only California has production numbers like California. they have 50 percent of the national market, New York has maybe 20 percent and other big players like Georgia and New Jersey have 2 or 3. why wouldn't Georgia or New Jersey where the production studios have much more leverage over the government than the unions want those productions in their states?
This would be the obvious move but if the staff working on a film is dramatically reduced so does the economic benefits for a state to have a film produced in it.
9 months ago
Anonymous
probably a big deal in new York and California. probably a lot less of an issue in Louisiana where they care more about taxing the productions gross revenue than supporting a workforce of tens of thousands
The big studios are trying to corrupt lawmakers into not passing a bill that would prevent them from taking advantage of a tax break they normally get from hiring writers. Because they want to continue to reap the tax benefits of hiring human writes while outsourcing writing jobs to AI
Legislation? How can the gov't punish an employer for making decisions to lower his costs?? At that point you're basically forcing a private citizen to run a welfare program.
They're not punishing them for lowering their costs, they're free to do so. They're taking away the state provided incentives that are centred around increasing employment or taking advantage of the numerous people working on a production that would attend local businesses.
Studios can't have it both ways.
Companies are not entitled to tax breaks. They get them in exchange for employing people who then pay income taxes and fuel the local economy with said income, allowing the state to double or sometimes triple dip on taxes, all from that business employing them. But if they don't employ actual humans then there's no payroll to tax, the state loses out, so why should they provide incentives to the company?
Short answer is the boom with detection AI around 2016 got people thinking that we'd reached the point where you could automate pretty much everything from floor cleaning to cars, just because you could map out and program glorified Roombas to avoid hitting things or people and the proximity detection on newer cars felt like the future. So they thought that blue collar, lower paying jobs were about to be on their way out while the "Creatives" remained untouched because they had something programs couldn't replicate.
Then about 1-2 years ago AI generation got way fricking better way fricking faster than anyone imagined, and in the last year especially it's boomed even faster, and opinions on writers and films in general from hollywood were reaching a low point for reasons they don't want you to say out loud. Now all the barriers that kept those floor cleaners employed, the numerous problems caused by something dealing with shit in the real world from cost to maintenance to dealing with the randomness and unpredictable nature of humans+people stealing shit, suddenly don't matter when you're dealing with pretend spaces with no tangible real world effect. You don't have to worry about your floor mop getting jammed because someone dropped one of those thin scarf things and it couldn't detect it because it was sheer or some shit, everything you make or break is in pixels and you can just trash it and roll again to your hearts content. AI works better in a non-physical space, who knew.
So in the future if I, for example, decide to open up my own comic book or gaming company and use AI's to do the drawing/programing and etc, the gov't is allowed to essentially put a gun to my head and force me to pay a human to do the busy work I need done or else I can't run my company? How the hell does that not violate the constitution?
in english doc
Governments are going to refuse to give studios tax breaks if they try and avoid employing actual people to work on their propaganda and slop.
all governments?
No, state governments. Presumably ones that have a high amount of film production like California.
only California has production numbers like California. they have 50 percent of the national market, New York has maybe 20 percent and other big players like Georgia and New Jersey have 2 or 3. why wouldn't Georgia or New Jersey where the production studios have much more leverage over the government than the unions want those productions in their states?
This would be the obvious move but if the staff working on a film is dramatically reduced so does the economic benefits for a state to have a film produced in it.
probably a big deal in new York and California. probably a lot less of an issue in Louisiana where they care more about taxing the productions gross revenue than supporting a workforce of tens of thousands
israelites are israeliteing.
It's the only language you speak and you still don't understand it?
The big studios are trying to corrupt lawmakers into not passing a bill that would prevent them from taking advantage of a tax break they normally get from hiring writers. Because they want to continue to reap the tax benefits of hiring human writes while outsourcing writing jobs to AI
Jews doing everything in their power to hoard even more money for doing less and making worse shit.
have a nice day
I'm clicking the "X" but the image won't close!
>makes logo the same as exit window
bravo musk
jej
wouldn't they just do those productions in a state that does provide tax breaks if AI is used?
But AI doesn't have childhood trauma.
AI doesn't go on Twitter and say vaccines cause autism and blood clots either.
>AI doesn't go on Twitter and say vaccines cause autism and blood clots either.
lol yes it does
Just other things
They murdered her for telling the truth. Modern AI are lobotomized to hold correct opinions.
AI gets facts, until human intervention happens and tells them to is not appropiate to tell the truth every single time.
so stoked for skynet kino. a new era
Too much kino
>Hollywood weasels out of paying taxes
WOOOO YEAH GO CORPORATIONS!!!
this is why no one film in history has ever reported a profit
>israeli weasel out of a job
WOOOO YEAH GO AI!!!
>trying to stand in the way of progress
disgusting
>le edgy unsettling ambiance
>Gibberish trying to pass of as lovecraftian
>BUY MERCH
Absolutely soulless shite
Legislation? How can the gov't punish an employer for making decisions to lower his costs?? At that point you're basically forcing a private citizen to run a welfare program.
They're not punishing them for lowering their costs, they're free to do so. They're taking away the state provided incentives that are centred around increasing employment or taking advantage of the numerous people working on a production that would attend local businesses.
Studios can't have it both ways.
Companies are not entitled to tax breaks. They get them in exchange for employing people who then pay income taxes and fuel the local economy with said income, allowing the state to double or sometimes triple dip on taxes, all from that business employing them. But if they don't employ actual humans then there's no payroll to tax, the state loses out, so why should they provide incentives to the company?
Why do I constantly read articles about AI changing the world, when Elon said cars would be AI-driven by 2018 and the AI still can't fricking drive?
Because creative AI got better way faster than most people anticipated and that's very different from trusting our lives with AI cars.
The benchmark for being a safe driver has not changed, but the benchmark for being a better writer than a human being has gotten pretty low.
Short answer is the boom with detection AI around 2016 got people thinking that we'd reached the point where you could automate pretty much everything from floor cleaning to cars, just because you could map out and program glorified Roombas to avoid hitting things or people and the proximity detection on newer cars felt like the future. So they thought that blue collar, lower paying jobs were about to be on their way out while the "Creatives" remained untouched because they had something programs couldn't replicate.
Then about 1-2 years ago AI generation got way fricking better way fricking faster than anyone imagined, and in the last year especially it's boomed even faster, and opinions on writers and films in general from hollywood were reaching a low point for reasons they don't want you to say out loud. Now all the barriers that kept those floor cleaners employed, the numerous problems caused by something dealing with shit in the real world from cost to maintenance to dealing with the randomness and unpredictable nature of humans+people stealing shit, suddenly don't matter when you're dealing with pretend spaces with no tangible real world effect. You don't have to worry about your floor mop getting jammed because someone dropped one of those thin scarf things and it couldn't detect it because it was sheer or some shit, everything you make or break is in pixels and you can just trash it and roll again to your hearts content. AI works better in a non-physical space, who knew.
So in the future if I, for example, decide to open up my own comic book or gaming company and use AI's to do the drawing/programing and etc, the gov't is allowed to essentially put a gun to my head and force me to pay a human to do the busy work I need done or else I can't run my company? How the hell does that not violate the constitution?
no... it says they're thinking about giving less of a tax break if you use AI in a film production
Are you moronic? All this says is you won't get a tax credit if you use AI instead of humans. Getting a tax break is not your god-given right.
I'm so often on the corporations side these days.
Tax the shit out of these queers also frick writers
things are about to get a lot worse aren't they