boring overrated trash
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
boring overrated trash
boring overrated trash
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
entertaining properly rated kino
wrong n'Wah
scared me
Your attention deficiencies are not criticism.
you're right
DC/Marvel threads await you
The setting and music is more interesting than the characters. 2049 and the novel are far superior as character stories. in Blade Runner, Deckard is an empty shell and the replicants are psychos that murder the man that gave them refuge.
you never read the book.
the point of the droids is that they don’t have empathy, which by default makes them psychos. they torture him in the book, murder him in the film.
i repest, that’s the whole point, it is why he is dhown as obsessed with mercer
Not that poster but that's not the point. The pint is that each replica t is unique, pris cruelty doesn't mean they all lack empathy. Roy choose to save Deckard at the end for that very reason. Everything is a choice, that is the essence of humanity.
no, they really dont have empathy. they are incapable of it.
roy sparing deckard caine was to teach him a lesson, and to leave his mark on the world, to be remembered.
thus the idea of the moments of his existence being lost.
pris is a carbon copy of rachel, the difference being the false memories implanted in rachel. rachel has no more empathy than pris, as is clear in the book. being conscious and selfish is not empathy.
they can kill and not feel anything, but they do feel loss from things that directly belong to them.
look up a definition of empathy and it should become clear.
it really is the main theme.
You're confusing the book with the movie. In the movie they definitely have empathy. Roy cries after Pris.
>it's the main theme
In the book. The movie has different themes and world.
no. he cries because she belongs to him.
like i said, you dont know what empathy is, look up a clear definition.
Watch commentary. The writers talk about that. They clearly believe that Roy is more of a human than other humans.
they mustn’t have understood what they were working with. roy is a killer, killed untold numbers off world, killed sebastian, killed the maker.
he spared deckard caine to be rememhered, and that’s it.
see Heat, and other nemesis type relationships, "closest thing i had to a friend".
>deckard caine
You guys are genuinely some of the most idiot people in this thread right now. It's Rick Deckard, not a fricking diablo character you absolute subhuman.
>Heat
>Lists the most boring and genuinely worthless criminal drama possible, one that's constantly forced on this website by absolute idiots with no taste or basic level of narrative comprehension
I'm genuinely not surprised anymore, this level of stupidity should be expected at this point.
You are genuinel an idiot and the only one that should be upset here are you parents, for spawning such a complete and utter idiot. Nobody cares about your opinion if you can't even get the character's name right you absolute moron.
>someone doesn't like a shit movie and explains why
>gah, you're just stupid
Yeah, couldn't be it is just a shit movie
Try not naming the main protagonist a fricking diablo character next time you absolute moron or bringing up an even worse movie, that isn't even in the same genre, as comparison. You literally have zero comprehension, intelligence or credibility of anything other than the shit you just smeared all over yourself here, shut the frick up. Go open a letterbox account and stay contained there.
never seen diablo, it sounds lilke a spanish soap opera.
so what if the characters have the same names in two films, there were about a million jacks in eighties action films and it wasn’t confusing.
Y'know not everybody who disagrees with you is the same person, right?
They're the same as in they're both fake distraction bullshit. Buster Friendly and Wilbur Mercer both are just characters on a screen. Friendly doesn't have some cosmic power that allows him to broadcast 46 hours a day he's just an android, Mercer doesn't have any divinity it's just old recordings of a washed up actor. In Do Androids Dream religion and mass media are shown to be literally the same thing as allegory.
Again, everybody who disagrees with you is not one person
>is not the same person
Can't fricking type, shit
this is a dumb zoomie thread and nobody cares about your shitty opinions lol
You could actually address the things I said, but I guess it's easier to just insult and dismiss me for getting the name of a fictional character I don't care about slightly wrong.
We already have, up above where you got caught not knowing what you're talking about already. Where you don't even know the differences between the novel or the movie, as you keep sperging out like some kind of autist "theres no themes in the movie". You literally cannot even name the character, nobody cares about anything you said, absolute homosexual. Do you really think it's possible for a subhuman like you, that saves jpegs like this on his device to even begin to have a discussion? have a nice day.
>Where you don't even know the differences between the novel or the movie
What on earth are you talking about? I've never read the book, and have no opinion on it.
>as you keep sperging out like some kind of autist "theres no themes in the movie".
I've never said that.
>You literally cannot even name the character,
Oh no, I misremembered "Deckard" as "Decker" how foolish of me.
>nobody cares about anything you said, absolute homosexual. Do you really think it's possible for a subhuman like you, that saves jpegs like this on his device to even begin to have a discussion? have a nice day.
You seem genuinely miserable, and if this is your reaction to reading opinions on a work of fiction, life is going to be very hard for you.
Genuinely fricking stupid, man. You didn't just misremember the name, everything you've said is absolutely idiotic in every single manner imaginable. And if you don't want a negative reaction, then don't come in here entitled thinking your opinion is worth a shit when you legitimately cannot even form cohesive arguments or name the characters, nevermind the themes or anything else in general. This is a discussion board, not your twitter space. Don't worry about me, bro. You keep going like this life is going to be hard for you.
>everything you've said is absolutely idiotic in every single manner imaginable
That would be an impressive accomplishment if true.
>And if you don't want a negative reaction, then don't come in here entitled thinking your opinion is worth a shit
Oh, I don't mind a negative reaction, yours in particular is quite funny. What exactly about my opinion is "entitled"?
>you legitimately cannot even form cohesive arguments
Funny, because my first post was responding to somebody else who likes the film for aesthetic reasons, and they mostly agreed with me.
>or name the characters
OH NO! Calling the fictional character portrayed by the actor Harrison Ford in the movie Blade Runner "Decker" instead of "Deckard" is truly the greatest sin.
>nevermind the themes or anything else in general
I've never said "theres no themes in the movie" and I also think the statement is wrong.
>This is a discussion board
So why get so mad?
>You keep going like this life is going to be hard for you.
I'm not the loser calling people "subhuman" and telling them to kill themselves seething because they expressed opinions about a movie I like...
have a nice day subhuman
>OH NO! Calling the fictional character portrayed by the actor Harrison Ford in the movie Blade Runner "Decker" instead of "Deckard" is truly the greatest sin.
>Deckard Caine
he spared deckard caine to be rememhered, and that’s it.
see Heat, and other nemesis type relationships, "closest thing i had to a friend".
have a nice day lying subhuman lol
You know there are more than two people in this thread, right? I've even told you several times that the things you've claimed I've said were not actually said by me, but you still couldn't figure it out.
My first post in this thread is:
>You know there are more than two people in this thread, right?
the irony stop bumping this shitty thread you moron lol
>pls anon! stop bumping this thread! I can't handle more people commenting how mediocre Blade Runner is :""(
>gets filtered
>stop enjoying things your dumb I will le show them!!! :'X
dumb zoomer
I never told you to stop enjoying it, I just expressed, to somebody else mind you, what I thought about it and you sperged out.
>dumb zoomer
I was born in the 80s.
You're not 40+. If you are, have fricking mercy on your holy 'tism batman
>You're not 40+
Anon, people born in the 80s are between the ages of 34 and 44.
nevet once saw anyone call him rick. everyone calls him deckard as his first name. sounds like you’ve been watching too much rick and marty.
anyway the point stands, sherlock holmes and moriarty, dustin hoffman and tichard deniro in heat, the bad guy is alone, the good guy id alone, and all they have is their work. that’s why he wants to be remembered, and that isn’t empathy
It's unbelievably tiring and annoying having to deal with blatant fricking liars on here. Why do you feel the need to comment or post if you clearly have no idea about what you're talking about? Is it attention? Is it social media addiction? Are you really this desperate for attention you'll literally just make up random nonsense, maybe even not random, maybe you just genuinely don't remember it properly but you feel the need to stay adamant on your stupid point without double checking it at least? This is why there's zero incentive to have any genuine discussion on this shitstain website anymore. Whatever intelligence and taste you think you have, you've left that behind long ago. I don't think I'm staying on this website any longer... The generational gap is just way too much and you people have become way too addicted and unbelievably stupid.
calm down roy. you will never be a human
>The movie has different themes
It doesn't have any theme.
It's great. About a dying Earth, the struggle to simply be good enough, the conflict and identicalness of religion and mass media.
The movie isn't about anything. The tards who made it just heard "bounty hunter whose quarry is androids" and made this shite without knowing what it's actually about.
>identicalness of religion and mass media
Dropped right there. They couldn't be any different, they're diametrically opposed to one another. That struggle is why people obsessed with media hate religion, and why people obsessed with religion hate mass media.
>That struggle is why people obsessed with media hate religion, and why people obsessed with religion hate mass media.
Yes, that's the point. They're in conflict but are the same. That is the culmination of the Buster Friendly/Wilbur Mercer conflict which is the heart of the story.
Because the people involved with making this movie were moronic. I still have no idea why they met up in the movie, no one has even tried giving a reason for it.
She was supposed to seduce him like she did many bounty hunters before to get him out of the game. And when it doesn't work she kills his goat to frick with him. But in the movie they reverse that scene and there is no goat so it doesn't matter.
>There's barely any science in this science fiction book.
Space colonization, brain implants for mood smoothening and robot animals aren't enough science fiction for you?
>It has universal themes that connect with me more strongly than anything from the book.
If you can't connect with the struggle to simply be enough I don't know what to say. That is a universal theme unlike anything in the movie
>The movie is about mortality, memories, empathy, loneliness, depression
I guess any movie can be about anything if you say it is
Things that are in conflict with eachother cannot be 'the same'. A lion is in conflict with a rabbit: Are the the same? A fish is in conflict with the bait I used to catch it: are they the same? No. What a stupid statement. They are diametrically opposed. One, religion, is offering freedom from the bonds of slavery the world places on us, and Mass Media propogates this slavery. They couldn't be any more different.
I never thought it would be possible for someone to keep writing and somehow consistently degrade in levels of intelligence, in such a way that is completely believable too. You might genuinely just be this absolutely braindead, what matter graced you to get ahold of the novel is beyond anyone's guess, that is if you've even read it. For my own sanity, I'll just assume this is bait and leave you to your rot and complete stupidity by yourself.
They are diametrically opposed. You're failure to understand this very basic concept between any faiths theology, and 'the world' of evil it is in opposition to, is remarkable.
i think you’re right, decksrd caine is shown as weak, human and passionate, while troy is unemotional, robot-like and extremely strong.
it’s apples and oranges, complete opposites
The movies have incredible amount of themes, you are quite possibly the most idiotic person on this website so far.
https://archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/191048927
Read this thread and then have a nice day.
It's goofy shit. There's barely any science in this science fiction book. The future world is too fantastical compared to the movie. I can imagine future similar to Blade Runner, the book future is already too outdated.
The movie is about mortality, memories, empathy, loneliness, depression. It has universal themes that connect with me more strongly than anything from the book.
>The movie is about replicants having no empathy, because that is what the book is about.
Are you for real? Absolute fricking moron.
Yep, it's empty popcorn trash. Completely devoid of theme and emotion
And that poster is shit, looks like train and has no trains
>more interesting than the characters
That's because they cut out important characters and scenes for more pew pew action bullshit
Oh, wait, you acknowledged that. Started typing too soon
I still dont get why it is so highly praised.
Yes sure it has some cool shots, mainly the long drawn out view shots, and I suppose the darkness and miniatures add to it, the feeling of a bleak dystopian cyberpunk world, story is not too bad either but I think it is an average movie.
That being said I didnt rate 2049 too high until I watched it a few times and appreciate the undertones of the movie, stuff that is not given to the viewer.
Harrison fords shoehorn into that movie really fricking ruins it, the entire parts of him are shit and ruin the movie. Would have been better if he was just dead when K sent to look for him and found no info.
You should've used this chart for advice, you have no one to blame but yourself for watching it
>Puts Masters of disguise next to Kung pow..
Rodan
Kurosawa's "Ran"
Heat
Tokyo Story
The Lion in Winter
Titan A.E.
Princess Bride
Giant
Some Like it Hot
Key Largo
The 9th Gate
add to the list if you're a film buff not some pantywaste gay.
Master and Commander
There Will Be Blood
Hard Boiled
Stop trying to bait the legendary BR poster , he btfoed absolutely everyone in that soprano thread a few days ago and solidified this movie as the legend that he is. Nothing you could say could literally take away from it.
i don’t remember posting in any supraynu threads.
there can’t be another
Do npcs dream of electric sheep?
This dudes final scene was so overrated
>it’s cool to be bored
Nah he’s what gave the movie soul.
What soul, saying "All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain"?
I kept seeing gifs and edits of this shit quote and I went into the movie thinking it's going to be something really deep or at least a cool one liner but it was literally nothing.
Pic unrelated, zoomer pleb
lol, the book is shit. How can you homosexuals prefer it over the movie?
It's not. from the aspect of production design and lighting design it's a masterpiece.
I've tried so hard for so long to like Blade Runner, watched it 6-8 times over the years, but It's just not good.
It looks good, but it has the philosophical depth of a mediocre episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation. Also, Decker, despite supposedly being "the best" is a total fricking moron who is trash at his job. The only good part of the movie is towards the end of the first act when he's doing detective work.
It's a 45 minute plot stretched to a paper thin 2 hours.
Don't get me started on the "tears in rain" monologue. I'm sure "Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion" are really impressive, but it means nothing to me. It's like trying to describe the D-Day landings to somebody in the 15th century without any visual representation.
>inb4: no attention span
My three favorite films are all bordering on 3 hours long, if not exceeding it, and no, they're not LotR.
>I purposefully enter threads with things I do not like just to exclaim how much I don't like them, le profound intellectual
Good thing nobody cares about your pseud opinion. Go start a letterbox account and revel in your own piss with the rest of the mutants there.
You seem upset that I expressed reasons I dislike a movie. Do you feel personally attacked?
I agree with your issues surrounding the plot. I'm not a huge fan of the plot, although I do like the idea of androids being unaware they are androids, and the identity crisis the realization that they have no real 'personality' causes them. I am more a fan of it's production design than anything. Story could and should have been way better.
i`m pretty sure roy knew he was a robot, don’t know where you have this identity crisis from.it’s like saying terminators dont know they are cyborgs
>looking for depth in movies
lol, you think the silly book is deep?
I've never read the book so I have no opinion on it.
I agree with everything you said, people who praise Bladerunner have never consumed media that actually has an interesting story.
I'll be honest, you, just like most people in this thread are genuinely ignorant. However, I will do my best to offer a very diplomatic response to you. It's understandable, from your limited point of view, that you've given the film multiple chances, and it still hasn't clicked with you. Films, especially ones as iconic as Blade Runner, can be quite divisive in terms of personal taste and interpretation. The visual aspect of the movie, which is often praised, certainly adds a unique and visually stunning dimension. In terms of philosophical depth, it's true that not every film resonates with every person on the same level. What some find profound, others might not. As for the main character, Rick Deckard, some people view his character differently and it is my belief that most people simply choose to ignore key themes in lieu of their personal bias or limited intelligence. His flaws and struggles are central to the story's exploration of humanity and what it means to be human, but it's fair to have a different perspective. It doesn't mean you are important or that this clarifies your existence. It just means that you have a different view. The pacing and plot can indeed be a matter of personal preference. Some appreciate the deliberate, atmospheric storytelling, while others may feel it's stretched thin. The "tears in rain" monologue by Rutger Hauer's character Roy Batty is often lauded as a powerful moment in the film, but it's also perfectly fine if it didn't resonate with you. This doesn't take away from the scene, it just takes it away for you. Film interpretations are highly subjective and can be influenced by various factors, including personal taste and the context in which you view them, not to mention level of intelligence, emotional awareness or basic levels of attention. that's perfectly fine. There are countless other movies out there, each with its own unique appea that will resonate with you in a different way, in a different thread.
This reads like chat GPT. Especially: "Films, especially ones as iconic as Blade Runner, can be quite divisive in terms of personal taste and interpretation."
I'm well aware that my opinions are my own, you don't have to reiterate that several times.
No. It has to be reiterated because you seem to be laboring under the delusion that they are objective factual statements, when in fact they are not. They are just your private opinions.
>"it's just not good"
Is a factual statement. It's in your first apparent post. I am trying to be civilized with you, so do not be dishonest anymore. I completely understand your limited perspective. If you're looking for a more engaging and tightly woven story, then stop replying and find something else. I understand it's frustrating when a film doesn't deliver on that front for you personally but you are simply not going to convince anyone nor succeed in ridiculing people for enjoying what they want.
I also understand that some people are more interested in a different narrative and character development that what you've perceived out of it. If you are genuinely an intelligent person then you should realize the choice to find movies that align with your preferences and storytelling expectations. For most people I would say it is celebrated for its influential visuals and thought-provoking themes but again, it's understandable it's not everyone's cup of tea. Nobody intelligent, clear minded and positive about this film expects anything out of you if you don't. You are entitled to express your opinion, if you want to have a blade runner hate thread go ahead but you have to expect to be challenged.
Which brings me to the actual real reason for this thread, which is baiting for attention. No genuine discussion can occur with a loaded setup in the original post like that and no poster should be taken at full face value and in true faith. This is a massive issue with this website, you people are too concerned over your egoic prisons than having a genuine, meaningful interaction. This speaks more volumes about the type of people that you are, than anything you believe in here or anywhere else, about this movie or otherwise.
>"it's just not good"
>Is a factual statement.
Are you being intentionally obtuse? Do I need to clarify every opinion I state with the tag "...in my opinion" just so you understand what you're reading? "I am of the opinion that the movie Blade Runner is just not good."
>I completely understand your limited perspective.
What exactly is my "limited perspective" here? Because there's a good chance I own more movies than you've even watched.
>If you're looking for a more engaging and tightly woven story, then stop replying and find something else.
This is a "please stop saying things I don't like" statement, but I'm glad you admit the story of Blade Runner is a mess.
>ridiculing people for enjoying what they want.
Who exactly have I ridiculed? Because the primary response to my opinion was insults, something I actively avoiding doing in response.
>If you are genuinely an intelligent person then you should realize the choice to find movies that align with your preferences and storytelling expectations.
Trust me I have.
>For most people I would say it is celebrated for its influential visuals and thought-provoking themes
"most people" implies a majority, the majority of opinions on the film are that it is dull, which is evident by its performance at the box office.
>You are entitled to express your opinion
Gee, thanks Chat GPT, I'm glad I have your permission to express an opinion.
>if you want to have a blade runner hate thread go ahead but you have to expect to be challenged.
The bulk of "challenges" have been insults, or people who like the film agreeing with me.
>Which brings me to the actual real reason for this thread, which is baiting for attention.
Ask OP, I just responded to somebody praising the aesthetics of the film.
>you people are too concerned over your egoic prisons than having a genuine, meaningful interaction.
I criticized a movie you like.
>This speaks more volumes about the type of people that you are
I'm a single person, chat GPT.
>Do I need to clarify
1. Yes, you do. Since every statement you have made is by default in a thread with a preconceived bias. You are intentionally passing off your statements as objective fact.
2. Your limited perspective is the inability to perceive media you clearly are not interested in yet persist in spending time, energy and effort trying to understand it. If you do not like something, you move on. But that's not why you're here is it? I don't think anyone cares about your worthless credentials. You are not an authority here. It is irrelevant both to the discussion or the movie. Your validation seeking and need to establish authority is irrelevant.
3. I never admitted the story of Blade Runner is a mess. Do not assign things I have never said. The statement I've made is straightforward, simple and simple to understand, if you wish to find a more engaging and tightly woven story then stop replying and find something else.
4. This is an anonymous website, I have no evidence or basis to accuse you specifically and personally of ridicule, however, based on the replies so far, the original bias of the entire thread and your current reply to me. It is clear you are here for the same reason. I am not chatgpt, mongoloid. That's a joke, I'll try take that as a compliment.
>Trust me I have
5. Then leave. By continuing to stay here and argue you are effectively supporting the bias of the thread, the need to attention seek and argue about opinions that you've already stated, which aren't discussed anymore. Everything that was written up above has been diplomatic, open-ended, acknowledging of your irrational personal feelings and meant to create a compromise between this conflict. But that's not why you're here, is it? By choosing to stay here you are forfeiting any genuine credibility and not one singular person wishes to engage with you or your mentally ill like any further.
>1. Yes, you do. Since every statement you have made is by default in a thread with a preconceived bias. You are intentionally passing off your statements as objective fact.
"You need to tell me it's an opinion every time you state an opinion" Holy fricking autism.
>persist in spending time, energy and effort trying to understand it.
Watching a movie every 5-6 years to see if it clicks with me isn't that much effort. There's also nothing to "understand" about the film that I'm not grasping, which is kinda my problem with it.
>You are not an authority here.
Never claimed that I was. But I will certainly counter any claim that I have a "limited perspective" on films by pointing out that I've seen a significantly broader spectrum of movies than most people.
>stop replying and find something else.
"PLS STOP CALLING A MOVIE I LIKE BAD" no, you're free to leave and hide the thread at any time.
>It is clear you are here for the same reason.
"I've divined his motivation from the rodent's intestines."
>I am not chatgpt, mongoloid. That's a joke, I'll try take that as a compliment.
Being called out for vapid surface level responses isn't a compliment.
>Then leave.
No.
>By continuing to stay here and argue you are effectively supporting the bias of the thread
Yes, and? What are you going to do about?
>the need to attention seek and argue about opinions that you've already stated
It's almost like... ...this is a discussion board...
>not one singular person wishes to engage with you or your mentally ill like any further.
You want to try that one again, this time in English?
too obvious
>"it's just not good"
>Is a factual statement
Correct, Blade Runner is objectively a bad movie
>thought-provoking themes
Are you talking about a different movie now? Blade Runner doesn't have themes, it's too busy with pew pew action garbage for shit like that
>celebrated for its influential visuals
You mean constant nighttime? Wow, what great viduals
>Blade Runner doesn't have themes, it's too busy with pew pew action garbage for shit like that
I dislike Blade Runner, but it certainly does have themes, and it's "pew pew action" is few and far between. Neither more nor less action would remedy the movie's problems.
Every statement you have just made is objectively false. It is entirely your personal view and you are entitled to believe so. However, if you want to act like a child, then you will be treated such.
You have been challenged right now. So far, your response has been typical of the same attention seeking behavior that is rooted in egoic prison petty struggles. It is virtually impossible to have a diplomatic, civilized discourse this way. Every reply that was made to you was incredibly considerate of your ignorance and stubborness. Learn how to have a genuine conversation instead of sitting in threads such as these, stunting your mental and physical development this way, while pretending you are accomplishing any meaningful criticism of any kind. This interaction is over.
Bro. You're literally 40+ shut the frick up you stupid homosexual, youre not owning anyone here
see
>if I keep regurgitating the same armchair psychology maybe they'll stop telling me Blade Runner is bad
Blade Runner is bad.
i watched a 40 year old movie when i was a kid
thought it was shit and old and shit
but then i grew up
and it will happen to youuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
You got filtered Black person deal with it lol
Filtered by what exactly? Baby's first philosophical thought experiment? Move sucks.
hate when people call the plot revolutionary
homie read any mid century science fiction book
/tv/gays have never read a book in their lives
I always forget how bat shit crazy the film turns near the end, with all the somersaulting
Why did he rape Rachel?
THANK!! YOU!!
Finally, someone said it.
have a nice day homosexual.
low IQ zoomer thread
i've read manga with more depth than this shit movie
The manga about highschool girls trying to eat mermaids to make boys fall for them has more depth and more to say than this movie.
It's what the movie should be about. Androids are allegory for letting yourself get so doped up you don't really feel anything anymore.
This is another thing the movie fails on. There's no mood organs
>Androids are allegory
mate... lmao
literally stop bumping this shit thread nobody cares about your filtered status
hes right you know
Welcome to 90% of "classic masterpieces".
hows the simpsons version compare
ive been here for about 15 years and ill still never not be surprised by how you c**ts can make copper wire out of a penny.
youll argue about anything.
its like you think your hot takes clarify your existence.
The main problem is Scott trying to ruin the film's ambiguity regarding certain plot elements and to force feed his personal interpretation to everyone with his new "improved" cuts.
Not only did Scott never make a single quality film after Blade Runner he is also retroactively trying to make one of his few good films worse.
He really should have kicked the bucket after the 80s
>Scott never make a single quality film after Blade Runner
Eh, I have a soft spot for Gladiator and American Gangster is alright. I fear Napoleon will be a bloated mess, but I hope for the best.
>AHHHHH PLOT PLOT PLOT CHARACTERS PLOT PLOT CHARACTERS PLOT
Not the fricking point. For one thing, the special effects are still unmatched to this day. The film is an incredible technical achievement. What is with zoomers and their desperate need for plot twists? Because that's really the big thing that's missing here for them. Nothing they can take to Reddit about and talk about how "hype" it was.
>the special effects are still unmatched to this day
This is just patently false.
>What is with zoomers
Audiences at the time of release thought it was a boring mess (they were correct). Were they zoomers?
>desperate need for plot twists?
It's not about plot twists or the lack thereof, it's the fact that what little plot there is has been stretched to a painfully dull 2 hours.
If you like looking at cyber punk imagery so much just stare at cyber punk wallpapers, some of us are here to watch a story.
Yes, plot and characters is what a story is about. And this movie butchered both
Being pretty is not enough and this shit doesn't even do that, it's ugly as shit. If you want a storyless visual spectacle movie watch Life of Pi
I tried to watch it twice and I was bored out of my fricking mind. I love Alien too so it confuses me why I hate it so much.
Reminder that, whenever you're bickering with a millennizoomer b***hing about a celebrated genre epic and they won't say what their idea of a "good" movie is...it's capeshit. Always.
i love blade runner but i dont care for its themes or character development or lack thereof.
i just love watching these alien people going about their business in this alien world.
thx 4 listening.
I saw the shining in theaters this week and thought it was boring as hell
its threads like these that make me realize how truly bitter and worthless this place has really become, it's a good movie go frick yourselves you souless attention vampires
It is vapid shlock.
>ohhh but the special effects
Looked like shit then and still do
>op makes guaranteed replies thread
>makes self look like total moron in the process
every time
imagine wasting hours a day replying to bots and bait threads on a dead thread created by souless bitter lonely monsters because it makes them feel unique and edgy
1 make shit bait thread
2 wait for people to take bait
3 try and tell them off for taking the bait
4 feel good that you have dragged the world down to your meaningless level
I don't think OP has actually posted in the thread...
>What if we gave androids fake consciousness and memories, made them superior to humans in every physical aspect except lifespan?
>Now what if those androids wanted to extend their life span?
>Wow, things not wanting to die, such a profound original concept for a story
>shove that into a cyberpunk setting and it'll distract audiences from how little substance there is.
>oops we made it boring and nobody cares
Seventh Seal should be added to
Aka good movie list
Great setting
Great visuals
Great atmosphere
Great premise
Good actors and actresses
Shit story
Any other kinos like this?
A lot of the films of Jess Franco
Lost in Translation? Story is virtually non-existent.
Blade Runner is the epitome of pseuds thinking a movie looks cool = a movie is good.
Pic extremely related.