yeah this is only time i would put him in the wrong
i grew up poor but not hungry and yes in multiple moments I have seen food in the trash or recently put on the ground and ate it because I was unsatisfied, i saw nuggets sitting on top of trash outside a minimart and they were bomb
>i saw nuggets sitting on top of trash outside a minimart and they were bomb
you are disgusting
i grew up poor but not hungry and yes in multiple moments I have seen food in the trash or recently put on the ground and ate it because I was unsatisfied, i saw nuggets sitting on top of trash outside a minimart and they were bomb
Yes. Never seen a good argument against eating it >b-b-but it was below le rim XD
For like a minute or less, which George knew. It was on top of a magazine and was further protected by that doily thing. Sorry but George was clearly in the right here
He doesn't actually know what was wrong with it or who put their bodily fluids on it. It was in the trash for a reason, and it might have been a good reason.
It being in the containment of the trash can meant that it would have been contaminated by the fumes of whatever else is in the trash. Also everyone is missing the point that she didn't see the actual contents of the trash can and assumed reasonably that he just took a half eaten piece of food out of the trash and ate it
When I worked retail and had to go around collecting garbage from around the store there was a box of these chocolate eggs in the bin and I ate a bunch of them. I figured since they were wrapped and in a box it was fine.
Yeah, I would eat that old lady's ass.
You will eat the trash
I dont like eclairs
I would have eaten it, but not in someone elses home. It's just not a great look.
This really never made sense, why would George eat trash
His glasses and stature make him somewhat of a raccoon..and wash bears (the German name for them, Waschbären) do eat trash.
He's fat
Because larry david did it.
As stated in an interview every character in Seinfeld is part of Larry David's psyche and Larry David is a psychopathic israelite
No its in the trash container and has absorbed the garbage fumes
No, the other person may have AIDS or dropped it. Things in the garbage were put there for a reason.
*would you of
I hope you're just pretending to be moronic for (You)s.
Nope. If it was a bin with no lid and I was at a family dinner, maybe. Closed bin and in a situation like that? No way.
No. This was one of the rare few times that George was in the wrong. I'm a /georgebro/ but even I have to admit he was wrong here
yeah this is only time i would put him in the wrong
>i saw nuggets sitting on top of trash outside a minimart and they were bomb
you are disgusting
>jack24.webm
I need the jaCinemaphile folder, NOW!!!
Only during the Summer of George
i grew up poor but not hungry and yes in multiple moments I have seen food in the trash or recently put on the ground and ate it because I was unsatisfied, i saw nuggets sitting on top of trash outside a minimart and they were bomb
He was in the wrong. Same with double dipping. Crazy to think there was a time before double dipping and seinfeld educated everyone
What's your feeling on double dipping with the un-bitten part of the chip?
Not him, but with family and close friends it's okay
why was he going to put the dishes in the garbage
they were dirty
The real question is what would compel a man to open the trashcan if they're just carrying dirty dishes to the sink?
To scrap the food thats left over into it you fricking mongoloid
He was American
Yes. Never seen a good argument against eating it
>b-b-but it was below le rim XD
For like a minute or less, which George knew. It was on top of a magazine and was further protected by that doily thing. Sorry but George was clearly in the right here
He doesn't actually know what was wrong with it or who put their bodily fluids on it. It was in the trash for a reason, and it might have been a good reason.
It's partially eaten food in a virtual stranger's house, that alone is reason enough not to eat it.
No it's not.
It being in the containment of the trash can meant that it would have been contaminated by the fumes of whatever else is in the trash. Also everyone is missing the point that she didn't see the actual contents of the trash can and assumed reasonably that he just took a half eaten piece of food out of the trash and ate it
Better question
What kind of psychopath just takes a bite then throws out a perfectly good cookie?
No. You never know where it might have been before.
Maybe someone sneezed on it or maybe it dropped on the ground
No. Someone took a bite out of it and infested the cream with their nasty mouth bacteria.
>infested the cream with their nasty mouth bacteria
George was a double-dipper. I doubt he'd care.
I'm not a fatty, so no
>all the trash fumes circulating in there
no? even if there wasn't a bite already taken out of it, its obviously in the wrong
When I worked retail and had to go around collecting garbage from around the store there was a box of these chocolate eggs in the bin and I ate a bunch of them. I figured since they were wrapped and in a box it was fine.
I ate the eclair
No. I just got out of the pool.
it could have been sitting in the trash for a day
>on top of a doily
>thats on top of a bunch of magazines (not even dirty garbage)
It was perfectly fine to eat. George was 100% in the right
>but le trash fumes!
You are a moron
yo, bobo, shouldn't you be out hibernating instead of rummaging through garbage cans?
She just said there was still food out, why eat something from the trash?
Not then and there. I would've put it in my pocket or something, or at least made sure no one was around.
No but I would have said that I did.