Blow Out

anon last night recommended me this. thank you to you, anon. the movie had some extremely comfy scenes and i enjoyed it overall. the ending rocked me though at the core and i was very upset... i wanted her to survive with him and live happily ever after

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

  1. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    One of the movies that I'm convinced is "faux 2.35" which yes is my own term. I'm convinced this movie was shot with the intended purpose of being sown in 4:3 because there is an ungodly amount of wasted space in practically every shot.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      massive redpill

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Thank you. I'm convinced 2010 is another. Even the pan and scan is very suspicious to me. They used a type of it to mimic camera movement. One pan includes two different speeds. It starts at the normal speed and then slows down at the end. Cable tv was huge at the time of both of these movies so I think it was experimentation of how to deal with this new market. Home video however was actually still pretty new but also certainly still played a part.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      I assume you're being sarcastic but can't really ever know here

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      never seen a de palma movie before huh?

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        I've seen pretty much all of them. And Blow Out's use of 2.39 is very suspicious to me compared to for example Scarface. In particular there was some hotel room scene as I recall in Blow Out that I just could not believe what I was looking at. Which was literally nothing. The character in the middle of the screen as I recall and just an entire screen's worth of wasted space on either side.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          which point in this scene are you referring to out of curiosity? is it one of the closeups or?

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            That right there seems to be a pretty good example. Its been many years since I've seen it. But there is no way in hell this movie couldn't have easily been 1.85. Pure theater gimmick being 2.39. And then the best of both worlds. Center all the action generally speaking and it'll look great cropped on tv

            • 5 months ago
              Anonymous

              interesting and I'm inclined to agree with your take on this

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                Thank you very much. I dont remember what any others were but this and 2010 are all I recall now.

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                any other interesting stuff you know about some movies?

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            Literally 80% of the movie is framed so that it would be totally ruined if it was cropped. There's many cool split screen kinda shots also utilizing the Panavision format to the max.

            • 5 months ago
              Anonymous

              >ruined if it was cropped
              not with pan and scan. That may have even had an interesting wipe effect that he wanted with the split screen.

              What a dumbass

              You should maybe watch it again for like 10 seconds and realize how dumb that sounds

              Meant to reply to your moronic ass

              but yeah maybe I'm remembering it wrong and he still just only sacrificed some shots integrity like

              which point in this scene are you referring to out of curiosity? is it one of the closeups or?

              because he needed the aspect ratio for later. But as I recall I had all this in mind when I watched it.

              Either way 2010 definitely does this so its definitely a concept around that time. So its not like I'm being unreasonably suspicious. There is an ungodly amount of wasted or barely used frame space in Blow Out

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                Do you know what else is possible? He actually just shot it the way he wanted and composed for widescreen without getting autistic about a little negative space here and there.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          Meant to reply to your moronic ass

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            super cool split screen shot right there

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      moron.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      You should maybe watch it again for like 10 seconds and realize how dumb that sounds

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      What a dumbass

  2. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    and its not even 2.35 its 2.39

    pure gimmick for the theaters nothing more

  3. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Might've been me. I too thought I would've liked a happy ending at first but the film wouldn't be nearly as memorable. It leaves you with profound sadness with that great score by Pino Donaggio

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      thank you anon. looking back on the movie in hindsight, i would have to agree with you that it wouldn't be as memorable. it's a sting that you never forget
      if you have another suggestion for me i'll take it. to give you an idea of my tastes, the scene at the beginning where he witnesses the car going off the bridge is my favorite scene in the movie. i haven't seen a scene as comfy as that one maybe ever albeit i'm very new to Cinemaphile and watching movies in general

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        The Conversation by Francis Ford Coppola is another great film involving sound recording/surveillance stuff. It has sorta similar vibes at times.

  4. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    I saw it because Tarantino hyped it up. Film is okay. Not even great. Quentin’s fanboying over Travolta combined with a Director that he is the biggest fanboy of, and you get a clever ending but not necessarily much else.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      what would you say is your top 5 movies?

  5. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    I love the movie but does anyone else think it would've been better if Lithgow's character had been doing what he was told? I feel like it should have been a government backed hit rather than an agent gone rogue.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      yeah I was a bit confused by that whole fiasko. I was expecting that as well instead of the rogue agent that I found to be doing shitty acting in the movie if I'm being completely honest

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      It adds another layer to John Litgow's character. He's not doing it just for political reasons but because of his sadistic and psychopathic impulses. It would be more boring if it was just a regular ol' hitman.

  6. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    I love De Palma 70s and early 80s.

  7. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Extremely underrated film. Nothing quite like that recording scene outdoors. And that finale was just fantastic even if what led up to it, him crashing the car and then waking up and going after him, was kind of silly and unnecessary.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah the parade scene was a bit bizarre, especially the music.

  8. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Blow Up (photo)
    The Conversation (recording)
    Blow Out (their unity in film)

    It forms an intentional trilogy and the latter title is clearly a pun on the first.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *