Just watched this documentary. What did I think?
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Beyond the Myth (2010)
Just watched this documentary. What did I think?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
|
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
>You have to make propaganda to convince people these things aren't monsters because they backlog animal shelters the most
Not even joking. I bet a ton of you see adds from those places with these fricking things they try to hock on people.
The pitbull lobby controls a ton of animal advocacy organizations. A ton that used to be general animal welfare orgs are basically just bailouts for pitbull puppy mills and paying for lawyers to cover up children getting mauled.
Now replace pitbull with black and drop the word "animal"and "puppy"
Mhmm wypipo don season dey big mommas
The very first pit propaganda was a news article published by a pitbull breeder claiming they're a "nanny dog" breed. Time is a flat circle.
Less than 1% homosexual.
>her human brother, Tre
>Tre
Pit-mommy confirmed for coalburner.
Or Tre could just be a redneck. I've met a few southern gentlemen with black sounding names who nonetheless despised melanated americans.
Rednecks are just white Black folk.
>Mauled to death by shitbull while having a seizure
>Family believes "it was just trying to help"
This is like something from a comedy sketch.
>ads
>hawk to
i don't care what you thought, they're still bad.
I don't understand why anyone would choose one of these shit dogs when there are a lot of good well behaved breeds that won't brutally kill grandma or the neighbors toddler.
The doc objectively portrays the personalities of the previous owners to be the main reason of why pitbulls are aggressive.
Sorry but the breed/phenotype is inherently aggressive. When you read about a single white woman getting eating by her pack of pit bulls or one killing a newborn because someone in the room sneezed, these were pit bull people not dog abusers.
I have a German shorthaired pointer and guess what? She points. Has ever since she was a puppy and checks off all the behavioral traits of the breed in a predictable fashion: high prey drive, insane energy, likes to work, anxious, a bit of separation anxiety, one-man dog and great with my family. She literally pointed when she was 3 months old that didn’t come from training.
You get a pug you know what to expect same with many other breeds. A husky isn’t going to behave like a husky or a Pomeranian depending on the owner anymore than a pit bull isn’t, generally speaking, going to not be a pit bull ie a breed bred for aggression.
It’s ridiculous to argue otherwise and the only thing worse than pit bulls are delusional pit bull people.
Good post.
It amazes me that people try to project tabula rasa bullshit onto animals created by selective breeding for specific traits.
Few would argue that Jersey dairy bulls aren’t among the most aggressive or that ragdoll cats aren’t extremely docile or that greyhounds don’t have intense prey drives.
These are all traits that were selected and refined by breeding, either purposefully or as a byproduct of breeding for other desirable traits.
Yet for some reason when it comes to pit bulls they are as you said a complete blank slate with no genetic predispositions or inherent traits: they are 100% the products of their owners.
It seems to always return to this
Yeah but that’s false as evidenced by this thread. Or was the 8 y/o pit bull who ate his owner while she had a seizure “just trying to help” like the israelites on TV said?
Literally it’s picrel IRL.
>heroic pitbull eats owner “he was trying to help!”
I've adopted 7 of these mutts from different sources
Launched each of them into a ravine
S
I kneel.
Based.
is it pro or anti pitbull?
I think every pit bull in existence should get a bullet through its brain but this is fricked up
They didn't get asked to be born, they should have their existence ended humanely
Not that guy but a ravine seems pretty humane to me, provided it's high enough.
I would eliminate all pitbull from existence if it meant saving 1 child from an attack
Every single bad encounter I've had with a dog was a pit bull, save for one husky (also an aggressive breed).
>It's the owner, not the breed.
Skinny ginger hipster homosexuals, homeless, white upper class moms, normal friendly suburban families.
It did not matter.
Get a border collie instead, they're god tier.
>illegal in England
>illegal in Russia
>illegal in Germany
>illegal in France
>illegal in Italy
>legal in USA
do americans really?
American identify pitbulls with blacks to the point that they feel a knee-jerk reaction to defend them. Wouldn’t want to be racist, would we?
This. If you acknowledge that shitbulls are genetically predisposed to violence it's only a matter of time before you start asking if the same is true of Black folk. Black folk are America's gods so they need to keep that conversation off-limits
The math doesn't line up. Less than 1% of pitbulls do what you accuse them of, while something like 20-30% of blacks will be in prison for a violent crime at some point in their life. There's no room for comparison.
They both disproportionately injure and kill people relative to their share of the population, so yeah, it's a fair comparison
You really don't see the difference between less than 1% and 20-30%?
No one cares about your garbage dogs. You’re as emotional and moronic as white women thinking they can change criminals and no better than the statistics.
My brother in law killed a shitbull with his bare hands and a brick when it attacked his gf’s 14 year old papillon and that moment I went from having mild contempt for him to realizing he is based as frick.
>No one cares
AH! And the leftist fricktard outs himself with the standard emotional argument and appeal to popularity fallacy. You don't speak for everyone homosexual, and the reality is everyone disagrees with YOUR moronic, asinine, anti-math view.
When these pitties killed an intruder (black) the police station was flooded with THOUSANDS of outraged callers. Outraged callers... DEMANDING the pitties release. How many calls do you think they got from moron Black folk like you? Zero homosexual. No one agrees with YOU. You get that you stupid fricking b***h?
The numbers aren't on your side, the math isn't on your side, the stats aren't on your side. All you have is autistic gore and hatred. Pure unfiltered autism for you to vomit in the darkness online because you're a cowardly piece of shit and you know if you say this shit publicly people will laugh in your stupid fricking face. FRICK you.
Stats are not on your side. I just hope if you ever have kids they are never left alone with your “angel without wings”
>Stats are not on your side
Less than 1% moron. That's on my side, and your b***h ass is so buck broken and TOLD by it you won't even acknowledge it lololololol. Imagine being absolutely bent over and FRICKED by a number destroying your entire moronic argument.
None of your angry whiney autism is going to change that number. Less than 1% of pitbulls harm anyone. Deal with it b***h.
>ummmm there is only a 1% chance me or my kids will be mauled by our dog breed of choice
>checkmate chud
you keep saying "less than 1%" but you've posted no stats to back that claim up, aside from this shit that assumes everyone attacked by a shitbull dies immediately
>You keep saying less than 1%.
18 million pitbulls in the US alone according to google. 1% of 18 million is 180,000. There aren't even a thousand pitbull fatalities a year, and even if we factor in the worthless non-fatal numbers it still doesn't add up to 180,000. So no matter how you slice it, all your autistic screeching is in fact about what LESS THAN ONE PERCENT do, b***h.
>ONLY tens of thousands of shitbulls could kill you at any given moment. OWNED!
>Only tens of thousands.
Anon, you're not very good at math. "200 at most" =/="tens of thousands".
I don't give a shit if it's only 10 of them. All shitbulls should be holocausted.
Name one other breed where a supposedly small amount is responsible for the majority of dog attacks.
Dachsunds. 20% of Dachsunds are said to have attacked someone. Or consult this list:
That list is a bullshit temperament test which means absolutely nothing compared to hard data.
Also that 20% dachshund claim is definitely pulled directly from the ass of that moron in this thread claiming "1%" over and over.
Present your counter stats. OH, what's that? You don't have any? Lmfao. You're pulling your assertions DIRECTLY out of your ass? You just love putting shit in there, don't you? You can't just dismiss statistics that demonstrate how patently moronic your every fricking argument is. You present data which refutes it or you're fricking TOLD.
>Present counter stats to something that doesn't happen
How do you prove a negative, moron? Show me the stats that actually exist.
>How do you prove a negative?
You were presented studies and data, you assert that data is wrong with nothing countering it. Thus, you're making empty assertions. You don't know what "prove a negative" even means you stupid homosexual.
What "studies and data" posted show that 20% of dachshunds have attacked someone? You sure as shit didn't post it.
>18 million pitbulls in the US alone according to google.
No there aren't, you fricking moron. Look at the top results on google. There's a few in the 1 - 5 million range and only one that estimates 20 million from pitbullinfo.org but that is hilariously calculated from shelters and the only reason shelters have so many pitbulls is because they're abandoned at such a high frequency. Animal shelters can't kill them quick enough to keep up with the numbers that keep getting dumped on them.
You really are insanely stupid. Whoever settled on that statistic is blatantly dishonest, hilariously so lol. YOUR source is "worldanimal foundation".
This is the top of the page that link leads to. What number does that say homosexual? WHAT NUMBER b***h? Your own source just bent you over and fricked you AGAIN. TAKE IT. UNNNG. Yeah, and you'll be back because you like it, homosexual.
Don't you realise this means your own claim is contradicted too, homosexual? The same source is claiming 1.3 million on another of their pages. What does that suggest, genius? It means both their claims can be thrown in the bin.
Find me one other source that comes close to 18 million, you ugly Black person. Literally every other one is between 1 - 5 million.
>Don't you realise this means your own claim is contradicted too, homosexual?
Wow, antipitgay can't fricking read lol.
>The same source is claiming 1.3 million on another of their pages.
No moron, it's the same page and it's not saying 1.3 million is all pitbulls in the US, it's saying 7.9% of dogs ADVERTISED FOR SALE are pitbulls, which equates to 1.3 million. Your ENTIRE BASIS FOR THE NUMBER DIDN'T EVEN SAY WHAT YOU WERE TOO STUPID AND LACKED THE READING COMPREHENSION TO UNDERSTAND YOU IMPOSSIBLY STUPID b***h.
Man, I gotta be careful I don't get arrested for slavery considered your homosexual ass just got owned impossibly fricking hard.
>Find me one other source that comes close to 18 million
No, I refuse. Here's four instead:
Mighty peculiar how much you enjoy getting buck broken.
>only 1-in-100 pitbulls have fatally attacked a human chud checkmate!
…….
The link on their page claiming the 18 million comes directly from this https://www.pitbullinfo.org/pit-bulls-population.html.
It's the same source that estimates that 18 million completely off shelter data. It's pulled directly from their ass. It's not accurate and based on anything tangible, just like your common sense.
Imagine you hear that a dog attacked someone. You do not know what breed it is, but if you guess the breed correctly, you'll win a billion dollars. What breed do you guess?
Well as we've established less than 1% of pitbulls attack anyone, while 20% of dachsunds do. So I guess if you're a dumb Black person bad at math you say pitbulls and don't win any money lol.
Dumb homosexual. Any other appeal to emotion arguments you want to embarrass yourself with?
Notice, everyone, how the shitbull defender didn't actually answer the question that was posed to him
I ask again: what would YOU guess?
Dachsunds, 1in5 chance of being correct.
Pitbullls, LESS THAN ONE PERCENT chance of being correct.
Dachsunds is the non-moronic answer. You're a moron though, right?
I'll let this hilariously moronic, statistically illiterate response speak for itself. Dachsunds don't account for two thirds of dog attacks, bud. That's shitbulls. Thanks for revealing what a moron the average pitophile is to everyone ITT.
>Statistically Illiterate
You really don't want to bring up Statistical Literacy in a Pitbull thread.
Less than 1% of pitbulls ever attack anyone, 20% off dachsunds do. None of your bluster and autism will make you any less wrong or bad at math.
>20% off dachsunds do.
Based off what? That temperament test that the conductors admit is not a study or indicative of any statistical significance?
>Based off what?
A different study:
>A study by the University of Pennsylvania discovered that 20% of Dachshunds had bitten a stranger. The majority of the six thousand people study claimed they believed their small dogs had problems with aggressive behavior.
Lol, it's not made up moron. You've seen the stats posted in the thread. And no less than three instances of "shitsunds" killing people:
Am I saying all dachsunds are violent and should be put to death? No moron, the point is these stories are isolated incidents cherry picked for an appeal to emotion. They're not representative of the entire breed, for any breed. Bad dogs should be put down, but if you put down every single bad pitbull that would leave 99.99% of them unharmed.
>20% of Dachshunds had bitten a stranger
>>>
Not only is the study hullshit but who cares if they bite a stranger? If a Dixon bites a stranger what happens? Nothing. If a pitbull bites a stranger(or more likely your elderly mother or child) they’re gonna lose a hand or die.
Seriously what even is your stance here? “Pitbulls sometimes won’t kill you!”
Cool? Not getting one and I’ll poison every single one I see.
>who cares if they bite a stranger?
Hahahaha, demonstrating your own hypocrisy and selective outrage. No matter how much you sperg, all you describe is less than 1% of pitbulls.
>If a pitbull bites a stranger(or more likely your elderly mother or child) they’re gonna lose a hand or die.
Good thing less than 1% of them would, moron. Meanwhile 20% of dachsunds would.
>I’ll poison every single one I see.
The coward says anonymously asserting he'll use the feminine, passive-aggressive murder method of women.
>dachsund attack: maybe get a cut on your hand
>pitbull attack: toddler's throat ripped out
So 1% of pit bulls have fatally killed a person, gotcha. Puts hippos and crocodiles to shame.
You suck at math lmfao. LESS THAN 1%. Not even 1%. God damn, you're reduced to quibbling over even this lmfao.
>A study by the University of Pennsylvania discovered that 20% of Dachshunds had bitten a stranger. The majority of the six thousand people study claimed they believed their small dogs had problems with aggressive behavior.
I cannot find one link to the actual study in question, supposedly from 2008. Just a bunch of blogs claiming it exists. Do you have one or are you just reposting these blogs without any research of your own into the sources used?
Okay found it. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168159108001147?via%3Dihub
A questionaire to 1553 people and 20% of the people that own dachshunds (no reference to the total number of dachshund owners) that returned the questionaire claim their dog bit another dog or person.
That is not sufficient data to suggest 20% of dachshunds bite people.
>duuuhhhhhhh it’s the owner not the breed
>nooooooooooooo not like that!
...And yet shitbulls account for far more dog attacks than dachsunds, so if you picked shitbulls you'd have a higher chance of being correct
>Dachsunds
>agresive
hahahahahaha holy frick your delusion is rly funny Black personlover
elderly terminally ill golden retriever on painkillers
but what injured the chihuahua in the first place?
Illegal in Australia as well
Americans aren't humans. This has been established.
I’d kill that thing if I saw it in my neighborhood.
>Stay mad homosexuals. Pitbulls are objectively high-T animals for high-T men. My "pet" can maul the shit out of your homosexual dog and little cat. Stay the frick away from my property or I'll have him maul your face.
Pit bulls are the only dogs I don't return when they wander onto the farm property. See one and it goes into a hole. They kill livestock and go after people working here.
My Malamute could kill your nonexistent pitbull, but he won't without cause because he's not a genetic monster
Sure it could, homosexual.
I think I would not like to have to choose between needing a skin graft or jogging with my pistol. I hate treadmills but I dont have confidence in shitbull owners to stop their dogs from mauling me so it's partly their fault.
Must suck to live around Black folk or rednecks.
>live in apartment complex
>go outside walking my little jack russel terrier
>have her on a leash because she's a jerk
>walking her around to find poop spot
>see pitbull come running from back fence
>quickly pick up jack russle and punt the pitbull right in as it barrels toward me
>steel toe hiking boot on, perfect impact, pitbull literally does a flip into the air, yelps and falls down as his fat frick stupid "pit mommy" comes running up and grabs the little beast while it's dazed
>starts screaming at me while I take my dog inside
animal abuse is illegal
Pittbulls are sub-canine and not animals.
You're sub-human with these autistic non-arguments.
Imagine getting this upset about dog breeds.
I know, imagine being so autistic you get upset and assert angrily one "isn't an animal". That's just fricking moronic.
Calm down. It’s not healthy to take things that seriously.
Kicking a dog charging at you isn't though
/r/thathappened
Cope pitgay, no one likes your little shitmonsters except other nwords like you.
Anon, that wasn't a pitbull. That was Warwick Davis and his wife.
Even more based.
I wish people would just look at this from a realistic and historical perspective. It's pretty much common sense.
We domesticated the animals that we did because of what kind of behavioral changes we were able to make with them and their species through select breeding.
The problem with pit bulls is that you have an animal that is absolutely selectively bred to kill and maim and Mall things while mentally having the proclivity to snap and attack things at random, while being overall aggressive no matter who trains them. They are as much of a utility tool of an animal as anything else that possibly exists, and the problem comes when you have people putting that kind of tool into the middle of their family and children as if it's a golden retriever or a wiener dog. I don't care how aggressive a wiener dog is, I don't care how some old golden retriever that you knew growing up bit some kid one time after he hit it with a stick, the fact is that the pit bulls on average and on a scientific level are going to cause more damage to human beings and the other animals around them because of the amount of training and oversight that needs to be there. And if you go into the pet situation thinking that you're going to treat it like a wiener dog or a golden retriever, it's just not going to work the same way.
People who keep dangerous dogs within reach of other people in other animals are low down human beings, and more worthy of hate than the actual animals. They're just dogs, they can't help being what they were born to be, any more than a bear or a leopard or a White shark. Their dog that you have to train intensely on a professional level, or keep chained up in the yard as a deterrent for people that would come onto your property. You just can't have them as a family animal and reasonably expect to have no issues.
case closed
>They also have "great tenacity. They put their mind to something, and they do it.
>They put their mind to it any they do it
Yeah like when they have the idea to rip a baby's face off
>"In general"
So, they are aggressive with people some of the time, which makes them a liability.
>Pitbulls aren't violent, they're just...not very friendly with other dogs...
>Have to a make biased and deceptive movie full of lies to convince people there's nothing wrong with an inherently dangerous breed
Pitcucks are pathetic.
Now post the makeup of pitbull to general dog populations
>despite making up
Exact numbers are difficult to determine because of shit like backward breeding but WAP estimates approximately 1.3 million pitbulls in the US, or roughly 8% of all dogs.
*WAF
Your numbers are cherry picked and misrepresentative. No matter how you reframe it, it's less than 1% of pitbulls that harm anyone.
Which other breed has 1% responsible for so many attacks and fatalities?
Also, where are you getting 18 million from? It just says "statistics". 1.3 million seems to be the most common number, though the highest I've seen is 4.5 million.
The AVMA estimates around 79 million dogs total in the US which using your numbers would mean pitbulls are almost 20% of dogs in the USA.
>Which other breed has 1% responsible for so many attacks and fatalities?
Not 1%. LESS than 1%. Like 99.9% of pitbulls don't do any of the violent shit you're describing.
Now, we could have a discussion about assuring responsible pet ownership, but I don't think something like a license for it would be a good idea. Instead I'd say stricter prison sentences for animal neglect. If your dog harms someone or another animal, you're held legally responsible as if you did it. No more people allowed to keep a dog on a chain in the backyard it's whole life.
So which other beed has less than 1% of dogs responsible for 70% of fatalities?
lol
All you can do is cherry pick from the less than 1% of cases.
Shitbull shills don't care. They know that dog attacks would be practically nonexistent if all those hellhounds were dumped in a ditch and burned alive. But they unironically think their right to own a beast bred for maiming and killing supersedes a toddler's right to live.
Less than 1%, you absolute fricking moron.
That image is so fricking stupid lol. That's actually what this one was created in response to:
You cherry pick horror stories from the less than 1% then using the math and reasoning skills of the Black folks you claim to despise, pretend that means they're all like that. The entire basis for your autism is appeal to emotion.
lol
Lol, which number is bigger homosexual, 0.01% or the 99.99% of pitbulls that harm no one? Anti-pitgay TOLD. Ignore this number if you acknowledge you're wrong and just got buck broken.
Yet the utility of pitbulls as a breed is vastly outweighed by that 0.01%, because they account for so many injuries and deaths. Society would objectively improve if they didn't exist. There is nothing you can say to change that.
Lmfao, you're not even using real math to justify your autism. You're just asserting things and autistically declaring them to be unarguable. Dog Expert Cesar Milan has pointed out that anti-pit sentiment is just another fad. "Before pits it was German Shephards, before that it was Dobermans. Every so many year stupid people pick one breed to pretend is evil. It's stupid and baseless." That's a dog expert. You're meanwhile a fat autist sitting in his underwear in his mother's house.
Not a single argument made. I accept your concession, pitfricker. Keep posting your cherrypicked articles, no one's gonna read em
Bold of you to assume I’m wearing underwear at all, anon.
The problem is you can't tell which shitbulls are "like that" until it's too late because they're as unpredictable as they are violent. Even a "docile" shitbull could snap and maim a 5-year-old at any moment. Even one is too many.
The problem is you're a disingenuous moron and you don't even know which dogs even are pitbulls.
Hilarious that the pitophile has to go back 20 years to find a story of a dachshund killing. Dumb Black person doesn't realize that a shitbull killed multiple people each week.
https://www.wdtv.com/2023/06/16/pit-bull-breed-kills-owner-after-falling-unconscious-beckley/
All the stats they use are before 2016 too. They just use the same old stats, hilariously misinterpreted, and then just post a bunch of good news stories from blogs that were written by biased pitcucks like themselves. When someone gives them a question they can't answer they just ignore it.
>20 years
There have been three stories of dachsunds killing people on this thread moron, are all three from 20 years ago? And again, feel free to google. There are 18 million pitbulls in the US alone. The number of deaths caused by pits each year isn't even in the thousands, so no matter how you cry, it's less than 1% of them you're crying in abject terror like the weak b***h you are about.
>shit bull kills innocent snake
Less than 1%.
>doesn't know the difference between general aggression and lethality
Whoever posted this is fricking moronic. The ATTS admits that their testing isn't scientific and tells flat out not to compare breed scores to breed scores. Each breed's temperament characteristics are set by that breed's breeders. So none of this shit is apples-to-apples. How anyone could take this shit seriously is hilarious
Reminder, anyone who says "This study proving me wrong is a fricking moron" is themselves, a fricking moron as they're making assertions and not backing up their butthurt, seething attacks with anything other than seethe and assertions.
Point at them and LAUGH.
Yes you, along with your "study" are fricking moronic.
>rogan loves and used to own pitbulls
checkmate chuds
Why not just get literally any other dog breed? Even well behaved pitbulls are still moronic. You could get a more intelligent guard breed instead.
Pit-mommy b***hes get pitbull stitches.
Yjk
Cool it with the anti-semitism, okay?
Less than 1%.
>October is Pit Bull Awareness Month
I’m getting tired of this “x is y awareness month” bullshit.
Cool it with the antisemitism.
My favorite thing is when they point to dog bite statistics and start talking about how chihuahuas and other small dog breeds actually bite more people. Yeah and I bet sharks bite less people than pugs but i know which id' rather have bite me.
Never forgive them.
If george had been another pitbull he would have just joined in attacking the children.
Less than 1%.
Less than 1% of all guns harm anyone, why do you want them banned?
I don't. I think banning things because of what happens with less than 1% of them is moronic.
>lol pit bulls aren’t dangerous guys
>names dog “Kill-o”
sus
>heroic thief tries to end pitbull menace, fails
Who was holding all those guns?
PitBlack folk are responsible for like 80% of dog bites but keep posting this cherrypicked shit, you're not fooling anyone
Pitbulls have no purpose at all.
Neither do you though. Pitbulls make good companion animals, loving protectors and have all the standard uses of a dog from bomb sniffing to drug sniffing, tracking missing persons, finding dead bodies, protection and so on.
Those with ill wills fear the pitbull.
>Pitbulls make good companion animals, loving protectors
Unless you are a 5 year old, a grandmother, etc
>bomb sniffing
German Shepherds, Labrador Retrievers, Indian pariah dogs, German Wirehaired Pointers, and Malinois
>drug sniffing
English Springer Spaniels, Labrador retrievers, Terriers, and English wienerer Spaniels
>tracking missing persons, finding dead bodies,
German Shepherds and Dachshunds
>protection
German Shepherds
Literally never seen pitbulls used in those servies. The only people with pitbulls are Black folk and women who get fricked by dogs. Which are you?
See? All you have is stereotypes and autism lol. You don't have anything approaching an actual argument. Lots of things "aren't necessary". That's Commiehomosexual thinking. "You don't need to eat meat, it's not necessary. Eat ze bugs." "You don't NEED to own things, get in the pod." "Take the jab, you don't need bodily autonomy." When we actually let mealy-mouthed homosexualS like your cowardly ass decide what is and isn't needed, you know your worthless ass is going to be first against the wall right dipshit? Because we sure as frick don't need you.
Wait I though pit bulls weren’t actually a breed? Isn’t that what you losers say when faced with data? Kek
Lol, no counter argument. Anti-pitgays TOLD.
Kill anti-pitgays. Force anti-pitgays to pet puppies and laugh as they piss their pants in terror. Take anti-pitgays to the zoo and watch them go into cardiac arrest from the dangerous animals. Kick anti-pitgays down flights of stairs. Shoot anti-pitgays in the face with guns that cause far more annual fatalities that pitbulls ever do. Report anti-pitgays to the IRS. Curbstomp anti-pitgays brown manlet faces into fine red paste. Send anti-pitgays to Communist utopias so they'll be lined up against walls and shot. Drown anti-pitgays. Slip poison into anti-pitgays foood. Convince anti-pitgays parents to kick them out of the basement and make them get a job.
Sanest shitbull defender
Anti-pitgays maaaaad.
>posts pics of dangerous predators right next to children
…
Hero pitties next to kids they saved and protected.
How many news stories do you have in your collection? Maybe 50, which represent a span of how many years?
The number of life-changing pitbull attacks matches those numbers every couple years.
All dogs save people. pits are uniquely dangerous. You're talking about the exception to the rule and saying it's the other way around.
Wow, a meme. I accept your concession
>shitbull owners when they haven't sucked their dog's dick yet today
>when pitbulls kill grandmas and toddlers it’s always a case of mistaken identity confusing them for their natural prey!
Also you’re ignoring half the thread and pretending to yourself you “won” but everyone else can read and see with their own eyes m8…..
Shitbull paws soaked with the fresh blood of a 2-year-old typed this post
>dog bred for aggressive traits
>named "pit" bull as if to imply dominance in a scenario involving combat
>ItS mY Q t pIe
do trans people really?
So I guess you are the type to be fricked by pitbulls?
just get a rottweiler, pencil dick
No one wants pitbulls banned. In fact, we just want to remove the laws that prevent us from protecting ourselves from n*****s and p*******. We want less laws. Not more laws…..
where in the constitution does it say you're allowed to have pitbulls?
If you want to be completely accurate it's 7.9% of dogs owned and 69.6% of attacks between 2010 and 2021 but otherwise yeah.
Pitbulls go after children because they're weak homosexuals. When confronted by anything that can deal with their "I'm gonna bite and not let go" shit they get overwhelmed easily.
do you reckon a chimp could mog a pitbull?
Even if pitbulls weren’t dangerous, I’d still hate them because they’re ugly.
KEK did anyone else think there was blood and viscera by the dog’s feet from the thumbnail?
Lol if your shitbull comes anywhere near me or my loved ones it's getting one between the eyes
I've seen the Black person claiming "less than 1%" in one of these threads before. Their understanding of maths is abysmal and their statistics they use are not remotely accurate.
>legalize the consumption of dog meat
>spread memes about pitbull meat giving you a larger penis and more sexual stamina
>Chinese people keep the shelters empty
this is a good idea, chinese people dont have souls.
Bring back dog fighting. It's unironically cruel to deny them of their purpose.
Imagine having an instinct to fight and then getting punished for any combative behavior.
It's like people keeping sheep dogs in a small apartment and not giving them any work to do.
Any good qualities they possess are due to being dogs, not to being pitbulls
Pitophiles are moronic. They're always either white trash, ghetto Black folk, or wetback cholos.
or naive women with savior complexes
>put a puppy's face on an adult's body to make it look sympathetic
the pitBlack person cope in this thread is hilarious.
keep posting screenshots of biased news articles with no statistics to back them up.
The only good pitbull is the bald miami guy.
MR WORLDWIDE
DALE
305
OYE ASERE
I once cut a pitbull that ran up on me barking in two with one chop (just in front of the hind legs) with a heavy kukri, that little b***h stopped being aggressive real quick.
kek@lower right
>janny, come do the needful and clean up
They'd almost be worth it if they were good guard dogs, but they aren't. They're a cowardly breed that's most aggressive against targets they perceive as weak.
They have no redeeming value. They're butt ugly and anything they supposedly offer can be done to a stronger degree by another breed that isn't prone to aggression and unprovoked attacks. They are a blight and burden on society which is just increasing as they continue to be abandoned in increasing numbers and it's infuriating that they're so fervently defended by a group of below 90 IQ morons.
They are truly ugly too. Even if you removed their violent tendencies I don’t understand why anyone would want to be seen with such an ugly fricking dog that has no real value besides killing small breed dogs, infants and owners who turn their backs on them.
I see pit bulls and want to launch them into ravines. Maybe that’s why they bred them to look so shitty: even shitbulls want to kill each other on sight.
Smash every pit in the head with a rock.
Why doesn't any other dog breed get defended this much?
No other breeds need it. Yeah German shepherd and Rot swillers are mean and everyone knows it but they don’t suddenly fricking snap and kill their owner and all the children in the house. If you’re the mailman you better watch your ass tho, or if you have guests keep those mean mfs in the basement but pitbulls will just go mad and decide to eat you one day.
More than that, it’s the way they bite and attack that’s the problem. Trannies like to ignore this but pit bulls were bred to bring down bears and bulls, to grab onto the nose of a bull and not let go. If you get bitten by a German shepherd that’s it, it’s over, but a pitbull is gonna latch on like an alligator and never let go.
>nooooo you’re just prejudice let me, a real woman and my pitbulls babysit your infant! they’re NANNY dogs chud!
No……..
Just think of all the people who have gotten killed because of this pitbull propaganda bullshit saying they’re great family dogs. How many kids need to be killed. You KNOW they’re fighting dogs/guard dogs/junkyard dogs/hunting dogs and yet for some reason you pretend they’re docile teddies and get people hurt.
Frick you, you fricking pedophiles.
i tend to avoid pits but i do have a female coworker who has a female pit bull and its literally the nicest dog i have ever met in my entire life. people call put bulls "mommy dogs" and this dog absolutely fits the bill. i have never seen a dog like this one. the amount of shit she puts up with without showing any sort of anger or distress whatsoever is unbelievable. she has young dogs stomping all over her head and she just smiles and takes it.
unfortunately she is very old and is probably going to die soon
Most shitbulls seem nice until their teeth are buried in your leg. Never relax.
>discrimination
>against an animal that was custom designed for violent aggression through selective breeding
Tell me one thing shitbulls do better than other breeds that justifies keeping them around despite the hundreds of fatalities a year.
>durr less than 1%
Don't care, 1% too many
In college, a few friends and I moved into a house. I was the first to arrive after summer and got a call from one of the roommates saying he got a dog. I was really pissed because I am pretty allergic but the worst part was it was a fricking adopted pit bull. I decided then and there I couldn’t live with a time bomb dog. The house also had tons of mice (it was a party house) so I put rat poison around the house not only to kill the mice but to deter a dog from living there.
When my other roommates arrived and saw the mouse poison they were freaked out and I told them yeah it was there when I got here, there were tons of rats, and maybe we shouldn't have a dog here. They ended up just combing the house top to bottom and getting rid of all the poison.
I ended up feeding the dog rat poison inside ground beef. It didn't die but it almost did and my roommate ended up moving out to an apartment of his own, he was too freaked out about the dog finding hidden rat poison again. So in a way, it all worked out.
holy based
too bad the dog didn't die, though
Nice.
Poisoning in secret is the passive-aggressive murder method favored by women. Thanks for outing yourself as a weak beta b***h afraid of puppies.
>trannies subconsciously defend shitbulls because the wounds in babies they make hit too close to home
>trannies prey on children
>shitbulls prey on children
Could be a great new form of suicide for troons. Once they’ve finally had enough of grooming kids online and derailing threads on Cinemaphile they can simply awaken their pitbull from a nap and it will break their neck in its jaws.
I smell a /tv psyop coming on
As long as pitbulls maul their owners and no one else, I'm ok with them.
Every stray pitbull should however be throw into a pit set on fire though.
>every shitbull owner has to be trained and licensed
>a shitbull cannot be housed in the same location as an infant or an elderly or disabled person
>a shitbull who shows even the faintest sign of aggression must be immediately shot
>all stray shitbulls are shot on sight
I'd tolerate the risk of having shitbulls in society if these measures are implemented
Enforcement of those measures wouldn’t happen because it would be considered “racist.”
Chris Watts should've gotten a pitbull and just waited.
You think anyone has detailed archives on how pugs totally aren’t dangerous and are good family dogs and won’t kill you?
No because they don’t need it.
Why do pitbulls? Because people are “”””prejudice””””” against pitbulls, a fricking animal? Ultimately what purpose are you even serving other than getting people hurt.
To quote you, "What purpose to pugs serve?" They're not good guard dogs, they have a terrible sense of smell, their selective breeding has given them a number of health and breathing proplems and common defects. You keep arguing merit and need, and then you post one of the other breeds most often argued it's cruel to even breed.
Didn’t read. Pugs don’t kill people so they don’t need archives “proving” that but pitbulls are killing machines so they need to be constantly damage controlled.
>Didn’t read.
Puggay concedes defeat and refuses to read like a typical Black person. Your total concession is accepted b***h.
Your comment doesn’t make any sense if you would have read what I wrote. I didn’t need to read what you wrote because you’re moronic and I don’t want your words in my brain.
Disappointing lack of shitbulls being set on fire in this video
Any pithomosexuals wanna take a crack at this one or are you taking the L…?
That guy stopped spamming, probably unironically just got killed by his pitbull, a statistical likelihood.
Where's their mom?
They are like the Gorn!
aww they playin
Holy shit do pitgays spend so much effort defending their dumb ugly breed.
they're as dumb as you'd expect
Same exact reason troons say men are women. They’re severely mentally ill.
They're as dumb and ugly as the dogs they're defending.
Spit out saliva all over my screen enlarging this thumbnail.
There are just over 500 different dog breeds. Of those roughly 500, a single one commits over 50% of dog attacks. Take a guess which breed that is.
Banning pitbulls is moral and ethical. They are genetically designed to harm, maim, and kill living beings, and it shows. They are ugly and excel in no other areas, meaning someone choosing a pitbull is doing it solely to cause harm to others at some point in the future. No one "needs" a pitbull, and other dogs are much better choices.
>Banning pitbulls is moral and ethical.
Stop right there, no it’s not. More laws are not moral or ethical. What would be moral and ethical is removing laws which percent us from defending ourselves against pitbulls and other… less friendly elements/beings living in the US…
>Anarkiddie lolbert goy
The only real answer is National Socialism.
How come nobody can ever post Pitbull attacks in proportion to their population size?
Because the exact size of their population is difficult to determine but someone did
>breeding discrimination
>applying political correctness to a fricking animal
but why?
that pibbles are monsters that should be made illegal and forcibly removed from existence.
>be shitbull
>gets rekt by borzoi or tibetan basket weaving forum dog
No really, you burn local because you're only able to burn local.
Hi Cinemaphile, can I interest any of you in a TRUE TOADLINE GOTTILINE MICRO EXOTIC BULLY. BIG BONED SUPER SHORT AND EXTREME IN ALL WAYS. WE HAVE THE BEST EXOTIC BULLIES FOR SALE YOU WILL FIND SELECTION AND QUALITY . TOADLINE WAS CREATED BY ROYCE ROCCO OF NORTH COUNTY GOTTILINE FROM TRUE %100 GOTTILINE DOGS , WHICH HAS GOTTYLINE PITS DAXLINE , THE BULLY CAMPLINE MIAGI BLOOD , WEST COAST GOTTILINE ACELINE , EDGE OF GOTTILINE BULLSEYE BLOOD AND AFTER MANY YEARS OF BREEDING FOR SELECTIVE BULLY TRAITS?
SMASHED and SLAMMED
what the frick lmao
I SEE YOUR INTERESTED HOMIE, VISIT OUR WEBSITE TOADLINE.COM HOME OF FAMILY RAISED, LOVING BULLIES, EXOTIC BULLY, MICRO PUPS FOR SALE AND STUD SERVICES
What in God’s name?
kek didn’t they saddle Picard with one of these in the new troony Star Trek show?
Star Trek Pit-tard
I just want to remind everyone this sad abominations are not pitbulls but instead a sad misshapen nightmare created from bulldogs. I can't think of any reason people would want to breed and own a dog that can't walk and looks like it's in pain every moment of it's life.
BROKE ASS homie MAD CAUSE HE CAN"T AFFORD A TRUE CAMPLINE BULLY FROM MIAGI BLOOD
SMASHED
L
A
M
M
E
D
The pitards are flailing lol
Every time they think they get a win it just further proves them wrong.
It's hilarious.
Why are we arguing about stats when pitbulls kill people all the time and no other dog does……?
Because you're not using mental gymnastics to try and diminish the hard data.
Other dogs do.
But the ultimate argument is Pit Bulls death and injury rates are ultimately insignificant.
Everyone knows Pit Bull hate is just a jumping off point to complain about Black folk. Only idiots get bogged down in thinking its about dogs.
Because they fricking don't. There's no comparison. Every vicious thing you describe accounts for less than 1% of pitbulls. 20-30% of blacks commit a violent crime at some point in their life, there's absolutely zero space for comparison at all.
>wiener dogs are evil killers
>killer dogs that kill and eat people are dindu nuffin
????? why are you posting this shit, we can all read, we all have eyes, we can all see reality, just because you make something up in your head doesn’t mean it’s real, we know it’s not lol
fricking wiener dogs lmao
Kill all Shitbulls
Pitbulls eat their owners all the time.
Real dogs do not do this.
Got a shitbull to lick my butthole...I hahe aids. K keep going to dog parks and they keep eating the corn out of my shit and getting aids. Terrible breed and always seems to attract low IQ and trannies.
What causes pitbull owners to defend their breed so vigorously? I think they have their uses as guard dogs or even outside dogs on a large property but no way in a million years would I ever own one if I had a family or keep it inside the house. Why can't they acknowledge that not every dog should be treated the same and that some are much more dangerous than others?
They're usually also leftists and they don't want to open the door to the argument that violence has a genetic component
Why don't they do the same for race
>jannies are autosaging the thread
WHY we’re not allowed to say we don’t like pitbulls??????? If this was a husky hate thread they would not have given a frick but just like seasoning-americans for some reason pitbulls are protected like an endangered species.
Just a reminder that the pitophile in this thread is a moron who will lie to defend their ugly dog
LMFAO
checking to see if this thread is on autosage
Confirmed it is.
*remakes thread after it dies*
>”no fun allowed” *pulls 2-foot dildo from ass followed by a pile of shit and blood*
Actually great white sharks, we're originally used as Nanny fish to protect children swimming in the ocean.
There's no evidence that the breed is violent
Great whites have only been responsible for 52 fatalities total over all the centuries recorded. They've got a long way to go to close the gap on pit bulls.
Sharkbros, can they do it?
>Sharkucks making excuses for Black personfish
Of course
Literally the only thing out of leftist/israelite mouthes is “LOWER YOUR GUARD. DANGEROUS THINGS AREN’T DANGEROUS. LOWER YOUR GUARD.”
and "STOP NOTICING THAT THING IS BAD. WE ALREADY TOLD YOU IT'S NOT!"
Well they'd be responsible for a lot fricking more if you had to walk by them on the street every single day.
Not the fish that's the problem, it's the owner.
>If they told ya wolverines make good housepets would you believe ‘em?
>Leftist: “Yes.”
Kill shitbulls and their owners on spot.
>see scrawny little woman walking two pitbulls
>if they charge at anything she's going to get ragdolled because she's lighter than them