*Beep*

Saying something facetiously does not make it untrue.

>Absolute proof shouldn't be a prerequisite for belief in something
Correct, it should be proof beyond a reasonable doubt. You have zero proof whatsoever for your claims, so I have reasonable doubt. In fact I have no reason whatsoever to believe anything you're claiming because you've put forward zero evidence. Imagine showing up to trial and saying "U-uhh, just trust me he did it!! Look at the cameras!!" and people look at the camera footage and nothing's on it. Then you try to convince the judge and jury that it actually happened, it was all just invisible and to "have faith" that it really happened. This is moronic delusion and not worth anything, your case would be thrown out immediately because it's nonsense. If you want to believe nonsense that's on you, stop trying to make me entertain your delusions. It's on the same level as a troony trying to convince me he's a woman.

>But I rely on science to explain religion.
The scientific process cannot explain religion because it requires proof and experimentation. There is no proof for the supernatural and all experimental data actively disproves it. What are you talking about?

>The likelihood that something conscious and intelligent made us far outweighs the likelihood that something random did.
You only say this because of your own biases and cannot conceive of alternatives

All of that has been relentlessly debunked. I'm sorry you stopped reading at these authors and never looked into their rebuttals. Quite ironic you're accusing others of not reading when you stopped halfway through.

Lmao, I'm not saying you can find God with the scientific method.
I'm saying what we do find with the scientific method is best explained by God.

So basically, what you're saying is unverifiable schizobabble nonsense.

It is braindead because it's something asserted with no proof. Why not just say "I don't know, there is no compelling evidence" instead of coming up with some nonsense?

The idea of science is directly opposed to a universe of randomness. If the universe is subject to a random existence then you can not reliably record repeating phenomena.

What you just said is absolutely irrelevant to the question of whether God/the supernatural exists. It proves absolutely nothing, it argues for absolutely nothing, other than the observable fact that the universe has order to it. Did you think I was going to argue against that? Whether the universe has order to it or not makes absolutely zero difference when coming up with copes for why a deity supposedly exists, other than ascribing that order to your deity, which, again, there is zero proof for. It's you using faulty, backwards logic to arrive at a preconceived conclusion.

I've read Aquinas and I've also read the rebuttals that BTFO him, you should try doing the second part but you're too cowardly and want to cling to your belief system rather than being intellectually honest. It's also fairly obvious why he's wrong if you have critical thinking skills. Overall, not very compelling.

>if I strawman him, then I can win!
Okay, enjoy that victory over whatever made up redditor you're arguing with. Maybe you should make a webcomic so you can illustrate it and feel even better.

This is getting repetitive.
Because the evidence we have makes it the most logical option to me.
The point of science isn't just saying
>I don't know better just leave it alone!
Right?
We're supposed to try and best figure things out.
And the idea of something intelligent making something intelligent makes more sense than something unintelligent randomly making intelligence.
Just a kind of basic idea. I don't know how else I can word this.

Alright. Maybe one day I'll wake up and find it more logical that everything just happened to be as perfectly designed as it is, but until then, I'll wait for the proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

The perfection that allows us to even exist in the first place. The perfection that allows mistakes to form.
Science observes on a minimal scale all it wants, but at the end of the day, it can't answer on a big scale. And the theories it has aren't fulfilling, as they rely on just as much happenstance and gap filling as religion does.
It took me a long time to notice it, but finally seeing it really opened my eyes.
Science has small answers, but its big answers are clouded in just as much guesswork.

>No, Schizobabble, Black person, moronic, Cope, Delusion
This is what I mean. No actual attempt to prove anything, just personal incredulity. This is what science comes down to when it isn't being used in it's most logical manner.
Perfection must exist, or else imperfection would not. Therefore, yes, life is both perfect and imperfect. Not perfect because it is imperfect, but capable of being imperfect because it is at some level, perfect.
I need to start working pretty soon, so is there anything else you'd like to add of substance before I stop actively replying?

That is literally what they're doing. Some schools don't let students get graded less than 50% and others are doing away with grades altogether.

Where I grew up you were automatically pushed up to the next grade, no matter how shit a student you were, until high school. I think even the legit tards had their own system for that as well.

If this 'equity' israeli meme is dispelled, what's next for blacks?

>or Asian.

The Asians vote Dem and every vote they cast is a stab in the back to whites.

Sure, you can hang around them, but I hope you are wary or show videos of blacks attacking their elderly.

That’s just usually white envy though.

For quite some time you're gonna have many districts that will not be able to afford to hire teachers, or has a total lack of hiring options

Anon, there is literally nothing - NOTHING - that teachers can do if they're assigned to inner city schools. All the kids have single moms who are addicted to crack. Their early childhood was all screaming and fighting and drug abuse. They never faced any discipline. They were never taught any values whatsoever. They outnumber their teachers 50:1. What exactly do you think a teacher is going to be able to accomplish with them? Do you think better funding and training would increase your chances of teaching the chimps in the zoo enclosure to pass math tests? It's just not going to happen.

You have to start somewhere anons. A few thousand years ago the Romans thought Anglos were all morons who would never amount to anything and look how they turned out. Learn to crawl before learning to walk and all that.

The native britons were not anglos, anon. The anglos showed up centuries after rome subjugated britain. Also, the britons immediately took to the roman way of life, learned to read and write, and they are not of massively inferior genetic stock. This is shown by their ability to assimilate and even surpass the romans. Meanwhile blacks cannot assimilate anywhere on the planet, with a few rare individual exceptions.

This doesn't invalidate my original point in any way so I don't give a shit.

The native britons were not anglos, anon. The anglos showed up centuries after rome subjugated britain. Also, the britons immediately took to the roman way of life, learned to read and write, and they are not of massively inferior genetic stock. This is shown by their ability to assimilate and even surpass the romans. Meanwhile blacks cannot assimilate anywhere on the planet, with a few rare individual exceptions.

Imagine the rape.

>You have to start somewhere anons. A few thousand years ago the Romans thought Anglos were all morons who would never amount to anything and look how they turned out. Learn to crawl before learning to walk and all that.

And how violent was this attempt to teach Anglos how to walk?

>answer question correctly unlock a single TikTok swipe
Children have the attention span of dogs these days and our response must be Pavlovian

When I was in kindergarten they thought i was moronic (i wasn’t, it was just ADD and bad finger dexterity from playing N64 too much) and put me in a sped class with troglodytes and they used to reward us for engaging in the lesson with M&Ms. Shit worked.

?si=DArLkwcsbSCtAbd_