>Bookemort: Calm and predatorial. Like a cat playing with his food. Cracks only begin to show after the mystery of Voldemort is revealed and all his horcruxes are destroyed
>Moviemort: Is a sperg from the outset and immediately jobs in front of all his minions and seethes about it right after. Never shown as particularly competent or the legendary boogie man that everyone says he is. Has a mental breakdown after every minor setback
Honestly looking forward to the HBO series. Voldemort is one of the best villains in literary history and a series would do him justice over movies. We could have episodes dedicated to him taking over the ministry of magic behind the scenes and him being the shrewd puppet master and magical genius that he should be
Bump. Why they frick don't I get any replies. Fricking bullshit
In theory, it's because your post is shit. It's full of autistic hyperbole and one can imagine the overly excited manchild voice ranting it out.
In practice though, tons of trash threads get replies and the real reason yours hasn't yet is probably just "tldr" and the lack of blatant outrage bait.
You’re a stupid frick
No one cares. Let your shitty thread die.
Only women have actually read the books and there are no women in the internet.
>in Cinemaphile*
Ftfy
Because half the board hates jk rowling because shes a refugee loving feminist and the other half hates her because they are troons.
I hate her because she didn't make Luna Lovegood Harrys love interest instead of Ginny Weasley the infamous Blacked Slag.
Don't get me wrong I'd marry Ginny Myself because I could never bring myself to see Lunas innocence destroyed by a herd of rape-fugee BLACK BVLLS but am totally fine with doing that qith Ginny.
Harry deserved better he's been through a lot and Rowling didn't have the balls to stick with the plan and ship harryXluna and instead had him creep on his best friend's blacked l*li sister like a sick freak.
Also your thread sucks.
bump
Bump
Bump
>Voldemort is one of the best villains in literary history
He cannot kill a fricking kid
Only because of love. And it's almost a trope how the big bad monster can kill everything in sight except for a child which evades it's grasp. It honestly makes sense that a genius who sacrificed his humanity made one blunder of overlooking something as foreign and intrinsically human to Jim as love
Who's Jim?
Fuxk you I meant gim
Him*
>The boy who lived... come to die.
>.................
>....uuuUUHHHWADAGEHDAHBRUH
Why don't see see actually genius uses of magic. In Naruto fornjnstance you can see genius level ninjutsu and feints upon feints upon feints, thinking 10 steps ahead. In the book Snape vs McGonagall had that with them constantly transforming and not just being a beam struggle. And honestly GoF should be changed so that Voldemort purposely let's Harry get away to make him seem more threatening
kek based
>Voldemort is one of the best villains in literary history
Hes barely more than a McGuffin for 7 books. All of his "characterization" is told through pensieves and flashbacks. Shit, Barty Crouch Jr. is a better villain, and hes pretending to be someone else for 90% of the story.
In the last movie all the villains were noticeably nerfed.
>Book Voldemort
Die
>Movie Voldemort
Deh
The best and most compelling depiction of Voldemort was unironically in a fan fiction:
https://archiveofourown.org/works/28926447/chapters/70972632
>We could have episodes dedicated to him taking over the ministry of magic behind the scenes and him being the shrewd puppet master and magical genius that he should be
First off all, your perception of Voldemort is not actually based on the text but rather this fanfiction/fantasy you can concocted in your head. Secondly, the show will probably be a very book accurate, shot for shot adaptation of the text so unless it’s in the book you’re not getting it. And what was Voldemort’s backstory again… that’s right, working in an antique shop for like a decade and then launching a moronic war which decimated much of the pureblood population he was seeking to preserve.
>your prescription of Voldemort is not actually based
First if all, I think you meant to say "perception", unless you literally meant that I have a glasses prescription for voldemort. Second of all, it is based
A-anon, he did say perception. I think you may need a glasses prescription after all.
>creo que quisiste decir "percepción"
jej mira lo otra vez
Bookemort is still more menacing than Moviemort. Him being in the background and a macguffin like another anon said builds to his legend. He seems untouchable only until the very end when the Voldemort facade cracks and it's just a hysterical and scared Tom Riddle
Voldemort is scary because he can 1v1 dumbledore
Voldemort is a meme
>Moviemort: Is a sperg from the outset and immediately jobs in front of all his minions
In the books its similar. Book 1 he's a spooky, smelly face on a guy's head and is defeated by an 11 year old. Book 2 his magical remnant persona and the basilisk are defeated by a 12 year old. Book 4 he kills a side character, who is again just a teenager and is defeated by Harry again. Books 6 and 7 his scheming and systematic mind control/infiltration of government is mostly in the background, I think that book 7 only contains like one scene where Voldemort plans these sort of things "on screen" so to speak.
He had potential but he's the big bad of a children's book series so his job is to job
The first 2 books can be retconned that it is only an echo of Voldemort but not him itself. Honestly just cut Voldemort from the first movie and make it just a guy's scary face. The danger should ramp up over time, not immediately letting Harry see the big bad in the first book. It's a metaphor for the transition from childhood to adulthood. Voldemort very clearly represents the dangers posed to children like sexual predators made explicit with the creepy "I can touch you now" lin. He's exposed without the protection(love spell) from his parents
So you just want them to write their own shit instead of adapt the books? I bet that will be more of a disaster than you're thinking, it always is. What you seem to want is a more "adult" harry potter story which would need to be set outside the books which are all about coming of age themes etc, Voldemort is less character than plot device in the books and movies
The part in the later books where Voldemort and Dumbledor have a duel in the Ministry Of Magic and they’re, like, turning statues alive and trying to one-up each other’s spells, and that’s the first time we see a high-level magic duel against two top level wizards was such a hype moment in the series. I don’t know what it was like in the movie, but in my mind reading it, it’s like one of the only parts that I vividly remember.
The movie adapted it pretty faithfully. Unfortunately it ended up being completely irrelevant both in the books and the movies because no characters ever display magic abilities like that again.
No it didn't. It should be incorporate more tactics and tactics representative of a genius. Not a beam battle until Voldemort finally spergs out and shatters the glass.
Voldemort should be better than Dumbledore and using the duel to stall and achieve his real objective of getting in Harry's mind
Eh, you're probably right, I haven't read the books in over a decade, I'm just going off memory.
>Voldemort should be better than Dumbledore
He explicitly is not.
>Voldemort should be better than Dumbledore
What part of "the only one he ever feared" do you not understand?
I really don't understand the decision to make Voldemort into a screeching lunatic in the movies. His most intimidating scenes by far are when he's doing the cold psycho act, which is in line with the books.
It's actually really good in the movie too. Literally the only wizard duel in the whole series that actually feels like a wizard duel. They're doing all kinds of insane, creative shit, it really stands out compared to the rest of the movies where it's just Expelliarmus vs Avada Kedavra.
It's also baffling because Ralph Fiennes is probably the best villain actor currently working. He could have given a super memorable performance and David Yates was just like "Yeah, screech like a banshee some more, that will really scare the kiddos"
I remember as a kid being utterly terrified by the first half of the graveyard scene in Goblet of Fire, where he's mocking Cedric's corpse, intimidating the Death Eaters, explaining the secret behind Lily's protection....and then he started screaming "DEEEEEEEEEEH" as he touched Harry's scar and the whole thing became absolutely comical.
Yeah, the movies suck but Voldemort is one of the worst adapted characters. It's shocking how badly they missed the point of his death scene.
What do you guys think they did with his body? I liked to imagine they just tossed it in the Hogwarts lake and the giant squid ate it.
BECAUSE MOVIES ARE FRICKING GARBAGE READ A BOOK homosexual," I said calmly.
You are correct. The movies also ruined Grindelwald. I thought Depp was bad but his Laurence Olivier compared to the homosexual who replaced him. Farrel was perfect hilariously
>Calm and predatorial. Like a cat playing with his food.
you can tell whoever said this has never owned a cat
>he posted calmly
disgusting warner media israelite shill thread