>Bluey but the boys are blue and the girls are pinkish and have eyelashes
Blueysisters...they're mocking us...
>Bluey but the boys are blue and the girls are pinkish and have eyelashes
>Bluey but the boys are blue and the girls are pinkish and have eyelashes
Blueysisters...they're mocking us...
Cons won't stand for any of that gender confusion indoctrination bullshit. Blue is fundamentally a male color and eyelashes are fundamentally a female attribute. In fact, real men should shave their eyes.
Writers these days be like
Yet Stitch is way hotter and gets more porn
>She needs long antennae
Ah... yes... because women are known for their antennae...
It's the equivalent to women having long hair. That's it youre banned from having opinions give me your brain
Equivalent to eyelashes really.
She already has eyelashes
sweet baby Christ I fricking hate tumblr so hoddamn much holy frick
Somehow they made it to the industry
It was them (or rather, now it's them and then it was their LiveJournal/DA predecessors) or the Newgrounds guys.
A choice had to be made.
Frick, I meant to say "a choice had to be made and they were the more brand friendly option."
They infiltrated many industries.
I don't think tumblr invented gluing conventional female human beauty features onto aliens and animals.
Simple design tricks like this work, but they work especially well for children whose brains are still developing and really benefit from clear cut design choices like this. Same thing with BIG MUSCULAR CHARACTER HAS BIG SQUARE CHIN or CUTE CHARACTER HAS ROUND FEATURES AND BIG EYES.
I don't know why the pink/blue thing gets so much shit but people still fricking eat up, "Sharp corners means EVIL design!". The same people who b***h about heteronormative design aspects in cartoon characters probably adore Helluva Boss even though it's just as manipulative with its design choices.
That post is completely right, feminine designs like that aren't inherently bad, but it was bad for this specific character.
>work especially well for children
I never got the reason for this since children will know a character is female the moment they speak, unless the character is mute. I'm mainly referring to non-human characters.
There is nothing wrong with her design, it's simple and effective and the merch doesn't lie
Would frick
We know hamsterviel
THAT'S HAMSTERWHEE...wait.
You're brilliant mr hamsterviel, I hope you make angel happy for me
https://files.catbox.moe/x6kxaw.png
based
https://files.catbox.moe/utrz3i.png
anal edit when
what happen to stitch's wiener
and reuben edit when?
Leroy edit at best
would love a Leroy edit
and a chop suey edit
at the beginning we had hamsterviel
now we only have hamsterwenig
Neither do her little hips.
Has the general reception of that anime ever gotten better since it aired over a decade ago?
I don't believe it ever has to my knowledge. There may be the oddball fan that likes it, but generally most people are still sour on it. I find it kind of ridiculous since I don't think the anime is that different in quality to the series, but I think most will never get over it since it involves Stitch leaving Lilo. That was a plot that only existed in the dub until the sub decided to add it towards the end of the show.
Was there really a curiously attractive pink dragon in one ep, or was that just a promo still?
Like PPGZ the show feels the need to add all these tiring anime cliches and cringeworthy comedy to constantly remind you that you're watching an anime, it feels like a weeb making a painfully generic series based on the shit they find hilarious because it's japanese
Also the animation is dogshit
>That was a plot that only existed in the dub until the sub decided to add it towards the end of the show.
So it was originally AU stuff before being retconned to what the dub did?
Looks like that comes from the Chinese one.
>So it was originally AU stuff
To my knowledge yes, the first episode in the dub mentions Stitch acting up because he feels abandoned by Lilo, but the first episode in sub doesn't even mention anything like that. It's only towards the end of the final season that the anime sub has Stitch randomly reunite with Lilo for a single episode.
I guess they decided to change the colors.
>red!? my son is red!?
>the Chinese one
Oh, ok, the ch- WHAT?!?! They made MORE??? wtf...
Yep. This one's a Chinese AU that premiered around 2017 or something.
Do you think Chink girls want to be fricked by Stitch?
Wouldn't be surprised.
Most of them liked Stitch over Lilo.
I think the Chinese in general just want to eat him.
Ok, THAT experiment FRICKS.
Jumba knew what he was doing
Depends on what anon's issue is. Like aesthetically she's inoffensive. She's Girl Stitch which isn't bad in itself. But compared to a lot of other experiments it's weak because it doesn't communicate her powers or anything making it clear she was designed to just be girl stitch so that you could immediately see "Stitch would want to frick this"
>She's Girl Stitch
>you could immediately see "Stitch would want to frick this"
That's the problem I have with it, this character has no value other than being a pink clone that dates Stitch to make merch money. Not only is the writing of her episode bad, but she makes
permanent changes to the franchise while offering very little. If she were a one-off experiment that wasn't Stitch's girlfriend with a just as girly but a more unique design and purpose, I wouldn't have an issue with her. The only thing I mainly have a problem with design wise in regards to her femininity is her breasts, since I find them odd looking on small furry creatures. I think smooth chests or chest fur look better.
At first look I thought they were doing something else tbh
>smooth chest that sticks out a little more
Disney likes doing this even on their dudes sometimes (see also: Timon)
Dunno why she brought that up.
>SJW moron can't stop thinking about getting cucked
Kek
I don’t know why femoids still b***h and moan about female characters looking attractive (having eyelashes, boob fluff, being seductive). American cartoons won’t even give women breasts these days because male artists are afraid of being labeled as rapists. The only countries still putting out female characters like these are France (Balak) and Japan
I fricking wish cartoons were putting out characters like Peg Pete, Jessica Rabbit, Hello Nurse or Lola Bunny continuously. But they simply aren’t. feminist b***hing like this is what crippled the industry from ever doing anything besides dumb preschool cartoons and family guy knock-offs.
The fact men have to fry their brain cells just to see an attractive woman through porn is also likely one of the many reasons Zoomers are completely sexless as well. It used to be basic human biology that men preferred women who look good. Now we have to pretend stuff like obese hair dyed women are “high standard” when they clearly aren’t. Who the frick cares if they drew Stitch’s girlfriend like that. She’s a bloody alien not a human being. It’s like if someone criticized Spongebob’s parents for being brown sponges while he was yellow.
There’s a vast difference between normalizing stuff like rape and drawing a cartoon chick with big boobs or thighs. The people who conduct feminist based criticisms view both as the same thing because of isolated incidents like Spumco. Frick man
>TDLR: Male Gaze criticism killed men
My issue is purely she's a lazier design than most the other experiments and doesn't communicate what she is just so she can be a Minnie to Stich's Mickey. A proper design probably still has her being pink and feminine but would also communicate she has singing powers.
Eyelashes aren't a sexually dimorphic trait nor are they inherently feminine
In media they are.
why?
Because long lashes look attractive on women
how so?
It's association (and stylistic inspiration) with makeup, such as mascara
Its*
frick
A wild troony appeared
I can't pin all the blame on the younger zoomers,, tbh.
They're only treading the path older generations paved for them, after all...
AI image?
Who is the middle guy?
Drake
I wouldn't be surprised if an actual Alf reboot did this.
Feminists and women are not the same groups. I was about to make the fingers and thumbs allegory until I remembered all the moronic male feminists also pulling this anti-sexy bullshit.
>Implying women who look good are f*minine
>And not built tomboys with washboard abs
I'm trans btw
We know, that's why you think wearing pink is enough to make you a woman
>The fact men have to fry their brain cells just to see an attractive woman through porn is also likely one of the many reasons Zoomers are completely sexless as well.
This is why gacha games are so popular
>most people are of poor character and ugly to boot
>outdoors is full of pollution and hostile minorities
>peers are mentally ill
>"Look! A game where you can pretend to be friends with great, attractive people! All while exploring idealized cities and landscapes"
Hence whales who dump thousands of dollars on moving .jpgs for their perfect husbado/waifu.
>The fact men have to fry their brain cells just to see an attractive woman through porn is also likely one of the many reasons Zoomers are completely sexless as well
Japan always had attractive character designs and still do, but there the ones suffering from a birthrate crisis so this has nothing to do with the prevalence of hot chicks in cartoons. People fry their brain on porn because our SOCIETY is alienating and expensive.
>besides dumb preschool cartoons and family guy knock-offs
That's more a fault of companies trying to maximize profits in the most low effort way possible.
>She’s a bloody alien not a human being.
That's kinda the point. Stitch himself is a little blue alien guy but his design is fairly neutral, while Angel is the one that needed the overtly feminine design that's just the main character gender swapped. The designs of the experiments in general are fairly neutral, it's just the girl ones they feel the need to have stick out.
cry about it?
And that's a good thing.
I'm trans btw
she's aware there are plenty of female experiments in the show that aren't nearly as overt with their femininity (if at all) as Angel is, right?
Most of the other female characters are shit, have barely any screen time, or are essentially background characters.
No but nip boys do.
>pic
>Most of the other female characters are shit, have barely any screen time, or are essentially background characters.
A shame, considering a select few of them were also cute in their own right
Either that or they're soppy bastards who want to write romance with cute things and got the job after showing the execs their PG-rated 50 chapter MLP fanfic. On that note God damn it why does that pic have to be so ADORABLE FRICK.
You're looking at this with scant evidence and you're still implicitly assuming it's the norm, even if you disagree with the execs.
Yeah but they aren't the only people who think like this, those execs. The tumblrina and you are questioning the execs who think 'this is sensible', but NOT going the step further and questioning their impled belief 'this is the norm'. You think it's the norm as well. You dislike it, but you still presume it's the norm.
You have scant evidence. Here's the simple answer:
It's not the norm. Some people wanted to write a cutesy pair of space koalas being in love because it would help sell toys, and they made one look vaguely more feminine to suggest they were female. There are some execs who think like in the pic, but not all.
Sorry, but it's a bit 'out there. Let's look at another example we often see.
We often see a Tumblrina say 'The Harry Potter films are antisemitic because of the big nosed greedy goblins and the Star of David on the floor of the bank they work in!' You know, in WOKE HOLLYWOOD.
I wanna shou at them, like Don't you REALISE that there are far right morons who agree, and think 'Yes, she's telling us the truth about israelites!'?
You have scant evidence. Here's the simple answer:
The Goblin = israelite stereotype appeared in the 1500s or so, worked its way into movies and people missed the connotations. JK Rowling designed the goblins completely differently in the books and a lot of the movie design is beyond her control. The Star of David is the Star of Australia when it was 6 sided due to having 6 states instead of 7 like now. There is no antisemitism.
And that's israelites saying that.
here's the perfect female
https://files.catbox.moe/ylyit8.png
eh.
They think we are idiots
Because you are
>*sexually confuses American conservatives in you're path*
These idiots at Daily Wire or Bentkey or whatever the frick they call themselves don’t realise that the heeler breed have blue coats, but they think Bluey is blue because they are against females acting like females and are against the patriarchy. Fricking morons.
Yeah, Bluey is a Blue Heeler and Bingo is a Red Heeler. They're the same breed, just specified by coat pattern. Like having a yellow lab and a chocolate lab be siblings.
"Blue" coat is an exaggeration, it's more grayish, but works well for a cartoon embellishment.
>Internet personalities use culture war to boost their own product and make profit of people enjoying the product
>Cinemaphile seethes about the political angle as if 90% media isn't woke
You guys sure hate your own game kek
I’m not a suicide victim with an infected groin you daft seppo. I laugh at America for normalising trans surgeries for the youth and adults. A once “great” nation now in shambles lolololol
>Bluey but the boys are blue
Tell me you've never seen Bluey in a more obvious way.
It's true, the BOYS are blue, not the girls like bluey
Sorry blueygay, your dog looks like a boy
Imagine if make a bluey and touhou crossover
>reading comprehension
>I was just pretending to be moronic
It's alright anon I forgive you
Bluey x touhou project now
Talking about the blue male characters like the dad and uncle in Bluey not Chip Chilla you illiterate mouth breathing moron.
Oh my god you are such a moron, the point is that chip chilla doesn't have a girl be blue, (you) illiterate
Bluey x touhou project
Blueys dad is blue too, what's your point.
The dad is a man
His daughter looks like a man cause eyelashes and pink are overrated LOL
Did they actually b***h about Bluey being Blue is this just a twittergay kvetching thing to get mad that a mildly similar show made boys blue.
How is this show? Do they hide their powerlevel or is it PragerU tier?
If anyone is taking reqs: https://litter.catbox.moe/4egrck.png
lol
>is bluey for dogs
I'll anything with an actual vag
>blue and pink dogs
>they're both female
Yes, as it always should be. I hate how modern female characters don't have eyelashes so it's hard to tell them apart from the men characters design-wise. Stop trying to subvert simple design rules you snivelling c**t.
You'll get the black cat girl looking like a man and you're gonna like it
CONTROLLED OPPOSITION
HEGELIAN DIALETICS
wow, that looks like shit
Cute chillas, pls keep pissing off tumblr
What about sacrifice those chinchillas to satan
I want to make bluey my wife
Whoa there big daddy.
That's a boy
Fixed
>Draw a boy
>Call it a girlt
Many such cases
Hot take: It's good in moderation
cute girl
I will now watch your series
>pantsless wife
yes
Shes kinda cute
True.
Will probably clip the series for her.
Didn't you already get your bait comment deleted once
Obsessed lmao
>dumb room temp OP mutt got his nerves in shambles after I called him out for his illiteracy so he reports my post
El oh frickin el. Seppos are true clowns.
Touch grass
How could she do that..
A woman's got to eat
Fat
As they should be!
Sonic Ocs or Sonic Archie comic characters?
Archie characters.
I liked it better when I thought the shitty lipstick was her mouth open
>Kids these days are lazy entitled snowflakes!
>can't even come up with an original show idea
Bluey doesn't own the conept of anthropomorphic animal family fricking around, dumbass.
It’s not just that. The art styles are extremely similar. The backgrounds are practically identical. If they had stuck with the original style nobody would be calling it a copy
>The art styles are extremely similar
The chillas don't look like drink cans with limbs
Bluey is just caillou with dogs
Understatement. It's more of a Blue Clues meets Peppa Pig. It wouldn't compare Bluey to that canadian horseshit show like Caillou..
What's the difference bluey is a spoiled little shit
More tolerable than a bald headed b***h that acts like a massive homosexual, it's no wonder why in later seasons, they toned down most of Caillou's crybaby outbursts into making felt disappointed in a blank slate.
Pretty on brand for the Daily Wire, actually.
Is it any good?
I enjoyed it, but taste varies
For me it's like Bluey but a bit safer and with more history lessons
how is it a bit safer?
the only part of Bluey i can imagine parents caring about is Bandit pressing his square ass against the glass
Bland as hell, none of the kino feels, and it's obvious and annoying when they try for them. It's like their family lives are shit, so they have to make up things that normal families do, but it's "off" because they have no experience with it themselves.
I'm just in it for the mom I'unno
> ROB SCHNEIDER IS
> A CHINCHILLA
>AND HE'S ABOUT TO FIND OUT THAT BEING A CHINCHILLA IS HARDER THAN IT LOOKS
Kino..
I want the mom chinchilla fart
What kind of conservative values can we expect to see in the show?
They're not mocking us, they're aping the shit out of Bluey to try to cash in. What unoriginal fricks...LOOK at this shit. They're aping Bluey HARD (right down to the character behavior), but there's none of the heart, and these designs suck. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKCiYU1HECQ
Idk
It's almost as though Cinemaphile has been full of gays since the beginning
>male version has more replies
>what did Cinemaphile mean by this
Well the original was posted before
Blue and pink!
Blue and pink!!
Blue and pink!!!
Blue and pink!!!!
Blue and pink!!!!!
Blue and pink!!!!!!
We just gonna ignore that their mom and dad are the opposite?
You ruined my post flow motherfricker.
Doesn't matter, Gumball and Anais play into the color stereotypes.
Blue and pink!!!!!!!
Blue and pink!!!!!!!!
Blue and pink!!!!!!!!!
Blue and pink!!!!!!!!!!
Blue and pink!!!!!!!!!!!
Blue and pink!!!!!!!!!!!!
Blue and pink!!!!!!!!!!!!
Blue and pink!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Blue and pink!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Blue and pink!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Blue and pink!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>Tfw young boys only watch bluey because they think she's a boy
>thinking young boys actually give a shit whether the main character of a show is a boy or a girl
PPG was popular as frick among boys when I was a kid, kids don't give a shit about moronic adult ideas about muh gender stereotypes or whatever, they just want a fun show.
Shut up faust
I don't know what this means but you sound like a homosexual
>the troon thinks boys were watching barbie and polly pocket back then
The content of the show itself is what they care about, regardless of whether the character is a boy or a girl. Was the Wild Thornberries a girls' show? Are you under the impression that young boys thought the main character was s dude with pigtails?
They literally said Powerpuff Girls, at least don’t asspull and ignore what’s being said if you wanna keep being moronic.
Also yeah, most kids I knew absolutely watched the original show growing up, boys and girls alike. It was sick. https://youtube.com/watch?v=67flFO6AtDg&pp=ygUUYnV0dGVyY3VwIG1vam8gY2FuZHk%3D
>kids don't give a shit about moronic adult ideas about muh gender stereotypes
The comment was moronic and probably typed by a gay
post hands
Blue and pink!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
benis and dagina???
No.
Unambiguous genders is a feature of design as the animals are anthropomorphic and we want to relate to them as we see ourselves. In the wild, there isn't much observable difference between male and females most of the time. What is "feminine" is always through the lense of what is human female and femininity is a human construct. To make that less innate and forward in the design like what happened in Bluey, there is a gender related confusion that occurs. A conservative show for kids from a network that promises content that won't challenge conservative notions, gender included, would likely be avoided with design choices like these.
>Blue but bad and soulless
Chilla show is never going to attract any drawgays.
Sad, the characters have a more conventional anatomy than drink cans with limbs
I tried watching this and couldn't make it through the first episode. Not because of the art style (yeah, it's a direct ripoff of Bluey, but what children's cartoon isn't based on a previous one's style?) or the supposed politics in it (I didn't get that far into it to find out if there was an agenda or not.)
No, what caused me to hit the off button were the voices. This was some of the WORST voice-acting I'd heard. Loud, way too fast-paced, and over-emoted like the entire cast was doing coke.
A shame really, because the art is kinda cute and we could always use another NONdysfunctional family cartoon. But I'm afraid this won't make it.
>or the supposed politics in it (I didn't get that far into it to find out if there was an agenda or not.)
The agenda isn't apparent because it's about what is excluded rather than included.
So a normal show then
Could be if it weren't for the stated agenda and intent of those behind the show. A normal show can show divorce without agenda. They made it their agenda to never show divorce.
Or public schools for that matter, which I assume is perfectly convenient for the target audience of this streaming service.
Bluey featured a divorce and there are kids books that go over that topic. It's not inappropriate, it's something kids live through. Love You Forever is heavier and more mature than divorce.
Anon, I'm agreeing with you. I'm saying for the same reasons they made it their agenda to not show divorce, there was an explicit decision made to have the family be homeschoolers. I don't think I have to spell out why the Daily Wire Bluey knockoff doesn't want the kids to be going to public schools like Bluey and Bingo do.
I'm sorry, I thought you were talking about their agenda was just being appropriate for public schools. My mistake.
You're right, normalizing home schooling is a different type of propaganda than normalizing gays in children's media. At worst, showing gays in a kids show is to convince people that gays are fine and shouldn't be bullied or discriminated against. You can say that showing home schooled kids is to make it so that they are more normalized and less bullied, but the content has reach limited to families that are already invested in the right. It's just echo chamber propaganda about how public schools shouldn't be funded.
Male btw.