Why are you thinking about Indians so much? Not one of the directors in the post you originally responded to is Indian. It's one israeli guy, a Japanese and the rest are white. What's wrong with you?
>Why are you thinking about Indians so much? Not one of the directors in the post you originally responded to is Indian. It's one israeli guy, a Japanese and the rest are white. What's wrong with you?
7 months ago
Anonymous
Bruh, you're the worst poster on here. Just pure trash coming from you.
7 months ago
Anonymous
are you equating indians with trash? thats not very nice anon
7 months ago
Anonymous
Refering to your posting "style". Personally, I don't even think about Indians, it's you weird freaks bringing them up for some reason.
7 months ago
Anonymous
why are you getting buttmad at the indian comparison then, it only seems to be an issue if you look down on them as a people, or do you?
7 months ago
Anonymous
I keep seeing this type of post and it's just cancer. Disregarding my opinion of them (Indians), your post is just completely off the mark. It has nothing to do with anything. It's spam.
Same as Lars von Trier, he excels in making degenerate misery porn. Stylistically he's interesting of course but I don't think I could recommend any of his movies to a non-mentally ill person without getting into trouble for it.
With Lars it's pretty brutal though, looked at an image of his the other day and it literally made me gag. Guy's ugly inside out. Hope he'll get better.
Was thinking about suggesting Sorrentino and Fukunaga. Problem with both is that their output is too samey. They kind of are one-trick-ponies. With Sorrentino it's less severe because of the beauty of the things his images capture but looking at Fukunaga's stuff it's hard to differentiate the movies from each other, visually. Doesn't help it's all mundane stuff.
i have a friend who is very into korean media and in jest i would say "anon say ho." there is nothing malicious about it, it's just poking fun at someone's particularly korean taste. he doesnt get buttmad
similarly when anon posted his indian-core list, the "sirs" was a friendly nod at his particularly indian taste. no malice or cancer, one only takes offense if he loathes the indian folk, ergo he considers the indian association as derogatory. it has absolutely everything to do with it because it exposes your mean spirit. you are in fact the one being weird about it
DEFINE: «XXI CENTURY Cinemaphile CREATOR».
he's one of the best
>DEFINE: «XXI CENTURY
I believe the new millennium began in 2001
>Cinemaphile CREATOR
directors, visionaries, writers, artists etc
>S. Craig Zahler
>Robert Eggers
>Terrence Malick
>Michael Bay
>Zack Snyder
>Mel Gibson
>George Lucas
>Brothers Dowdle
>Benson & Moorhead
>Hideaki Anno
>Christopher Nolan
>Hideaki Anno
HACK
>Michael Bay
>Zack Snyder
NO
>George Lucas
peaked in the 20th century
Wrong on all accounts.
sirs
Shouldn't it be "sir", singular.
sirs, poosessive participle
Why are you thinking about Indians so much? Not one of the directors in the post you originally responded to is Indian. It's one israeli guy, a Japanese and the rest are white. What's wrong with you?
>Why are you thinking about Indians so much? Not one of the directors in the post you originally responded to is Indian. It's one israeli guy, a Japanese and the rest are white. What's wrong with you?
Bruh, you're the worst poster on here. Just pure trash coming from you.
are you equating indians with trash? thats not very nice anon
Refering to your posting "style". Personally, I don't even think about Indians, it's you weird freaks bringing them up for some reason.
why are you getting buttmad at the indian comparison then, it only seems to be an issue if you look down on them as a people, or do you?
I keep seeing this type of post and it's just cancer. Disregarding my opinion of them (Indians), your post is just completely off the mark. It has nothing to do with anything. It's spam.
>one of the greatest directors ever
>looks ike my uncle Czesiek ze Śląska
Same as Lars von Trier, he excels in making degenerate misery porn. Stylistically he's interesting of course but I don't think I could recommend any of his movies to a non-mentally ill person without getting into trouble for it.
>Lars von Trier
He's mentally ill, Gaspar is just edgy
With Lars it's pretty brutal though, looked at an image of his the other day and it literally made me gag. Guy's ugly inside out. Hope he'll get better.
post image babe
Not gonna look for it again. Just google him, you probably can find plenty. He's clearly not in a good place.
He looks like he lost some weight
Much as Ridley Scott's been producing forgettable blockbuster these last decades, he's also the undeniable king of Sci-Fi kino.
Was thinking about suggesting Sorrentino and Fukunaga. Problem with both is that their output is too samey. They kind of are one-trick-ponies. With Sorrentino it's less severe because of the beauty of the things his images capture but looking at Fukunaga's stuff it's hard to differentiate the movies from each other, visually. Doesn't help it's all mundane stuff.
Michael Mann
Makes me fall asleep. Most of his movies totally lack humanity. Worse than Fincher's.
you lack humanity
I'm superhuman.
Michael Mann is very based too. He filmed a Sarah Gadon sex scene in Ferrari.
>Sarah Gadon's sex scene in Michael Mann's Ferrari.
Cant wait to see it.
Aronofsky
Visually and acting-wise fantastic but always misses the landing because he's into all that schizo shit.
I love refn
*Zzzzzzzzzzzz*
Your sleeping habits are getting out of hand mr potus
I talked to one of the directors of this show about THAT scene in Irreversible. A bit surreal.
Jean Marc Vallee
Gaspar Noe is based, he once had dinner with Sarah Gadon.
Very few have been as polarizing as him
i have a friend who is very into korean media and in jest i would say "anon say ho." there is nothing malicious about it, it's just poking fun at someone's particularly korean taste. he doesnt get buttmad
similarly when anon posted his indian-core list, the "sirs" was a friendly nod at his particularly indian taste. no malice or cancer, one only takes offense if he loathes the indian folk, ergo he considers the indian association as derogatory. it has absolutely everything to do with it because it exposes your mean spirit. you are in fact the one being weird about it