>At the top of every critic's list
>Didn't even make it on Cinemaphile
Why do you gays hate this exactly?
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
>At the top of every critic's list. >Didn't even make it on?
fell asleep
It is SO fricking BORING
I can appreciate the cinematography, the acting, the circular plot, but it's so goddamn BORING
this is certainly right up top of my favourite hitchwieners.
although i didn't really notice she was the same woman or whatever.
its nowhere near as boring as citizen kane or 2001 or any of the other shit Cinemaphile harps on about constantly. in fact i would say it isn't boring at all.
typical for Cinemaphile to prefer a film where a man dress as woman and murders cis woman get your head examined pervert.
Both Citizen Kane and 2001 are better and more interesting than Vertigo, especially for someone going in with no prior knowledge of the films.
Citizen Kane in relation to how much it's had its dick sucked? Not really. 2001 yes.
Citizen Kane got its dick sucked 60 years ago, most people kind of dismiss it now. It turns out it's actually a fantastic movie, but most people ignore it because of how much it was shilled in the past.
>It turns out it's actually a fantastic movie
It's a well made film on a technical level, but the story is complete derivative trash (see The Great Getsby and other novels of its time) with terrible pacing and no climax.
The only people who think it was good are film professors who don't care about storytelling, and teenagers like yourself who call films "movies".
gas all plotgays
>plotgays
You do understand that "plotgayging" describes people who care more about plot events happening than about the themes and meaning behind it, right? In other words, the very people who think that stories don't need metatext, and that Citizen Kane (which is as shallow as a puddle) is therefore good. In other words: It describes what you are doing.
Citizen Kane isn't boring at all, it's consistently funny and entertaining. 2001 blows, one of like 3 movies I've fallen asleep watching.
Vertigo really is weighed down by Jimmy Stewart being a shitty actor. Half the movie is him making googly eyes and acting like a mime while annoying music plays. I guess Vertigo originated the "discordant music playing means art" idée fixe of the critical set.
>Citizen Kane isn't boring at all, it's consistently funny and entertaining.
wrong
lol, Citizen Memer is boring as frick. There are some funny scenes, but overall it's pretty shitty. It makes me laugh how every pseud claims this is the first modern film. It literally looks and feels like an early 40s movie.
The third man > citizen kain
Citizen Kane is not boring at all
It goes to show that there are old films with good pacing but Vertigo is just really boring
>It is SO fricking BORING
>I can appreciate the cinematography, the acting, the circular plot, but it's so goddamn BOR-ACK
Because Psycho mogs the frick out of it
The movie unironically ends with a guy explaining the movie. Hitchwiener was always shit at expositions scenes but that one really took the cake.
Did you literally not realize it's the same woman? She let it be done to her because she was in love with him, knowing full well she will never be Judy but wanting to try anyways. That's what I love about Vertigo, it's just "you can never mold the perfect person" or "it's doomed from the start to love an image" but wrapped up in such supernatural elements
Did you not realise that it still MADE NO FRICKING SENSE?!
If she loved him she would've come clean with him right after having dinner with him and roll the dice on whether he turns her in or not ,but i guess that would cut in the director's ''vision'' for the ending.
Having her just ''playing along'' with him and ''indulging' him' all the way to the very end is the laziest,hackiest way to get this done.
Here's an alternative to Hackwiener's ending
>he runs in her into the street and recognises her
>starts following her for days,obsessing about her thinking the woman he loves is still somehow alive despite what he knows as a fact
>audience sees the whole decline in sanity and a man at his breaking point
>not even breasts mcgee can console him
>finally one day goes to the hotel she lives to confront her
>she's taken aback but doesn't cop to anything
>he sees the necklace
>puts two and two together
>he snaps and he kidnaps her
>makes her wear the dress
>makes her wear a wig
>he takes her to the bell-tower where he overcomes his vertigo and climbs to the top and in a SHOKING TWIIIiiiST she finally breaks down confesses everything to him proving him correct into thinking that she was alive the whole time
>the nun spooks her, she falls off the bell-tower, THE END!
THERE!
I only wathced this shitfest two days ago for the first time and came up with this ending in the time it took me to write this reply and i didn't even have to meander for half an hour throwing implausible situation after implausible situation at the viewer of the film just to put two people in a bell-tower and throw one of them off.
>MADE NO FRICKING SENSE?!
clearly you dont know how far some people are willing to go for love, especially women. makes sense considering ur a virgin whos never loved before. women will 100% change their hair, clothes, and mannerisms for a man they love and often men will as well but u wouldnt know that, would u anon?
>If she loved him she would've come clean with him right after having dinner with him and roll the dice on whether he turns her in or not
no, she wouldnt. go interact with women then come back here and try again
>how far some people are willing to go for love
I would do anything for love.
But I won't do THAT!
It's good, but it's not THAT good.
The plot is kind of shitty. I really dislike how Jimmy actually discovered the truth at the end. Him genuinely going completely insane would be so much better.
Cinemaphile is a breasts-board
Vertigo is all about the ass
https://archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/193438909
Lynch absolutely mogs Hitchock and his goofy flick. What Hitchock wanted to do with Vertigo Lynch did with Mullholand Drive and Twin Peaks.
The old frauds that made all those cinematic canons are dying fast. Good riddance. It's time for actual masterpieces to replaced those goofy-ass outdated flicks.
You didn't think about your post at all, did you?
I don't disagree with you, but without the "boring and goofy" canon of the golden age the postmodernist perversion of people like Lynch wouldn't be possible.
>The old frauds that made all those cinematic canons are dying fast.
>David Keith Lynch (born January 20, 1946)
soon
who are the lynch and hitchwiener of ourdays/]?
Tarkovsky and Lang.
this board is full of manchilds and hipsters thats why
anyway i didnt voted Vertigo though is top 3 hitch movies imo and top 50 all time
i voted Double Indemnity, Dr. Strangelove, Lawrence of Arabia, Laura and Shane.
if /tv were hipster, there would be more staple artsy shit like paris texas but nope it didnt even make the list but nolanslop and fricken ex machina did
True, it's just capeshitters.
hitchkok is for the uppermid bourgeoisie licking high class asses everyday and in every aspects of their lives, and in the theaters too.
nobody with half a brain can consider this shit to be kino.
grow up bollocks, licker.
This board is edgelord and coomer infested and Vertigo does not have a nude or sex scenes.
I like the movie, but it is over rated by critics, it’s not even Hitchwiener’s best film. They just sing it’s praises because it has an artsy side.
>approahes her on the street after the events of the first two thirds of the movie
>follows her home
>forces himself into the apartment
>dates him anyways despite the glaring red flags
>forces her to wear same dress
>forces her to change hair color
>let's herself to be taken to ''surprise location'' for their secret date
>forces her to climb bell-tower
Honestly man the movie was fine until that point but jesus on a pogo stick does it fall apart at the seams by that point ;there's suspension of disbelief and then there's whatever the frick this is supposed to be.
There's telegraphing the ending and then there's this.
How the frick did Hitchwiener fool everyone into thinking he's some sort of genious is beyond me.
You deaf? Too white.
Frick off. Slava Ukraini.
modern Cinemaphile anons haven't watched it i guarantee you
It's one of my favorite movies
there is a simple fix for BPPV vertigo called the Epley maneuver. It takes about three minutes and anyone can do it on a bed with a pillow under your shoulder. Basically, you're rotating your head in three positions and realigning the crystals that float in your inner ear that tell you which way you are aligned.
The whole premise of the film is stupid and preventable.
>although i didn't really notice she was the same woman or whatever.
Did you even watch the movie? Where did you go after your pressed play? It's not even hinted at; it is hamfistedly unambiguously EXPLAINED/confessed in the letter-writing scene. It's not even contrived dialogue, it's Hitchwiener sitting you down and explaining what is happenint
Yup, worst part of the movie. It's like that scene in Psycho where the doctor explains that Bates isn't a troony. It's so fricking bad.
It's really annoying too. I love many Hitchock's movies, but they almost always have a scene that pretty much ruins the film.
I'd rather watch rear window
this
I like hitchwiener's straightforward movies more
From what I've seen Shadow of a Doubt is his least flawed film.
North by Northwest is the only Hitchwiener I have a problem with. I love Vertigo, I even love Birds, but NbN is just a nonsensical, absurd comedy for me.
I preferred NXNW over Vertigo honestly. Vertigo got a little silly towards the end. A lot of big coincidences.
I'd be much more worried if a midwit board like Cinemaphile DID like Vertigo. The psychological depth of Vertigo makes the subtext of most of Kubrick's movies look like a fricking puddle.
>psychological depth
>goofy ass mystery thriller that explains its plot halfway through
>watches movies for the plot
Like I said, fricking puddle brains
Hitchock forces me to care about his shitty plot with the terrible letter writing scene.
>
I hate the plot scenes in Hitchwiener movies.
>Vertigo: sitting in car with Midge, the deposition scene, the letter-writing
>Psycho: entire last 10 minutes
>North by Northwest: the conference room where strangers explain what Thornhill is doing
>Strangers on a Train: whatshisname's phone call with his wife
Those are the standout ones
What about the first scene in FAMILY PLOT? It's hard to believe that Hitchwiener thought that starting his movie with an old woman at a psychic reading with a younger woman --two women talking--was a good idea. I've never been able to make it past that scene.
Hitchwiener didn't do mysteries he did suspense.
lol, his friend was more insane than anyone else. That scene where the crazy woman painted herself in Carlotta's dress was so fricking weird.
They never explain how she disappeared from the hotel and Hitchock himself refused when called out on it. What a fricking hack.
Kim Novak is the only classic hollywood star I jerked off to
Based. Something in the way how submissive she becomes for Scotty when trying on new outfits, israeliteellery and doing her hair really does it for me.
It's indisputably a great movie, bur I do prefer several other Hitchwiener movies over it (Strangers on a Train is my favorite from him).
>the ending where cops are just firing into a crowd of innocent people because a suspect is fleeing, killing a carnival worker
made me lol
It's not that good.
Il Posto, Zorba the Greek, Gladiator and Lawrence of Arabia are better movies.
Gladiator is a cheesy revenge flick for morons, and Lawrence has even less of a story than Vertigo. 4 hours of middle eastern vistas, you might as well just watch a nature documentary
Because Hitchwiener confuses the zoomer. They just settle for more stupid Fishtank threads.
I mean, it's alright. The main twist is great, but the ending feels lacking somehow
It's good, but lets face it, it ain't many peoples personal GOAT. For Hitch, I'd place Rear Window ahead of it. 39 Steps, Shadow of a Doubt, and Psycho are all close for me.
Great looking movie, but the story and characters aren't good. Novak is very miscast.
It's at the top of a bunch of director's lists, and they tend to look for something diggerent in a movie than your average viewer. They're judging more based off a bunch of factors beyond just how elaborate the movie is.
It's like how screenwriters consider Chinatown a perfect film.
Cinemaphile hates kinos. Can't you see the fricking garbage in the catalog all day long?