What kind of moronic logic is this? >if a totally unrelated film about a different character with a different cast in a different setting performed just as well as the Batman film, we'd have made a sequel to the Batman film
I mean, yeah, sure. But why pin the chances of a sequel on a totally unrelated film? "We would have made Spider-Man: No Way Home, but Captain Marvel made shit money, so clearly there's no market for a Spider-Man film."
It's about shaming DCucks into watching the flash again. If a BB movie was really profitable they'd make it regardless and wouldn't tell you until it's already cast.
>It's about shaming DCucks into watching the flash again. If a BB movie was really profitable they'd make it regardless and wouldn't tell you until it's already cast.
This makes 100% sense and is almost certainly the case, good point
Everything they’ve done is petty
“Reeee you only made $873m for us on Batman vs Superman not $1b, we’re firing Henry Cavill and keeping you in suspense if he’ll be back just to spite you”
Old batman had a better relationship with barry than regular batman. I cannot see keaton as bitter batman beyond bruce, he'd work better as a mentor to the justice league. Shame they had to do a stupid joke ending for the sake of gunnverse reboot.
Michael Keaton is like the least Batman guy ever
what makes you say that?
He is a skinny guy with a wrinkly face and a high pitched voice
he was batman and owlman and vultureman
nobody is more flying thing man
Considering the absolute state of DC at the moment, that would have likely have been terrible.
Nostalgia baiting is so tiring.
What kind of moronic logic is this?
>if a totally unrelated film about a different character with a different cast in a different setting performed just as well as the Batman film, we'd have made a sequel to the Batman film
Like what the frick lmao
All capeshit is the same
I mean, yeah, sure. But why pin the chances of a sequel on a totally unrelated film? "We would have made Spider-Man: No Way Home, but Captain Marvel made shit money, so clearly there's no market for a Spider-Man film."
the logic of the people in charge of the DCU
It's about shaming DCucks into watching the flash again. If a BB movie was really profitable they'd make it regardless and wouldn't tell you until it's already cast.
>It's about shaming DCucks into watching the flash again. If a BB movie was really profitable they'd make it regardless and wouldn't tell you until it's already cast.
This makes 100% sense and is almost certainly the case, good point
Another day another beating.
>tranime
Get out.
Capeshit is run by trannies
Why is Goku about to rape Superman?
Sounds like bitter execs being petty.
>you didn't watch our slop, now you don't get your reward!!!!
Everything they’ve done is petty
“Reeee you only made $873m for us on Batman vs Superman not $1b, we’re firing Henry Cavill and keeping you in suspense if he’ll be back just to spite you”
All the merch was batman stuff.
Why not make Into the Bat-verse? Or make Batman Beyond right away? Why depend on the Flash?
Why not make that in the first place? The Flash film isn't a Batman film
good, i don't want DC making a batman beyond movie and turning terry into blackman
More like Notman.
Who would you cast as Terry?
rob pattison would have been great if he was younger but he is already batman.
you know damn well they are going to cast a Black person
>We would have ruined more if it wasn't for you!
Good to know they can only ruin so much
Dammit, we can't have anything nice
Inque was hot and I don't care what anyone says
Man that OST is fantastic.
Only literal boomers give a shit about Michael Keaton's Batman.
I feel bad for him at this point. He got two comeback Batman films, one is shelved forever, the other most his scenes were cut.
Old batman had a better relationship with barry than regular batman. I cannot see keaton as bitter batman beyond bruce, he'd work better as a mentor to the justice league. Shame they had to do a stupid joke ending for the sake of gunnverse reboot.