small cute slim men, and we should have a matriarchal dynamic in our species.
This is the future of humans btw. Gene editing and social conditioning will make us this way.
Only if most men had this fetish. Most don't, so no. >gene editing
I will edit my genes to have a murderwiener, a wiener that murders anyone I don't like.
Its the ideal size. The women can birth litters every time easily, and the men require only a few hundred calories per day. This way, we can support greater population sizes, while never falling below replacement fertility even with only a single pregnancy per woman.
This is the future
7 months ago
Anonymous
I mean sizes like this
homie manlets coping that they are 1/5 of their whale wifes.
7 months ago
Anonymous
No, I'm doing a Ph.D in computational biology and genomics, and I'm working on reversing size dimorphism in mammals
7 months ago
Anonymous
95% of those are birds, anon.
7 months ago
Anonymous
What? 95% of what are birds?
7 months ago
Anonymous
OF the speciac which have reversing size dimorphism.
Most mammals males are larger.
Genetic tampering and social engineering through media, social media, schools, government programs. ESG is one such infamous attempt at forcing transhumanist change.
Same for quasi famous "geniuses" pushing "AI" and cybernetics
Its the ideal size. The women can birth litters every time easily, and the men require only a few hundred calories per day. This way, we can support greater population sizes, while never falling below replacement fertility even with only a single pregnancy per woman.
This is the future
You. Get over to the female transformers thread. I know you have some good stuff to share with the rest of the class.
OF the speciac which have reversing size dimorphism.
Most mammals males are larger.
Female-biased size dimorphism is by far the most common form of size dimorphism across all sexually reproducing eukaryotes, from little microscopic animals all the way up to the blue whales (female blue whales are larger than males and are the largest animals ever recorded). It's not just birds. Insects, lizards, invertebrates, amphibians, arachnids, fish, pretty much all animals, the females are larger than the males in almost all of them.
For mammals, females are larger than males in about 22% of mammal species, and males are larger in a little over 30%. Females and males are the same size in the rest.
Ha, nice try cucklord.
But I am not going to bite the "Cuz i said it so" shit you are serving. Exception to the norm does not make it a good speciment for any research because its results are harder observe.
Also funny of you to employ a whale as the standard representation of mammal dimorphism. Like giving the the caecilian as a representative for all amphibians.
it wasn't dwelt on, because it was a funny animal.
it's the same thing as all the tickling torture or weight gain episodes of the 80s & 90s, they were put in for specific reasons (replacing more brutal torture methods, & drawing attention to the child obesity crisis) not because the showrunners, writers, storyboarders, etc had a fetish.
Idk how they viewed it, I know it was a lie all the same. Women don't initiate. Ive been with many women and only one (1) asked me out. Was a surreal experience, and then the c**t stabbed me in the back.
Yes.
Yes and?
No, maybe in the 20s. Shit hasn't changed for awhile.
Didn't the 50's have a resurgence of traditional gender roles which the squirrel girl is not adhering to?
Ok I guess then things change but stay the same? I dunno man it's late and I've been drinking. History is cyclical?
>History is cyclical?
yes
>rise of nationalism
>pandemic
>absurd inflation
what 20s am i talking about?
>There were no assertive girls in the 20's!
>homie doesn't know what flappers are
There have always been women seeking sex. Always.
And there arent enough that do seek it out to go around.
Hazel thread?
Girls are always the pursuer, every time.
It's natural, if they aren't pursuing, you haven't aroused their interest and probably never will.
>But men are supposed to pursue the women
That's the grand facade, women want to feel like they are the ones being pursued, even if it's not true.
If the men aren't the ones to pursue, then theyare betas. Women naturally want a male to lead because it shows strength and stability. If the woman led in the relationship, she'd lead it off a cliff with her monthly periods
Incorrect.
Men are the pursuers but need a signal from the woman that they are open to being pursued. That's where the "dropping the handkerchief" came from. Women couldn't pick up the handkerchief because of their dresses so a man would have to do it for them. This became a way for women to invite engagement by purposefully dropping the handkerchief for the man to pick up and greenlight an interaction between the two.
That whole interaction is different from a woman being aggressively affectionate and breaking the physical barrier first.
My point still stands, the women pursued the man first, she dropped the handkerchief.
She made the first move,
now it's just a dog and pony show.
wtf you got a point
wtf women aren't dropping shit nowadays, how am I supposed to take hints?
>wtf women aren't dropping shit nowadays, how am I supposed to take hints?
You're supposed to read their minds, incel.
No, evolution dictates that females has the most autonomy in chosing a mate but, across so many species it is down to the male to put forth the best display.
A female may be in heat and visibly show the male she is ready to humour his advances but giving a green light to be approached is not pursuing shit.
Else animals with horns/antlers wouldn't need to do shit, the female would approach the ones that had the best antlers/horns without a fight needing to happen to show it's not just pretty.
You may find this surprising, but women have wanted sex for all of human history
The female libido was not invented in the 1900s
Strippers don't want sex, they want money.
Same for single mothers. They just put out sex to keep the latest ATM around.
This is a gross over simplification. They have 17x less testosterone which means they have 17x less of a sex drive. They are also hypergamous and only want a small fraction of the total men. This is why they are so picky. This is why we need legalized prostitution. And why throughout time it was legal.
Regarding the hankerchief example...... it is half-good. There is a real difference between passive aggression and aggression. Making a slight gesture and then waiting for the man to make his move, is not the same as jumping on a man and tearing his clothes off.
>It's half good
lol who the frick are you again?
Cinemaphile incels are so brain damaged they're bawd shaming victorian era women
Not sure where I was an incel bawd shaming women of the past, but I am sure it all makes sense in your head somehow.
No, it was more in line with Bugs Bunny dressing as a woman and kissing men, it was a "haha you are not suppossed to do that! that´s why its funny" thing.
Litterally untrue.
Women heavily pursuing a man was a normal thing.
Bugs bunny dressing like a woman was a cringe funny thing that played on the troony trap aspect that men feared
Women should be taller, thicker, and heavier than small cute slim men, and we should have a matriarchal dynamic in our species.
This is the future of humans btw. Gene editing and social conditioning will make us this way.
Only if most men had this fetish. Most don't, so no.
>gene editing
I will edit my genes to have a murderwiener, a wiener that murders anyone I don't like.
I think most younger men and women like the idea of women being bigger
Women can be almost as laerj as men with 0 le gene editing, and instead just active life and good food.
I mean sizes like this
Oh, that's a fetish, anon-kun.
Its the ideal size. The women can birth litters every time easily, and the men require only a few hundred calories per day. This way, we can support greater population sizes, while never falling below replacement fertility even with only a single pregnancy per woman.
This is the future
homie manlets coping that they are 1/5 of their whale wifes.
No, I'm doing a Ph.D in computational biology and genomics, and I'm working on reversing size dimorphism in mammals
95% of those are birds, anon.
What? 95% of what are birds?
OF the speciac which have reversing size dimorphism.
Most mammals males are larger.
It's been 60 years. The science worshipping transhumanists have shown they are fricking lunatics and this will never happen.
What?
Genetic tampering and social engineering through media, social media, schools, government programs. ESG is one such infamous attempt at forcing transhumanist change.
Same for quasi famous "geniuses" pushing "AI" and cybernetics
Ah Hazel, the eternal squirrel waifu.
You. Get over to the female transformers thread. I know you have some good stuff to share with the rest of the class.
I don't know where that is.
Female-biased size dimorphism is by far the most common form of size dimorphism across all sexually reproducing eukaryotes, from little microscopic animals all the way up to the blue whales (female blue whales are larger than males and are the largest animals ever recorded). It's not just birds. Insects, lizards, invertebrates, amphibians, arachnids, fish, pretty much all animals, the females are larger than the males in almost all of them.
For mammals, females are larger than males in about 22% of mammal species, and males are larger in a little over 30%. Females and males are the same size in the rest.
Ha, nice try cucklord.
But I am not going to bite the "Cuz i said it so" shit you are serving. Exception to the norm does not make it a good speciment for any research because its results are harder observe.
Also funny of you to employ a whale as the standard representation of mammal dimorphism. Like giving the the caecilian as a representative for all amphibians.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2363067-females-are-not-smaller-than-males-in-most-mammal-species/
https://repository.si.edu/bitstream/handle/10088/11651/Ralls1976c.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Females are larger than males in 86% of all animals, males are larger in less than 2%
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/animal-female-size_b_3177995
Stop trying to hide your fetish behind statistics.
Why do you dislike females being larger than males?
Hazel will fight for her acorns
I love Cinemaphile's Hazel art in general, but that was an especially great recent addition.
Hazel thread, lads? I wanna see more greentexts
did they bang in the middle of the library?
Shut the frick up Crumb.
There will only be small men and large women in the future. It's more efficient and superior
Small men with giant woman pleasing wieners. That is the genetic future.
Something something memes.
Also
>gene editing
>Totally won't blow up in our faces and start eugenics wars.
>you will never meet your wife on the battlefield of the 2050s Giantess Wars
Yeah nah. Sorry buddy, you won't be seeing your fetish. Not in your lifetime or your son's.
Found the troony
I'm not a troony
My favorite dynamic
She was sexually harassing him, thank god she got cucked in the end
Not the first time they've done it
You know man are very late into the chase game, so woman need to set up the bate for the chase to start.
Is that why she urinates in his face and he tastes?
bawd
So women cant be incel.
it wasn't dwelt on, because it was a funny animal.
it's the same thing as all the tickling torture or weight gain episodes of the 80s & 90s, they were put in for specific reasons (replacing more brutal torture methods, & drawing attention to the child obesity crisis) not because the showrunners, writers, storyboarders, etc had a fetish.
I still think the squirrel became Lady Guinevere, with Madam Mim's help.
Proper girls dont go hunting down boys
Ugh, those 4 eyes are creeping me out! What is that?
Was suppose to be a love stuck squirrel going after a four eye geek frog.
bing ai
Why do you know what?
squirrel girl huh
Idk how they viewed it, I know it was a lie all the same. Women don't initiate. Ive been with many women and only one (1) asked me out. Was a surreal experience, and then the c**t stabbed me in the back.