Why do people recommend this movie? I couldn’t get through it. The audio quality is fricking horrendous, the dialogue is awful, and the plot is slow & boring. Shit.
Why do people recommend this movie? I couldn’t get through it. The audio quality is fricking horrendous, the dialogue is awful, and the plot is slow & boring. Shit.
filtered
>The audio quality is fricking horrendous
No? That sounds like a problem on you end anon
I thought it might’ve been, so I actually bought it and it was still shit. Terrible movie for terrible people.
>play film on dogshit setup
>"hmm this sounds like shit, what should i do"
>"i know, i'll pay for it!"
you get what you fricking deserve
I have HyperX Cloud II headphones. My audio is usually quite good.
There must be some gene that makes certain people really respond to window dressing production quality and Blade Runner certainly looks really good. The rest of us respond to characters, dialogue, plot, chemistry, mood, direction, etc, und so weiter. I think Blade Runner is fine but when some of these other people get drooly and call if the best movie ever made... I don't know....
There's this old theater saying I'm paraphrasing about how a good actor and director can point to a stack of cardboard boxes and say "Hark! The Castle of my Princess Love!" and make you believe. I prefer that sentiment over "Wowwwe it's raining on the building and the building says Atari wowwwwe". Not to mention other movies look better....I don't really get it
>und so weiter
homosexual
I am posting from Germany I love ze apple strudel
I don't understand why people don't like this movie. It's a noir movie -- that explains the dialogue. Other than that it's a movie about what it means to be human, first mainly through Rachael and Rutger Hauer and then through Deckard. I think it's a solid movie. No masterpiece sure, but it's fun, good visuals, good food for discussion, good ending, etc
>I don't understand why people don't like this movie. It's a noir movie
You've answered your question. Little boys watch sci-fi, for them film culture started sometime around Star Wars, and they hear about Blade Runner's reputation as a seminal film. They go into it expecting something like the James Cameron movies of the time, or RoboCop, Predator, etc., stuff that's recognizable in the DNA of the action blockbuster shlock they were weened on, and then with Blade Runner they get something that has completely different artistic goals and is a different mode of filmmaking. It's probably the first detective film noir movie a lot of them have ever seen. Its tone, pacing, and overall sense of cinematic storytelling are completely unlike what they expected or have any point of reference for, and they are incurious and stupider than they think, and so after the movie rejects them, they reject it.
>stuff that's recognizable in the DNA of the action blockbuster shlock
Which is exactly what Blade Runner is. It is a trashy generic action movie.
>Which is exactly what Blade Runner is. It is a trashy generic action movie.
It's not really an action movie though. Deckard feels guilt in killing these "replicants", and in the end the "villain" ends up saving the "hero". Does that happen in a lot of action movies?
It's a "classic" so it must be good. Truth is it's vapid popcorn garbage. If it didn't have Harrison Ford it would've been rightly forgotten decades ago
>I don't understand why people don't like this movie
Because it's bad. It's an empty emotionless mess made by brainless hacks. I could barely stomach 15 minutes of it. There is nothing good or likable about it, every scene misses the point
>It's a "classic" so it must be good. Truth is it's vapid popcorn garbage. If it didn't have Harrison Ford it would've been rightly forgotten decades ago
How old are you anon? What are your favorite movies? Just curious
K, read the book or watch Ryan Gosling: The Movie, instead..
The plot isn't slow at all, I wonder how you came to that conclusion. I thought that the first android got killed too early.
watch the sequel its awesome
ENHANCE
It's not a bad movie but not top 100 of all time,I suppose it's one of those "you had to be there".I prefer the sequel,felt darker and more bleak
Both directors and critics disagree with you. Blade Runner usually ends up around 50-70 place in a list of best movies of all time.
The sequels don't show up at all. And it probably won't change in the future.
I'm genuinely baffled that so many people here prefer the sequel. Is this some zoomer disease or what?
>Villememe shit
BR has no sequels
the only thing it has going for it are the visuals, otherwise it is strictly inferior to the book in every way
it sucks
it is baby's first scifi. not even a good adaptation of the book
Why do so many dislike the original and overrate the sequel? Coming from somebody that has the original on his number 1 spot
I don't really understand the love for the new one either. Bringing back Harrison Ford... Yikes.
dishonest film criticism
>Why do people recommend this movie? I couldn’t get through it. The audio quality is fricking horrendous, the dialogue is awful, and the plot is slow & boring. Shit.
What movies do you like?
It's your own fault OP, you should've known it was on this chart.
>the same schizo autist is back again calling Blade Runner a popcorn flick
Get a life man, being this obsessed is not healthy