This. I'd much rather be a stay at home dad and takes my kids to the park, teach them how to read, cut the grass, do house chores, and cook than have to go to work.
A woman's primary function is nurturing BABIES, Once a child reaches the age of reason (~7 years old) they're supposed to have decreased time in the house with their mother and increased time out in the world with their father. The mother is there to love, nurture, and feed unconditionally because a baby/very young child is both physically and mentally unable to help themselves. The father's role is to take over and show the child how to start doing things for themselves once they're old enough to walk, talk, and have a solid understanding of right and wrong. We've created this lie that children are solely the domain of the mother and the father just goes out and brings all the food home for the woman and child until the child is 18 and then they just magically become a full fledged adult after living like an infant for nearly 2 decades, which is why we have so many manchildren and entitled childish women in the world today.
Bruh let's be real here. If you don't have a shit job you're probably only working a couple hours and then chilling the rest of the day. That's not that different from cooking and doing the chores everyday.
I know you probably have one of the most laborious jobs out there, but I get my salary work done in an hour and a half. Cooking and cleaning takes me longer and is more physically demanding. Do you think we all work the same job? Because *that* would be moronic.
I know so many women who can't stand playing with children. It doesn't make any sense. It isn't like they are super cereal people, either. It just seems like anything outside of pouring cheese sauce and margaritas down their throat and getting drunk and shaking their ass to shitty music isn't fun and exciting.
Children that are your own can too. There isn't some switch that just comes on that makes you love and worship your children once you have them. It's another scam that traps you.
>Modern women are the most uncaring creatures and unfit to take care of children.
Always were. It was no different in your grandmother's generation, just talked about less. A relatively small number of human beings are actually genetically fit to reproduce.
wow, more divisive commie propaganda to destroy traditional gender roles and promote perversion that is leading to the collapse and import of the third world into all western countries to destroy them from within
so stunning so brave
>in theaters this fall
Is this a joke? I mean, I could understand, maybe, if this was some straight to netflix turd that the plebeians watch because they will watch anything sitting with blank expressions on their sofas. I can't however imagine anyone going to the movies to watch this obvious garbage. This movie poster is some AI made joke? Right?
Society is just now waking up to the fact that not all women like children. My sister would rather know everything there is to know about the American civil war than change a diaper. She honestly would make an awful mom.
See that's the thing, we were raised in a strict Christian household by she rebelled from the start. There are just some women out their that you can't force into the box no matter how hard you try. My parents have accepted they weren't getting a traditional child pretty early on.
>There are just some people you can't force into a box >There are just some people that do not fulfill their biological purpose and are genetic dead ends, because they were mindfricked by "society"
It's the modern day culling.
That's a fallacy. It's only a small subset who are dreadful people who would be abusive and should not have kids. It's a skill like anything, and you learn as you go and get better.
Anyone that falls for the meme that your selfish for living your life on your own terms is a cuck that deserves to be screwed over by society. You only get one life.
>live your life on your own terms
Except women don't do that you stupid homosexual. Ever.
They live life sponging off every single man around them with sugar daddy government stealing it all for them at gunpoint.
And there are pussy-worshipping cucks like you saying they should be allowed to.
Nah you gotta have some form of passion for it. I've know women that just had kids from societal pressure and they really fricked up their kids. Props to people like this anons sister for not bringing about more problems for everyone else to clean up
>I've know women that just had kids from societal pressure and they really fricked up their kids
Back in the 50s the message a generation of women were fed was "be the perfect housewife", "have kids", "buy a new refrigerator and Buick. cons00m" and many couldn't handle it and broke down. they abused the kids they never really wanted anyway who as soon as they hit puberty rebelled by doing drugs, having random free sex, committing crime, becoming roving serial killers, etc. frick, no wonder boomers were so messed up.
Well yeah there's a lot of genetic rejects, always has been but they're not as forced to conform by society as they were in the 1950s. Back then a lot of people who clearly shouldn't have reproduced did because it was expected of them and it was why the boomer generation had so much crime and serial killers.
>Society is just now waking up to the fact that not all women like children.
In a natural environment that wouldn't make sense. The women who love children would outbreed the ones that hate them. It's actually pretty incredible that the environment has changed so much that it makes women hate children where previously they would love them.
>Society is just now waking up to the fact that not all women like children
Well that's too fricking bad.
Because if the c**ts aren't having children why the frick are men expected to spend so much money keeping the useless parasites alive?
Fricking lmao. Imagine thinking women should be allowed to have a '''''choice'''' about anything. Imagine being that much of a fricking cuck.
Giving women a '''''choice'''''' means letting them survive off the fruits of men without having to give anything in return.
>NNOOOOOO I CAN'T JUST TAKE CARE OF A BABY FOR A FEW YEARS AND THEN DO 2 HOURS OF WORK A DAY ONCE IT'S IN SCHOOL I NEED A CAREER WHERE I MAKE POWERPOINT PRESENTATIONS IN SOME BUSY-WORK OFFICE JOB FFUUUUCCCKKK I'M GOING TO TURN INTO A DOG NOW
“Nightbitch” is a novel written by Rachel Yoder. The book was published in 2020 and has garnered attention for its unique premise. The story revolves around an unnamed protagonist, referred to as “Nightbitch.” She is a stay-at-home mother who begins to experience strange and unsettling changes. As she navigates the challenges of motherhood, she becomes convinced that she is turning into a dog. The novel delves into themes of identity, self-discovery, and transformation. The protagonist’s physical changes mirror her internal struggles and desires. The novel critiques societal expectations placed on women, especially mothers. It challenges the idea that motherhood should define a woman’s entire existence. Yoder’s writing style is both poetic and raw. She weaves together humor, surrealism, and emotional depth. The tone oscillates between absurdity and poignant reflection.
>The novel critiques societal expectations placed on women, especially mothers. It challenges the idea that motherhood should define a woman’s entire existence.
Note the implied social constructivism where there's implied to be no biological drive to reproduce or have kids, it's merely an "expectation" placed upon them. More feminist writing where the ideal woman is a 38 year old functional alcoholic wine aunt with no kids who progressively loses her mind and tries to find a child replacement. It's a misery cult through an through.
>Note the implied social constructivism where there's implied to be no biological drive to reproduce or have kids, it's merely an "expectation" placed upon them.
you literally can't read
imagine getting so mad over a passage you misunderstood
I can read, I know feminist theories in and out. They ONLY ever talk about social construction and NEVER address biology, because they believe everything is socially construction. They believe or imply that people are born as grey blob blank slates, thus anything else is thrust upon them by the power structures. If you state their theories directly, you see how stupid and absurd they are.
>They ONLY ever talk about social construction and NEVER address biology, because they believe everything is socially construction. They believe or imply that people are born as grey blob blank slates, thus anything else is thrust upon them by the power structures. If you state their theories directly, you see how stupid and absurd they are.
They're not _wrong_ in the sense that one's upbringing is a large part of who they are, but fail to realize that they became purple haired feminazis not because they made a more enlightened choice that the breeders but because they're damaged human beings who had a terrible upbringing.
>>The novel critiques societal expectations placed on women, especially mothers. It challenges the idea that motherhood should define a woman’s entire existence. >especially mothers. It challenges the idea that motherhood should define a woman’s entire existence.
>Note the implied social constructivism where there's implied to be no biological drive to reproduce or have kids
i highlighted your moronness
No, I know what they're saying. They challenge it because they believe there's no biological basis for women wanting to have children and nurture them. They think that there is no such thing as human nature, and that everything is thrust upon us via power structures. This is called social constructivism. But they also don't directly advocate for blank slate theory, eventhough that's defacto what they argue so they can just go "tee hee, we're just asking questions". But they never put forth a testable hypothesis, and ignore science freely.
Meet women post 28 they go BABY CRAZY if they don't have one. If they are ideologically feminist they channel that crazy into something else. It's ultimately a misery cult.
Novel is rhetorical exercise in metaphors. A live action movie adapting the ideas makes it seem like promoting anti-motherhood with a "role model". Depends on the tone/performance, likely a black comedy/satire of a woman out of her depth. Why would one movie reset the bar for all women, esp if self-proclaimed feminists are the types who consciously want to be "Not my mother". A lot of men also grow up swearing to be the furthest thing from their dads.
>It challenges the idea that motherhood should define a woman’s entire existence
Its been forced on women for so long, a lot of them are completely rejecting it now. We did this to ourselves. All people should have the opportunity to find self actualization on their own terms. The problem is that too many of them get caught up in meaningless work instead of hobbies or interest.
To be fair on the work front, that's partially men's fault as well. When you tie a woman down with kids and hold all the financial power and you're an actual psychopath who shouldn't be married in the first place, those finances become the biggest and easiest manipulation to reach to. It's why a lot of "men" want child support and shit to be outlawed now, and divorce to either be outlawed or be really hard to get done.
Child support and alimony are outdated systems based on a society that no longer exists. Ironically, those taxes you're talking about support my point more than they do yours
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
A society where there are two parents, you mean? Pay up, deadbeat.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Why do you keep calling me a deadbeat? Are you a woman seeing your ex boyfriend here? Deal with your choices, single mommy.
Also, explain why child support and alimony are owed to someone who makes the same amount of money as you. Explain it like somebody who has a set of morals and not a set of ovaries.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
A mother with young kids most likely doesn't have a job in the first place. If she was made a mother young she most likely doesn't have any work experience at all. So not only is it still hard for women with children to get jobs, we've got a second parent who's being a deadbeat piece of shit. If a woman wins custody, full-stop, you need to pay. They're still legally your children, but your dumb ass lost the right to them. "B-but the courts always side with women!" Men who dedicate their time to winning custody win 60% of cases. Deadbeats lose. If you ever lose your kids, take the hint.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
No, that's all false. Statistically women have actually grown in their 'value' (pay rate, etc) while in marriage. Divorced women tend to make more money than their ex husbands while also taking half of their ex husbands' pay.
Men do not win custody cases 60% of the time on average. The vast majority of the time the woman will fake an injury to herself or the child and win. Prenuptial agreements are routinely thrown out by judges.
There is no logical basis for alimony and child support still existing in modern society. Thank you for stopping with the random deadbeat namecalling.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
You have literally nothing to back any of that up, and you're a reddit spacer.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Why do you attack the person instead of the argument over and over? None of what I did was reddit spacing btw, those were all just paragraphs. Really short paragraphs, but paragraphs nonetheless.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
The last one was two sentences, which isn't a paragraph. Also, you didn't attack my argument either, you just said it was wrong and didn't show proof.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Paragraphs do not have a minimum sentence requirement in non academic writing. For instance, this is a paragraph.
I did attack your argument, I just didn't cite any sources. Rest assured, though, women do make as much as men, if not more. These are things you can look up. If society hasn't collapsed by 2060 or 2070, child support and alimony laws will likely look very different.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Paragraphs do not have a minimum sentence requirement in non academic writing
Oh, okay.
So that was a paragraph.
And so is this.
If this isn't academic writing, why are you spacing paragraphs?
That's weird.
Are you following academic rules or not?
Pick one. >Rest assured, though, women do make as much as men, if not more
I didn't say some women don't make as much as men. They do. In fact women should be surpassing men if they haven't already, as women are more educated on average now. What I said that you said was wrong and didn't bother looking up yourself is that men win 60% of custody battles where they fully comply with the judge, talk to their lawyers, show up for every court date, and aren't abusive pieces of shit. And they do. Here, I'll give you a quote from a study you can look up yourself that's less generous than the numbers I'm currently giving you: >"Phyllis Chesler interviewed 60 mothers involved in a custody dispute and found that fathers who contest custody are more likely than their wives to win (p. 65). In 82% of the disputed custody cases fathers achieved sole custody despite the fact that only 13% had been involved in child care activities prior to divorce (p. 79 tbl. 5). Moreover, 59% of fathers who won custody litigation had abused their wives, and 50% of fathers who obtained custody through private negotiations had abused their wives (p. 80 tbl. 6)."
There you go. Now engage for real this time.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Your first 3 sentences were all the same idea, and should have been the same paragraph. If you can fully convey your idea, that's a paragraph. You had to add on to it multiple times.
You just linked a study involving 60 people total. That's cool, but we are trying to talk big picture here, if this is an actual argument you're making in good faith (that is sarcasm, I know this is a bad faith argument you're making).
Here are the takeaways I want you to remember:
1. Women make more money than men
2. Women are awarded with half of the male's earnings in most--if not all--divorce cases
3. Women are awarded full custody at a rate of 91%
4. Women are the primary payees of child support, and in cases where men win child support as sole custody, they are paid less on average than women
These are all situations that shouldn't be true at the same time. It's a failing of society that will ideally be rectified soon.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
You're the one being bad faith here is what I'm pointing out. Like, have you ever looked further into any of this? >Women make more money
Which ones? Right now young women with Masters degrees who are over 30 and childless do. Which ones are you talking about, and what about women as a whole?
Do you not see how you're coming to a conclusion with limited knowledge that favors limited outcomes when looked at together? Put it under a more precise lense.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
This was never a specific argument. The point is and always has been that child support and alimony shouldn't exist in the current economic climate. If you make the same as or more than your partner, why should you be entitled to half of what they earn and have in the event of a separation?
>It challenges the idea that motherhood should define a woman’s entire existence.
FINALLY. There has never been a work of media in DECADES to say this. No one has promoted this idea ANYWHERE in the media for the last 50 years.
Wouldn't this be much more comparable for the husband that has to throw away all his dreams, aspirations, and sense of self to work a deadend job to support his family?
Men don't exist in feminist writing, which is just female narcissistic writing. They just want to be top dogs (heh) at the top of the tree that everyone worships, without having to do any work. Men are just objects that exist in the background to serve them.
you know, all this shit out there, sometimes I think that this might have a positive effect, like a turbo-charged eugenics program. Think of all the ceaseless messages Whites get; don't have kids, if you have kids have only one, if you have kids and you're White, have them with a non-white, hate your race, hate yourself, sacrifice for the blacks and browns.
The Whites who end up marrying other Whites and having large families are going to be a different breed of White. A White that's more racial-centric, a White that's less susceptible to propaganda, probably, a White that has a higher IQ than the average White. Going forward, those are the kinds of Whites who will exist towards the end of this century. That's a good thing. It's like we're filtering out all of the moronic weak ones. Sure, we're giving up lands but we'll be stronger genetically
>And though Nightb***h is angry, nearly-feral with desperation at this dinner party, she is fricking funny, and not because she says, “I could crush a walnut with my vegana! to no one in particular,” when she turns over the dinner table.
Why are we living in a society where women are sex obsessed literally all the time but call men pigs if men meet their energy?
It is the hardest in human history it has ever been to reproduce as a male now I think. You have to be near zen tier patience level and your social skill has to be perfect to land hot women. You have to be playing life like you're on a newgame+ mode to really succeed as a man
>Why are we living in a society where women are sex obsessed literally all the time but call men pigs if men meet their energy?
Unless you're a newbie, you know exactly why.
Read Culture of Critique.
Listen to the audio if that's more your speed.
>“I could crush a walnut with my vegana! to no one in particular,”
MOTHERS could be here, thought Nightbitch. I've never been to this house party before. There could be MOTHERS anywhere. The cool air contioned hepa-filtered air felt good against her chest even as the $9 rose wine circulated through her powerful veins and washed away her (merited) fears of motherhood.
>thrown into this unnatural situation where God forbid, you stay at home to raise your child as a woman >ends up transforming into some furry, bestiality situation where you don't want the child anymore but to just frick dogs
Frick modern women honestly. I am done.
I babysit a toddler for about 10 hours a week. It's fricking nothing. You change a diaper, you feed them, you put them down for a nap, you take them for walks. It's the easiest fricking job on the planet. 10 hours a week and I have the little shit trained to help me clean up the house, too.
>left high pitch scream tantrums >right cries for hours straight at night >above autisticaly screeches, jumps around and drags furniture >back building scream fights
I'll never have children
>Mom of 2 >Was essentially a SAHM until my youngest started preschool (I worked as an evening cashier for some fun money) >Enjoyed spending going to the local library, kid events, the park, reading books, watching movies, etc.
I'll never understand how anyone could completely hate being a SAHM. If you really crave some sort of adult interaction, coordinate and get a part time job - Walmart was ez as frick. Made dinner, left for work at 6pm, got home at 10pm - the only thing I missed was bedtime and my husband didn't mind doing that.
Honestly, I really miss it but both my kids are in school all day so it's not practical for me to be at home.
The female Falling Down? It doesn't have to be a rejection of motherhood, just venting. Like the breadwinner is allowed to vent. "Both sides" don't have to make it so combative.
Ofc, this can seem inflammatory cos MR MOM is played as a comedy. SAHD are "funny" to feel unappreciated or the odd man out, but SAHM become a "feminist" issue even if they have problems adjusting to a new "job".
I genuinely do not understand what is so bad about children. I have two and the worst of it is mostly in the first three months or so.
Does it suck, to some degree? Sure
Does your life go on hold? No, it's really not that bad. Children can go on planes and you can teach them a bunch. I really do not get the issue with these things.
Yeah if you had a baby with an issue, sure probably a lot worse than I had it. But like...they're you're kids, how could do anything but love them?
Frickin Zoomlennials think you need to make 500K yearly and be 65 years old to have even ONE kid because you need to be sure your life is over so your kid doesn't ruin your life lmao
Millennials and zoomers got raised by baby boomers and gen Xers who b***hed constantly about how they had to spend money on their kids. It spooked them into thinking children would destroy their finances and cut into their free time.
>It challenges the idea that motherhood should define a woman’s entire existence.
FINALLY. There has never been a work of media in DECADES to say this. No one has promoted this idea ANYWHERE in the media for the last 50 years.
Constant revolution. every time is the first time. First openly gay movie character. first black lead. First woman to not be defined by her relationship to men. Every year is year zero.
>woman movie about how much they hate their natural maternity, framed within a story about turning into (and presumably fricking) a dog
I mean it writes itself fellas.
>older Women at work love children and will run up and play around/hug them >young women get into a really weird defensive sarcastic mannerisms and then quickly wanna head back to there desk or leave to go partying
you cannot tell me this isnt social conditioning done on purpose to ruin a country
Then the women who have children get bored of the dad, turn him crazy, tell everyone he's a "narcissistic abuser" and divorce rape him. Months later, they go on to dating sites making demands of men, act arrogant, and put pictures of themselves WITH THEIR KIDS' FACES up on their profiles.
These women deserve the metaphorical boot on the neck until they quit the reproduction game in shame. I feel complete sadness for the kids in these broken homes they've created.
Western bawds hate kids because they're all on birth control and antidepressants. Their brains are Bayer petri dishes, and when they do finally wake up from the chemical lobotomy, they're 40 with a carton of rotten eggs.
>But why would our heckin based pharmaceutical industry do this to them?
Having babies would take them out of the workforce, which is bad for GDP.
>I wasn't cast as the toddler
fricking bullshit
>the antinatalist flick doesn't cast a DEI negress
Really jogs the nog
>antnatalist
sauce?
The disgusting, degrading roles still go to whites.
>Emma Stone in Poor Things
>Tom Holland getting ass fricked in that gay thing
What is so fun about going to work anyway? I would rather stay home.
This. I'd much rather be a stay at home dad and takes my kids to the park, teach them how to read, cut the grass, do house chores, and cook than have to go to work.
Women are fricking stupid.
you wouldn't last one day taking care of any kid under age of 8
Why did you say it that way? What the frick is wrong with you?
A woman's primary function is nurturing BABIES, Once a child reaches the age of reason (~7 years old) they're supposed to have decreased time in the house with their mother and increased time out in the world with their father. The mother is there to love, nurture, and feed unconditionally because a baby/very young child is both physically and mentally unable to help themselves. The father's role is to take over and show the child how to start doing things for themselves once they're old enough to walk, talk, and have a solid understanding of right and wrong. We've created this lie that children are solely the domain of the mother and the father just goes out and brings all the food home for the woman and child until the child is 18 and then they just magically become a full fledged adult after living like an infant for nearly 2 decades, which is why we have so many manchildren and entitled childish women in the world today.
Dogs don't go to work either.
Not a popular opinion, but being a housewife/husband is basically a job too. My mom unironically works harder than my dad.
Because you are moronic.
Bruh let's be real here. If you don't have a shit job you're probably only working a couple hours and then chilling the rest of the day. That's not that different from cooking and doing the chores everyday.
>only working a couple hours
Yeah, 100% moron.
Not everyone works at McDonald's like you, you failure.
I know you probably have one of the most laborious jobs out there, but I get my salary work done in an hour and a half. Cooking and cleaning takes me longer and is more physically demanding. Do you think we all work the same job? Because *that* would be moronic.
No kne6 in their right mind would disagree with that opinion.
go back
They made the YJK meme into a movie?
I know so many women who can't stand playing with children. It doesn't make any sense. It isn't like they are super cereal people, either. It just seems like anything outside of pouring cheese sauce and margaritas down their throat and getting drunk and shaking their ass to shitty music isn't fun and exciting.
children are usually fricking annoying, loud little shits
what the frick did I just read?
A summary of modern women
children suck
children who aren't your own are intolerable
Children that are your own can too. There isn't some switch that just comes on that makes you love and worship your children once you have them. It's another scam that traps you.
Modern women are the most uncaring creatures and unfit to take care of children.
>Modern women are the most uncaring creatures and unfit to take care of children.
Always were. It was no different in your grandmother's generation, just talked about less. A relatively small number of human beings are actually genetically fit to reproduce.
It is scientifically documented that children without father figures turn out worse than children without mother figures.
any female born after 1993 can’t cook… all they know is mcdonald’s , charge they phone, twerk, be bisexual , eat hot chip & lie
This is true.
Every modern woman I met can’t cook for shit. They can’t even cook good tacos.
Only older women can cook.
What are hot chips?
That's a Youtube comment section pasta.
I know, but what are hotchips?
Like cheetos
This is just the female equivalent of a stoned-out gamer.
>It doesn't make any sense. It isn't like they are super cereal people, either.
>super cereal people?
That guy you're replying to was stoned as frick.
THEY want to be children. THEY don't want to work.
They're jealous of actual children.
WHAT IF WE MADE GINGER SNAPS
BUT FOR MENOPAUSE
bravo
You just know
>the director of the movie on the right, the author of the book on the left
really make you think
That's a halfu and her mother isn't israeli so she isn't actually considered a israelite.
I consider her a israelite given the demonic blood
kek, this is cope like that scene in Ghostbusters 2 where Bill Murray pilpuls how his dirty shirts aren't really dirty shirts.
They both frick massive dog penis. You just know.
>I NEED TO WASH THE DISHES AND TELL MY KID NOT TO PUT FORK IN AN ELECTRIC SOCKET
>AAAAAAAAAAA I'M GOING INSAAAAAAAAAAAANE
women are so fragile
DAYb***h AAAH FIGHTER OF THE NIGHTb***h AAAAAH
more abortions
Anti-Civilizational propaganda will be a criminal offense. And it will be retroactive.
wow, more divisive commie propaganda to destroy traditional gender roles and promote perversion that is leading to the collapse and import of the third world into all western countries to destroy them from within
so stunning so brave
why are you childless tho?
Imagine implying this when you carved your reproductive organs out and now live as a mutilated freak
That's what happens when you frick dogs. Let this be a warning to you, white girls.
>in theaters this fall
Is this a joke? I mean, I could understand, maybe, if this was some straight to netflix turd that the plebeians watch because they will watch anything sitting with blank expressions on their sofas. I can't however imagine anyone going to the movies to watch this obvious garbage. This movie poster is some AI made joke? Right?
Becoming a dog to frick a dog. Powerful
White woman pitbull owners have assured me that dogs make excellent nannies.
The people responsible for making this shit should be hanged by the neck until dead.
I don't know my man. The idea of having Amy Adams crawling around naked on all fours is kinda based.
Better tagline:
>You Are What Eats You
STRONG.
BRAVE.
Society is just now waking up to the fact that not all women like children. My sister would rather know everything there is to know about the American civil war than change a diaper. She honestly would make an awful mom.
>My sister would rather know everything there is to know about the American Civil War than change a diaper.
I mean, who wouldn't?
Society failed your sister on purpose to make room for more easily controlled brown golems
See that's the thing, we were raised in a strict Christian household by she rebelled from the start. There are just some women out their that you can't force into the box no matter how hard you try. My parents have accepted they weren't getting a traditional child pretty early on.
>There are just some people you can't force into a box
>There are just some people that do not fulfill their biological purpose and are genetic dead ends, because they were mindfricked by "society"
It's the modern day culling.
Someone in your family raped your sister
Well they're Christian, so obviously.
strict "christian" parachurch fify
Your sister is a failed homosexual sapiens.
>you have to be a perfect mother to be a mother!
That's a fallacy. It's only a small subset who are dreadful people who would be abusive and should not have kids. It's a skill like anything, and you learn as you go and get better.
Your sis is just selfish and lazy, sadly.
>selfish
Anyone that falls for the meme that your selfish for living your life on your own terms is a cuck that deserves to be screwed over by society. You only get one life.
>live your life on your own terms
Except women don't do that you stupid homosexual. Ever.
They live life sponging off every single man around them with sugar daddy government stealing it all for them at gunpoint.
And there are pussy-worshipping cucks like you saying they should be allowed to.
Nah you gotta have some form of passion for it. I've know women that just had kids from societal pressure and they really fricked up their kids. Props to people like this anons sister for not bringing about more problems for everyone else to clean up
>I've know women that just had kids from societal pressure and they really fricked up their kids
Back in the 50s the message a generation of women were fed was "be the perfect housewife", "have kids", "buy a new refrigerator and Buick. cons00m" and many couldn't handle it and broke down. they abused the kids they never really wanted anyway who as soon as they hit puberty rebelled by doing drugs, having random free sex, committing crime, becoming roving serial killers, etc. frick, no wonder boomers were so messed up.
kek read about Ed Kemper. that guy was the ultimate boomer with serious mommy issues.
don't have children then
Well yeah there's a lot of genetic rejects, always has been but they're not as forced to conform by society as they were in the 1950s. Back then a lot of people who clearly shouldn't have reproduced did because it was expected of them and it was why the boomer generation had so much crime and serial killers.
>woman
>caring about [military] history
I think anon is implying that his sister isn't very womanly. 4
>Society is just now waking up to the fact that not all women like children.
In a natural environment that wouldn't make sense. The women who love children would outbreed the ones that hate them. It's actually pretty incredible that the environment has changed so much that it makes women hate children where previously they would love them.
That’s called outing yourself from the gene pool due to autism.
>Society is just now waking up to the fact that not all women like children
Well that's too fricking bad.
Because if the c**ts aren't having children why the frick are men expected to spend so much money keeping the useless parasites alive?
Fricking lmao. Imagine thinking women should be allowed to have a '''''choice'''' about anything. Imagine being that much of a fricking cuck.
Giving women a '''''choice'''''' means letting them survive off the fruits of men without having to give anything in return.
Women who don't like children serve no purpose in society. They should be euthanized and ground up into meat paste to feed homeless veterans.
This. If they're not taking care of men or children, then what is the fricking point of their existence.
Ask her this:
Was it about Slavery or State's Rights of Secession?
If she answers the former then she's wasting everyone's time.
Night b***h would totally be playing at the idiocracy movie theatre
There are too many metaphors. Nobody would get it.
>NNOOOOOO I CAN'T JUST TAKE CARE OF A BABY FOR A FEW YEARS AND THEN DO 2 HOURS OF WORK A DAY ONCE IT'S IN SCHOOL I NEED A CAREER WHERE I MAKE POWERPOINT PRESENTATIONS IN SOME BUSY-WORK OFFICE JOB FFUUUUCCCKKK I'M GOING TO TURN INTO A DOG NOW
>maybe be turning into a dog
what the frick
“Nightbitch” is a novel written by Rachel Yoder. The book was published in 2020 and has garnered attention for its unique premise. The story revolves around an unnamed protagonist, referred to as “Nightbitch.” She is a stay-at-home mother who begins to experience strange and unsettling changes. As she navigates the challenges of motherhood, she becomes convinced that she is turning into a dog. The novel delves into themes of identity, self-discovery, and transformation. The protagonist’s physical changes mirror her internal struggles and desires. The novel critiques societal expectations placed on women, especially mothers. It challenges the idea that motherhood should define a woman’s entire existence. Yoder’s writing style is both poetic and raw. She weaves together humor, surrealism, and emotional depth. The tone oscillates between absurdity and poignant reflection.
>The novel critiques societal expectations placed on women, especially mothers. It challenges the idea that motherhood should define a woman’s entire existence.
Note the implied social constructivism where there's implied to be no biological drive to reproduce or have kids, it's merely an "expectation" placed upon them. More feminist writing where the ideal woman is a 38 year old functional alcoholic wine aunt with no kids who progressively loses her mind and tries to find a child replacement. It's a misery cult through an through.
imagine getting so mad over a passage you misunderstood
>Note the implied social constructivism where there's implied to be no biological drive to reproduce or have kids, it's merely an "expectation" placed upon them.
you literally can't read
I can read, I know feminist theories in and out. They ONLY ever talk about social construction and NEVER address biology, because they believe everything is socially construction. They believe or imply that people are born as grey blob blank slates, thus anything else is thrust upon them by the power structures. If you state their theories directly, you see how stupid and absurd they are.
>They ONLY ever talk about social construction and NEVER address biology, because they believe everything is socially construction. They believe or imply that people are born as grey blob blank slates, thus anything else is thrust upon them by the power structures. If you state their theories directly, you see how stupid and absurd they are.
They're not _wrong_ in the sense that one's upbringing is a large part of who they are, but fail to realize that they became purple haired feminazis not because they made a more enlightened choice that the breeders but because they're damaged human beings who had a terrible upbringing.
>>The novel critiques societal expectations placed on women, especially mothers. It challenges the idea that motherhood should define a woman’s entire existence.
>especially mothers. It challenges the idea that motherhood should define a woman’s entire existence.
>Note the implied social constructivism where there's implied to be no biological drive to reproduce or have kids
i highlighted your moronness
No, I know what they're saying. They challenge it because they believe there's no biological basis for women wanting to have children and nurture them. They think that there is no such thing as human nature, and that everything is thrust upon us via power structures. This is called social constructivism. But they also don't directly advocate for blank slate theory, eventhough that's defacto what they argue so they can just go "tee hee, we're just asking questions". But they never put forth a testable hypothesis, and ignore science freely.
Meet women post 28 they go BABY CRAZY if they don't have one. If they are ideologically feminist they channel that crazy into something else. It's ultimately a misery cult.
Frick the roastie israelites, anon.
Your post is pure win.
A pure win that women has only 1 option. While men can decide to be child-free/single for life, just a playboy is pure winning TOO.
Novel is rhetorical exercise in metaphors. A live action movie adapting the ideas makes it seem like promoting anti-motherhood with a "role model". Depends on the tone/performance, likely a black comedy/satire of a woman out of her depth. Why would one movie reset the bar for all women, esp if self-proclaimed feminists are the types who consciously want to be "Not my mother". A lot of men also grow up swearing to be the furthest thing from their dads.
>It challenges the idea that motherhood should define a woman’s entire existence
Its been forced on women for so long, a lot of them are completely rejecting it now. We did this to ourselves. All people should have the opportunity to find self actualization on their own terms. The problem is that too many of them get caught up in meaningless work instead of hobbies or interest.
You speak like someone who doesn't talk to a lot of--or, any--women.
How so?
To be fair on the work front, that's partially men's fault as well. When you tie a woman down with kids and hold all the financial power and you're an actual psychopath who shouldn't be married in the first place, those finances become the biggest and easiest manipulation to reach to. It's why a lot of "men" want child support and shit to be outlawed now, and divorce to either be outlawed or be really hard to get done.
Child support does not make sense in a society where women can and often do make more than men during wedlock.
Paying for your kids makes sense in a society where we use taxpayer money as a social safety net for children. Pay for your kids, deadbeat.
Child support and alimony are outdated systems based on a society that no longer exists. Ironically, those taxes you're talking about support my point more than they do yours
A society where there are two parents, you mean? Pay up, deadbeat.
Why do you keep calling me a deadbeat? Are you a woman seeing your ex boyfriend here? Deal with your choices, single mommy.
Also, explain why child support and alimony are owed to someone who makes the same amount of money as you. Explain it like somebody who has a set of morals and not a set of ovaries.
A mother with young kids most likely doesn't have a job in the first place. If she was made a mother young she most likely doesn't have any work experience at all. So not only is it still hard for women with children to get jobs, we've got a second parent who's being a deadbeat piece of shit. If a woman wins custody, full-stop, you need to pay. They're still legally your children, but your dumb ass lost the right to them. "B-but the courts always side with women!" Men who dedicate their time to winning custody win 60% of cases. Deadbeats lose. If you ever lose your kids, take the hint.
No, that's all false. Statistically women have actually grown in their 'value' (pay rate, etc) while in marriage. Divorced women tend to make more money than their ex husbands while also taking half of their ex husbands' pay.
Men do not win custody cases 60% of the time on average. The vast majority of the time the woman will fake an injury to herself or the child and win. Prenuptial agreements are routinely thrown out by judges.
There is no logical basis for alimony and child support still existing in modern society. Thank you for stopping with the random deadbeat namecalling.
You have literally nothing to back any of that up, and you're a reddit spacer.
Why do you attack the person instead of the argument over and over? None of what I did was reddit spacing btw, those were all just paragraphs. Really short paragraphs, but paragraphs nonetheless.
The last one was two sentences, which isn't a paragraph. Also, you didn't attack my argument either, you just said it was wrong and didn't show proof.
Paragraphs do not have a minimum sentence requirement in non academic writing. For instance, this is a paragraph.
I did attack your argument, I just didn't cite any sources. Rest assured, though, women do make as much as men, if not more. These are things you can look up. If society hasn't collapsed by 2060 or 2070, child support and alimony laws will likely look very different.
>Paragraphs do not have a minimum sentence requirement in non academic writing
Oh, okay.
So that was a paragraph.
And so is this.
If this isn't academic writing, why are you spacing paragraphs?
That's weird.
Are you following academic rules or not?
Pick one.
>Rest assured, though, women do make as much as men, if not more
I didn't say some women don't make as much as men. They do. In fact women should be surpassing men if they haven't already, as women are more educated on average now. What I said that you said was wrong and didn't bother looking up yourself is that men win 60% of custody battles where they fully comply with the judge, talk to their lawyers, show up for every court date, and aren't abusive pieces of shit. And they do. Here, I'll give you a quote from a study you can look up yourself that's less generous than the numbers I'm currently giving you:
>"Phyllis Chesler interviewed 60 mothers involved in a custody dispute and found that fathers who contest custody are more likely than their wives to win (p. 65). In 82% of the disputed custody cases fathers achieved sole custody despite the fact that only 13% had been involved in child care activities prior to divorce (p. 79 tbl. 5). Moreover, 59% of fathers who won custody litigation had abused their wives, and 50% of fathers who obtained custody through private negotiations had abused their wives (p. 80 tbl. 6)."
There you go. Now engage for real this time.
Your first 3 sentences were all the same idea, and should have been the same paragraph. If you can fully convey your idea, that's a paragraph. You had to add on to it multiple times.
You just linked a study involving 60 people total. That's cool, but we are trying to talk big picture here, if this is an actual argument you're making in good faith (that is sarcasm, I know this is a bad faith argument you're making).
Here are the takeaways I want you to remember:
1. Women make more money than men
2. Women are awarded with half of the male's earnings in most--if not all--divorce cases
3. Women are awarded full custody at a rate of 91%
4. Women are the primary payees of child support, and in cases where men win child support as sole custody, they are paid less on average than women
These are all situations that shouldn't be true at the same time. It's a failing of society that will ideally be rectified soon.
You're the one being bad faith here is what I'm pointing out. Like, have you ever looked further into any of this?
>Women make more money
Which ones? Right now young women with Masters degrees who are over 30 and childless do. Which ones are you talking about, and what about women as a whole?
Do you not see how you're coming to a conclusion with limited knowledge that favors limited outcomes when looked at together? Put it under a more precise lense.
This was never a specific argument. The point is and always has been that child support and alimony shouldn't exist in the current economic climate. If you make the same as or more than your partner, why should you be entitled to half of what they earn and have in the event of a separation?
Kys roastie
>It challenges the idea that motherhood should define a woman’s entire existence.
FINALLY. There has never been a work of media in DECADES to say this. No one has promoted this idea ANYWHERE in the media for the last 50 years.
>gets married
>has a kid
>becomes a b***h
Well ain't that the truth of it, brother! Heheheh.
Wouldn't this be much more comparable for the husband that has to throw away all his dreams, aspirations, and sense of self to work a deadend job to support his family?
Men don't exist in feminist writing, which is just female narcissistic writing. They just want to be top dogs (heh) at the top of the tree that everyone worships, without having to do any work. Men are just objects that exist in the background to serve them.
obviously not. a woman wouldn't be able to make a martyr of herself for doing laundry and feeding a baby that way
you know, all this shit out there, sometimes I think that this might have a positive effect, like a turbo-charged eugenics program. Think of all the ceaseless messages Whites get; don't have kids, if you have kids have only one, if you have kids and you're White, have them with a non-white, hate your race, hate yourself, sacrifice for the blacks and browns.
The Whites who end up marrying other Whites and having large families are going to be a different breed of White. A White that's more racial-centric, a White that's less susceptible to propaganda, probably, a White that has a higher IQ than the average White. Going forward, those are the kinds of Whites who will exist towards the end of this century. That's a good thing. It's like we're filtering out all of the moronic weak ones. Sure, we're giving up lands but we'll be stronger genetically
I doubt it. Is there any historical precedent for anything like this besides the meager native American population?
>What if you were a woman and you were forced to raise a child...with no dad to help??!
>From the twisted mind of Jordan Peele's mother
PUT DOWN THE MAMOSAS NIGHT b***h
Is there a dog catcher character? What about a pet detective?
>And though Nightb***h is angry, nearly-feral with desperation at this dinner party, she is fricking funny, and not because she says, “I could crush a walnut with my vegana! to no one in particular,” when she turns over the dinner table.
https://southernreviewofbooks.com/2021/09/24/nightbitch-rachel-yoder-interview/
Why are we living in a society where women are sex obsessed literally all the time but call men pigs if men meet their energy?
It is the hardest in human history it has ever been to reproduce as a male now I think. You have to be near zen tier patience level and your social skill has to be perfect to land hot women. You have to be playing life like you're on a newgame+ mode to really succeed as a man
>Why are we living in a society where women are sex obsessed literally all the time but call men pigs if men meet their energy?
Unless you're a newbie, you know exactly why.
Read Culture of Critique.
Listen to the audio if that's more your speed.
>“I could crush a walnut with my vegana! to no one in particular,”
MOTHERS could be here, thought Nightbitch. I've never been to this house party before. There could be MOTHERS anywhere. The cool air contioned hepa-filtered air felt good against her chest even as the $9 rose wine circulated through her powerful veins and washed away her (merited) fears of motherhood.
So, it's Wolf for women.
Why would I need kids if I have an avengers statue on my desk?
>thrown into this unnatural situation where God forbid, you stay at home to raise your child as a woman
>ends up transforming into some furry, bestiality situation where you don't want the child anymore but to just frick dogs
Frick modern women honestly. I am done.
>gets his entire experience of women from this shithole
Sounds like a good idea
I babysit a toddler for about 10 hours a week. It's fricking nothing. You change a diaper, you feed them, you put them down for a nap, you take them for walks. It's the easiest fricking job on the planet. 10 hours a week and I have the little shit trained to help me clean up the house, too.
>tfw living in a apartment complex
trust me man, there is some literal hellspawn out there
>left neighbor plays drums and has scream fights
>right neighbor is schizo and is currently in jail for the upteenth time for meth possession
>left high pitch scream tantrums
>right cries for hours straight at night
>above autisticaly screeches, jumps around and drags furniture
>back building scream fights
I'll never have children
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH NOT THE HECKIN SUBURBS!!!
>feral power of motherhood
What?
Women shouldn't work, only as bawds in movies. Thanks, Feminazis.
>Mom of 2
>Was essentially a SAHM until my youngest started preschool (I worked as an evening cashier for some fun money)
>Enjoyed spending going to the local library, kid events, the park, reading books, watching movies, etc.
I'll never understand how anyone could completely hate being a SAHM. If you really crave some sort of adult interaction, coordinate and get a part time job - Walmart was ez as frick. Made dinner, left for work at 6pm, got home at 10pm - the only thing I missed was bedtime and my husband didn't mind doing that.
Honestly, I really miss it but both my kids are in school all day so it's not practical for me to be at home.
The female Falling Down? It doesn't have to be a rejection of motherhood, just venting. Like the breadwinner is allowed to vent. "Both sides" don't have to make it so combative.
Ofc, this can seem inflammatory cos MR MOM is played as a comedy. SAHD are "funny" to feel unappreciated or the odd man out, but SAHM become a "feminist" issue even if they have problems adjusting to a new "job".
Will it at least give us some good werewolf scenes?
I genuinely do not understand what is so bad about children. I have two and the worst of it is mostly in the first three months or so.
Does it suck, to some degree? Sure
Does your life go on hold? No, it's really not that bad. Children can go on planes and you can teach them a bunch. I really do not get the issue with these things.
Yeah if you had a baby with an issue, sure probably a lot worse than I had it. But like...they're you're kids, how could do anything but love them?
Frickin Zoomlennials think you need to make 500K yearly and be 65 years old to have even ONE kid because you need to be sure your life is over so your kid doesn't ruin your life lmao
Millennials and zoomers got raised by baby boomers and gen Xers who b***hed constantly about how they had to spend money on their kids. It spooked them into thinking children would destroy their finances and cut into their free time.
Constant revolution. every time is the first time. First openly gay movie character. first black lead. First woman to not be defined by her relationship to men. Every year is year zero.
On all levels except physical I am Nightbitch
Wait isn't that literally the plot of b***h from 5 years ago.
The title is a naughty word.
In many workplaces, the b***h word is more dangerous than the Black person word.
OK, but is it as good as Fat b***h?
>woman movie about how much they hate their natural maternity, framed within a story about turning into (and presumably fricking) a dog
I mean it writes itself fellas.
>older Women at work love children and will run up and play around/hug them
>young women get into a really weird defensive sarcastic mannerisms and then quickly wanna head back to there desk or leave to go partying
you cannot tell me this isnt social conditioning done on purpose to ruin a country
Then the women who have children get bored of the dad, turn him crazy, tell everyone he's a "narcissistic abuser" and divorce rape him. Months later, they go on to dating sites making demands of men, act arrogant, and put pictures of themselves WITH THEIR KIDS' FACES up on their profiles.
These women deserve the metaphorical boot on the neck until they quit the reproduction game in shame. I feel complete sadness for the kids in these broken homes they've created.
Western bawds hate kids because they're all on birth control and antidepressants. Their brains are Bayer petri dishes, and when they do finally wake up from the chemical lobotomy, they're 40 with a carton of rotten eggs.
>But why would our heckin based pharmaceutical industry do this to them?
Having babies would take them out of the workforce, which is bad for GDP.
>feral power deeply rooted in motherhood